cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota medan,
Sumatera utara
INDONESIA
PREMISE LAW JURNAL
Published by Universitas Sumatera Utara
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 812 Documents
 35   36   37   38   39 
ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP PEMBERHENTIAN NADZIR WAKAF DALAM PERSPEKTIF FIQIH ISLAM DAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 41 TAHUN 2004 TENTANG WAKAF (Studi di Kecamatan Samudera Kabupaten Aceh Utara) MUHAMMAD EKA SYAHREL
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 16 (2016): VOLUME XVI TAHUN 2016
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (342.897 KB)

Abstract

Wakaf (property donated for religious/community purposes) is one of the Islamic social institutions which has the value of ibadah (service to Allah the Almighty).The position of nazir (the person who takes care of wakaf property) is very vital since he is responsible for taking care of it and developing wakaf so that it will function properly. One of the problems of wakaf in Samudera Subdistrict is that the wakaf nazir is dismissed before his tenure ends with reasonable background for his dismissal. In consequence, he loses his right and obligation as stipulated in Law No. 41/2004 on Wakaf. The problems of the research were as follows: how about the procedure of dismissing a wakaf nazir in the perspective of the Islamic Fiqh and Law No. 41/2004 on Wakaf, how about the right and obligation of a wakaf nazir who was dismissed in the perspective of the Islamic Fiqh and Law No. 41/2004 on Wakaf, and what factor which caused a wakaf nazir to be dismissed before his tenure ended in Samudera Subdistrict, North Aceh District. The research used judicial empirical method. The procedure of dismissing a wakaf nazir in the perspective of the Islamic Fiqh and Law No. 41/2004 is regulated in Article 45 of Law No. 41/2004 and in Article 221 of KHI (Compilation of the Islamic laws). he is not reliable in taking care of the wakaf property or the wakaf management is not transparent. It is recommended that the person who will be appointed as a wakaf nazir fully understand his duty well according to the Islamic Fiqh in the KHI and in Law No. 41/2004. A wakaf nazir who manages wakaf property in each Subdistrict or village should be supervised and assessed properly so that there will no embezzlement of wakaf property. Keywords: Dismissal of Wakaf Nazir
HAMBATAN NOTARIS DALAM PEMBUATAN AKTA BADAN HUKUM PERKUMPULAN RINA RINA
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 16 (2016): VOLUME XVI TAHUN 2016
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (369.684 KB)

Abstract

Drawing up a deed of a legal entity association involves a Notary as a public officer who is empowered to draw up deeds.The problems of the research were how about the position of an association established as a legal entity and how about a Notary’s responsibility for the deed of legal entity association after the issuance of the Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights No. 6/2014 on the Validation of Legal Entity Association. The research used judicial normative and qualitative method, based on legal provisions and respondents’ opinions.          Usually, notary usually used the modeling of foundation deed in drawing up legal entity association deeds which contained the statutes of association since there was the resemblance between foundation and legal entity association and its registration was done manually. However, since the issuance of the Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights No. 6/2014 on the Validation of Legal Entity Association, a Notary has to comply with this regulation in drawing up legal entity association deeds, including the registration of legal entities which is done electronically (online system). The problem is that the statutes of the association is not clearly organized so that a Notary as a State official who has the authority to draw up authentic deeds encounters obstacles in drawing up legal entity association deeds. Keywords:       Legal Entity Association, Notarial Deed, Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights No. 6/2014 on the Validation of Legal Entity Association
ANALISIS YURIDIS PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN KREDITUR DALAM MASA PENGAWASAN SEBELUM DILELANG MENGALAMI KEHILANGAN SEBAGIAN PROPERTI BARANG JAMINAN (STUDI PADA PT. BANK SUMUT CABANG PEMBANTU MELATI) HABIBAH NASUTION
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 17 (2016): VOLUME XVII TAHUN 2016
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (282.319 KB)

Abstract

Credit settlement sometimes encounters problems, namely failure in credit payment. In the practice, a creditor requests some collateral for his security in the credit payment. In the practice of the object analyzed in this research, the status of the debtor’s credit is a bad credit. The creditor secured the collateral by means of supervision by planting a signboard on the collateral. However, some of the properties often miss before being auctioned; the collateral  was an empty house under the supervision. The debtor filed an objection to the creditor for any compensation, but the creditor refused with an excuse that the missing of some of the properties was not his/her responsibility. Keywords        :           Creditor, Debtor, supervision, Collateral
ANALISIS HUKUM TERHADAP PEMBATALAN AKTA PERDAMAIAN SECARA SEPIHAK (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN PERKARA PERDATA NO: 605/Pdt.G/2013/PN.Mdn) IRVEB IMANUEL TARIGAN
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 17 (2016): VOLUME XVII TAHUN 2016
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (203.393 KB)

Abstract

The unilateral annulment made before a Notary was actually unnecessary to be made again because the Court Ruling has contained the legal force to annul the deed. The Notary is not authorized to make an annulment deed of reconciliation as stipulated in Article 1338 paragraph (2). The legal consequences produced after the Ruling No.605/Pdt.G/2013/PN.Mdn were that the Agreement Deed No.08 dated February 21, 2012 and Reconciliation Agreement Deed No.09 dated February 21, 2012 were annulled By The Law. Based on the conclusion, it is suggested that the parties involved in the making of the deed of reconciliation agreement be assisted by a mediator. It is also suggested that all parties who make the agreement of reconciliation concur and comply with the requirements mentioned by the law, in this case the Article 1320 of the Civil Code. It is recommended that the Notary be more conscientious in making the Deed of Reconciliation and pay more attention to the provisions and regulations in the prevailing Law, so that any kind of potential conflict can be prevented in the future.   Keywords: Reconciliation Deed Annulment, Unilaterally, Ruling
ANALISIS HUKUM ATAS KEKUATAN HUKUM GRANT SULTAN TERHADAP ADANYA PENERBITAN SERTIPIKAT OLEH PIHAK LAIN DILOKASI YANG SAMA JOHN QADRI HANAFIAH
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 17 (2016): VOLUME XVII TAHUN 2016
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (347.545 KB)

Abstract

The regulation on the position of rights in grant Sultan states that it is the Indonesian rights and is subject to the adat law. Grant Sultan in the Melayu kingdom was under the authority of Sultan. Therefore, grant Sultan which is issued for dependency was signed and stamped the Sultan of Melayu kingdom. The proving procedure of the grants before UUPA was in effective in the portions of land settled by the Melayunese under the four oeroengs was that they were issued, signed, and sealed by the head of oeroeng and then signed and sealerd them. After UUPA was in effective, the proving procedure was that the mechanism of its implementation was by direct conversion. The issuance of certificate in the grant has met the procedure of land registration according to PP (Government Regulation) No. 24/1997 which is done systematically. The Judge’s Verdict No. 96/Pdt/2012/PN-Mdn on the case of grant Sultan is legal because it is in accordance with article 32, paragraph 2 of PP No. 24/1997 on Land Registration. Keywords: Legal Protection, Grant Sultan, Certificate
ANALISIS HUKUM TENTANG PENDAFTARAN TANAH ULAYAT YANG MENJADI HAK PERORANGAN PADA TANAH ULAYAT DI KABUPATEN DAIRI LAMHOT HERIANTO SIGIRO
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 17 (2016): VOLUME XVII TAHUN 2016
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (306.028 KB)

Abstract

As an adat community, the majority of people in Parbuluan Subdistrict comply with Batak adat law. Each plot of land in Batak community is controlled by certain marga (clan) as the owner of village adat land. Since law No. 5/1960 on Basic Agrarian Regulations is in effect, land registrations becomes the most important thing in the land system in Indonesia because it is the beginning of the process of the bird of land rights ownership. The adat law community in Parbuluan Subdistrict who wants to register their land has to request for Raja Huta/Kepala Huta (village head) by submitting an amount of money which is called “Tulak Sakkul” as a token that the marga land rights has been released and is allowed to be registered for getting its certificate. “Tulak Sakkul” is submitted in an adat ceremony by having meal together as a proof that the village land owner, represented by the village head, has submitted his rights on the marga land. Keywords: Land registration, Marga Land, Parbuluan Subdistrict
EFEKTIFITAS PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA WARISAN MELALUI MAJELIS ADAT ACEH (STUDI DI KECAMATAN DARUSSALAM, KABUPATEN ACEH BESAR) RAHMAT FITRAH
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 19 (2016): VOLUME XIX TAHUN 2016
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (366.585 KB)

Abstract

Judicially, there are types of settling a dispute case: by litigation in the court and by non-litigation outside of the court. In non-litigation as an alternative settling. In Aceh Besar, a dispute is dominantly settled through Majelis Adat (Adat Council) like a problem of inheritance because the people think that it is in accordance with the people’s sense of justice which is more effective. It is, therefore, interesting to analyze is how far the effectiveness of settling a dispute in inheritance the Majelis Adat is. It was located in Darussalam Subdistrict. The result of the research showed that the legal ground for Majelis Adat Aceh Besar in settling dispute in inheritance by handing down the Verdict No. 40/1999 on Organization of Aceh Special Region in which Aceh and Law No. 11/2006 on Aceh Provincial Government. The role of Majelis Adat Aceh Besar in settling dispute in inheritance is a mediator and as a communicator. The implementation of the ruling of the Majelis Adat Aceh Besar in settling dispute in inheritance for the conflicting parties was effective since it is carried out by the stakeholders so that it can be settled by adat (custom) without any conflict in the future. Keywords: Effectiveness, Dispute in Inheritance, Majelis Adat Aceh
KEDUDUKAN HUKUM ATAS HARTA YANG DIHIBAHKAN PADA PERKAWINAN YANG BELUM DICATATKAN TANPA PERSETUJUAN ISTRI (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Nomor 425/PDT.G/2012/PN.Mdn tanggal 05 November 2012) MARIA SIANTURI
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 17 (2016): VOLUME XVII TAHUN 2016
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (285.906 KB)

Abstract

A marriage in Indonesia is regulated in Law No. 1/1974 on Marriage. Article 2, paragraph 1 of Marriage Law states that a marriage is legitimate when it is performed according to each religion and belief; paragraph 2 states that each marriage is to be registered according to the prevailing regulations. Based on this Article, the legitimacy of a marriage is interpreted differently in the verdict of the District Court No. 425/Pdt.G/2012/PN.Mdn on November 5, 2012 which states that a marriage is legitimate when it is performed according to religion and belief while registration is only administrative action. The research used descriptive analytic and judicial normative method. The marriage registration can prove that there is a marriage which is recognized by State. An unregistered marriage does not cause legal consequence for husband and wife, children and joint property. Joint property which is registered is considered as dowry brought to a marriage by either side. Hibah (grant) given by a husband on unregistered joint property does not need his wife’s approval. Therefore, active role in registering a marriage is needed to get legal certainty on a wife’s right and property. Keywords : Marriage Legitimacy, Marriage Registration, Legal Consequence of   Unregistered Marriage
ANALISIS YURIDIS PENGESAHAN PERKAWINAN BEDA AGAMA DAN AKIBAT HUKUMNYA (STUDI PENETAPAN NO. 156/PDT.P/2010/PN.SKA TENTANG PERKAWINAN BEDA AGAMA) YUDI PRANATA
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 17 (2016): VOLUME XVII TAHUN 2016
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (213.41 KB)

Abstract

A marriage is very important and sacred because it is a profound wedlock between a husband-to-be and a wife-to-be who want to establish a family and a household by committing a marriage. The problems of the research were as follows: how about the regulation on prohibiting a mixed marriage according to the Marriage Law in Indonesia, how about the legal consequence of a mixed marriage according to the Marriage Law in Indonesia, and how about the consideration of the panel of judges in the Ruling No. 156/Pdt./2010/PN.Ska on the Request for a Mixed Marriage. The research uses descriptive and judicial normative method.  The regulation on the prohibition of a mixed marriage in Indonesia is clearly regulated; but, in reality, is still ineffective because there is different perspective in interpreting the Article on the prohibition of a mixed marriage. The legal consequence of a mixed marriage is in Article 2 of Law No. 1/1974 on Marriage. The consideration of the Panel of Judges in the Ruling No. 156/Pdt./2010/PN.Ska on the Request for a Mixed Marriage places the emphasis on Article 57 of Law No 1/1974 on Marriage which regulates a Mixed Marriage. Keywords: Marriage, Prohibition of Marriage, Different Religions
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM PEMEGANG HAK TANGGUNGAN TERHADAP BARANG JAMINAN YANG DISITA OLEH KANTOR PAJAK FITRI TRISNASARI NASUTION
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 18 (2016): VOLUME XVIII TAHUN 2016
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (394.722 KB)

Abstract

Based on Article 21 of UUKUP, the State has the authority to dun tax early although hypothecation is attached on the confiscated object so that the position of creditor as the hypothecation holder who has preference right on debtor’s debt is weak. The research used judicial normative and statute approach. The result of the research showed that collateral with hypothecation on it confiscated by the State will not eliminate its droit de suite of the collateral according to Article 7 of UUHT which states that hypothecation will not end although it is transferred to another party (in this case it is confiscated by Tax Office). By the binding of hypothecation, the authority on the collateral is transferred to creditor to execute it when debtor is not able to pay off his debt. The right of the collateral owner will be returned when hypothecation is cancelled because the loan has been paid off. Keywords: Hypothecation Protection, Taxes Payable, Collateral

Page 37 of 82 | Total Record : 812

 35   36   37   38   39 

Filter by Year

2013 2019


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 18 (2019): VOLUME 18 TAHUN 2019 Vol 17 (2019): VOLUME 17 TAHUN 2019 Vol 16 (2019): VOLUME 16 TAHUN 2019 Vol 15 (2019): VOLUME 15 TAHUN 2019 Vol 14 (2019): VOLUME 14 TAHUN 2019 Vol 13 (2019): VOLUME 13 TAHUN 2019 Vol 12 (2019): VOLUME 12 TAHUN 2019 Vol 11 (2019): VOLUME 11 TAHUN 2019 Vol 10 (2019): VOLUME 10 TAHUN 2019 Vol 9 (2019): VOLUME 9 TAHUN 2019 Vol 8 (2019): VOLUME 8 TAHUN 2019 Vol 7 (2019): VOLUME 7 TAHUN 2019 Vol 6 (2019): VOLUME 6 TAHUN 2019 Vol 5 (2019): VOLUME 5 TAHUN 2019 Vol 4 (2019): VOLUME 4 TAHUN 2019 Vol 3 (2019): VOLUME 3 TAHUN 2019 Vol 2 (2019): VOLUME 2 TAHUN 2019 Vol 1 (2019): VOLUME 1 TAHUN 2019 Vol 17 (2018): VOLUME 17 TAHUN 2018 Vol 16 (2018): VOLUME 16 TAHUN 2018 Vol 15 (2018): VOLUME 15 TAHUN 2018 Vol 14 (2018): VOLUME 14 TAHUN 2018 Vol 13 (2018): VOLUME 13 TAHUN 2018 Vol 12 (2018): VOLUME 12 TAHUN 2018 Vol 11 (2018): VOLUME 11 TAHUN 2018 Vol 10 (2018): VOLUME 10 TAHUN 2018 Vol 9 (2018): VOLUME 9 TAHUN 2018 Vol 8 (2018): VOLUME 8 TAHUN 2018 Vol 7 (2018): VOLUME 7 TAHUN 2018 Vol 6 (2018): VOLUME 6 TAHUN 2018 Vol 5 (2018): VOLUME 5 TAHUN 2018 Vol 4 (2018): VOLUME 4 TAHUN 2018 Vol 3 (2018): VOLUME 3 TAHUN 2018 Vol 2 (2018): VOLUME 2 TAHUN 2018 Vol 1 (2018): VOLUME 1 TAHUN 2018 Vol 24 (2017): VOLUME 24 TAHUN 2017 Vol 23 (2017): VOLUME 23 TAHUN 2017 Vol 22 (2017): VOLUME 22 TAHUN 2017 Vol 21 (2017): VOLUME 21 TAHUN 2017 Vol 20 (2017): VOLUME 20 TAHUN 2017 Vol 19 (2017): VOLUME 19 TAHUN 2017 Vol 18 (2017): VOLUME 18 TAHUN 2017 Vol 17 (2017): VOLUME 17 TAHUN 2017 Vol 16 (2017): VOLUME 16 TAHUN 2017 Vol 15 (2017): VOLUME 15 TAHUN 2017 Vol 14 (2017): VOLUME XIV TAHUN 2017 Vol 13 (2017): Volume XIII Tahun 2017 Vol 12 (2017): VOLUME XII TAHUN 2017 Vol 11 (2017): Volume XI Tahun 2017 Vol 10 (2017): VOLUME X TAHUN 2017 Vol 9 (2017): vol IX Tahun 2017 Vol 8 (2017): Volume VIII Tahun 2017 Vol 7 (2017): Volume VII Tahun 2017 Vol 6 (2017): VOLUME VI TAHUN 2017 Vol 5 (2017): VOLUME V TAHUN 2017 Vol 4 (2017): VOLUME IV TAHUN 2017 Vol 3 (2017): VOLUME III TAHUN 2017 Vol 2 (2017): VOLUME II TAHUN 2017 Vol 1 (2017): VOLUME I TAHUN 2017 Vol 21 (2016): VOLUME XXI TAHUN 2016 Vol 20 (2016): VOLUME XX TAHUN 2016 Vol 19 (2016): VOLUME XIX TAHUN 2016 Vol 18 (2016): VOLUME XVIII TAHUN 2016 Vol 17 (2016): VOLUME XVII TAHUN 2016 Vol 16 (2016): VOLUME XVI TAHUN 2016 Vol 15 (2016): VOLUME XV TAHUN 2016 Vol 14 (2016): VOLUME XIV TAHUN 2016 Vol 13 (2016): VOLUME XIII TAHUN 2016 Vol 12 (2016): VOLUME XII TAHUN 2016 Vol 11 (2016): VOLUME XI TAHUN 2016 Vol 10 (2016): VOLUME X TAHUN 2016 Vol 9 (2016): VOLUME IX TAHUN 2016 Vol 8 (2016): VOLUME VIII TAHUN 2016 Vol 7 (2016): VOLUME VII TAHUN 2016 Vol 6 (2016): VOLUME VI TAHUN 2016 Vol 5 (2016): Volume V Tahun 2016 Vol 4 (2016): Volume IV Tahun 2016 Vol 3 (2016): Volume III Tahun 2016 Vol 2 (2016): Volume II Tahun 2016 Vol 1 (2016): Volume I Tahun 2016 Vol 14 (2015): Volume XIV Tahun 2015 Vol 13 (2015): Volume XIII Tahun 2015 Vol 12 (2015): Volume XII Tahun 2015 Vol 11 (2015): Volume XI Tahun 2015 Vol 9 (2015): Volume IX Tahun 2015 Vol 8 (2015): Volume VIII Tahun 2015 Vol 7 (2015): Volume VII Tahun 2015 Vol 6 (2015): Volume VI Tahun 2015 Vol 5 (2015): Volume V Tahun 2015 Vol 4 (2015): Volume IV Tahun 2015 Vol 3 (2015): Volume III Tahun 2015 Vol 2 (2015): Volume II Tahun 2015 Vol 1 (2015): Volume I Tahun 2015 Vol 10 (2015) Vol 4: Volume 4 (2014) : Volume IV Tahun 2014 Vol 3 (2014): Volume III Tahun 2014 Vol 2 (2014) Vol 1: Volume I Tahun 2014 Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Volume II Tahun 2013 Vol 3: Volume III tahun 2013 Vol 1 (2013) More Issue