cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota medan,
Sumatera utara
INDONESIA
PREMISE LAW JURNAL
Published by Universitas Sumatera Utara
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 812 Documents
 51   52   53   54   55 
PERLINDUNGAN HAK PATEN ATAS JAMU KAITANNYA DENGAN PENGETAHUAN TRADISIONAL DI INDONESIA MIEKE IRENE HUTABARAT
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 18 (2017): VOLUME 18 TAHUN 2017
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (325.486 KB)

Abstract

In its development, Indonesia as a developing country has abundance of traditional knowledge and geographical indication although it does not maximally realize its potential because of weakness in knowledge, skill, professionalism in human resources and funds. This condition is used by developed countries that are more advanced in technology, financial and technical skill, and the operation of various multinational companies. Since it has the variety of traditional knowledge and great culture, Indonesia today becomes of hijacking from foreign countries. Foreigners learn, search for, patent and sell traditional medical science and indigenous medical plants with high price to the third world. The research used judicial normative method by analyzing legal provisions in patent rights under Law No. 13 of 2016 on Patents and some other literatures related to Paten Rights on Traditional Jamu in Indonesia. Keywords : Patent, Traditional herbal medicine, Judicial review.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PEMENANG LELANG ATAS OBJEK YANG DIBELI MELALUI LELANG (STUDI PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI NOMOR: 121/PDT.G/2014/PN.MDN) SONDANG SIMANJUNTAK
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 18 (2017): VOLUME 18 TAHUN 2017
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (433.43 KB)

Abstract

Collateral is legal protection for creditor when debtor cannot take his responsibility to pay off his debt to the creditor. The pay off to the creditor is by selling the collateral through public auction. The problem in auction occurs when the winner does not have the collateral he has bought since it is difficult to get it and there is complaint from the debtor. the process of the auction will cause the collateral is shifted from the seller to the winner of the auction, but it brings about a problem such as the winner cannot own the auction object. In this research, the implementation of auction has been ion accordance to the Decree of the Minister of Finance No. 93/PMK/06/2010 on the Operational Manual, the responsibility of the auctioneer, and the Bank in withdrawing the collateral auctioned is not involved so that the auction buyer/winner does by himself in withdrawing the auction object or the winner submit a request for execution to the District Court where the object is placed. Legal protection should be given to the auction winner in order to create legal certainty for the auction winner on the auction object he has bought. The conclusion is that an auction winner who has good faith (intention) has not yet obtained legal protection so far. Keywords: Legal Protection, Auction Winner, Auction Object
AKTA PERDAMAIAN YANG DIBUAT DIHADAPAN NOTARIS SEBAGAI DASAR PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM UNTUK MEMUTUS PERKARA DI PENGADILAN (PUTUSAN PENGADILAN TINGGI MEDAN NOMOR: 305/PDT/2015/PT-MDN) SYARIFAH NURJANI P
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 18 (2017): VOLUME 18 TAHUN 2017
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (397.779 KB)

Abstract

A dispute which costs less money and spends a little time can be settled by litigants to reconcile. The Supreme Court’s Ruling No.2/2003 on the Procedure of Mediation in the Court states that all civil cases in the District Court have to be settled through reconciliation with mediators. They can also be settled before a Notary by making Reconciliation Deeds. A Notary’s authority to make all deeds, including reconciliation ones, otherwise stipulated differently by law, is based on Article 15, paragraph 1 of Law No. 30/2004 in conjunction with on Notary’s Position in conjunction with Law No. 2/2004 on the Amendment of Law No. 30/2004 on Notary’s Position. An authentic deed made by a Notary is strong evidence needed by the related parties. The reconciliation deed can be used as evidence before the court which can be the judge’s consideration in handing down a Ruling as reconciliation in the Medan Appellate Court. The research used descriptive analytic method on Reconciliation Deed made by a Notary as the Judge’s Consideration to Hand Down a Ruling, using juridical normative approach related to Reconciliation Deed made before a Notary. The result of the research showed that Reconciliation Deed made before a Notary can be one of the alternatives in settling a dispute outside the Court with quick process and less money spent on it. It is recommended that litigants can reconcile by making a reconciliation deed before a Notary in order to settle it quickly with less money. Keywords: Reconciliation Deed, Notary, Appellate Court
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN HUKUM PEMILIK TOWER TELEKOMUNIKASI TERHADAP PEMILIK BANGUNAN ATAS TIMBULNYA KERUGIAN AKIBAT FORCE MAJEURE (STUDI PUTUSAN MA RI NO. 1144K/PDT/2012) YOLANDA EVANS SIMORANGKIR
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 18 (2017): VOLUME 18 TAHUN 2017
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (451.157 KB)

Abstract

The case in the Ruling of MA RI (the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia) No.1144K/PDT/2012 started with a lease agreement of some parts of a place on the upper side of a building owned by H. Darmawan Kasim as the installation of telecommunication tower belonging to PT.Telkomsel. Darmawan Kasim claimed PT. Telkomsel to indemnify the loss incurred because the tower fell on his building, while PT.Telkomsel refused because according to them it was caused by force majeure such as earthquake striking the area. The research results revealed how to determine force majeure in a legal event i.e. by studying its elements; namely, the rented object is vanished, there is no element of debtor’s mistake (schuld) or neglect; the legal event in this case was not an event that can be predicted earlier and the debtor did not have any bad intention, they in fact have good intention when the legal event took place. The tower owner will definitely no loner be able to execute the agreement because the building has been vanished due to the earthquake. The judge’s consideration to fine the tower owner is regarded to be improper because the loss due to force majeure is not the tower owner’s risk or legal liability. Keywords : Legal Event, Force Majeure, Legal Liability
ANALISIS YURIDIS PENGALIHAN PIUTANG SECARA CESSIE DAN AKIBAT HUKUMNYA TERHADAP JAMINAN UTANG DEBITUR (STUDI KASUS ATAS PUTUSAN PN PEKANBARU NO. 22/PDT.G/2016/PN.PBR) YURISTIA EKA ERWANDA
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 18 (2017): VOLUME 18 TAHUN 2017
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (400.335 KB)

Abstract

One of the ways to settle bad credit done by a bank is cessie or debt transfer and or hand over (Article 613 of the Civil Code). The case in the ruling of Pekanbaru District Court No.22/Pdt.G/2016/PN.Pbr is a claim by a new creditor (Nelmawati) who has bought the debt from PT Bank Tabungan Negara (Persero) Tbk Pekanbaru against the debtor (Ema Damayanti) who has bad credit to Pekanbaru District Court to permit the transfer of Land Title Certificate which is made collateral of the debtor on behalf of herself. The research problems are related to the legal consequence of the debtor’s collateral if the former creditor transfers the debt by cessie to the new creditor, the efforts to settle the bad credit that can be made by the new creditor related to the prohibition of beding, and the legal analysis of the Ruling of Pekanbaru District Court No.22/Pdt.G/2016/PN.Pbr.
KAJIAN ATAS PERBANDINGAN HUKUM PERLINDUNGAN ANAK ANGKAT ATAS PERCERAIAN ORANGTUA ANGKATNYA MENURUT HUKUM ADAT DAN KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PERDATA YANG BERLAKU PADA ETNIS TIONGHOA DI SIBOLGA-TAPANULI TENGAH YUVINDRI YUVINDRI
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 18 (2017): VOLUME 18 TAHUN 2017
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Attention to children has long existed in line with human civilization itself which from day to day progresses. The child is the son of life, the future of the nation and state. Therefore, children need coaching, special guidance in order to grow physically, mentally and spiritually to the fullest. The issues discussed in this thesis are the arrangement of adoption for the ethnic Chinese in Sibolga - Central Tapanuli according to Customary Law and Civil Code, due to any law that can arise to adopted children when their adoptive parents from ethnic Chinese in Sibolga-Tapanuli Tengah are divorced And legal protection of adopted children in connection with the divorce of their adoptive parents from ethnic Chinese in Sibolga - Central Tapanuli. Keywords : Protection, Divorce and Child Lift
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP TERTANGGUNG DALAM HAL PENANGGUNG MENOLAK KLAIM ASURANSI AKIBAT TERJADINYA RESIKO TOTAL LOSS ONLY (STUDI PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI MEDAN NO. 392/PDT.G/2013/PN.MDN) ANDRIANSYAH PUTRA NAPITUPULU
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 19 (2017): VOLUME 19 TAHUN 2017
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research discussed legal protection for the insured because the insurer refused the claim when the ‘total loss only’ (TLO) occurred by using the Medan District Court’s Verdict No 392/Pdt.G/2013/PN.Mdn) as the material of the analysis. The term, loss in not only used as the loss of insured vehicles because of criminal act, but also damage. The damaged insured by TLO is at least 75% which is intentional since it s certain that the vehicle is thoroughly damaged and cannot be used anymore. As the means of mobility, it cannot be functioned although it still exists. The research used juridical normative of legal doctrinaire research which was referred to legal norms by using statue approach and legal provisions, especial law on insurance. Keywords: Legal Protection, the Insured, Risk for Claim, Total Loss Only
TINJAUAN YURIDIS TANGGUNG JAWAB LIKUIDATOR DALAM PEMBERESAN HARTA PERSEROAN YANG DIBUBARKAN ANGELINE ANGELINE
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 19 (2017): VOLUME 19 TAHUN 2017
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (444.673 KB)

Abstract

Liquidation of a corporation begins with the issuance of RUPS provision, followed by arrangement. A company arrangement is an action in the process of company liquidation in order to document and to sell or liquidate the company’s assets by distributing them to the persons entitled to them such as creditors and shareholders. In the process of liquidation, one or more liquidators are appointed to make the arrangement; but in practice, the process of arrangement is usually ignored by the owner of the company so that liquidation is not carried out of it is not completed. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the responsibility of liquidator in the process of arranging the assets of liquidated corporation. Keywords: Responsibility, Liquidator, Liquidation of a Corporation, Liquidation
KEPASTIAN HUKUM AKTA PERJANJIAN JUAL BELI YANG OBJEKNYA DIAGUNKAN DI BANK FENI WULANDARI
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 19 (2017): VOLUME 19 TAHUN 2017
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

An agreement should meet the requirement for its validity under Article 1320 of the Civil Code. It does not fulfill object element because it becomes the seller’s mortgage in the Bank, and he transfer the land and building  without the acknowledge of the Bank, and violates against the provision of Article 11, paragraph (2), letter g of Law No. 4/1996 on Collateral. This research analyzes legal certainty on purchase agreement certificate which object is mortgaged in the Bank made by a Notary without considering the prevailing regulations.The research used juridical normative and empirical and descriptive analytic.The result of the research showed that Purchase Agreement Certificate which object is mortgaged in the Bank is null and void because it does not meet the objective requirements stipulated in Article 1320, paragraphs (3) and (4) of the Civil Code and violates against Article 11, paragraph (2), letter g of Law No. 4/1996 on Collateral. In a Purchase Agreement Certificate which object is mortgaged in the Bank, the Notary as a public official has to comply with Notarial Code of Ethics. Article 15, paragraph (2), letter E of the Notarial Act No. 2/2014. Keywords: Legal certainty, Purchase Agreement, Collateral
PENYELESAIAN HUKUM TUMPANG TINDIH KEPEMILIKAN TANAH (STUDI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 221 PK/PDT.2014) INDRI HANDAYANI
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 19 (2017): VOLUME 19 TAHUN 2017
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

One example of a dispute over land title is the case between Peter Soetjipto and  Hanan. How about the legal force of the land title with legal standing such as Renunciation Deed made by a Notary, how about the judge’s consideration in pronouncing the case, and whether the settlement of the overlapping land title case has provided legal certainty to the legitimate owner. The legal force of a land title grounded on the Renunciation Certificate made by a Notary proved that there has been a civil title transfer over a land from someone. The judge’s was not grounded on the legal fact in the hearing and merely grounded on the written evidence proposed by the Plaintiff. the settlement of the overlapping land title case has failed to provide legal certainty to the legitimate owner i.e. the Defendant, It is suggested that the Notary, in making a renunciation deed, be more conscientious in verifying the evidence of the land title proposed by the parties the Judge in his consideration to settle the similar dispute case be impartial in verifying the evidence and analyzing the legal facts Keywords: Legal Settlement, Overlapping, Land Title.

Page 53 of 82 | Total Record : 812

 51   52   53   54   55 

Filter by Year

2013 2019


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 18 (2019): VOLUME 18 TAHUN 2019 Vol 17 (2019): VOLUME 17 TAHUN 2019 Vol 16 (2019): VOLUME 16 TAHUN 2019 Vol 15 (2019): VOLUME 15 TAHUN 2019 Vol 14 (2019): VOLUME 14 TAHUN 2019 Vol 13 (2019): VOLUME 13 TAHUN 2019 Vol 12 (2019): VOLUME 12 TAHUN 2019 Vol 11 (2019): VOLUME 11 TAHUN 2019 Vol 10 (2019): VOLUME 10 TAHUN 2019 Vol 9 (2019): VOLUME 9 TAHUN 2019 Vol 8 (2019): VOLUME 8 TAHUN 2019 Vol 7 (2019): VOLUME 7 TAHUN 2019 Vol 6 (2019): VOLUME 6 TAHUN 2019 Vol 5 (2019): VOLUME 5 TAHUN 2019 Vol 4 (2019): VOLUME 4 TAHUN 2019 Vol 3 (2019): VOLUME 3 TAHUN 2019 Vol 2 (2019): VOLUME 2 TAHUN 2019 Vol 1 (2019): VOLUME 1 TAHUN 2019 Vol 17 (2018): VOLUME 17 TAHUN 2018 Vol 16 (2018): VOLUME 16 TAHUN 2018 Vol 15 (2018): VOLUME 15 TAHUN 2018 Vol 14 (2018): VOLUME 14 TAHUN 2018 Vol 13 (2018): VOLUME 13 TAHUN 2018 Vol 12 (2018): VOLUME 12 TAHUN 2018 Vol 11 (2018): VOLUME 11 TAHUN 2018 Vol 10 (2018): VOLUME 10 TAHUN 2018 Vol 9 (2018): VOLUME 9 TAHUN 2018 Vol 8 (2018): VOLUME 8 TAHUN 2018 Vol 7 (2018): VOLUME 7 TAHUN 2018 Vol 6 (2018): VOLUME 6 TAHUN 2018 Vol 5 (2018): VOLUME 5 TAHUN 2018 Vol 4 (2018): VOLUME 4 TAHUN 2018 Vol 3 (2018): VOLUME 3 TAHUN 2018 Vol 2 (2018): VOLUME 2 TAHUN 2018 Vol 1 (2018): VOLUME 1 TAHUN 2018 Vol 24 (2017): VOLUME 24 TAHUN 2017 Vol 23 (2017): VOLUME 23 TAHUN 2017 Vol 22 (2017): VOLUME 22 TAHUN 2017 Vol 21 (2017): VOLUME 21 TAHUN 2017 Vol 20 (2017): VOLUME 20 TAHUN 2017 Vol 19 (2017): VOLUME 19 TAHUN 2017 Vol 18 (2017): VOLUME 18 TAHUN 2017 Vol 17 (2017): VOLUME 17 TAHUN 2017 Vol 16 (2017): VOLUME 16 TAHUN 2017 Vol 15 (2017): VOLUME 15 TAHUN 2017 Vol 14 (2017): VOLUME XIV TAHUN 2017 Vol 13 (2017): Volume XIII Tahun 2017 Vol 12 (2017): VOLUME XII TAHUN 2017 Vol 11 (2017): Volume XI Tahun 2017 Vol 10 (2017): VOLUME X TAHUN 2017 Vol 9 (2017): vol IX Tahun 2017 Vol 8 (2017): Volume VIII Tahun 2017 Vol 7 (2017): Volume VII Tahun 2017 Vol 6 (2017): VOLUME VI TAHUN 2017 Vol 5 (2017): VOLUME V TAHUN 2017 Vol 4 (2017): VOLUME IV TAHUN 2017 Vol 3 (2017): VOLUME III TAHUN 2017 Vol 2 (2017): VOLUME II TAHUN 2017 Vol 1 (2017): VOLUME I TAHUN 2017 Vol 21 (2016): VOLUME XXI TAHUN 2016 Vol 20 (2016): VOLUME XX TAHUN 2016 Vol 19 (2016): VOLUME XIX TAHUN 2016 Vol 18 (2016): VOLUME XVIII TAHUN 2016 Vol 17 (2016): VOLUME XVII TAHUN 2016 Vol 16 (2016): VOLUME XVI TAHUN 2016 Vol 15 (2016): VOLUME XV TAHUN 2016 Vol 14 (2016): VOLUME XIV TAHUN 2016 Vol 13 (2016): VOLUME XIII TAHUN 2016 Vol 12 (2016): VOLUME XII TAHUN 2016 Vol 11 (2016): VOLUME XI TAHUN 2016 Vol 10 (2016): VOLUME X TAHUN 2016 Vol 9 (2016): VOLUME IX TAHUN 2016 Vol 8 (2016): VOLUME VIII TAHUN 2016 Vol 7 (2016): VOLUME VII TAHUN 2016 Vol 6 (2016): VOLUME VI TAHUN 2016 Vol 5 (2016): Volume V Tahun 2016 Vol 4 (2016): Volume IV Tahun 2016 Vol 3 (2016): Volume III Tahun 2016 Vol 2 (2016): Volume II Tahun 2016 Vol 1 (2016): Volume I Tahun 2016 Vol 14 (2015): Volume XIV Tahun 2015 Vol 13 (2015): Volume XIII Tahun 2015 Vol 12 (2015): Volume XII Tahun 2015 Vol 11 (2015): Volume XI Tahun 2015 Vol 9 (2015): Volume IX Tahun 2015 Vol 8 (2015): Volume VIII Tahun 2015 Vol 7 (2015): Volume VII Tahun 2015 Vol 6 (2015): Volume VI Tahun 2015 Vol 5 (2015): Volume V Tahun 2015 Vol 4 (2015): Volume IV Tahun 2015 Vol 3 (2015): Volume III Tahun 2015 Vol 2 (2015): Volume II Tahun 2015 Vol 1 (2015): Volume I Tahun 2015 Vol 10 (2015) Vol 4: Volume 4 (2014) : Volume IV Tahun 2014 Vol 3 (2014): Volume III Tahun 2014 Vol 2 (2014) Vol 1: Volume I Tahun 2014 Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Volume II Tahun 2013 Vol 3: Volume III tahun 2013 Vol 1 (2013) More Issue