cover
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
pandecta@mail.unnes.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
pandecta@mail.unnes.ac.id
Editorial Address
Law Journals Development Center, Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang. K 3 Building 1st Floor, UNNES Sekaran Campus, Jln. Kampus Timur, Sekaran Gunungpati, Semarang 50229, Indonesia
Location
Kota semarang,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Pandecta : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum (Research Law Journal)
ISSN : 19078919     EISSN : 23375418     DOI : https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta
Core Subject : Social,
Pandecta Research Law Journal is a scientific legal publication dedicated to exploring contemporary legal issues in Indonesia. Specializing in Indonesian law, this journal consistently publishes a diverse array of articles across various legal domains. With a firm commitment to fostering international collaboration and knowledge exchange, Pandecta Research Law Journal serves as a prominent platform for disseminating legal research findings and facilitating discussions on the dynamic developments in the Indonesian legal landscape. Indonesia, as a developing country, offers a rich and fascinating landscape for legal development studies. Its extensive jurisdiction encompasses a diverse array of factors, including social politics, culture, ethnicity, religion, and local wisdom. These multifaceted influences contribute to the complexity and diversity of legal developments in Indonesia, rendering them both captivating and highly relevant to the international community. The unique interplay of these elements makes legal studies in Indonesia not only interesting but also invaluable for gaining insights into the broader global context and understanding the dynamics of legal systems worldwide.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 63 Documents
Intellectual Property as Fiduciary Collateral in Indonesian Banking: Legal Guarantees and Creative Economy Financing Ulil Albab Junaedi; Rofi Wahanisa; Martitah Martitah
Pandecta Research Law Journal Vol. 21 No. 2 (2026): December, 2026 (In Press)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/pandecta.v21i2.33068

Abstract

Indonesia recognizes intellectual property rights (IPR) as intangible movable assets that may secure financing, yet banking practice still treats IPR as marginal collateral. This study examines how Indonesian law positions IPR as fiduciary collateral, what legal guarantees protect banks and creative economy actors, and why implementation remains limited after Government Regulation No. 24/2022. Using normative legal research, this article analyzes the Copyright Law, Patent Law, Fiduciary Guarantee Law, Creative Economy Law, Government Regulation No. 24/2022, OJK Regulation No. 40/POJK.03/2019, and the 2025 regulation on intellectual property valuers. The analysis is supported by official creative economy data and comparative case studies from Singapore, the United Kingdom, and the United States. The findings show that copyright and patent rights can be bound through fiduciary security because they are transferable economic rights with asset value. The legal guarantees consist of a notarized fiduciary deed, registration, preference rights, third-party enforceability, and execution rights after default. The main implementation gap lies in valuation, secondary market uncertainty, and the absence of IPR from the collateral categories recognized for bank provisioning under OJK asset-quality rules. The novelty of this article lies in connecting IPR doctrine, fiduciary security, prudential banking regulation, and the new Indonesian framework for registered intellectual property valuers.
Legal Framework for Maritime Museum Development in Coastal Areas: Evidence from Semarang, Indonesia Mochamad Rizqi Zia Ul’haq; Michelle Tiffani DN; R. Benny Riyanto; Suhadi Suhadi
Pandecta Research Law Journal Vol. 21 No. 2 (2026): December, 2026 (In Press)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/pandecta.v21i2.59555

Abstract

The initiation of establishing a cultural infrastructure in the form of a Maritime Museum by the Semarang City Government manifests a strategic step in optimizing coastal geographic characteristics as an epicenter of maritime education, integrated tourism, and preservation of collective maritime memory. However, this ambitious project with an estimated building site area of ​​five hectares in the northern coastal region faces overlapping spatial regulations, uncertainty of land tenure status, and vulnerability of coastal ecosystem degradation. This study comprehensively analyzes the legal feasibility of land tenure, spatial planning, and environmental management across three alternative locations (Pearl of Java City, Polder Banger, and Tambachlorok). Utilizing a normative-juridical approach, this study evaluates the dynamics of foundational licensing post-implementation of the job creation regulations, which shifts the paradigm from traditional administrative permits to risk-based approvals. The comparative analysis recommends Pearl of Java City as the primary priority for construction based on spatial conformity parameters, subject to the mandatory completion of land rights transfer of reclaimed land as a municipal asset (Regional Property). This study concludes that the acquisition of hierarchically structured legal instruments ranging from land rights procurement, marine and terrestrial spatial conformity, to national institutional registration is an absolute prerequisite to ensure the sustainability of public investment, mitigation of administrative litigation risks, and ecological protection of the Semarang City coast.
Normative Dissonance Of The Precautionary Principle In Extractive Mining Governance: A Critical Analysis Of Indonesia's Achievement Of SDG 13 Izzul Munna; Martitah Martitah; Duhita Driyah Suprapti; Karno Roso
Pandecta Research Law Journal Vol. 21 No. 2 (2026): December, 2026 (In Press)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/pandecta.v21i2.62163

Abstract

This article examines the dissonance between the normative position of the precautionary principle in Indonesian environmental law and the practice of governance in extractive mining permits following the enactment of the Omnibus Law on Job Creation. Using a normative juridical approach supported by case studies in three locations – coal mining and forestry in Wadas Village, Kutai Kartanegara Regency, and Boven Digoel – the article shows that the shift in the licensing regime from a precaution-based approach to a risk-based licensing approach has weakened the legal instruments that should prevent environmental damage early on, with direct implications for the failure to achieve the 13th Sustainable Development Goal (Climate Action). Unlike existing literature, which generally frames this issue as an implementation failure or misuse of administrative discretion, this article argues that the dissonance is built-in in the architecture of risk-based licensing law itself. By combining Lawrence Friedman's Legal System Theory and Mahfud MD's Legal Politics Theory, this article argues that the weakening of the precautionary principle is a product of political configurations that deliberately prioritize the acceleration of extractive investment over the prevention of ecological and climate risks. The article concludes with a proposal for a normative reformulation so that the precautionary principle can function as a genuinely precautionary and accountable legal instrument for national climate mitigation targets