cover
Contact Name
Ismed Batubara
Contact Email
keadilann052@gmail.com
Phone
+62813-6375-8304
Journal Mail Official
keadilann052@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jln Garu II A Gang Teratai No. 44 B, Medan, Sumatera Utara 20147
Location
Kota medan,
Sumatera utara
INDONESIA
Neraca Keadilan
ISSN : -     EISSN : 29645123     DOI : -
NERACA KEADILAN adalah jurnal yang menjadi wadah publikasi ilmiah yang bersumber dari penelitian, baik penelitian lapangan maupun juga penelitian pustaka. Jurnal ini adalah jurnal penelitian open access berkualitas tinggi dengan E-ISSN. 2964-5123 yang diterbitkan oleh YAPEKAM (Yayasan Pendidikan Kamaliah Medan). CADIL menerima artikel penelitian yang ditulis oleh peneliti, guru, mahasiswa, akademisi, profesional, dan praktisi, jurnal ini terbit setiap bulan Juni dan Desember.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 53 Documents
PENYELESAIAN UTANG PIUTANG MELALUI PKPU DALAM PERKARA PERDATA NO .22/PDT.SUS-PKPU/2021/PN NIAGA MEDAN PADA PENGADILAN NEGERI MEDAN Hanapi Sayuti Siregar
NERACA KEADILAN Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): NERACA KEADILAN
Publisher : YAPEKAM

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and PKPU, which is a refinement, the position of PKPU is further strengthened in the Indonesian legal system as an instrument that is not only repressive, but also preventive against bankruptcy. This law provides a more comprehensive and operational legal basis for the implementation of PKPU, including the procedures for filing, appointing a supervisory judge, curator, and the time limit for the PKPU process. Thus, the existence of PKPU has strategic value in the business world because it allows companies to continue operating while completing their financial obligations through transparent and legally supervised restructuring. The problems in this paper are a) How to settle debts in Civil Case No. 22/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2021/PN Niaga Medan at the Medan District Court, b). What are the judge's considerations in deciding debt cases through PKPU in Civil Case No. 22/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2021/PN Niaga through PKPU. C). How is the legal certainty for PKPU applicants in obtaining their rights based on Law No. 37 of 2004. The research method used is normative legal research, namely research conducted by examining both primary and secondary legal materials. Normative legal research is used to study laws and regulations, doctrines, legal principles, and court decisions that are relevant to the problem of Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU). The research findings are that the Panel of Judges in their decision, stated that the applicants' application was sufficiently legally based and fulfilled the elements as stipulated in Article 222 paragraph (1) of Law Number 37 of 2004, namely: The Respondent has more than one creditor; There is a debt that has matured and can be collected; Collection has been carried out both verbally and in writing; There has been a default by the respondent. Bankruptcy. The legal considerations of the panel of judges in PKPU cases are based on the fulfillment of formal and material requirements for submitting PKPU. Simple evidentiary elements, the existence of debt due, more than one creditor, and the good faith of the applicants are the main basis for accepting this application. With the understanding and application of these elements, the Commercial Court plays a role as an enforcer of justice in maintaining a balance between the legal protection of creditors and the debtor's business rights. Legal certainty in the PKPU process also concerns the clarity of debt status, both in terms of maturity, amount, and validity of the debt agreement. Article 8 paragraph (4) of Law No. 37 of 2004 even states that evidence in PKPU cases is sufficient to be carried out simply, namely by showing that the debtor has two or more creditors and there is a debt that is due and collectible.
AKIBAT PERUBAHAN REGULASI TERHADAP STRATEGI OPERASI ANTI TERORISME YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH UNIT GEGANA BRIMOB POLRI DI SUMATERA UTARA Boy Agus Chain Gulo
NERACA KEADILAN Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): NERACA KEADILAN
Publisher : YAPEKAM

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The regulatory change brought about by Law Number 5 of 2018 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Terrorism has had a significant impact on the operational strategies employed by the Gegana Unit of the Indonesian Police Mobile Brigade (Brimob), particularly in the North Sumatra region. The background of this research stems from the growing complexity of terrorism threats and the need to adjust operational procedures to align with the new regulation, which grants broader authority to security force. This study aims to analyze the impact of the regulatory changes on the counter-terrorism operational strategies implemented by the Gegana Brimob Unit in North Sumatra, identify challenges in the strategy’s implementation, and formulate strategic solutions to enhance operational effectiveness. A descriptive qualitative approach was used, employing data collection techniques such as in-depth interviews, document analysis, and observation. The findings reveal that the regulatory change provides a stronger legal foundation and promotes a transformation in strategy from reactive to more proactive and preventive approaches. The Gegana Unit is now not only focused on enforcement but also actively engaged in prevention efforts, public education, and deradicalization programs. However, the implementation of these strategies faces several challenges, including limited human resources and logistics, suboptimal interagency coordination, and the diverse socio-cultural dynamics of the community. Therefore, recommendations to improve operational effectiveness include enhancing personnel capacity, modernizing equipment, establishing cross-sectoral standard operating procedures (SOPs), and strengthening community engagement.
EFEKTIVITAS IMPLEMENTASI UNDANG UNDANG DARURAT NO.12 TAHUN 1951 DALAM MENDUKUNG TUGAS UNIT GEGANA BRIMOB Ilham Rafsandjani
NERACA KEADILAN Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): NERACA KEADILAN
Publisher : YAPEKAM

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Emergency Law No. 12 of 1951 serves as an important legal foundation for actions against the illegal possession and use of firearms and explosives in Indonesia. Despite being more than seven decades old, this law is still enforced by security forces, particularly the Gegana Unit of the Mobile Brigade (Brimob), in handling various armed threats and acts of terrorism. Given the increasingly complex dynamics of crime, the effectiveness of this law’s implementation needs to be re-evaluated to ensure its alignment with modern security challenges.This study aims to analyze the extent of the effectiveness of the implementation of Emergency Law No. 12 of 1951 in supporting the duties of the Gegana Unit of Brimob, identify the obstacles encountered in the field, and formulate strategies to enhance its implementation. The research was conducted using a qualitative approach and descriptive-analytical methods through interviews, observations, and documentation studies of the operational activities of the Gegana Unit of the North Sumatra Regional Police (Polda Sumatera Utara). The results of the study indicate that this law remains relevant as a legal basis and has proven effective in supporting the operational tasks of the Gegana Unit, especially in handling cases of illegal possession of firearms and explosives. However, its implementation still faces several obstacles such as limited facilities and infrastructure, suboptimal utilization of modern technology, and low public legal awareness. Therefore, regulatory updates, capacity building of human resources, inter-agency synergy, and broader legal outreach are needed to optimize the role of this Emergency Law in the context of current national security.
EFEKTIVITAS PELAKSANAAN DIVERSI DALAM PENYELESAIAN TINDAK PIDANA ANAK BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NO 11 TAHUN 2012 SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA ANAK (Studi Kasus Polda Sumatera Utara) Nelvitia Purba, Syarah Ayunda Syaputri,
NERACA KEADILAN Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): NERACA KEADILAN FUTURE ISSUE
Publisher : YAPEKAM

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Permasalahan pidana yang melibatkan anak di bawah umur dapat diselesaikan melalui prosedur Diversi, yang memberikan kesempatan kepada anak untuk menyelesaikan perkara pidana di luar sistem peradilan formal. Diversi diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak (UU SPPA), yang bertujuan untuk melindungi hak anak serta memberikan alternatif penyelesaian tanpa harus menjalani proses peradilan yang dapat berdampak buruk bagi perkembangan psikologis mereka. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis efektivitas pelaksanaan diversi dalam penyelesaian tindak pidana anak berdasarkan UU No. 11 Tahun 2012, khususnya di wilayah hukum Polda Sumatera Utara, serta mengidentifikasi hambatan dan tantangan yang dihadapi aparat penegak hukum dalam pelaksanaannya. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis-empiris dengan metode penelitian hukum yang melibatkan pengumpulan data primer melalui wawancara tidak langsung. Informasi yang diperoleh didukung oleh dokumentasi hasil wawancara yang telah dipublikasikan dan pendapat ahli yang bersumber dari jurnal serta forum diskusi hukum online. Pendekatan ini digunakan untuk memperoleh perspektif praktisi hukum terkait pelaksanaan diversi di wilayah hukum Polda Sumatera Utara. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pelaksanaan diversi di Polda Sumatera Utara telah berjalan dengan efektif, dengan sebagian besar kasus tindak pidana anak dapat diselesaikan melalui proses diversi. Namun, terdapat beberapa hambatan seperti kurangnya pemahaman aparat penegak hukum mengenai prosedur diversi dan kendala dalam implementasi mediasi. Meskipun demikian, sistem peradilan pidana anak diharapkan dapat terus berkembang untuk melindungi hak-hak anak dan menghindarkan mereka dari stigma sosial yang diakibatkan oleh proses peradilan formal.
TINJAUAN YURIDIS OPTIMALISASI MANAJEMEN PEMBINAANKARIER SUMBER DAYA MANUSIA POLRI UNTUK MEWUJUDKAN PENEGAKAN HUKUM YANG PROFESIONAL DI POLDA SUMUT Muhammad Hizbullah, Mas Teguh Muhammad Tamyiz,
NERACA KEADILAN Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): NERACA KEADILAN FUTURE ISSUE
Publisher : YAPEKAM

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Penegakan hukum yang profesional dan berintegritas di tubuh Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia sangat bergantung pada kualitas sumber daya manusia (SDM) yang dimiliki. Manajemen pembinaan karier yang adil, transparan, dan berbasis kompetensi merupakan aspek krusial dalam menciptakan anggota Polri yang kompeten dan beretika. Namun, realitas di Polda Sumatera Utara menunjukkan masih adanya tantangan dalam penerapan sistem pembinaan karier, seperti persepsi ketidakadilan dalam promosi jabatan dan keterbatasan akses pelatihan, yang dapat memengaruhi motivasi dan profesionalisme anggota. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaturan yuridis pembinaan karier SDM Polri berdasarkan regulasi yang berlaku, mengevaluasi implementasi sistem tersebut di Polda Sumut, serta mengidentifikasi hambatan dan merumuskan solusi optimalisasi manajemen pembinaan karier guna mendukung penegakan hukum yang profesional. Metode yang digunakana adalah pendekatan deskriptif kualitatif melalui wawancara, observasi, dan studi dokumentasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun sistem pembinaan karier di Polda Sumut telah dilandasi oleh regulasi formal seperti Perkap No. 16 Tahun 2012 dan dijalankan melalui mekanisme assessment center, pelatihan, serta sidang dewan karier, pelaksanaannya masih menghadap ikendala struktural dan kultural. Terdapat aspirasi anggota terhadap peningkatan transparansi penilaian, pemerataan pelatihan, dan pembinaan karier yang lebih personal. Oleh karenaitu, optimalisasi sistem pembinaan karier berbasis meritokrasi, keterbukaan informasi, dan coaching internal menjadi langkah strategis dalam mewujudkan institusi Polri yang profesional dan dipercaya masyarakat.
ANALISIS HUKUM PENGGUNAAN SENJATA API OLEH BRIMOB DALAM MENANGGULANGI KEJAHATAN BERSENJATA DI KOTA MEDAN Tri Reni Novita, Hagata Brillianto P,
NERACA KEADILAN Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): NERACA KEADILAN FUTURE ISSUE
Publisher : YAPEKAM

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Penanggulangan kejahatan bersenjata di Indonesia menjadi salah satu tugas utama aparat kepolisian, dengan Korps Brigade Mobil (Brimob) Polri memiliki peran penting dalam mengatasi ancaman tersebut. Kejahatan bersenjata yang semakin marak di Kota Medan, seperti perampokan dan pembunuhan, memerlukan tindakan tegas dari aparat keamanan. Dalam menjalankan tugasnya, Brimob berwenang menggunakan senjata api, namun penggunaannya harus sesuai dengan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku untuk mencegah pelanggaran hak asasi manusia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis penggunaan senjata api oleh Brimob dalam menanggulangi kejahatan bersenjata di Kota Medan, dengan menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif. Melalui metode deskriptif, penelitian ini menggali prosedur penggunaan senjata api oleh Brimob serta dampaknya terhadap penanggulangan kejahatan. Data diperoleh melalui wawancara dengan anggota Brimob dan analisis dokumen terkait peraturan yang ada.Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penggunaan senjata api oleh Brimob telah sesuai dengan perundang-undangan, namun terdapat tantangan dalam implementasi prosedur, terutama dalam hal pengawasan dan pelatihan. Dampak positif penggunaan senjata api terhadap penanggulangan kejahatan bersenjata di Kota Medan terlihat dari penurunan angka kejahatan, meskipun masih ada kekhawatiran terkait potensi pelanggaran hak asasi manusia. Oleh karena itu, penting untuk meningkatkan pelatihan dan pengawasan dalam pelaksanaan tugas Brimob.
PERAN PASUKAN PELOPOR BRIMOB POLDA SUMATERA UTARA DALAM PENANGGULANGAN AKSI TERORISME DITINJAU DARI PERSPEKTIF UNDANG-UNDANG NO. 5 TAHUN 2018 TENTANG TERORISME Ismed Batubara, Januar Fazhari,
NERACA KEADILAN Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): NERACA KEADILAN FUTURE ISSUE
Publisher : YAPEKAM

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research is motivated by the increasing threat of terrorism in Indonesia, which demands a high level of preparedness from all law enforcement agencies, particularly the Mobile Brigade Corps (Brimob) of the Indonesian National Police. The aim of this studyis to analyze the role of the Brimob Pioneer Unit in counter- terrorism efforts, to examine the implementation of Law Number 5 of 2018 as the legal basis for their duties, and to identify operational challenges faced in the field. This research uses a qualitative approach with a descriptive-analytical method. Data were obtained through interviews with members of the Brimob Pioneer Unit of the North Sumatra Regional Police and documentation of counter-terrorism activities, and were analyzed using juridical and theoretical approaches. The results of the study show that the Brimob Pioneer Unit plays a comprehensive and structured role in combating terrorism, including a preventive role through patrols and counter-radicalization outreach; a repressive role in securing, arresting, and evacuating civilians; and a post-incident role in recovery and support for deradicalization programs.The implementation of Law Number 5 of 2018 provides legitimacy and a legal framework that supports the execution of duties in a measured and professional manner. Challenges such as limited resources, inter-agency coordination, and psychological support for personnel remain key concerns in efforts to enhance operational effectiveness. This study recommends improvementsintacticalandmentaltraining,as well as strengthening inter-agency synergy as part of a sustainable strategy to maintain national security.
ANALISIS YURIDIS PELANGGARAN KODE ETIK PROFESI POLRI OLEH PERSONEL SATUAN BRIMOB POLDA SUMATERA UTARA YANG MELAKUKAN KASUS TINDAK PIDANA Muhammad Ridwan Lubis, Muktar Lutfi,
NERACA KEADILAN Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): NERACA KEADILAN FUTURE ISSUE
Publisher : YAPEKAM

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The implementation of the duties of Polri personnel, especially members of the North Sumatra Police Mobile Brigade Unit, is very vulnerable to violations of the professional code of ethics and criminal acts that can damage the image of the Police institution. These violations often occur in handling criminal cases, in the form of abuse of authority, excessive use of violence, and violations of applicable legal procedures. This condition creates public distrust of the Polri and hinders the realization of fair and professional law enforcement. Based on this background, this study formulates three main problems, namely: first, the form of violation of the professional code of ethics committed by personnel of the North Sumatra Police Mobile Brigade Unit who commit criminal cases; second, the mechanism for monitoring and enforcing the police professional code of ethics against personnel of the North Sumatra Police Mobile Brigade Unit who commit criminal cases; and third, legal accountability for personnel of the North Sumatra Police Mobile Brigade Unit who are proven to have violated the professional code of ethics. This study uses a normative juridical method by examining laws and legal literature related to the Polri professional code of ethics, internal supervision mechanisms, and aspects of legal accountability of Polri personnel. The results of the study indicate that violations of the code of ethics of the North Sumatra Police Mobile Brigade Unit personnel generally take the form of abuse of authority, disproportionate use of violence, and neglect of legal procedures. The mechanism for monitoring and enforcing the code of ethics is carried out through internal institutions such as Propam and the Police Code of Ethics Commission, as well as external supervision by Kompolnas and the community. Legal accountability includes ethical, disciplinary, and criminal areas that complement each other to maintain accountability and professionalism. This study recommends strengthening internal and external supervision and strict law enforcement against violations of the code of ethics to increase public trust in the Police and ensure fair law enforcement.
ANALISIS HUKUM TERHADAP KEWENANGAN GEGANA BRIMOB POLDA SUMATERA UTARA DALAM PENANGANAN KEJAHATAN LINTAS BATAS (CROSS-BORDER CRIMES) Sukma Ramadansyah Ginting
NERACA KEADILAN Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): NERACA KEADILAN FUTURE ISSUE
Publisher : YAPEKAM

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Cross-border crime is a serious challenge in the era of globalization, where national borders are increasingly blurred due to technological advances and mobility. North Sumatra Province, which borders the Straits of Malacca and Malaysia, is a vulnerable area for narcotics and firearms smuggling, as well as cross-border terrorist activity. The Gegana Detachment of the Mobile Brigade Corps (Brimob) of the North Sumatra Regional Police, as the National Police's elite analytical unit, plays a crucial role in combating these crimes, particularly through its technical capabilities in bomb disposal and armed threat security. However, debate has arisen regarding the limits of this unit's legal authority to repress transnational crime. This study aims to analyze the legal basis for the Gegana Detachment's authority in handling cross-border crime, assess the effectiveness of this unit's involvement in law enforcement operations, and evaluate the coordination structure between relevant agencies. The approach used is empirical juridical, through the study of laws and regulations and direct observation in the field. This research also examines the role of Gegana as part of the rapid response system to the threat of terrorism, as well as the normative gaps that arise due to the absence of technical regulations that regulate in detail its operational authority. The research results show that although the role of Gegana is very vital in the context of security and tactical operations, its authority is still functional and legally limited. The absence of an explicit legal basis causes overlapping roles with other investigative units such as Densus 88, and raises the potential for legal doubts in the enforcement process. Therefore, regulatory reform is needed in the form of cross-institutional SOPs and strengthening of implementing regulations to ensure that every operational action has clear, effective, and accountable legal legitimacy.
PERAN BRIMOB POLRI DALAM PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA TERORISME (Studi Kasus Satuan Brimob Polda Sumatera Utara) Noviara Aji Sasongko
NERACA KEADILAN Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): NERACA KEADILAN FUTURE ISSUE
Publisher : YAPEKAM

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Terorism merupakan ancaman luar biasa yang mengancam stabilitas nasional dan keselamatan publik. Di Indonesia, aksi-aksi terror terus menunjukkan kompleksitas yang meningkat, mulai dari serangan bersenjata hingga penggunaan teknologi digital dalam penyebaran paham radikal. Dalam menghadapi dinamika ini, Korps Brigade Mobil (Brimob) sebagai satuan elit Polri memegang peranan penting dalam penegakan hukum terhadap tindak pidana terorisme, khususnya melalui Tindakan represif, preventif, dan pemulihan situasi pasca-teror. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis secara mendalam peran Satuan Brimob Polda Sumatera Utara dalam penegakan hukum terhadap tindak pidana terorisme. Adapun focus utama penelitian meliputi: (1) bentuk operasional yang dijalankan Brimob dalam menangani kasus terorisme, (2) hambatan yang dihadapi dalam pelaksanaan tugas, dan (3) evaluasiatas efektivitas Kerjasama lintas sectoral dalam mendukung tugas-tugas Brimob. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Brimob Polda Sumatera Utara telah berperan aktif dalam berbagai operasi kontra-terorisme, termasuk pengamanan objek vital, penyergapan pelaku, evakuasi korban, serta pemulihan kondisisosial pasca-serangan. Keberhasilan tersebut ditopang oleh kompetensi personel, perlengkapan modern, dan sinergiantar lembaga. Namun, kendala yang dihadapi mencakup keterbatasan anggaran, tumpengtindih kewenangan, serta ancaman digital yang kian meningkat. Oleh karena itu, peningkatan kapasitas SDM, modernisasi teknologi, dan reformasi tata Kelola keamanan menjadi halkrusial untuk memperkuat peran Brimob di masa depan.