cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Muh. Ali Masnun
Contact Email
alimasnun@unesa.ac.id
Phone
+628563680211
Journal Mail Official
ijalgov@unesa.ac.id
Editorial Address
Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Surabaya Jl. Ketintang Gedung F01.02.04, Ketintang, Gayungan, Kota SBY, Jawa Timur 60231
Location
Kota surabaya,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
indonesian Journal of Administrative Law and Local Government (IJALGOV)
Published by Universitas Negeri Surabaya
ISSN : -     EISSN : 30908965     DOI : https://doi.org/10.26740/ijalgov
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Indonesian Journal of Administrative Law and Local Government is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes scholarly works focusing on the development, application, and critical especially evaluation of administrative law and local governance, particularly within the Indonesian context but also welcoming comparative and international perspectives. The journal covers a broad range of topics, including but not limited to: 1. Theories and principles of administrative law 2. Governance, rule of law, and administrative justice 3. Discretion, accountability, and oversight in public administration 4. Administrative courts and resolution of public law disputes 5. Decentralization, regional autonomy, and intergovernmental relations 6. Legal frameworks for local government and public institutions 7. Policy-making, regulation, and administrative discretion at the local level 8. Bureaucratic reform and innovations in local governance 9. Public service delivery and local government performance 10Legal review and evaluation of regional public policies This journal accepts original research articles, normative legal analyses, case studies, and critical reviews that contribute to academic and practical discourse on administrative law and the dynamics of local government. Contributions from interdisciplinary approaches that intersect with law, politics, and public administration are also encouraged.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Ilmu Sosial (Lain-Lain)
Articles 24 Documents
 1   2   3 
The Analysis of the Disharmonization of Institutional Authority in Regional Financial Oversight Dhea Nisa Arinanda; Ali Masnun, Muh.; Dwiyani, Alfiani
Indonesian Journal of Administrative Law and Local Government Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT (IJALGOV)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/ijalgov.v2i2.51343

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the disharmonization of institutional authority in regional financial supervision and its implications for the effectiveness of oversight mechanisms. In many regional governance systems, financial supervision is carried out by multiple institutions with different legal bases, mandates, and scopes of authority. However, the absence of clear coordination frameworks and the overlap of institutional functions often create disharmony in the exercise of supervisory authority. This research focuses on identifying the forms and causes of such disharmonization, particularly in relation to overlapping mandates, unclear division of responsibilities, and inconsistencies in regulatory arrangements governing regional financial supervision. Using a normative and analytical approach, this study examines relevant laws, regulations, and institutional practices that shape the structure of regional financial oversight. The findings indicate that institutional disharmonization leads to fragmented supervision, duplication of control functions, and gaps in monitoring processes, which ultimately weaken the effectiveness of regional financial supervision. In addition, disharmonized authority tends to create uncertainty among supervisory institutions, reduce institutional accountability, and limit the ability of oversight bodies to respond effectively to financial irregularities. This condition also undermines the consistency of supervisory standards and weakens the overall integrity of the regional financial management system. The study concludes that institutional harmonization is essential to strengthen regional financial supervision, requiring clearer legal frameworks, precise delineation of authority, and improved coordination among supervisory institutions. Addressing institutional disharmonization is therefore a key prerequisite for enhancing the effectiveness and coherence of regional financial oversight. Keywords: Disharmonization, Authority, Oversight, Governance, Regional Finance
Reformulating the Legal and Institutional Mandate of BNPB in Disaster Mitigation Policy Ellectrananda Anugerah Ash-shidiqqi; Rindia Fanny Kusumaningtyas; Mutiara Dwi Sari
Indonesian Journal of Administrative Law and Local Government Vol. 2 No. 01 (2025): INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT (IJALGOV)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/ijalgov.v2i01.46925

Abstract

Disaster mitigation in Indonesia requires a coherent and adaptive institutional framework capable of addressing the country’s high vulnerability to natural hazards. The National Disaster Management Agency (BNPB), as the central authority for disaster management, faces persistent challenges in coordination, regulatory fragmentation, and institutional rigidity that undermine its capacity for effective mitigation. This article examines the need to reconstruct the legal and institutional architecture of BNPB to strengthen its preventive and risk reduction functions. Using a qualitative juridical-normative approach combined with policy analysis, the study explores the alignment between existing disaster laws, decentralization policies, and international disaster governance standards such as the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction. The findings reveal that BNPB’s current legal mandate remains overly response-oriented, lacking clear authority and integration mechanisms with regional disaster agencies (BPBD) and sectoral institutions. Therefore, the paper proposes a reconstruction model emphasizing legal harmonization, institutional redesign, and collaborative governance among central and local actors. Such a transformation is expected to shift BNPB’s paradigm from reactive disaster response toward proactive, community-based, and sustainable disaster mitigation—anchored in legal certainty, institutional accountability, and resilience-oriented policy coherence.
Legal Problem of the Merah Putih Cooperativ Muhammad Alif Fauzi Fauzi; Muh. Ali Masnun; Ainun Najwa
Indonesian Journal of Administrative Law and Local Government Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT (IJALGOV)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/ijalgov.v3i4.54653

Abstract

The Merah Putih Cooperative is a government program aimed at strengthening the village economy through cooperative institutions based on economic democracy and family principles. This study aims to analyze the legal basis for the establishment of the Merah Putih Cooperative, the legal challenges in its implementation, and the potential criminal risks for cooperative managers. The study uses a normative juridical method with a statutory, conceptual, and analytical approach. The results show that the establishment of the cooperative based solely on Presidential Instruction Number 9 of 2025 does not meet the legality principles of state administrative law, thus creating legal uncertainty. In addition, there is overlapping function between the cooperative and the Village-Owned Enterprises (BUMDes), which causes institutional conflict at the village level. Weak internal oversight and low capacity of cooperative managers also increase the potential for misuse of funds, corruption, and other legal violations. Therefore, strengthening formal regulations, harmonizing village institutions, and improving cooperative governance are needed so that the Merah Putih Cooperative program can run transparently, democratically, and sustainably.
Government Versus Lex Sportiva: Government Authority in Accelerating the Development of National Football Dicky Eko Prasetio; Tri Nurhidayat
Indonesian Journal of Administrative Law and Local Government Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT (IJALGOV)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the government's authority in accelerating the development of national football and its alignment with the transnational principle of lex sportiva, which emphasizes the independence and autonomy of sports organizations. This issue is important because the policy for accelerating the development of national football, regulated by Presidential Instruction Number 3 of 2019 and the Regulation of the Coordinating Minister for Human Development and Culture Number 1 of 2020, creates a potential normative conflict between the authority of the government as the organizer of governance and the authority of the All-Indonesian Football Association (PSSI) as the national football governing body. This research uses the normative legal research method with a regulatory approach and a conceptual approach. The research results show that the government has the authority to play a role in the development of football as a manifestation of the welfare state thru policy formulation, budget allocation, infrastructure development, human resource development, and law enforcement. However, the regulations in Presidential Instruction Number 3 of 2019 and Coordinating Minister for Human Development and Culture Regulation Number 1 of 2020 indicate a tendency to take over the strategic functions of the federation thru top-down coordination and control mechanisms, which potentially contradict the independence and autonomy aspects of sports organizations that are the foundation of the lex sportiva principle. This research argues that the development of national football should be carried out thru a balanced partnership model between the government and PSSI, with a clear division of authority between the public aspects that fall under the domain of the state and the technical aspects of sports that fall under the authority of the federation. The recommendation of this research is the need to establish a Presidential Regulation on the Acceleration of National Football Development, which provides legal certainty regarding the boundaries of authority between the government and PSSI, prevents overlapping authority, and ensures the harmonization between national law and lex sportiva in order to realize a professional, sustainable, and internationally competitive national football governance.

Page 3 of 3 | Total Record : 24

 1   2   3 

Filter by Year

2024 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT (IJALGOV) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT (IJALGOV) Vol. 2 No. 01 (2025): INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT (IJALGOV) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT (IJALGOV) Vol. 1 No. 02 (2024): INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT (IJALGOV) Vol. 1 No. 01 (2024): INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT (IJALGOV)