cover
Contact Name
Junaidi
Contact Email
jurnallexlibrum@gmail.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
jurnallexlibrum@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jln. Kol. H. Animan Achad (d/h Jln. Sukabangun II) KM. 6.5 Lr. Suka Pandai No. 1610. Palembang, Indonesia.
Location
Kota palembang,
Sumatera selatan
INDONESIA
Lex Librum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
ISSN : -     EISSN : 26219867     DOI : https://doi.org/10.46839/lljih
Published by the Palembang Youth Pledge College of Law (STIHPADA) which aims to be academic media for discussing legal science issues. Contains scientific writing, summaries of research results, book reviews, and ideas. The editorial team invites lecturers, experts, students, practitioners and the public who are interested in expressing their thoughts into scientific writing. Publishing schedule 2 (two) times year in June and December. Submissions must be guided by scientific writing methods and writing instructions as attached.
Articles 12 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol. 12 No. 1 (2025)" : 12 Documents clear
PERKEMBANGAN ILMU PENGETAHUAN DAN TEKNOLOGI TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA CYBER CRIME PHISING DI INDONESIA AZ, Mutiara; Samawati, Putu
Lex Librum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 12 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The development of the internet has enabled the unlimited exchange of information, but it has also given rise to new forms of crime such as phishing. This study uses a normative legal method to analyse phishing as a cybercrime that utilises email, social media, and malicious software to obtain personal or financial data illegally. Technological advances have expanded the modes of phishing and increased its vulnerability. Countermeasures are carried out through relevant provisions of the Criminal Code, such as Article 362 on Theft, Article 378 on Fraud, and Article 263 on Identity Fraud. More specific regulations are contained in Law No. 11 of 2008 in conjunction with Law No. 19 of 2016 on ITE, particularly Articles 27–37 concerning prohibited acts and Articles 45–52 concerning criminal sanctions, with the threat of imprisonment for up to twelve years and a maximum fine of Rp2 billion
Wanprestasi Pinjaman Kredit antara PT. Trust Finance Indonesia dengan PT. Bunga Daru (Studi Putusan Nomor 378/Pdt.G/2024/PN Jkt.Pst) Maharani, Aurelia Gisa; Pongsirinding, Fisa Ande; Putri, Rafirstka Madyah; Garanta, Sandriani
Lex Librum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 12 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46839/lljih.v12i1.1128

Abstract

A breach of contract occurs when one of the parties to an agreement fails to carry out their end of the agreement they made. This infraction could be the consequence of negligence, a delay, or a substantive breach of the contract that affects the other party. This study aims to examine the types of contract violations in investment financing for sale-purchase and leaseback agreements, the factors the court considers when rendering a decision, and the resulting legal consequences for the parties involved in the dispute. In this study, a normative juridical approach is taken. This approach includes examining relevant laws and regulations, literature evaluations, and judicial rulings. According to the study's findings, PT. Bunga Daru, the defendant in this case, was found to have violated the terms of the contract by neglecting to make the agreed-upon installment payments for the car loan. The plaintiff’s evidence, which included the defendant’s past late payments and lack of good faith in paying the outstanding debt, was taken into consideration by the panel of judges. The court’s decision mandated that the defendant pay IDR 188,609,521.00 (one hundred eighty-eight million six hundred nine thousand five hundred twenty-one rupiahs) in fines and the remaining loan balance. To ensure the ruling’s enforcement, the court also ordered a security seizure of the car offered as collateral. However, the judges denied the plaintiff’s request for an immediate implementation of the ruling (uitvoerbaar bij voorraad) and a coercive monetary penalty (dwangsom). The court reasoned that the decision must be carried out in accordance with the relevant legal procedures without subjecting the defendant to more pressure.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 12