cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Adam Mudinillah
Contact Email
adammudinillah@staialhikmahpariangan.ac.id
Phone
+6285379388533
Journal Mail Official
adammudinillah@staialhikmahpariangan.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jorong Kubang Kaciak Dusun Kubang Kaciak, Kelurahan Balai Tangah, Kecamatan Lintau Buo Utara, Kabupaten Tanah Datar, Provinsi Sumatera Barat, Kodepos 27293.
Location
Kab. tanah datar,
Sumatera barat
INDONESIA
Cognitionis Civitatis et Politicae
Published by Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi
ISSN : 30482291     EISSN : 30481929     DOI : 10.70177/politicae
Core Subject : Social,
Social Sciences
Cognitionis Civitatis et Politicae is an international forum for the publication of peer-reviewed integrative review articles, special thematic issues, reflections or comments on previous research or new research directions, interviews, replications, and intervention articles - all pertaining to the research fields of Social Science and Political Science research. All publications provide breadth of coverage appropriate to a wide readership in Social Science and Political Science research depth to inform specialists in that area. We feel that the rapidly growing Cognitionis Civitatis et Politicae community is looking for a journal with this profile that we can achieve together. Submitted papers must be written in English for initial review stage by editors and further review process by minimum two international reviewers.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Ilmu Politik dan Hubungan Internasional
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 2 No. 5 (2025)" : 5 Documents clear
DECENTRALIZATION AND REGIONAL AUTONOMY: AN ANALYSIS OF PUBLIC SERVICE DISPARITIES AND GOVERNANCE CHALLENGES ACROSS INDONESIAN PROVINCES Kanoa, Jacob; Reit, Anna; Kintomw, Mike
Cognitionis Civitatis et Politicae Vol. 2 No. 5 (2025)
Publisher : Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/politicae.v2i5.3139

Abstract

Indonesia’s decentralization and regional autonomy reforms, implemented in the early 2000s, aimed to enhance local governance and improve public services. However, these reforms have led to varying outcomes across Indonesia’s provinces, with significant disparities in the quality and accessibility of public services. This study investigates how decentralization has influenced public service delivery and governance challenges in different regions, highlighting the uneven impacts of these reforms. This research aims to analyze the disparities in public service delivery across Indonesian provinces and the governance challenges resulting from the decentralization process. The study seeks to understand the factors contributing to these disparities and their implications for regional development and equity in public service provision. A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining quantitative data analysis from national and regional reports with qualitative interviews with local government officials and community leaders. The study examines key indicators of public service performance, such as healthcare, education, and infrastructure, across various provinces. The study reveals significant disparities in public service delivery, with wealthier and more urbanized provinces exhibiting better outcomes. Meanwhile, poorer and more remote regions face challenges in governance capacity and resource allocation, leading to uneven public service provision. The decentralization process in Indonesia has had mixed results, with regional autonomy contributing to greater governance flexibility but also deepening disparities in public service quality. Further reforms are necessary to address these inequities and strengthen local governance capabilities.
REFORMING THE BUREAUCRACY: A STUDY OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REFORMS AND THEIR IMPACT ON CORRUPTION AND SERVICE QUALITY Mohammad Habibi; Ngirabong, John; Kintomw, Monica; Rechab, Timothy
Cognitionis Civitatis et Politicae Vol. 2 No. 5 (2025)
Publisher : Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/politicae.v2i5.3140

Abstract

Pervasive issues of corruption and inadequate service delivery remain significant challenges in public administration globally, undermining public trust and hindering development. While many nations have initiated comprehensive bureaucratic reforms, their efficacy requires rigorous empirical assessment. This study aims to analyze the impact of specific public administration reforms focusing on transparency, accountability, and performance management on levels of corruption and the quality of public service delivery. A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining quantitative analysis of panel data from 20 countries over a 10-year period with in-depth qualitative case studies of two reformed public agencies. The findings indicate that reforms implementing e-governance and open data policies have a statistically significant negative correlation with corruption. Performance-based management systems were strongly associated with improved service quality metrics. However, the case studies revealed that the success of these reforms is significantly mediated by strong political leadership and the capacity to overcome institutional resistance. The study concludes that while structural reforms are effective tools, their success is contingent upon a supportive political and institutional environment, suggesting a need for context-sensitive implementation.
THE SOCIAL ECONOMICS OF UNIVERSAL HEALTH COVERAGE (BPJS KESEHATAN): A STUDY OF ITS IMPACT ON SOCIAL WELFARE AND HEALTHCARE EQUITY Lefèvre, Pierre; Dubois, Marie; Moreau, Antoine
Cognitionis Civitatis et Politicae Vol. 2 No. 5 (2025)
Publisher : Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/politicae.v2i5.3141

Abstract

Indonesia’s implementation of Universal Health Coverage (UHC) through the BPJS Kesehatan program has been a significant step toward improving public access to healthcare. The program was designed to address long-standing issues of inequality and inaccessibility in healthcare services. However, its impact on social welfare and healthcare equity remains a topic of ongoing debate, particularly regarding its effectiveness in reducing healthcare disparities across different socio-economic groups. This study aims to analyze the social and economic impacts of BPJS Kesehatan, focusing on its contribution to social welfare and its role in promoting healthcare equity. Specifically, it examines whether the program has achieved its goals of improving healthcare access for marginalized populations and reducing financial barriers to healthcare. A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining quantitative analysis of healthcare utilization data and qualitative interviews with beneficiaries, healthcare providers, and policymakers. The study evaluates the financial sustainability of the program, its reach among low-income populations, and its effects on health outcomes. The results indicate that BPJS Kesehatan has increased healthcare access, particularly for low-income groups, but challenges remain in ensuring equitable service quality and financial sustainability. While healthcare utilization has risen, disparities in service delivery persist, particularly in rural areas. BPJS Kesehatan has made notable strides in improving healthcare access and equity, but further reforms are needed to address ongoing challenges in service quality, financial sustainability, and regional disparities.
INDONESIA’S MIDDLE POWER DIPLOMACY: AN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS ANALYSIS OF ITS STRATEGIC ROLE WITHIN ASEAN AND THE G20 Kakala, Sione; Fangatapu, Luisa; Waluyo, Bambang Dwi; Tupuola, Toka
Cognitionis Civitatis et Politicae Vol. 2 No. 5 (2025)
Publisher : Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/politicae.v2i5.3142

Abstract

As a middle power in international relations, Indonesia plays a pivotal role in shaping regional and global affairs, particularly within ASEAN and the G20 frameworks. Over the past decades, Indonesia has strategically positioned itself as a key diplomatic player, balancing its national interests with broader global goals. Its diplomatic actions, especially in these multilateral forums, reflect a combination of soft power and pragmatic policies that aim to maintain stability and foster economic development in Southeast Asia. This study examines Indonesia’s middle power diplomacy, focusing on its strategic role within ASEAN and the G20. It aims to assess how Indonesia uses its diplomatic leverage to influence regional security, economic cooperation, and global governance. The research also explores the challenges and opportunities that Indonesia faces in navigating these two influential organizations. A qualitative approach is employed, utilizing content analysis of official government documents, speeches by key diplomats, and relevant academic literature. Additionally, interviews with policymakers and regional experts provide insights into Indonesia’s diplomatic strategies and objectives. The study finds that Indonesia’s middle power diplomacy is characterized by active engagement, mediation, and consensus-building, which enhances its influence within ASEAN and the G20. Indonesia’s ability to bridge gaps between major powers has solidified its role as a key regional leader. Indonesia’s diplomatic strategy in ASEAN and the G20 highlights its importance as a stabilizing force in both regional and global contexts. Its middle power approach allows Indonesia to shape discussions on global governance, economic development, and security.
A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ANTI-CORRUPTION INSTITUTIONS: THE CASE OF INDONESIA’S KPK AND SOUTH KOREA’S KICAC Santi, Luca; Rossi, Martina; Lazzari, Giuseppe
Cognitionis Civitatis et Politicae Vol. 2 No. 5 (2025)
Publisher : Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/politicae.v2i5.3143

Abstract

The establishment of independent anti-corruption agencies (ACAs) is a primary global strategy for combating systemic corruption. Indonesia’s Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) and South Korea’s former Korea Independent Commission Against Corruption (KICAC) represent two prominent yet divergent models in Asia, both emerging from post-authoritarian transitions. Understanding their distinct institutional trajectories provides crucial insights into the dynamics of anti-corruption reform. This study conducts a comparative analysis of the institutional design, operational effectiveness, and political resilience of the KPK and KICAC to identify the determinant factors shaping their successes and challenges in fulfilling their mandates. A qualitative comparative case study approach was employed, analyzing foundational legal documents, official institutional reports, scholarly articles, and reputable media archives. The analysis focused on key variables including legal powers, degree of independence, resource allocation, and the prevailing socio-political contexts in which each agency operated. The findings indicate that the KPK’s comprehensive mandate, which includes investigative and prosecutorial powers, allowed for more high-profile enforcement actions compared to KICAC’s primary focus on prevention and policy coordination. However, this enforcement power also made the KPK a target of sustained political resistance, while KICAC faced challenges of relevance that eventually led to its institutional merger. The long-term success of an ACA depends not only on a robust legal mandate but, more critically, on sustained political support and strong institutional defenses against political co-optation. The divergent experiences of the KPK and KICAC offer vital lessons for designing and safeguarding effective anti-corruption institutions worldwide.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2025 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026) Vol. 2 No. 6 (2025) Vol. 2 No. 5 (2025) Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 1 No. 6 (2024) Vol. 1 No. 5 (2024) Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024) Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024) More Issue