cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
ulj.journal@mail.unnes.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
ulj.journal@mail.unnes.ac.id
Editorial Address
Sekaran, Kec. Gn. Pati, Kota Semarang, Jawa Tengah 50229
Location
Kota semarang,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Unnes Law Journal : Jurnal Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang
Published by Universitas Negeri Semarang
ISSN : -     EISSN : 27224503     DOI : https://doi.org/10.15294/ulj
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
The Unnes Law Journal is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that publishes high-quality research on Indonesian law and its interaction with regional and global legal developments. Established in 2012, the Journal aims to advance rigorous legal scholarship and promote evidence-based discourse on law, justice, and governance.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 133 Documents
 10   11   12   13   14 
Children Abandoning Parents: What about Legal Sanctions? Yunanda Rahma Putri
Unnes Law Journal Vol. 5 No. 1 (2019): April, 2019
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ulj.v4i1.48278

Abstract

Obligations of care to parents from adult children (alimony) is an obligation of every child that should not be overlooked. If obligations are not complete with good cause neglected elderly. Surely such neglect will result in the emergence of a sanction for the child. However, the presence of sanctions for the actions of his apathetic children has not been widely known by the community . The neglected elderly people will be accommodated by the government in unit pelayanan lanjut usia, the government should guarantee economic security. In addition to the welfare of neglected elderly there are other important things that the government should take note that the protection of the elderly from wrong actions and arbitrary. The results showed that alimony obligation towards the parents of a child in Unit Pelayanan Sosial Lanjut Usia Wening Wardoyo Kabupaten Semarang has not met considering all the necessaries of life of beneficiaries has been borne by the government. For beneficiaries who still have children who are actually capable but abandoned that get into the unit should be subject to sanctions which can be a verdict asking the child to care for and maintain it self as a civil, ostracized, ridiculed and denounced by relatives in customary law and gets the barrier great to enter the gates of heaven in Islamic law, legal protection and welfare of beneficiaries in Unit Pelayanan Lanjut Usia Sosial Wening Wardoyo Kabupaten semarang have met with both proven by the various services and facilities received by the beneficiaries.
Non-Penal Conflict Resolution and Islamic Legal Culture: Evidence from Sunni–Shia in Indonesia Muwaffiq Jufri; Paul Atagamen Aidonojie; Ousu Mendy; Ebrima Sarr; Raphael Daoud Jackson-Ortiz
Unnes Law Journal Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): May, 2026
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ulj.v12i1.48337

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the potential success of a religion-based conflict-resolution approach grounded in non-penal policies of Islamic legal culture. The use of this method is important for resolving the Sunni-Shia conflict in Sampang Regency. This study contributes to the development of guidelines for regional governments on the use of non-legal policies to resolve religious conflicts. This study uses empirical legal research methods with a socio-legal and anthropo-legal approach. The findings of this study reveal that penal policies for conflict resolution are ineffective in resolving conflicts quickly and only perpetuate stigma regarding which religious sects are right and which are heretical. This study also reveals that, when attempting to resolve and prevent disputes, non-penal methods grounded in Islamic legal culture are more effective in resolving religious conflicts more quickly and peacefully, with a familial approach, while avoiding violent means in resolving religious sectarian differences. This study concludes that the non-penal approach should be strengthened by assigning a role to local actors within the Madurese tradition to conduct the resolution process, so that former Shia followers, who are still being rejected, can be appropriately addressed. This study recommends that the government adopt a non-penal approach to facilitate the immediate completion of the post-conflict reconciliation and reconstruction process.
Bank Trademark Protection in the Digital Era: Comparative Study of Indonesia, United States, Oman Anak Agung Ayu Ngurah Sri Rahayu Gorda; I Gede Agus Kurniawan; Putu Aras Samsithawrati; Princess Alyssa D. Tee-Anastacio; Musallam Al Awaid
Unnes Law Journal Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): May, 2026
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ulj.v12i1.48344

Abstract

This article examines the protection of bank trademarks in Indonesia, the United States, and Oman, representing Civil Law, Common Law, and a mixed civil–Sharia–GCC legal system respectively. It addresses two main questions: how differences in legal traditions shape the regulation and enforcement of bank trademarks in the digital era, and what model of protection can be formulated to make such protection more adaptive to technology‑based infringements while reinforcing depositor trust. Using a normative legal method with statute and comparative approaches, the study analyzes national trademark and banking regulations, international instruments such as TRIPS and the Madrid Protocol, GCC trademark rules, and relevant case law, interpreted through Lawrence M. Friedman’s legal system theory (structure, substance, and legal culture). The findings show that the United States provides the most advanced protection for bank trademarks through the combination of the Lanham Act, doctrines of likelihood of confusion and dilution, specific tools such as the ACPA and UDRP, and strong coordination with financial regulators. Indonesia and Oman have aligned their substantive rules with international standards, but face structural and cultural constraints, including fragmented inter‑agency coordination, the absence of fast‑track and online dispute resolution mechanisms for digital disputes, and limited institutional capacity. The article proposes a hybrid, trust‑centred model for Indonesia that strengthens substantive norms on bank trademarks, institutional coordination between IP, financial, and digital regulators, and rapid procedures for digital enforcement, while embedding consumer protection, good faith, and amanah as guiding principles.

Page 14 of 14 | Total Record : 133

 10   11   12   13   14 

Filter by Year

2012 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): May, 2026 Vol. 11 No. 2 (2025): October, 2025 Vol. 11 No. 1 (2025): April, 2025 Vol. 10 No. 2 (2024): October, 2024 Vol. 10 No. 1 (2024): April, 2024 Vol. 9 No. 2 (2023): October, 2023 Vol. 9 No. 1 (2023): April, 2023 Vol. 8 No. 2 (2022): October, 2022 Vol. 8 No. 1 (2022): April, 2022 Vol. 7 No. 2 (2021): October, 2021 Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021): April, 2021 Vol. 6 No. 2 (2020): October, 2020 Vol. 6 No. 1 (2020): April, 2020 Vol. 5 No. 2 (2019): October, 2019 Vol. 5 No. 1 (2019): April, 2019 Vol. 1 No. 2 (2012): October, 2012 Vol. 1 No. 1 (2012): April, 2012 More Issue