Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 33 Documents
Search

KETENTUAN HAK CIPTA BERKAITAN DENGAN PEMBAYARAN ROYALTI ATAS PEMANFAATAN CIPTAAN LAGU SECARA KOMERSIAL PADA RESTORAN/CAFÉ DI DAERAH PARIWISATA JIMBARAN BALI N.K.S. Dharmawan; P.T.C. Landra; I.W. Wiryawan; I.N. Bagiastra; P.A. Samsithawrati
Buletin Udayana Mengabdi Vol 16 No 1 (2017)
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (139.665 KB)

Abstract

Lagu-lagu yang digunakan secara komersial di restoran atau kafe tanpa izin dari pencipta dikategorikan sebagai melanggar hak cipta sesuai dengan Pasal 1, 4 sampai 9 Undang-Undang Nomor 28 tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta (UU Hak Cipta Indonesia). Namun, penggunaan lagu secara komersial tidak dianggap sebagai pelanggaran Hak Cipta asalkan pengguna memenuhi kewajiban mereka berdasarkan perjanjian dengan Lembaga Manajemen Kolektif (LMK) untuk membayar lagu royalti berdasarkan Pasal 87 (4) UU Hak Cipta Indonesia. Namun demikian, keberadaan lembaga ini tidak diketahui secara luas oleh pengusaha masyarakat (restoran dan kafe pemilik) di kawasan wisata Jimbaran-Kedonganan Bali. Tujuan dari sosialisasi ini adalah untuk memberikan pemahaman tentang perlindungan hak cipta lagu, pentingnya kewajiban membayar royalti oleh pengguna melalui LMK dan untuk mencegah dan meminimalkan kasus pelanggaran Hak Cipta. Metode yang digunakan dalam diseminasi ini dengan pemberian kuliah singkat dan diskusi mendalam untuk meningkatkan keasadaran mereka terkait hak cipta lagu dan melakukan distribusi UU Hak Cipta Indonesia. Diseminasi berhasil diselenggarakan di Kedonganan pada 21 21 Juni 2016 dan di Jimbaran pada 4 Agustus 2016, para peserta sangat antusias karena materi yang disampaikan hal yang baru dan berguna untuk kegiatan bisnis sehari-hari mereka.
PENJABARAN STANDAR INTERNASIONAL TRIMS DAN OECD DALAM KETENTUAN HUKUM PENANAMAN MODAL INDONESIA Ni Ketut Supasti Dharmawan; Putu Tuni Caka Bawa Landra; Putu Aras Samsithawrati
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 4 No 3 (2015)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (395.223 KB) | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2015.v04.i03.p11

Abstract

As a member of the WTO-TRIMs Agreement basically Indonesia has stipulated the NationalTreatment Principle to the legal provisions relating to investment activities. However, theIndonesian investment Law (Law No. 25 of 2007) still remains that the regulation of NationalTreatment with regard to national interests. In order to the difficulties may exist in domesticlevel such as the social, economic as well as values may be different in some member countries,the WTO-TRIMs provide exceptions for the member with notify mandatory requirement tothe Board of TRIMs. Relating to investment activities other International standards alsorelevant to study is the GCG principles developed by the OECD. Although Indonesia is notOECD member countries, the GCG principles adopted in various Indonesian laws relatedto investment activities doe to it relevant and harmony to the economic, social as well ascommunity values in order to develop capital investment.
PERUSAHAAN DAN KONSERVASI KEANEKARAGAMAN HAYATI LAUT: THE RIGHT TO TOURISM vs SUSTAINABLE TOURISM Ni Ketut Supasti Dharmawan; Made Sarjana; Putu Aras Samshitawrati
Masalah-Masalah Hukum Vol 46, No 2 (2017): MASALAH-MASALAH HUKUM
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (3600.109 KB) | DOI: 10.14710/mmh.46.2.2017.125-135

Abstract

Keanekaragam hayati laut dikembangkan sebagai salah satu produk dalam kegiatan kepariwisataan serta akses the right to tourism bagi wisatawan. Namun, pemenuhan hak tersebut jangan sampai  mengorbankan  sustainable tourism  bagi generasi mendatang, khususnya akses  lingkungan  sehat mata rantai ekosistem keanekaragaman hayati biota laut. Oleh karenanya, penting  mengkaji tanggungjawab perusahaan dalam usaha perlindungan dan konservasi. Metode penelitian hukum normatif digunakan untuk mengkaji Convention on Biological Diversity, UNWTO, UDHR, the GPs for Business and Human Rights, U.U. No. 5 Tahun 1990, U.U. No. 32 Tahun 2009, maupun U.U. No. 10 Tahun 2009. Perusahaan bersama dengan stakeholders lainnya bertanggungjawab mewujudkan perlindungan dan konservasi terhadap keanekaragaman biota laut.  Model Action Plans on Business and Human Rights relevan  untuk meningkatkan tanggung jawab perusahaan dalam perlindungan dan konservasi keanekaragaman hayati laut. 
Analysis of the Misuse of Legal English Terminology in Legal Scientific Work Abstracts Nyoman Satyayudha Dananjaya; Putu Ayu Asty Senja Pratiwi; Putu Aras Samsithawrati
Udayana Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Vol 2 No 1 (2018): UJoSSH, Feburary 2018
Publisher : Research and Community Services Institutes of Udayana University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (578.502 KB) | DOI: 10.24843/UJoSSH.2018.v02.i01.p01

Abstract

Scientific work in law field has its own characteristics, including the legal English terminology. Legal English is actually slightly different with general English. Nowadays, there are lots of inappropriate process of language transfer from Bahasa to English can be found especially in abstract, as part of the scientific work related to law field. Thus, such issue will affect the abstract validity as a representation of the contents of the scientific work as a whole. This study used an empirical juridical approach which employed non-probability sampling technique and qualitative descriptive analyses. The results show that the misuse of legal English terminology towards abstract of legal, scientific works may occur due to word-for-word translation, free translation, and literal translation. Based on empirical research, such misuse occurred due to the use of online translation engine which mostly caused by the ignorance of abstract’s authors on the structure of standard academic writing (S- P-O)in the source language and asking help from colleagues who mostly do not have legal background and has minimum knowledge of legal English terminology.
The Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: National Action Plans Toward Corporation Responsibility Ni Ketut Supasti Dharmawan; Desak Putu Dewi Kasih; I Gede Agus Kurniawan; Putu Aras Samsithawrati
Hasanuddin Law Review VOLUME 4 ISSUE 2, AUGUST 2018
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (604.642 KB) | DOI: 10.20956/halrev.v4i2.1480

Abstract

As a global principal, corporations have the obligation to comply with national and international hard law of human rights, respect soft laws and global standards. The United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (GPs) of 2011 were unanimously endorsed by the Human Rights Council and are respected as a global standard that stipulates that corporations should respect human rights when conducting their business activities. The purpose of this paper is to examine the scope and focus of National Action Plans (NAPs) by comparing the Netherlands NAP on Human Rights (2013) is compared to the UK’s updated NAP of 2016 with the aim of providing ideas and good examples of a NAP for Indonesia. This study used normative legal method. It is considered to be a valuable lesson both for developed and developing countries that for practical matters it is highly important to create and implement a NAP for the implementation of the GPs. Fortunately, Indonesia in June 2017 has launched a National Action Plan on Business and Human Rights (NAP). The burden responsibility to carry out the NAP on Business and Human Rights to corporation to be implemented strongly rests on the government authorities both central government and all levels authorities, including the local level, have the duty to implement human rights obligation, including to convince corporations that upholding the GPs will ultimately be to their benefit.
The Role of Human Rights and Customary Law to Prevent Early Childhood Marriage in Indonesia Anak Agung Istri Ari Atu Dewi; Ni Ketut Supasti Dharmawan; Anak Agung Istri Eka Krisnayanti; Putu Aras Samsithawrati; I Gede Agus Kurniawan
Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 6 Issue 2, July 2022
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol6.Iss2.1885.pp268-285

Abstract

Preventing early childhood marriage (ECM) can protect children’s rights from the perspective of human rights. There are several rules regarding the age limit for marriage. In Indonesia, the minimum age for marriage is nineteen years. However, in fact, early child marriage is still relatively high, with the seventh highest ranking in the world. This study aims to elaborate on the rights of children, which ECM potentially violates, and to identify who is responsible for minimizing and/or combating this phenomenon. This normative legal research with a human rights approach occurs in the childhood protection context. The results show that ECM has implications for violations against the right to life, the right to education, the right to develop, and the right to health. Thus, more stringently applying international and national law and combining with local wisdom (Balinese Customary Law) in protecting children's rights in the context of preventing ECM can prevent ECM effectively and minimize violations of other children's rights. Moreover, it is believed that the responsibility to reduce and combat ECM not only belongs to the government but also to all stakeholders within the community, such as families, academics, the media, non-profit organizations, entrepreneurs, and customary.
Perlindungan Karya Cipta Video Dalam Rangka Proses Pembelajaran Online: Perspektif Hak Ekslusif Pencipta Rafika Amalia; Putu Aras Samsithawrati
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 11 No 3 (2022)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i03.p05

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the regulation on the ownership of the exclusive right of a video, as copyright work, created by scholars in the online learning process and its protection system. This study uses a normative legal research method with the statute as well as analytical and conceptual approaches. The results indicate that normatively the video created by scholars in online learning is not included under the scope of Articles 35 and 36 Law 28,2014 (Copyright Law). However, if the video created by the scholar is the result of an assignment in online learning under the leadership and supervision that involves a process of guidance, direction, or correction from the person who designed and assigned it (lecturer), it can be interpreted that the video meets the criteria of Article Copyright Law, where the Author is the person who designed the work, in this case, the lecturer. Meanwhile if the video (created from the assignment in the online learning process) aims to increase the creativity and thought of the scholars and where the originality and ideas are entirely the results of the intellectual creativity of the scholars, it can be interpreted as fall under Article 1(2) Copyright Law. Thus, the scholars can be considered the Author who has exclusive rights to the video. The copyright protection system adheres to an automatic protection system, where recording is not an obligation but it is important to implement it. Tujuan dari penelitian ini untuk menganalisis pengaturan kepemilikan hak eksklusif atas karya cipta video yang dihasilkan para penstudi dalam proses pembelajaran daring dan sistem perlindungannya. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan Perundang-Undangan dan Analisis Konsep Hukum. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa secara normatif, karya cipta video yang dihasilkan para penstudi dalam proses pembelajaran daring tidak termasuk dalam lingkup Pasal 35 dan 36 Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 (UUHC). Namun, jika video yang dibuat penstudi tersebut dihasilkan dari suatu penugasan pembelajaran daring di bawah pimpinan dan pengawasan yang melibatkan proses bimbingan, pengarahan, ataupun koreksi dari orang yang merancang sekaligus menugaskan (dosen) maka dapat ditafsirkan karya cipta video itu memenuhi kriteria Pasal 34 UUHC dimana Pencipta adalah orang yang merancang Ciptaan, dalam hal ini dosen. Sedangkan jika video yang dihasilkan dari penugasan dalam proses pembelajaran daring untuk meningkatkan kreatifitas dan olah pikir para penstudi dimana originalitas dan idenya adalah seutuhnya hasil kreatifitas intelektual penstudi maka dapat ditafsirkan memenuhi unsur Pasal 1(2) UUHC. Dengan demikian Penstudi dapat dianggap sebagai Pencipta yang memiliki hak eksklusif atas video tersebut. Sistem perlindungan hak cipta menganut automatically protection system, dimana pencatatan bukanlah kewajiban namun penting untuk dilakukan.
Omed-Omedan as a Traditional Cultural Expression: Legal Protection of a Communal Intellectual Property in Indonesia Putri Triari Dwijayanthi; Putu Aras Samsithawrati; Dewa Ayu Dian Sawitri
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 11 No 4 (2022)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i04.p05

Abstract

The study was aimed to identify, analyze and elaborate the legal arrangement for communal intellectual property protection in Indonesia, including “omed-omedan”. Further, the study also examined the commercial use mechanism of Traditional Cultural Expression, including “omed-omedan”. This writing was normative legal research using statutory approach and conceptual approach. The study indicates that omed-omedan shall be protected as TCE, hence any commercial use of omed-omedan by major industries and/or foreign investors must obtain a permit and fulfill other obligations including but not limited to the distribution of benefits to customary law community in Banjar Kaja, Sesetan as the custodian.
TRANSFORMASI GOOD FAITH PRINCIPLE DALAM HUKUM PERBANKAN KHUSUSNYA BPR: PERSPEKTIF LOKAL NASIONAL DAN INTERNASIONAL Retno Murni; Ni Ketut Supasti Dharmawan; Putu Aras Samsithawrati
Arena Hukum Vol. 11 No. 3 (2018)
Publisher : Arena Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2018.01003.9

Abstract

AbstractThe Good faith principle as stated in Article 1338 paragraph (3) of the Civil Code, has not been maximally implemented in BPR credit agreements, so it is important to review the transformation of good faith principle of the Civil Code in banking provisions, especially BPR in realizing sound credit. The research uses normative juridical legal methods. The results of the study show that the transformation of the principle of good faith stated in the Civil Code has not been explicitly stated in the provisions of banking law in Indonesia. The existence of principle of good faith explicitly only exists in Article 1338 Paragraph (3) of the Civil Code. Meanwhile, in the provisions of the Banking Law the existence of the principle of good faith is only implied by the principle of economic democracy by using the precautionary principle that is applied carefully and in good faith, as well as the principles of trust and confidence in good ability, ability, intention and morals from customers or the community in returning credit. The transformation of the principle of good faith should be clearly stated in the norm structure into the Banking Law and other related banking legal provisions.AbstrakGood faith principle sebagaimana tercantum pada Pasal 1338 ayat (3) KUHPerdata, belum diimplementasikan secara maksimal dalam perjanjian kredit BPR, sehingga penting mengkaji  transformasi asas itikad baik KUH Perdata dalam ketentuan perbankan khususnya BPR  dalam  mewujudkan perkreditan yang sehat. Metode penelitian menggunakan metode penelitian hukum yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Transformasi asas itikad baik yang tercantum dalam KUHPerdata belum secara eksplisit ternormakan dalam ketentuan hukum perbankan di Indonesia. Keberadaan asas Itikad baik secara eksplisit hanya eksis dalam Pasal 1338 Ayat (3) KUHPerdata. Sementara itu, dalam ketentuan Undang-Undang Perbankan keberadaan asas itikad baik  hanya  tersirat dari asas demokrasi ekonomi  dengan menggunakan prinsip kehati-hatian yang diterapkan secara hati-hati dan itikad baik,  serta prinsip kepercayaan dan keyakinan akan kemampuan, kesanggupan, itikad serta akhlak yang baik dari nasabah atau masyarakat dalam mengembalikan kredit. Transformasi asas itikad baik sebaiknya dituangkan dalam struktur norma secara tegas ke dalam Undang-Undang Perbankan dan ketentuan hukum perbankan terkait lainnya.
Eksistensi Sanksi Administratif Bisnis Digital dalam Perspektif Economic Analysis of Law I Gede Agus Kurniawan; Putu Aras Samsithawrati; Lourenco de Deus Mau Lulo
Jurnal Ius Constituendum Vol 8, No 1 (2023): FEBRUARY
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jic.v8i1.6281

Abstract

Penelitian ini berfokus pada analisis atas isu hukum yaitu konflik aturan antara Pasal 65 ayat (6) UU Perdagangan dengan Pasal 80 PP PMSE terkait dengan sanksi administratif dalam perspektif Economic Analysis of Law (EAL). Hal ini karena dalam perspektif EAL, peran pemerintah penting sebagai regulator atas berbagai perkembangan bisnis yang ada. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan konseptual dan perundang-undangan. Hasil penelitian menegaskan bahwa problematika hukum terkait sanksi administratif dalam bisnis digital adalah adanya konflik hukum terkait sanksi administratif dalam bisnis digital yaitu sebagaimana dalam ketentuan Pasal 65 ayat (6) UU Perdagangan dengan Pasal 80 PP PMSE. Berdasarkan asas lex superior derogate legi inferior ketentuan Pasal 65 ayat (6) UU Perdagangan lah yang berlaku. Hal ini dikarenakan berdasarkan ketentuan Undang-Undang No. 12 Tahun 2011 Tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan (UU P3), maka secara hierarkis kedudukan UU Perdagangan adalah lebih tinggi dari PP PMSE. Hal ini berimplikasi bahwa setiap pelaku usaha bisnis digital yang tidak mencantumkan informasi atau data yang wajib dituangkan dalam bisnis digital sebagaimana dalam Pasal 65 ayat (4) UU Perdagangan, maka dikenakan sanksi administratif berupa pencabutan izin.   Sanksi administratif bisnis digital dalam perspektif EAL adalah tidak memenuhi aspek keberdayagunaan (utility), nilai (value), serta efisiensi (efficiency). Hal ini dikarenakan Pasal 65 ayat (6) UU Perdagangan justru menempatkan sanksi administratif berupa pencabutan izin secara langsung sebagai langkah utama, sehingga dapat berimplikasi pada iklim bisnis yang kondusif di masyarakat. Dengan demikian, mengacu pada analisis EAL maka ketentuan yang relevan adalah diberlakukannya sanksi administratif secara berjenjang sebagaimana dalam Pasal 80 PP PMSE. Oleh karena itu, ke depan perlu adanya revisi ketentuan dalam Pasal 65 ayat (6) UU Perdagangan sehingga dikonstruksikan sesuai dengan rumusan Pasal 80 PP PMSE.