cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Ariawan
Contact Email
indexsasi@apji.org
Phone
+6282250497178
Journal Mail Official
indexsasi@apji.org
Editorial Address
Jalan Achmad Nadjamuddin No 17, Kota Gorontalo
Location
Kota gorontalo,
Gorontalo
INDONESIA
Jurnal Begawan Hukum
Published by Universitas Ichsan Gorontalo
ISSN : 30310237     EISSN : 30267595     DOI : 10.62951
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Begawan Hukum (JBH) : Jurnal Begawan Hukum adalah jurnal ilmiah yang memfokuskan diri pada berbagai aspek ilmu hukum. Dengan nomor ISSN cetak: 3031-0237 dan ISSN daring: 3026-7595, jurnal ini memberikan akses terbuka kepada akademisi, peneliti, dan praktisi di seluruh dunia. Melalui platform, Jurnal Begawan Hukum memberi kesempatan bagi para penulis untuk mempublikasikan artikel penelitian mereka dalam berbagai bidang kajian ilmu hukum. Jurnal ini menjadi rumah bagi penelitian inovatif di berbagai bidang studi ilmu hukum. Menyoroti isu-isu terkini seputar hukum perdata, hukum pidana, hukum tata negara, dan hukum adat, Jurnal Begawan Hukum bertujuan untuk mendukung dan memajukan pemahaman global tentang kompleksitas hukum dalam masyarakat kontemporer. Dengan kebijakan akses terbuka, Jurnal Begawan Hukum berkomitmen untuk mendukung pertukaran pengetahuan terbuka, memfasilitasi dialog intelektual, dan mendorong penelitian yang berbasis pada hasil riset. sebagai sumber pengetahuan yang penting bagi mereka yang tertarik dalam memahami, mengkaji, dan merumuskan kebijakan dalam konteks hukum modern. Jurnal ini terbit 1 tahun 2 kali (April dan Oktober).
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 36 Documents
 1   2   3   4 
Tinjauan Hukum Pidana terhadap Kebijakan Keamanan di Perumahan Berdasarkan Peraturan Perumahan: Studi tentang Tanggung Jawab Pengelola dan Hak Warga
Jurnal Begawan Hukum (JBH) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Begawan Hukum (JBH)
Publisher : Lembaga Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Ichsan Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/jbh.v3i2.133

Abstract

Housing, as a basic human necessity, demands not only physical comfort but also assurance of safety and legal protection for its residents. In recent years, the rise in security violations within residential areas has raised serious concerns, especially regarding the authority of housing management and the frequent neglect of residents’ rights. Various security policies such as 24-hour gate security, CCTV installation, and visitor access restrictions are often enforced without a clear legal basis and without the participation of residents, thereby creating the potential for legal violations, including those related to criminal law and human rights. This study aims to analyze the forms of criminal liability that may be imposed on housing management in cases of negligence or abuse of authority in the implementation of security policies. It also examines the forms of legal protection available to residents and identifies potential criminal law violations arising from such policies. The research adopts a normative and empirical juridical approach, with a case study conducted at DL Sitorus I Housing Complex in Simalungun Regency. The results of the study show that the security policies at DL Sitorus I lack a valid internal legal foundation, were not developed through participatory means, and are not supported by standardized operating procedures (SOPs). This situation creates room for overreach by security personnel, such as arbitrary detention of visitors and unauthorized interrogations, which may violate Article 333 of the Indonesian Penal Code. Management may be held indirectly criminally liable under the principles of culpa in vigilando (negligence in supervision) and culpa in eligendo (negligence in the selection of personnel). The study recommends the formulation of internal regulations based on resident participation and the provision of legal training for security officers to ensure a fair, transparent, and legally compliant residential security system that upholds the principles of criminal law and human rights protection.
Tinjauan Hukum terhadap Efektivitas Sistem Pencatatan dan Pelaporan Barang Logistik pada Satuan Brimob Polda Sumatera Utara
Jurnal Begawan Hukum (JBH) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Begawan Hukum (JBH)
Publisher : Lembaga Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Ichsan Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/jbh.v3i2.134

Abstract

This research is motivated by the importance of an effective logistics recording and reporting system in supporting operational performance and security within the Mobile Brigade (Brimob) Unit of the North Sumatra Regional Police. Logistics items such as firearms, ammunition, and other operational equipment are classified as State-Owned Goods (BMN), which must be managed orderly, transparently, and accountably in accordance with prevailing legal provisions, such as Law No. 1 of 2004, Government Regulation No. 27 of 2014, and Police Chief Regulation No. 10 of 2011. Problems arise when the logistics system faces technical constraints, lack of personnel training, and weak oversight, which in some cases have led to the loss of strategic items such as firearms.The aim of this study is to analyze the implementation of the logistics recording and reporting system in the Brimob Unit of the North Sumatra Regional Police in accordance with legal provisions, assess its effectiveness in supporting operational duties, and identify existing challenges and improvement efforts. This research uses an empirical juridical method with a qualitative approach, through document studies and interviews with logistics and operational personnel.The research findings indicate that the recording and reporting system has been carried out in an orderly and accountable manner, utilizing both manual and digital systems in parallel. There is a strong commitment among personnel to comply with SOPs, use dual-recording as risk mitigation, and maintain regular reporting in accordance with standards. Nonetheless, challenges remain in the form of limited technological infrastructure, the need for continuous personnel training, and integration with national logistics systems. Strategic efforts have been made through capacity building, gradual digitalization, and strengthening of SOPs and internal audits. Overall, the system is considered effective in supporting the unit's tasks and reflects the principles of administrative law, namely legality, accountability, and orderly administration.
Aspek Hukum Kesiapsiagaan dan Penanganan Darurat oleh Unit Penjinakan Bom Satuan Brimob Polda Sumatera Utara dalam Perspektif Hukum Humaniter
Jurnal Begawan Hukum (JBH) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Begawan Hukum (JBH)
Publisher : Lembaga Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Ichsan Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/jbh.v3i2.135

Abstract

The threat of terrorism involving the use of explosives poses a serious challenge to Indonesia’s national security, particularly in strategic regions such as North Sumatra. The suicide bombing incident at the Medan Police Headquarters in 2018 serves as a clear example of the urgency of preparedness and emergency response by the Bomb Disposal Unit (JIBOM) of the Brimob Unit at the North Sumatra Regional Police. Handling such situations requires not only high-level technical expertise but must also adhere to the principles of International Humanitarian Law (IHL) to ensure the protection of civilians. This study aims to examine the preparedness of the JIBOM Unit, assess emergency handling procedures for explosive threats based on national regulations, and analyze the conformity of these actions with the principles of humanitarian law. The research uses a normative and empirical juridical approach through literature review, field observation, and interviews with JIBOM personnel. The findings reveal that the JIBOM Unit has implemented an effective preparedness system through regular training, the use of modern technologies such as EOD robots and X-ray scanners, and the application of an integrated command system. Emergency handling procedures are carried out in accordance with police standard operating procedures (SOP) while prioritizing civilian safety. From a legal standpoint, JIBOM's actions align with key humanitarian principles such as distinction, proportionality, humanity, and military necessity, even though Indonesia is not in an armed conflict. This study emphasizes the importance of strengthening regulations, enhancing inter-agency coordination, and improving public literacy to support the lawful and humane execution of bomb disposal operations.
Tinjauan Yuridis Peran Pelopor Brimob Polda Sumut dalam Penegakan Hukum terhadap Kejahatan Berbasis Kekerasan (Studi Kasus Brimob Polda Sumatera Utara): Studi Kasus Brimob Polda Sumatera Utara
Jurnal Begawan Hukum (JBH) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Begawan Hukum (JBH)
Publisher : Lembaga Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Ichsan Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/jbh.v3i2.136

Abstract

Violent crimes such as armed robbery, terrorism, riots, and hostage-taking pose serious threats to public safety and order. In this context, the Brimob Pelopor Unit of the North Sumatra Regional Police plays a strategic role as a paramilitary police force trained to handle high-intensity threats. This research is driven by the urgency to examine the extent to which Brimob’s role is carried out within the framework of criminal law and the principles of fair, professional, and proportional law enforcement. The aim of this study is to analyze the legal foundations underlying the involvement of the Brimob Pelopor Unit in handling violent crimes, identify operational and institutional obstacles faced, and evaluate the strategies implemented within the context of law enforcement. The method employed is a descriptive qualitative approach, using data collection techniques such as interviews, observations, and document studies. The findings indicate that the Brimob Pelopor Unit of North Sumatra actively participates in operations against armed crime, riot control, and securing vital objects, based on clear legal provisions such as Law No. 2 of 2002 and police regulations regarding the use of force. Key challenges include limited personnel, tactical equipment shortages, bureaucratic delays, and public pressure concerning human rights issues. Nevertheless, various reinforcement strategies are being pursued through intensive training, inter-agency collaboration, and a humanistic approach to community engagement. This study concludes that Brimob’s role is crucial in Indonesia’s law enforcement system, though continuous reform is required to maintain professionalism and legal legitimacy amid complex national security challenges.
Peran Bidang Kedokteran dan Kesehatan Kepolisian dalam Penegakan Hukum terhadap Kasus Penyalahgunaan Narkotika: Perspektif Hukum Kesehatan
Jurnal Begawan Hukum (JBH) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Begawan Hukum (JBH)
Publisher : Lembaga Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Ichsan Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/jbh.v3i2.137

Abstract

The abuse of narcotics in Indonesia has become a serious threat to public health and social order. In supporting law enforcement efforts against narcotics abuse cases, the role of the Police Medical and Health Division (Biddokkes) is crucial. Biddokkes is not only responsible for conducting medical and forensic examinations on suspects but also plays a key role in assessment and rehabilitation recommendations for drug addicts. The health law approach, which emphasizes recovery and the protection of human rights, serves as a vital framework in addressing these cases. This study aims to analyze the role of Biddokkes in supporting law enforcement processes against narcotics abuse and to examine how health law can be applied in this context. The research uses a normative-empirical method with primary and secondary data obtained through document studies, interviews, and field observations within Biddokkes of the North Sumatra Regional Police. The results show that Biddokkes plays a strategic role in legal proceedings, including conducting medical examinations, issuing visum et repertum, toxicology testing, and clinical assessments that determine the legal status of suspects. The findings also indicate that medical examination results from Biddokkes serve as vital evidence in court and form the basis for recommending rehabilitation for drug users. However, challenges such as limited facilities, human resources, and pressure in forensic practices remain obstacles. Therefore, the integration of criminal law and health law approaches must be continuously strengthened to establish a fair, humane, and recovery-based legal enforcement system.
Analisis Yuridis terhadap Peran Bagian Samapta dalam Penanganan Peristiwa Unjuk Rasa Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 9 Tahun 1998 Tentang Kemerdekaan Menyampaikan Pendapat di Muka Umum
Jurnal Begawan Hukum (JBH) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Begawan Hukum (JBH)
Publisher : Lembaga Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Ichsan Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/jbh.v3i2.138

Abstract

The freedom of expression in public is a human right guaranteed in Indonesia's legal system through Law No. 9 of 1998. The handling of public demonstrations by the Indonesian National Police, particularly the Samapta unit, plays a strategic role in maintaining order and security during protests. This study aims to analyze the role of the Samapta unit in managing public demonstrations, identify the challenges faced, and examine the implementation of human rights principles in crowd control. Using a normative legal method with a juridical normative approach, this study analyzes secondary data in the form of regulations, legal literature, and official documents, as well as primary data from Law No. 9 of 1998, Law No. 2 of 2002 concerning the Indonesian National Police, and related regulations. The results show that the role of the Samapta unit in managing public demonstrations includes three main aspects: preventive, repressive, and educational. The preventive role is carried out through coordination and security preparations as stipulated in Article 10 of Law No. 9 of 1998, the repressive role involves the dispersal of protests under certain conditions as per Article 15, and the educational role is implemented through socialization and community guidance. However, the implementation of human rights in protest security still faces challenges in aspects such as proportionality of force, non-discrimination, accountability, and public participation. The study concludes that, although it has a strong legal foundation, improvements in regulations, human resources capacity, and supervision systems are needed in handling public demonstrations.

Page 4 of 4 | Total Record : 36

 1   2   3   4 

Filter by Year

2024 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Begawan Hukum (JBH) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Begawan Hukum (JBH) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Jurnal Begawan Hukum (JBH) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Jurnal Begawan Hukum (JBH)