cover
Contact Name
Wirna Rindang Putri Larosa
Contact Email
admin@sihojurnal.com
Phone
+6282290663210
Journal Mail Official
admin@sihojurnal.com
Editorial Address
Jln. Dusun I No. 72 Desa Tetehosi Kecamatan Idanogawo Kabupaten Nias
Location
Kab. nias,
Sumatera utara
INDONESIA
Jurnal Ilmu Teknik Sipil Indonesia (JITESNA)
Published by CV. Sinar Howuhowu
ISSN : -     EISSN : 31231721     DOI : https://doi.org/10.70134/jitesna
Core Subject : Engineering,
Jurnal Ilmu Teknik Sipil Indonesia (JITESNA) merupakan jurnal ilmiah peer-reviewed yang fokus pada penyebaran hasil penelitian, ulasan, dan studi kasus di bidang Teknik Sipil. Diterbitkan dua kali dalam setahun, JITESNA bertujuan untuk mendukung kemajuan akademik dan praktik profesional dalam rekayasa struktur, infrastruktur, dan manajemen konstruksi di Indonesia. Lingkup kajjian ``jurnal ini mencakup berbagai topik utama dalam teknik sipil, termasuk rekayasa struktur dan material bangunan, geoteknik dan teknik fondasi, teknik transportasi dan jalan raya, serta manajemen dan ekonomi konstruksi. Selain itu, jurnal ini juga membahas teknik sumber daya air dan irigasi, teknik lingkungan dan kinerja infrastruktur, serta penerapan teknologi baru dalam konstruksi seperti Building Information Modeling (BIM) dan smart infrastructure. JITESNA turut membuka ruang bagi publikasi yang mengangkat analisis risiko dan keselamatan konstruksi, serta studi kasus dan kajian lapangan dari proyek-proyek sipil yang relevan. Dengan cakupan topik yang luas dan relevan, JITESNA berkomitmen menjadi wadah akademik yang mendorong inovasi dan penyebaran pengetahuan dalam bidang teknik sipil secara berkelanjutan.
Articles 42 Documents
Estimasi Biaya Penggunaan Semen Instan (Mortar) Vs Semen Konvensional Pada Pekerjaan Dinding Rumah Sederhana (Studi Kasus : Luwu Timur) Nur Ainun; Anggel Erpa Erong Pakiding
Jurnal Ilmu Teknik Sipil Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): JITESNA - Juli
Publisher : CV. SINAR HOWUHOWU

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70134/jitesna.v2i2.1972

Abstract

Wall work is one of the components with the largest volume in the construction of a simple house which greatly affects the cost efficiency of the project. This study aims to compare the estimated cost of using instant cement (Mortar) with conventional cement (a mixture of Portland cement and sand) in the masonry and plastering work of the walls of a simple type 36 house in East Luwu Regency. A comparative descriptive quantitative approach based on the Work Unit Price Analysis (AHSP) of the Minister of PUPR Regulation, namely by transferring the real volume of the building to the basic price of materials available in East Luwu. The results of the analysis show that although the retail purchase price of instant cement (Mortar) per sack is more expensive, material consumption per square meter is much less and is able to reduce the labor wage coefficient due to the faster work duration. Accumulatively in a type 36 house with a wall volume of 92 m2, the use of instant cement (mortar) results in a total cost of Rp 10,115,400, while conventional cement is Rp 13,248,000. Thus, the use of instant cement provides a cost efficiency of 23.65% and minimizes material waste in the field.  
Analisis Estimasi Biaya Dan Efisiensi Penggunaan Semen Instan (Mortar) Vs Semen Konvensional Pada Pekerjaan Dinding Rumah Sederhana (Studi Kasus: (Palopo) Fitriani Fitriani; Anggel Erpa Erong Pakiding
Jurnal Ilmu Teknik Sipil Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): JITESNA - Juli
Publisher : CV. SINAR HOWUHOWU

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70134/jitesna.v2i2.1975

Abstract

Constructing a simple house requires efficient budget planning without compromising structural quality. Wall work is one of the components with the largest volume in house construction. This study aims to compare the direct cost estimates and time efficiency between the use of conventional cement (Portland Cement + Sand) and instant cement (mortar) for wall work (masonry, plastering, and finishing) per 1 m2. The analytical method used is a unit price analysis based on a standard approach in the field and adjusted standards. The results show that although the price of instant cement is higher per bag, its efficiency in terms of work speed, minimizing waste, and neatness of the final result make instant cement a very competitive alternative in terms of total actual construction costs in the field.