cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Wirna Rindang Putri Larosa
Contact Email
admin@sihojurnal.com
Phone
+6282290663210
Journal Mail Official
admin@sihojurnal.com
Editorial Address
Jln. Dusun I No. 72 Desa Tetehosi Kecamatan Idanogawo Kabupaten Nias
Location
Kab. nias,
Sumatera utara
INDONESIA
Jurnal Ilmu Teknik Sipil Indonesia (JITESNA)
Published by CV. Sinar Howuhowu
ISSN : -     EISSN : 31231721     DOI : https://doi.org/10.70134/jitesna
Core Subject : Engineering,
Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Engineering Mechanical Engineering Transportation
Jurnal Ilmu Teknik Sipil Indonesia (JITESNA) merupakan jurnal ilmiah peer-reviewed yang fokus pada penyebaran hasil penelitian, ulasan, dan studi kasus di bidang Teknik Sipil. Diterbitkan dua kali dalam setahun, JITESNA bertujuan untuk mendukung kemajuan akademik dan praktik profesional dalam rekayasa struktur, infrastruktur, dan manajemen konstruksi di Indonesia. Lingkup kajjian ``jurnal ini mencakup berbagai topik utama dalam teknik sipil, termasuk rekayasa struktur dan material bangunan, geoteknik dan teknik fondasi, teknik transportasi dan jalan raya, serta manajemen dan ekonomi konstruksi. Selain itu, jurnal ini juga membahas teknik sumber daya air dan irigasi, teknik lingkungan dan kinerja infrastruktur, serta penerapan teknologi baru dalam konstruksi seperti Building Information Modeling (BIM) dan smart infrastructure. JITESNA turut membuka ruang bagi publikasi yang mengangkat analisis risiko dan keselamatan konstruksi, serta studi kasus dan kajian lapangan dari proyek-proyek sipil yang relevan. Dengan cakupan topik yang luas dan relevan, JITESNA berkomitmen menjadi wadah akademik yang mendorong inovasi dan penyebaran pengetahuan dalam bidang teknik sipil secara berkelanjutan.
Arjuna Subject : Teknik (semua kategori) - Bangunan dan Konstruksi
Articles 46 Documents
 1   2   3   4   5 
Estimasi Biaya Penggunaan Semen Instan (Mortar) Vs Semen Konvensional Pada Pekerjaan Dinding Rumah Sederhana (Studi Kasus : Luwu Timur) Nur Ainun; Anggel Erpa Erong Pakiding
Jurnal Ilmu Teknik Sipil Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): JITESNA - Juli
Publisher : CV. SINAR HOWUHOWU

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70134/jitesna.v2i2.1972

Abstract

Wall work is one of the components with the largest volume in the construction of a simple house which greatly affects the cost efficiency of the project. This study aims to compare the estimated cost of using instant cement (Mortar) with conventional cement (a mixture of Portland cement and sand) in the masonry and plastering work of the walls of a simple type 36 house in East Luwu Regency. A comparative descriptive quantitative approach based on the Work Unit Price Analysis (AHSP) of the Minister of PUPR Regulation, namely by transferring the real volume of the building to the basic price of materials available in East Luwu. The results of the analysis show that although the retail purchase price of instant cement (Mortar) per sack is more expensive, material consumption per square meter is much less and is able to reduce the labor wage coefficient due to the faster work duration. Accumulatively in a type 36 house with a wall volume of 92 m2, the use of instant cement (mortar) results in a total cost of Rp 10,115,400, while conventional cement is Rp 13,248,000. Thus, the use of instant cement provides a cost efficiency of 23.65% and minimizes material waste in the field.  
Analisis Estimasi Biaya Dan Efisiensi Penggunaan Semen Instan (Mortar) Vs Semen Konvensional Pada Pekerjaan Dinding Rumah Sederhana (Studi Kasus: (Palopo) Fitriani Fitriani; Anggel Erpa Erong Pakiding
Jurnal Ilmu Teknik Sipil Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): JITESNA - Juli
Publisher : CV. SINAR HOWUHOWU

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70134/jitesna.v2i2.1975

Abstract

Constructing a simple house requires efficient budget planning without compromising structural quality. Wall work is one of the components with the largest volume in house construction. This study aims to compare the direct cost estimates and time efficiency between the use of conventional cement (Portland Cement + Sand) and instant cement (mortar) for wall work (masonry, plastering, and finishing) per 1 m2. The analytical method used is a unit price analysis based on a standard approach in the field and adjusted standards. The results show that although the price of instant cement is higher per bag, its efficiency in terms of work speed, minimizing waste, and neatness of the final result make instant cement a very competitive alternative in terms of total actual construction costs in the field.  
Analisis Biaya Struktur Bawah: Perbandingan Rab Fondasi Batu Kali Dan Fondasi Lajur Beton Pada Rumah Sederhana Tipe 36 (Studi: Belopa) Firdha Sudirman; Anggel Erpa Erong Pakiding
Jurnal Ilmu Teknik Sipil Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): JITESNA - Juli
Publisher : CV. SINAR HOWUHOWU

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70134/jitesna.v2i2.1985

Abstract

The substructure is an essential part of building construction that serves as a which transfers building loads safely to the underlying soil. This study aims to analyze the cost comparisons between two types of foundations commonly used in simple type 36 house, namely stone foundation and concrete strip foundation. The method used was quantitative comparative analysis by calculating the Cost Budget Plan (RAB) of both types of foundations based on work volume and unit price of materials as well as labor wages. The results of the study showed that total cost of stone foundation amounted to IDR24,725,953 while concrete strip foundation was IDR39,475,448 hence there is a difference in cost of IDR14,749,495. Based on these results, stone foundations are more economical for simple homes in stable soil conditions, while concrete strip foundations are better suited to buildings that require higher structural strength.  
Perhitungan Rab Rumah Sederhana Dengan Tinggi Plafon 3 Meter Vs 3,5 Meter Gebi Gebi; Anggel Erpa Erong Pakiding
Jurnal Ilmu Teknik Sipil Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): JITESNA - Juli
Publisher : CV. SINAR HOWUHOWU

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70134/jitesna.v2i2.2006

Abstract

Ceiling height in residential homes plays a vital role in regulating indoor air circulation and enhancing passive thermal comfort, particularly in tropical coastal environments such as Palopo City. While elevating ceiling height improves indoor environmental quality by increasing air volume and facilitating natural ventilation, it directly increases the volume of vertical architectural and structural elements, thereby impacting overall construction expenditure. This research investigates the financial implications of increasing ceiling height from 3.0 meters (Model A) to 3.5 meters (Model B) in a simple Type 36 residential unit. The study adopts a comparative quantitative descriptive approach utilizing basic mathematical geometric calculations to determine volume changes, combined with the standard activity unit pricing (AHSP) of Palopo City. The evaluation reveals that a 0.5-meter vertical extension produces an 18.6% increase in vertical surface material requirements, including practical column concrete volume (from 0.399 m³ to 0.466 m³), red brick masonry (from 112.50 m² to 133.50 m²), as well as plastering, acian, and wall painting areas (each increasing from 225.00 m² to 267.00 m²). Consequently, the total estimated construction budget (RAB) rises from Rp 97,650,000 for Model A to Rp 103,500,000 for Model B, creating an absolute cost difference of Rp 5,850,000 or a 5.99% overall budget increase. The cost increment is heavily driven by wall masonry, plastering, acian, and painting work, which account for Rp 5,540,000 (94.7%) of the total difference, while structural column extensions contribute Rp 310,000 (5.3%). In conclusion, allocating a 5.99% cost premium is a rational engineering investment for long-term thermal comfort in tropical regions, provided budget constraints permit.  
Estimasi Anggran Biaya Penggunaan Dinding Precast (Pracetak) Pada Konstruksi Rumah Tinggalsederhan Tipe 36 (Studi: Belopa) Rezki Magefira; Anggel Erpa Erong Pakiding
Jurnal Ilmu Teknik Sipil Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): JITESNA - Juli
Publisher : CV. SINAR HOWUHOWU

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70134/jitesna.v2i2.2016

Abstract

This study aims to estimate the budget for precast wall construction for a simple type 36 residential house in Belopa, Luwu Regency. The research method used is descriptive quantitative with a case study approach. Calculations are based on the wall work volume, unit prices of materials and wages, and components of transportation and installation equipment costs. The cost analysis was conducted by referring to the Work Unit Price Analysis (AHSP) and the preparation of the Cost Budget Plan (RAB). The calculation results show that the total estimated budget for precast wall construction with a volume of 90 m² is Rp35,270,000. The largest cost component comes from the procurement of precast panels at Rp25,200,000, followed by installation labor costs of Rp4,950,000, material transportation of Rp2,500,000, adhesive mortar of Rp1,620,000, and installation equipment of Rp1,000,000. The results of this study can provide initial information in estimating the cost requirements for precast wall construction for the construction of a simple type 36 residential house in the Belopa area.  
Review Sistem Pengendalian Proyek Dengan Metode Nilai Hasil Pada Pembangunan Bendungan Bajulmati Basuki Rahmad Vici Ramadhan
Jurnal Ilmu Teknik Sipil Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): JITESNA - Juli
Publisher : CV. SINAR HOWUHOWU

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70134/jitesna.v2i2.2034

Abstract

Cost and schedule planning and control are integral parts of overall construction project management. To avoid losses in a project, we can forecast the project’s completion costs using the earned value concept. With the earned value concept, project progress can be measured by comparing the work plan established at the start of the project with the actual project implementation. Based on the results of an analysis using the earned value concept, a time variance up to the 20th month was determined to be (Rp. 289,158,847.65), which indicates a time variance meaning the project is behind schedule compared to the plan while the cost deviation up to the 20th month amounted to (-Rp. 1,072,748,617.68), indicating a cost deviation that is, costs were higher than planned. The project’s performance index, as assessed by the schedule performance index (SPI), yielded a value of 0.8, indicating that implementation was slower than planned; meanwhile, the cost performance index showed that costs incurred were higher than planned. The estimated cost to complete the project after the evaluation in the 20th month is Rp. 177,112,686,803.82, while the estimated time to complete the project after the evaluation in the 20th month is 33 months. When assessed in terms of time and cost in the 20th month, the project exhibits deviations in both cost and time: the costs incurred through the 20th month exceed the plan, and the implementation timeline is behind schedule.

Page 5 of 5 | Total Record : 46

 1   2   3   4   5 

Filter by Year

2025 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): JITESNA - Juli Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): JITESNA - Januari Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): JITESNA - Juli