cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Desi Sommaliagustina
Contact Email
nawalaedu@gmail.com
Phone
+6281374694015
Journal Mail Official
nawalaedu@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Raya Yamin No.88 Desa/Kelurahan Telanaipura, kec.Telanaipura, Kota Jambi, Jambi Kode Pos : 36122
Location
Kota jambi,
Jambi
INDONESIA
Ipso Jure
Published by PT Anagata Sembagi Education
ISSN : -     EISSN : 30327644     DOI : https://doi.org/10.62872/55p1zf80
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Ipso Jure is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal dedicated to advancing scholarly research and discourse in the field of law, with a particular emphasis on the principles of the rule of law. The journal aims to provide a platform for academics, legal practitioners, policymakers, and researchers to address contemporary legal issues and trends that shape societies globally. All articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), ensuring free access and reuse with proper attribution. Focus Ipso Jure focuses on exploring current and emerging legal challenges that influence the development and application of the rule of law. The journal seeks to publish original research that offers innovative perspectives, rigorous analysis, and practical insights into legal systems, theories, and practices. By fostering interdisciplinary and comparative approaches, Ipso Jure aims to contribute to global legal scholarship and promote dialogue among diverse legal traditions. Scope The journal welcomes original research articles, theoretical analyses, and policy reviews that address issues and trends in the following areas of law: Administrative Law Agrarian Law Banking Law Civil Law Commercial Law Comparative Law Constitutional Law Corporate Law Criminal Law Cyber Law Economic Law Environmental Law Human Rights Law International Law Legal Philosophy and Theory Legal Sociology Types of Contributions Ipso Jure primarily publishes original research articles (3,000–5,000 words) that present empirical findings, theoretical insights, or critical analyses. The journal also considers high-quality review articles or policy analyses that align with its scope and contribute significantly to legal scholarship. All submissions undergo a rigorous double-blind peer review process to ensure academic quality and integrity, as outlined in our Publication Process. Audience The journal targets a global audience, including: Legal scholars and researchers seeking to advance knowledge in law. Legal practitioners addressing practical challenges in their fields. Policymakers and government officials shaping legal frameworks. Students and educators exploring contemporary legal issues. Commitment to Open Access As an open access journal, Ipso Jure ensures that all published content is freely accessible to readers worldwide without financial or legal barriers. Authors retain full copyright of their work, and articles are licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0, promoting the widest possible dissemination and reuse of research. For submission details, please refer to our Author Guidelines. For questions about the journal’s focus and scope, contact the editorial team at nawalaedu@gmail.com.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 187 Documents
 15   16   17   18   19 
Corruption in the Digital Age: Challenges of Law Enforcement in Electronic Government Systems Setiawan, Rahmat; Mustikowati, Endang
Ipso Jure Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): Ipso Jure - April
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/ev55vj02

Abstract

The development of information technology has driven the transformation of governance through the implementation of the Electronic-Based Government System (ESBS) as an effort to realize a transparent, accountable, and efficient government. However, this digitalization does not necessarily eliminate corrupt practices, but rather gives rise to new, more complex, technology-based corruption patterns. This study aims to analyze the challenges of law enforcement against corruption crimes in the digital era within the ESBS system, particularly those caused by the ambiguity of norms in laws and regulations. The research method used is normative legal research with a legislative and conceptual approach, through an analysis of regulations related to ESBS, corruption crimes, and information technology law. The results show that the ESBS regulations in Presidential Regulation Number 95 of 2018 are still administrative in nature and have not been optimally integrated with the legal regime for eradicating corruption. In addition, there is a lack of clarity in the norms regarding the determination of legal accountability, system security standards, and digital evidence mechanisms, which creates legal uncertainty and multiple interpretations in law enforcement practices. Disharmony between the Corruption Crime Law and the Electronic Information and Transactions Law also weakens the effectiveness of enforcement against digital corruption. Therefore, legal reconstruction is needed through the reformulation of norms that are adaptive, integrative, and responsive to technological developments to ensure legal certainty and the effectiveness of eradicating corruption in the digital era.
The Urgency of Implementing Restorative Justice in Handling Juvenile Crime: A Study of the Principles of Humanity and Justice Saida Flora, Henny; Paminto, Saptaning Ruju; Salmon, Harly Clifford Jonas
Ipso Jure Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): Ipso Jure - April
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/fv0gj232

Abstract

Crimes committed by juveniles are a serious problem that requires comprehensive handling, prioritizing the principles of humanity and justice. The conventional retributive approach to criminal law is considered inappropriate for the characteristics of adolescent psychological development and their rehabilitation needs. This article aims to examine the urgency of implementing restorative justice in handling juvenile crime in Indonesia from the perspective of humanity and justice. The research method used is normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The results of the study indicate that restorative justice provides a more humane framework for resolution because it prioritizes restoring relationships between perpetrators, victims, and the community, rather than simply retaliation. This approach aligns with Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System, which prioritizes diversion and the best interests of children. The application of restorative justice has been proven to reduce recidivism rates, encourage perpetrator responsibility, and restore victims' dignity more effectively than conventional punishment. This study concludes that restorative justice is not merely an alternative but a necessity in a just and humane juvenile criminal justice system
Effectiveness of Criminal Law Enforcement in Eradicating Corruption in National Strategic Sectors Anis Noviya
Ipso Jure Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Ipso Jure - March
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/25vnq621

Abstract

Corruption in national strategic sectors is a serious problem that has a broad impact on economic stability and development. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of criminal law enforcement in eradicating corruption in national strategic sectors and to examine the influence of normative ambiguity on legal certainty. The research method used is normative legal research with a statutory, conceptual, and case approach, with primary legal material in the form of Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption in conjunction with Law Number 20 of 2001, and supported by secondary and tertiary legal materials. The results of the study indicate that the effectiveness of law enforcement is still not optimal due to normative ambiguity, particularly regarding state financial losses and abuse of authority, which gives rise to multiple interpretations and inconsistencies in law enforcement. In addition, disharmony between criminal law and state administrative law, weak coordination between institutions, and the influence of non-juridical factors such as politics and economics also hamper the effectiveness of law enforcement. The resulting legal uncertainty also impacts the investment climate and development implementation in strategic sectors. Therefore, a clearer and more assertive normative reconstruction, harmonization of regulations, and strengthening of legal structures and culture are needed to realize effective, fair law enforcement and provide legal certainty.
Social Justice in a Legal Perspective: An Analysis of Inequality in Access to Public Services Fitri Arianti; Anis Noviya
Ipso Jure Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): Ipso Jure - April
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/0ngb5k11

Abstract

Social justice in public services is a fundamental element in a state based on the rule of law, which prioritizes public welfare. Although it is normatively guaranteed in the constitution and various laws and regulations, its implementation still faces various obstacles, particularly related to unequal access to public services. This study aims to analyze the manifestation of social justice from a legal perspective and examine the influence of normative ambiguity in public service regulations on unequal access. The research method used is normative legal research with a legislative and conceptual approach, supported by primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, and analyzed qualitatively using deductive reasoning. The results show that normative ambiguity in public service regulations creates legal uncertainty, expands the scope for discretion of officials, and increases the potential for abuse of authority. This condition results in the emergence of service discrimination, unequal service quality between regions, and the marginalization of vulnerable groups. Furthermore, a gap is found between the ideal legal norm (das sollen) and the implemented practice (das sein), indicating that the application of the principle of social justice is not yet optimal. Therefore, normative reconstruction is needed through the formulation of clearer, more operational, and measurable regulations, as well as strengthening monitoring and sanction mechanisms to ensure equal access to public services.
Reconstruction Model in Filling the Regional Head Position from the Perspective of State Administrative Law and The Fourth Principle of Pancasila Zulwisman Zulwisman; Hengki Andora
Ipso Jure Vol. 3 No. 4 (2026): Ipso - May
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/74jxr537

Abstract

This article analyzes the process of filling regional head positions in Indonesia and reconstructs its model from the perspective of State Administrative Law and the fourth principle of Pancasila. The research uses normative legal methods with statutory, conceptual, and historical approaches. The results indicate that the regulation of filling regional head positions has evolved toward a more structured direct electoral democracy, but still faces fundamental weaknesses, namely the dominance of political parties in the nomination process, high political costs, money politics, overly procedural democracy, single candidates, and the widespread use of acting regional heads. These conditions indicate that the current system does not fully align with the principles of State Administrative Law and the values of the fourth principle of Pancasila. This research proposes a reconstruction of a model for filling regional head positions that is administrative-deliberative in nature, with electoral legitimacy maintained through more proportional access to nominations, strengthening public deliberative forums, and stricter restrictions on the appointment of acting regional heads.
Law Enforcement Against Transnational Cybercrime:Jurisdictional Problems and Regulatory Harmonization Rahmatilah Rahmatilah
Ipso Jure Vol. 3 No. 4 (2026): Ipso - May
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/wafdhr93

Abstract

The rapid development of information and communication technology has given rise to the phenomenon of transnational cybercrime, which challenges conventional criminal law, particularly the doctrine of territorial jurisdiction. This article aims to critically analyze the jurisdictional issues in law enforcement against transnational cybercrime and the urgency of regulatory harmonization at the global and regional levels. Using normative legal research methods based on statute, comparative, and conceptual approaches, this study finds that jurisdictional conflicts between countries constitute a structural obstacle stemming from the incompatibility between the concept of territorial state sovereignty and the borderless nature of cybercrime. Furthermore, harmonization efforts through the Budapest Convention have not achieved universal acceptability due to resistance from developing countries that view it as a Western instrument. Indonesia, as a country with high internet penetration, faces a dual challenge: limited domestic regulations and the absence of ratification of relevant international legal instruments. This study concludes that effective law enforcement against transnational cybercrime necessitates reform of international criminal law through an inclusive multilateral approach, strengthening of mutual legal assistance mechanisms, and transforming the jurisdictional paradigm from the principle of territoriality to the contextual effects doctrine principle.  
Analysis of Legal Protection for Public Shareholders in Public Limited Companies (PT Tbk) Through the Principle of Majority Rule, Minority Protection Andria Marchelia; Muhammad Ridha Febriyani; I Gede Sandy Satria
Ipso Jure Vol. 3 No. 5 (2026): Ipso - June
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/saf5d372

Abstract

A Public Limited Liability Company (PT Tbk), as a legal entity whose shares are widely owned by the public, presents a fundamental challenge in corporate governance: how to balance the authority of the majority with the protection of minority shareholders. The principles of majority rule and minority protection serve as the normative foundation that supports this balance within the Indonesian corporate legal framework. This study comprehensively examines how these principles are implemented in the provisions of Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies (UUPT) and relevant Financial Services Authority (OJK) regulations. The research method used is a normative juridical approach with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results show that although the regulatory framework is quite comprehensive in regulating protection mechanisms, there are a number of normative gaps and practical challenges in its enforcement, particularly regarding transparency, information disclosure, and access to justice for public shareholders. This study recommends strengthening enforcement mechanisms and special regulations against oppressive actions by controlling shareholders

Page 19 of 19 | Total Record : 187

 15   16   17   18   19 

Filter by Year

2024 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 2 No. 12 (2026): Ipso Jure - January Vol. 3 No. 5 (2026): Ipso - June Vol. 3 No. 4 (2026): Ipso - May Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): Ipso Jure - April Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Ipso Jure - March Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Ipso Jure - February Vol. 2 No. 11 (2025): Journal of Ipso Jure-December Vol. 2 No. 10 (2025) Vol. 1 No. 12 (2025): Ipso Jure - January Vol. 2 No. 9 (2025): Ipso Jure-October Vol. 2 No. 9 (2025) Vol. 2 No. 8 (2025): Ipso Jure - September Vol. 2 No. 7 (2025): Ipso Jure - August Vol. 2 No. 6 (2025): Ipso Jure - July Vol. 2 No. 5 (2025): Ipso Jure - June Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Ipso Jure - May Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Ipso Jure - April Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Ipso Jure - March Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Ipso Jure - February Vol. 1 No. 11 (2024): Ipso Jure - December Vol. 1 No. 10 (2024): Ipso Jure - November Vol. 1 No. 9 (2024): Ipso Jure - October Vol. 1 No. 8 (2024): Ipso Jure - September Vol. 1 No. 7 (2024): Ipso Jure-August Vol. 1 No. 6 (2024): Ipso Jure - July Vol. 1 No. 5 (2024): Ipso Jure- June Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): Ipso Jure - May Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): Ipso Jure - April Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Ipso Jure - March Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Ipso Jure - February More Issue