cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
sulistiyanto
Contact Email
wjowo2020@gmail.com
Phone
+6289618729653
Journal Mail Official
jurnalvonis@gmail.com
Editorial Address
PERUM BUMI BULU INDAH Gg. Rambutan No.1A RT:01/RW: 06, Desa BULU Kecamatan KRAKSAAN Probolinggo, JAWA TIMUR
Location
Kab. probolinggo,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Vonis
Published by CV. Akira Java Bulu
ISSN : -     EISSN : 31090400     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
Journal of Legal Studies published by Rumah Jurnal Akira Java Bulu which is published twice a year in May and November. This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The purpose of this journal is to provide a place for academics, researchers, and practitioners to publish original research articles or review articles. The scope of articles published in this journal discusses various topics in the fields of Criminal Law, Civil Law, International Law, Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, Islamic Law, Economic Law, Medical Law, Customary Law, Environmental Law and other sections related to contemporary issues in law.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Sosiologi dan Ilmu Politik
Articles 2 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "vol. 2 no. 2 (2026)" : 2 Documents clear
Proporsionalitas Pemidanaan Tindak Pidana Terorisme Pasca-KUHP Nasional: Analisis PERMA Nomor 2 Tahun 2026 dan Batas Diskresi Hakim Putu Ayu Veguita Putri Ningsih; Slamet Tri Wahyudi
Vonis Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : CV. Akira Java Bulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The entry into force of the National Criminal Code on 2 January 2026 reshaped the regulatory architecture of terrorism offences: Articles 6 and 7 of the Counter-Terrorism Law were repealed and their function transferred to Articles 600 and 601 of the Code, while Article 9, Article 13(c), and Article 15 of that law remain in force, and Law Number 1 of 2026 on Criminal Adjustment together with Supreme Court Regulation Number 2 of 2026 on Sentencing Guidelines for Certain Terrorism Offences add further normative layers. This study aims to explain the relative position of those four instruments in determining punishment and to formulate how judges may assess culpability, harm, and offender circumstances consistently without dissolving the individualisation of punishment. The method employed is normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, the latter drawing on the sentencing guidelines of England and Wales; legal materials were collected through literature study and analysed descriptively and prescriptively in six sequential stages, from the identification of the legal issues to the construction of the model. The findings show that the guidelines operate accessorily and depend on proof of an offence exhaustively listed within their scope rather than on a general labelling of a case as terrorism, and that they alter neither the elements of the offence nor the statutory sentencing range. The study also identifies a coherence problem in Article 15, which still refers to repealed provisions. Its contribution is a five-layer audit model of sentencing reasoning that keeps judicial discretion alive yet open to argumentative scrutiny.
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana terhadap Pihak yang Terlibat dalam Perencanaan dan Pelaksanaan Bom Bunuh Diri Justicia Salsabila; Slamet Tri Wahyudi
Vonis Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : CV. Akira Java Bulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Tindak pidana terorisme melalui aksi bom bunuh diri kerap melibatkan lebih dari satu orang, sementara pelaku yang meledakkan bom dapat meninggal dunia di tempat kejadian. Kondisi tersebut menimbulkan persoalan mengenai dasar dan batas pertanggungjawaban pidana terhadap pihak yang tidak meledakkan bom secara langsung tetapi terlibat dalam perencanaan, persiapan, penyediaan sarana, penggerakan, atau pembantuan. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis bentuk pertanggungjawaban pidana pihak-pihak tersebut serta batas pertanggungjawabannya berdasarkan peran dan tingkat keterlibatan. Penelitian menggunakan metode hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan kasus, yang dianalisis secara kualitatif-preskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pertanggungjawaban pidana tidak ditentukan oleh kedekatan fisik dengan ledakan, melainkan oleh perbuatan konkret, kesengajaan, hubungan antara kontribusi dan tindak pidana, serta bentuk keterlibatan menurut Pasal 20 dan Pasal 21 KUHP Nasional dan ketentuan khusus Undang-Undang Terorisme. Kematian pelaku langsung tidak menghapus pertanggungjawaban pihak lain. Penelitian ini menawarkan matriks peran yang bertumpu pada empat indikator, yaitu bentuk perbuatan, tahap keterlibatan, tingkat kesengajaan, dan kontribusi, guna menghindari kriminalisasi yang kurang maupun berlebihan, sejalan dengan berlakunya KUHP Nasional dan PERMA Nomor 2 Tahun 2026.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 2

 1 

Filter by Year

2026 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025)