cover
Contact Name
M. Yasir Said
Contact Email
injurlens@gmail.com
Phone
+62821 5770 9493
Journal Mail Official
injurlens@bdproject.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Brigjen. Hasan Basri Komp. Polsek Banjarmasin Utara Jalur 3, Banjarmasin, Kalimantan Selatan 70125
Location
Kota banjarmasin,
Kalimantan selatan
INDONESIA
INJURLENS
Published by Scholar Center
ISSN : 28289137     EISSN : 27764974     DOI : https://doi.org/10.51749
International Journal of Law, Environment and Natural Resources (INJURLENS) ISSN 2828-9137 (Print) 2776-4974 (Online) is an international, scholarly open access journal on the topic of law, environment, and natural resources. It publishes reviews and regular research papers and there is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their research in as much detail as possible, whether theoretical, empirical, or experimental. INJURLENS follows the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Scholar Center takes the responsibility to enforce a rigorous peer-review together with strict ethical policies and standards to ensure adding high-quality scientific works to the field of scholarly publication. Unfortunately, cases of plagiarism, data falsification, inappropriate authorship credit, and the like, do arise. We take such publishing ethics issues very seriously and our editors are trained to proceed in such cases with a zero-tolerance policy. To verify the originality of content submitted to our journals, we use Turnitin and iThenticate to check submissions against previous publications. Subject Areas Jurisprudence, Legal Theory, Philosophy of Law Criminal Law and Criminal Justice System Economic and Business Law Constitutional and Administrative Law Comparative Legal System Alternative Dispute Resolution Environmental Policy and Management Natural Resources Mineral And Geo-Resources Land And Ecological Resources Plant And Animal Resources Water Resources Energy Resources Food And Bio-Resources Resource Conservation, Reuse, And Recycling Sustainable Resource Management Resource Governance And Policy Circular Economy
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 85 Documents
Criminal Actions Against People Exploiting Children In Accordance To Indonesian Criminal Law M. Junaeddy; Budi Parmono; Hanafi Arief
International Journal of Law, Environment, and Natural Resources Vol. 2 No. 2 (2022): October Issue
Publisher : Scholar Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51749/injurlens.v2i2.47

Abstract

Exploitation of children is now more widespread, not carried out by families but also by small to large institutional groups. The perpetrators are sometimes the parents themselves with the intention of making a profit. The purpose of this study is to describe the position of children in Indonesian criminal law and to analyze criminal sanctions for child exploitation. As normative legal research, this study examines laws and regulations related to child exploitation and criminal sanctions. Research results: Article 45 of the Criminal Code defines a child as an immature person if he is not yet 16 years old. Criminal law has positioned children as legal subjects who must protect themselves and their interests as well as the special rights of the state. Economic, social and sexual exploitation of children with the intention of benefiting oneself or others is a criminal act. Criminal sanctions for those who commit, order to do, and those who participate in committing the act; give or promise something by abusing power or dignity, by violence, threats or misdirection, or by giving opportunities, means or information, encouraging other people to take action; intercourse (not the wife) is punishable by imprisonment for a maximum of nine years
Criminal Responsibility Of Defamation Under The Indonesian Criminal Law Aryansyah Aryansyah; Budi Parmono; Muhibbin Muhibbin
International Journal of Law, Environment, and Natural Resources Vol. 2 No. 2 (2022): October Issue
Publisher : Scholar Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51749/injurlens.v2i2.48

Abstract

The Research, "Responsibility of Defamation Actors in Indonesian Positive Law Studies" aims to describe the arrangements for criminal acts of defamation in the Indonesian criminal law system as well as analyze criminal responsibility for perpetrators of defamation in the Indonesian criminal law system. This research is a normative legal research, which examines laws and regulations in a coherent legal system as well as unwritten legal values ??that live in society, which are related to the responsibility of perpetrators of defamation in the perspective of positive law in Indonesia. The results of the research can be presented in an outline: Arrangements for criminal acts of defamation in Indonesian criminal law are regulated in the Criminal Code (KUHP), and the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to the Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions. The Criminal Code regulates Article 310 paragraph (1) and paragraph (2), as well as Article 311 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code. Whereas in the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to the Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions regulated in Article 27 paragraph (3); Criminal responsibility for defamation in the Indonesian criminal law system is borne by anyone who intentionally attacks the reputation or reputation of a person, by accusing something with clear intentions so that it is publicly known (Article 310 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code), and is also borne by every a person who intentionally and without rights distributes and/or transmits and/or makes accessible Electronic Information and/or Electronic Documents that contain insults and/or defamation (Article 27 paragraph (3) of Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions
Corporate Responsibility For Criminal Actions Of Song Copyright Under The 28 Law Of 2014 Ade Putera; Sunardi Sunardi; Hanafi Arief
International Journal of Law, Environment, and Natural Resources Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023): April Issue
Publisher : Scholar Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51749/injurlens.v3i1.50

Abstract

Research entitled "Corporate Responsibility for Crime of Song Copyright According to Law Number 28 of 2014" aims to analyze how copyright crimes are regulated in Indonesian positive law and to analyze corporate responsibility for copyright infringement according to the Copyright Law Number 28 of 2014. This research is normative legal research, which examines laws and regulations in a coherent legal system and unwritten legal values ??that live in society, which are related to corporate responsibility for copyright infringement according to the law 28 of 2014. The results of the study stated that copyright crimes, including song copyrights, are regulated in the Copyright Act as part of Indonesian positive law. Article 112 of the Copyright Law Number 28 of 2014 states that everyone who without rights commits the acts referred to in Article 7 paragraph (3) and/or Article 52 for commercial use, shall be punished with imprisonment for a maximum of 2 (two) years and/or a maximum fine of 300,000,000.00 (three hundred million rupiah). Because legal entities are equated with people, legal entities that commit criminal copyright infringements can also be punished under this article as a form of responsibility. Criminal acts by Corporations are regulated in Article 3 of MA RI Regulation 13/2016 which are criminal acts committed by people based on work relationships, or based on other relationships, both individually and jointly acting for and on behalf of Corporations inside and outside Corporate Environment.
Status Of Corruption Acts Under The Indonesian Criminal Law System Ahmad Nur Azizy; Budi Parmono; Moh. Muhibbin
International Journal of Law, Environment, and Natural Resources Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023): April Issue
Publisher : Scholar Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51749/injurlens.v3i1.51

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to describe the regulation of criminal law in Indonesia and to analyze the position of corruption in Indonesian criminal law. This research uses normative legal research in the form of library research using three types of legal materials, namely primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials, with the nature of qualitative descriptive research. The results of the study show that the criminal act of corruption is a part of Indonesian criminal law whose arrangements are outside the Criminal Code (KUHP). In addition, this crime has certain specifications that are different from general criminal law which are regulated in separate laws, namely: Law Number 31 of 1999 as amended in Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Eradication of Corruption Crimes. The criminal act of corruption is also known as a special crime. The criminal act of corruption is a part of the special criminal law which has certain specifications that are different from the general criminal law, such as deviations from procedural law and when viewed from the regulated material. The Criminal Procedure Code for corruption that is applied is lex specialist in nature, namely the existence of deviations intended to speed up procedures and obtain investigations, prosecutions and examinations at court hearings.
Juridical Review of Elections Dispute Settlement in Indonesia Akhmad Zaki Yamani; Sunardi Sunardi; Hanafi Arief
International Journal of Law, Environment, and Natural Resources Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): April Issue
Publisher : Scholar Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51749/injurlens.v4i1.52

Abstract

The research on “Juridical Review of Election Dispute Resolution in Indonesia” aims to describe the mechanism of election dispute resolution in Indonesia, and analyze the current weaknesses of election dispute resolution in Indonesia. This is a normative legal research, which examines laws and regulations in an Indonesian legal system that are coherent with written legal values, especially those related to election dispute resolution in Indonesia. The results of the study state that election settlement mechanisms are important to protect the rights of citizens and help determine whether elections are truly a reflection of the will of their citizens, as well as for elections to be considered credible, voters and election contestants must have access to effective election dispute resolution mechanisms. independent, fair, accessible and effective. Weaknesses in the settlement of election disputes that have been carried out so far have not fulfilled a sense of justice because dispute resolution is carried out through the Constitutional Court based on Article 24 C paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution, whose authority is then elaborated in Article 10 paragraph (1) of Law (UU) Number 24 2003 concerning the Constitutional Court as amended by Law Number 8 of 2011 (UU MK). Dispute resolution through the Constitutional Court in Jakarta is felt to be very burdensome for election participants because it is not in accordance with the principle of a cheap, fast and efficient trial. Election dispute settlement, which has been carried out for a maximum of 7 (seven) days, begins with the stages of receiving reports, researching, clarifying, conducting studies, and making decisions. The very limited completion time, which is a maximum of 7 (seven) days, can create a sense of injustice for justice seekers, because this short process can lead to haste in the examination which in turn creates a feeling of insecurity.
Status of the Verbalish Witness Recognition to Violence Against Suspects as a Tool of Evidence Faizal Rahman; Sunardi Sunardi; Hanafi Arief
International Journal of Law, Environment, and Natural Resources Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): April Issue
Publisher : Scholar Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51749/injurlens.v4i1.53

Abstract

In the examination of a criminal case trial requires several pieces of evidence as contained in the Criminal Procedure Code called KUHAP, such as: witness statements, expert statements, letters, instructions, and statements of the accused. Verbalized witnesses are not included in the KUHAP, but they often occur in criminal justice practices. This study aims to find out how the position of evidence in Indonesian criminal law and how verbal witness confessions can be used as evidence of criminal acts of mistreatment of suspects. This research is descriptive in nature, with a statutory approach, primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials and qualitative analysis is carried out systematically in order to obtain answers to problems, Witness statements are legal evidence as regulated in Article 184 paragraph (1) of Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning called KUHAP. A verbal witness is an investigative witness who is presented by a judge in a trial because the defendant withdraws the Minutes of Examination called BAP. The presence of this verbal witness was to prove the testimony of the defendant who said that during the investigation the defendant was under pressure or coercion. Verbal witness statements can be used as a judge's consideration in accepting the reasons for revocation of the  BAP carried out by the defendant and the judge's considerations in making a decision. Moreover, verbal witness testimony was taken in a trial.
Status Of Pretrial Institutions In Indonesian Criminal Law Famda Egga Prasnada; Sunardi Sunardi; Moh. Muhibbin
International Journal of Law, Environment, and Natural Resources Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023): April Issue
Publisher : Scholar Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51749/injurlens.v3i1.54

Abstract

This study aims to describe the position of pretrial institutions in the study of criminal law in Indonesia and to analyze the implementation of pretrial institutions as legal remedies for suspects in obtaining justice at the level of investigation and prosecution. This is a normative legal research, which examines statutory regulations in a coherent legal system and unwritten legal values ??that live in society, which are related to the suspect's efforts to obtain justice through the Pretrial Institution. The results of the study state that pretrial is one of the new institutions introduced since the existence of Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code in the midst of law enforcement life. Pretrial Institution arrangements in the Criminal Procedure Code are listed in Article 1 point 10, Chapter X Part One from Article 77 to Article 83. The position of the Judicial Institution in Indonesian positive law is part of the criminal justice system, as well as being part of law enforcement in abstracto or in concreto. In practice, pretrial is usually carried out in a rule of law country like Indonesia as long as the investigation process is carried out based on the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code, although not all pretrial decisions are won by the suspect or the party submitting them. In the process of pretrial examination hearings, of course, the facts, both juridical and material facts, will be considered.
Criminal Actions Of Illegal Logging In The Perspective Of Forestry Law G.M. Angga Satrya Wibawa; Moh. Muhibbin; Budi Parmono
International Journal of Law, Environment, and Natural Resources Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023): April Issue
Publisher : Scholar Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51749/injurlens.v3i1.55

Abstract

This research aims to describe the regulation of illegal logging in Indonesian positive law and to analyze how illegal logging is in the perspective of Indonesian criminal law. It is a normative legal research, which examines laws and regulations in a coherent legal system with the values ??contained in the Forestry Law Number 19 of 2004 and Law No. 18 of 2013 concerning Prevention and Eradication of Forest Destruction, The research results show that illegal logging is regulated in the Forestry Law, namely Forestry Law No. 19 of 2004, changes to Law no. 41 of 1999 became a Law as an instrument in tackling illegal logging crimes. Then Regulation of the Minister of Forestry Number: P.30/Menhut-II/2012 concerning Administration of Forest Products originating from Private Forests. The government also enacted Law no. 18 of 2013 concerning Prevention and Eradication of Forest Destruction as statutory regulations, and is the implementation of Law no. 14 of 1999. Illegal logging sanctions are emphasized in the Forestry Law in the form of criminal sanctions given to those who carry out illegal logging, according to Law no. 18 of 2013 with a maximum prison sentence of 15 years and a maximum fine of IDR 100 billion.
Detention Of Suspects Under The Indonesian Criminal Law Anzhari Anzhari; Sunardi Sunardi; Moh. Muhibbin
International Journal of Law, Environment, and Natural Resources Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): October Issue
Publisher : Scholar Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51749/injurlens.v3i2.56

Abstract

The research aims to describe the provisions of Indonesian criminal law regarding the detention of suspects and to analyze the legal protection of suspects during detention in terms of Indonesian criminal law. This research is a normative legal research, which examines laws and regulations in a coherent legal system and legal values ??related to the detention of suspects in the study of Indonesian criminal law. The results of the study show that the provisions for detaining suspects are regulated in Article 1 point 21 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Criminal Procedure. While in detention, suspects can exercise their rights in accordance with articles 50 to 68 of the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP).l protection is always associated with the concept of rechtstaat or the concept of the Rule of Law because the birth of these concepts cannot be separated from the desire to provide recognition and protection of human rights. A suspect has rights at the time of detention that are guaranteed by law, such as the right to receive and read a Detention Warrant or a Judge's Order which lists the identity of the suspect or defendant and states the reasons for the detention and a brief description of the crime case being suspected or charged and the place where he is being detained in accordance with Article 21 paragraph (2) Criminal Procedure Code.
Granting Of Criminal Sanctions Against Children Consumpting Narcotics Elche Angelina Ediwan; Budi Parmono; Moh. Muhibbin
International Journal of Law, Environment, and Natural Resources Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): October Issue
Publisher : Scholar Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51749/injurlens.v3i2.57

Abstract

This research aims to describe the regulation of Narcotics criminal acts according to positive law in Indonesia and those responsible for criminal sanctions against children who use Narcotics according to Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics’ This research is normative legal research, descriptive in nature, statutory approach, consisting of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. Qualitative analysis is carried out systematically in order to get answers to problems. The results of the study stated that the regulation of narcotics crimes began with Law No. 9 of 1976 which prohibited the manufacture, storage, distribution and use of narcotics. Then Law No. 22 of 1997 with a wider scope, the criminal threat is made worse in the form of the death penalty. Then Law no. 35 of 2009, prohibits possessing, storing, controlling or providing Narcotics and Narcotics Precursors; the act of producing, importing, exporting, or releasing Narcotics and Narcotics precursor; acts in the form of offering to sell, sell, buy, receive, become an intermediary in buying and selling, exchanging, or handing over Narcotics and Narcotics precursors; and acts in the form of bringing, sending, transporting or transiting Narcotics and precursors. Criminal sanctions for children who use Narcotics are regulated in Law No. 3 of 1997 concerning Juvenile Courts and Law No. 35. Children who commit Narcotics crimes can be sentenced under Article 127 of Law No. 35 of 2009 in conjunction with Article 22 of Law No. 3 of 1997 amended to Law No. 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System. Prison sentence that can be written off for Narcotics children is no longer than ½ (one half) of the maximum prison sentence for adults.