Artificial Intelligence in Lifelong and Life-Course Education
Artificial Intelligence in Lifelong and Life-Course Education (AILLCE) focuses on advancing scholarly understanding of how artificial intelligence (AI) is designed, implemented, and evaluated within educational contexts across the entire lifespan. The journal emphasizes lifelong and life-course perspectives, addressing learning as a continuous process that spans early childhood, formal schooling, higher education, vocational education and training, adult learning, professional development, and later-life education. Its primary focus lies in examining the pedagogical, psychological, technological, and ethical dimensions of AI-supported education in formal, non-formal, and informal learning environments. The journal publishes original research articles, theoretical analyses, methodological studies, and systematic reviews that address, but are not limited to, the following areas: Artificial Intelligence Across the Life-Course AI applications in early childhood education, school education, higher education, vocational and professional education, adult education, and education for ageing populations; life-course transitions and longitudinal perspectives in AI-supported learning. AI-Enhanced Lifelong Learning Systems Adaptive and personalized learning systems, intelligent tutoring systems, learning recommender systems, AI-driven assessment, learning analytics, educational data mining, and lifelong learning pathways supported by AI technologies. Pedagogical, Psychological, and Developmental Perspectives The impact of AI on learning outcomes, motivation, self-regulated learning, academic emotions, cognitive processes, well-being, and learner agency across different developmental stages and educational contexts. AI Literacy, Ethics, and Governance in Education AI literacy and digital competence across the lifespan; ethical, transparent, and trustworthy AI in education; issues of algorithmic bias, fairness, explainability, data privacy, and governance frameworks for AI-enabled educational systems. Emerging Technologies and Innovative Learning Environments Integration of AI with immersive and interactive technologies, including virtual and augmented reality, game-based learning, workplace learning systems, open and community-based education, and informal learning environments. Methodological and Design-Oriented Research Design-based research, design and development research, mixed-methods approaches, longitudinal studies, learning analytics methodologies, and the validation of AI-supported educational models, frameworks, and instruments.
Articles
12 Documents
AI-Driven Competency-Based Education: Shaping Lifelong Learning and Skill Acquisition in Dynamic Educational Environments
Muhammad Rafiq-uz-Zaman
Artificial Intelligence in Lifelong and Life-Course Education Vol 1 No 1 (2026): Artificial Intelligence in Lifelong and Life-Course Education
Publisher : PT. Academic Bright Collaboration
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.66053/aillce.v1i1.29
Purpose – This study analyzes how Artificial Intelligence (AI) can strengthen Competency-Based Education (CBE), an approach that prioritizes demonstrated mastery over time-based progression. Since traditional models do not ensure competency attainment, this review evaluates AI’s potential to enhance personalized learning pathways, adaptive assessment mechanisms, and continuous feedback systems that support lifelong competency development. Design/methods/approach – A systematic literature review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines, examining 29 peer-reviewed Q1–Q3 journal articles focusing on AI applications in CBE, personalized learning systems, and lifelong learning models. The synthesis covers technologies such as intelligent tutoring systems, learning analytics, natural language processing, and adaptive algorithms, interpreted through the lenses of the Technology Acceptance Model and mastery learning theory. Findings – The evidence indicates that AI contributes to competency development by enabling individualized instruction, real-time formative assessment, and early detection of learning gaps. AI-supported environments promote adaptive self-regulated learning skills that are central to lifelong learning. However, empirical evidence demonstrating long-term, quantifiable learning outcomes remains limited, and many studies rely on short-term or exploratory designs. Implementation challenges continue, especially in resource-constrained contexts where infrastructure, institutional readiness, and educator expertise are insufficient. Research implications/limitations – The generalizability of findings is restricted by the methodological limitations of existing studies, including limited longitudinal evaluation and contextual validation. Further research is needed to measure sustained mastery outcomes and test AI-enhanced CBE models across diverse educational settings. Originality/value – This study proposes an AI-Driven CBE Framework that integrates competency mapping, personalized learning pathways, dynamic assessment systems, and structured lifelong learning support. It highlights the importance of AI literacy, pedagogically grounded implementation, and ethical safeguards particularly data privacy, algorithmic fairness, and equitable access to ensure responsible and sustainable AI integration in education.
AI-Powered Pedagogy: Integrating Generative AI into Nigerian Tertiary Institutions Teaching and Learning
Kayode Sunday John Dada;
Ibrahim Salihu Yusuf
Artificial Intelligence in Lifelong and Life-Course Education Vol 1 No 1 (2026): Artificial Intelligence in Lifelong and Life-Course Education
Publisher : PT. Academic Bright Collaboration
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.66053/aillce.v1i1.30
Purpose – This study investigates the factors shaping Nigerian lecturers’ acceptance, adoption, and pedagogical integration of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in tertiary institutions. It integrates the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) and Activity Theory to explain both individual adoption dynamics and systemic institutional constraints. Design/methods/approach – A cross-sectional quantitative survey was conducted with 236 lecturers across Nigerian tertiary institutions. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was employed to test hypothesized relationships among UTAUT constructs (performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, facilitating conditions, behavioral intention, and actual use). Additionally, a systematic meta-analysis of 47 empirical studies (N = 12,483; 2022–2025) contextualized findings within global higher education research. Descriptive and correlational analyses examined integration patterns and implementation challenges. Findings – Performance expectancy emerged as the strongest predictor of behavioral intention (β = .742, p < .001), indicating that lecturers adopt generative AI primarily for perceived pedagogical value rather than efficiency gains. Facilitating conditions demonstrated the strongest influence on actual use (β = .734, p < .001), revealing a structural gap between high adoption motivation and weak institutional support. A significant intention–behavior gap was observed, attributable primarily to infrastructural inadequacies, insufficient training, and policy ambiguity. Integration patterns showed that generative AI is predominantly used for preparatory tasks (e.g., literature synthesis, instructional material development) rather than student-facing applications. Activity Theory analysis identified four systemic contradictions Subject–Artifact, Artifact–Rules, Artifact–Community, and Object–Division of Labor that constrain transformative integration. Research implications/limitations – While the study confirms UTAUT applicability in sub-Saharan African higher education, the convenience sampling approach and overrepresentation of university lecturers limit generalizability. Future research should employ stratified probability sampling and longitudinal designs to examine evolving adoption patterns. Originality/value – This study provides one of the first large-scale empirical examinations of generative AI adoption in Nigerian tertiary education. By combining UTAUT’s behavioral precision with Activity Theory’s systemic diagnostic framework, it offers a theoretically integrated and policy-relevant explanation of why adoption intentions do not consistently translate into sustained pedagogical practice in resource-constrained contexts