cover
Contact Name
Andi Ahmad Yani
Contact Email
aayani@unhas.ac.id
Phone
+62 813-5540-5052
Journal Mail Official
jpsd@jurnal.unhas.ac.id
Editorial Address
Center for Peace Conflict & Democracy (CPCD) Lantai 3 Gedung LPPM Universitas Hasanuddin Jl. Perintis Kemerdekaan KM 10 Makassar. Indonesia. 90245
Location
Kota makassar,
Sulawesi selatan
INDONESIA
Journal of Peace, Security, and Democracy
Published by Universitas Hasanuddin
ISSN : -     EISSN : 3090515X     DOI : DOI: https://doi.org/10.63280/jpsd.v1i1
Core Subject : Social,
JPSD is a peer-reviewed journal that encompasses an interdisciplinary approach to exploring the interrelations between democratic processes, peace, and security. It aims to publish both empirical and theoretical research that addresses how democratic institutions influence peace and security outcomes globally and regionally. The journal would feature detailed case studies, comparative analyses, and innovative methodologies to deepen understanding of these dynamics. It seeks to bridge the academic-policy divide, providing policymakers with actionable insights while engaging the public through accessible discussions on the roles that democracy and peace play in enhancing security. The journal aspires to be a comprehensive platform for advancing scholarly debate and informing practical solutions in these critical areas.
Articles 5 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): January" : 5 Documents clear
The Role of NGOs in Resolving the Syrian War: A Case Study of The Carter Center Athilla Nadiyah
Journal of Peace, Security and Democracy Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): January
Publisher : Center of Peace, Conflict and Democracy - Hasanuddin University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63280/jpsd.v1i1.42244

Abstract

This study examines the crucial role carried by the Carter Center in facilitating negotiations and resolving the Syrian war between 2016 and 2019. This time was characterized by severe humanitarian emergencies and intricate geopolitical factors. The Syrian civil war, known for its immense human suffering and widespread international participation, posed significant obstacles to peacebuilding endeavors. In the midst of this upheaval, the Carter Center emerged as a significant participant, utilizing its expertise in resolving conflicts to facilitate discussions and advance the cause of peace. This research utilizes a thorough examination of primary and secondary data, such as government reports, interviews with important individuals, and evaluations conducted in the field, to analyze the effectiveness of the Carter Center's actions. The research emphasizes the Center's comprehensive strategy, encompassing the facilitation of talks, support for ceasefire agreements, and promotion of humanitarian aid. This is done while upholding a position of neutrality and demonstrating a profound understanding of other cultures. The data demonstrate that the Carter Center played a crucial role in establishing avenues for communication and mitigating violence, despite the ongoing and changing obstacles. This thesis enhances our comprehension of the intricacies of international conflict resolution and highlights the crucial role that non-state actors may play in promoting peace by scrutinizing the Center's techniques and outcomes. The research highlights the significance of continuous, compassionate involvement in areas of conflict and provides valuable understanding of the wider consequences for international efforts to promote peace.
Konflik Pelayaran Internasional Terhadap Stabilitas Keamanan di Selat Hormuz:: Konflik Iran-Amerika Serikat Hardian Noviyanto; Agussalim Burhanuddin; Nurjannah Abdullah
Journal of Peace, Security and Democracy Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): January
Publisher : Center of Peace, Conflict and Democracy - Hasanuddin University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63280/jpsd.v1i1.42245

Abstract

This study aims to determine the interests of Iran and the USA in the Iran-USA shipping conflict in the Strait of Hormuz and the impact of the Iran-USA shipping conflict on security stability in the Strait of Hormuz. The research method used in compiling this thesis is descriptive, with a literature review data collection technique. The results of this study indicate that Iran's interests are classified as defense interests, namely to maintain the existence and sovereignty of its country from sanctions imposed on them by Western countries, and economic interests, namely to resolve the impacts resulting from sanctions imposed by western countries on the development of nuclear weapons made by Iran as their military defense tool. Meanwhile, America's interests are classified as world order interests to maintain its trade activities in the Strait of Hormuz so that they can run well and ideological interests to maintain its existence as a world police responsible for maintaining the concept of the international ocean as a route that any other country cannot claim. The impact of the Iran-USA shipping conflict on security stability in the Strait of Hormuz is the increasing escalation of the conflict in the Strait of Hormuz, the threat to global trade activities marked by a decline in global oil trade activities, and the increase in oil prices on the global market.Keywords: strait Hormuz, shipping conflict, stability, interests.
Media dan Perilaku Boikot: Studi Terpaan Berita Konflik Palestina-Israel di Indonesia Nur Qalby; Andi Alimuddin Unde
Journal of Peace, Security and Democracy Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): January
Publisher : Center of Peace, Conflict and Democracy - Hasanuddin University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63280/jpsd.v1i1.42492

Abstract

The Palestinian-Israeli conflict that has been ongoing since 1948 has become a global geopolitical issue that has received widespread attention from the international media. The media plays a strategic role as the main source of information that can shape public perception. This study aims to analyze the influence of news exposure of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict on the boycott behavior of pro-Zionist products in Makassar City. Using media cultivation theory conducted with a descriptive quantitative approach on 348 respondents. The results of the regression analysis show that news exposure has a significant influence on boycott behavior with a contribution of 45.1%, while 54.9% is influenced by other factors not studied. Respondents confirmed that news content in the form of photos, videos, and text narratives increased awareness, emotions, and intensity of boycott actions. The findings confirm that the media can mobilize social action based on moral solidarity towards global humanitarian issues. This research recommends the development of more inclusive and adaptive communication policies to respond to evolving social dynamics, especially in efforts to build international solidarity through the media.
Dinamika Konflik dan Resolusi dalam Pemilihan Kepala Desa: Studi Kasus Di Desa Maradekaya Zukhrufi Kasmat; Ariana Yunus; Sakinah Nadir
Journal of Peace, Security and Democracy Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): January
Publisher : Center of Peace, Conflict and Democracy - Hasanuddin University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63280/jpsd.v1i1.42521

Abstract

Chief of Village Election is an essential local democratic agenda in the transition of village-level leadership, but it often becomes a source of significant social conflict. This study explores the Pilkades conflict in Maradekaya Village, Gowa Regency, in 2016 using a descriptive qualitative approach. The conflict was triggered by personal competition between candidates, the low socio-economic conditions of the community, and the inability of the election committee to maintain firmness and neutrality in the election process. The three candidates—who had strong support bases and different political backgrounds—formed dynamic alliances and feuds, creating political tensions that culminated in acts of mass violence. This tension was exacerbated by the social conditions of the community, dominated by residents with low levels of education and a strong paternalistic culture, which made them vulnerable to pragmatic politics based on money and social pressure. This study uses Burton's Conflict Resolution Theory and maps the conflict resolution approach into two main mechanisms, namely negotiation and mediation. Negotiations between candidates resulted in a decision to re-elect as an effort to avoid further escalation of the conflict. However, the implementation of mediation by the election committee was unsuccessful due to a lack of legitimacy and firmness. In contrast, mediation conducted by the Bajeng Sub-district Head showed more effective results with an evaluative approach that emphasized decision-making based on majority vote and consensus. The results of the study indicate that the Maradekaya Pilkades conflict reflects the complexity of local politics involving structural, cultural, and personal dimensions. Effective conflict resolution requires strengthening the capacity of local institutions, increasing political education of the community, and implementing a consensus-based mediation strategy involving figures who have authority and public trust. This study emphasizes the importance of the role of professional and neutral mediation in preventing social fragmentation that can disrupt the stability of democracy at the village level.
Dinamika Kerjasama Keamanan Siber antar Negara : Studi Kasus Indonesia Dan Belanda Muhammad Faiq Qushayyi
Journal of Peace, Security and Democracy Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): January
Publisher : Center of Peace, Conflict and Democracy - Hasanuddin University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63280/jpsd.v1i1.42626

Abstract

The rapid development of information technology in the era of globalization has brought new challenges in the field of cybersecurity. As a country with a high internet adoption rate, Indonesia faces various cyber threats that can damage critical infrastructure and threaten socio-political stability. In the face of these challenges, international cooperation is becoming increasingly important, and one significant form of cooperation is between Indonesia and the Netherlands. This article examines the impact of cybersecurity cooperation between the two countries in improving Indonesia's capacity to deal with cyber threats. Through a qualitative approach, it explores the various initiatives that have been implemented, including training programs, information exchange, and joint policy development to improve Indonesia's cyber resilience. It found that this cooperation not only strengthens the technical aspects but also facilitates the formation of more holistic policies in addressing cyber challenges. The article also discusses the obstacles faced in this collaboration, including differences in infrastructure, human resource capacity, and political and legal aspects that may affect the effectiveness of this collaboration. Finally, the article offers strategic recommendations for both countries to strengthen their cooperation, with a focus on strengthening Indonesia's national capacity and integrating cybersecurity policies at the international level.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5