cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Nur Hasanah
Contact Email
nur.hasanah@batan.go.id
Phone
+6221-5204243
Journal Mail Official
jpen@batan.go.id
Editorial Address
Kawasan Kantor Pusat Badan Tenaga Nuklir Nasional Jl. Kuningan Barat, Mampang Prapatan, Jakarta 12710 Kotak Pos 4390 Jakarta 12043
Location
Kota adm. jakarta selatan,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Jurnal Pengembangan Energi Nuklir
Published by Badan Tenaga Nuklir Nasional
ISSN : 14109816     EISSN : 25029479     DOI : https://doi.org/10.17146/jpen
Core Subject : Science, Social, Engineering,
Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Social Sciences
Jurnal Pengembangan Energi Nuklir publishes scientific papers on the results of studies and research on nuclear energy development with the scope of energy and electricity planning, nuclear energy technology, energy economics, management of nuclear power plants, national industries that support nuclear power plants, aspects of the nuclear power plant site and environment, and topics others that support the development of nuclear energy.
Arjuna Subject : Energi (semua kategori) - Teknik dan Energi Nuklir
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 3, No 2 (2001): Desember 2001" : 5 Documents clear
EVALUASI LINGKUNGAN CALON TAPAK PLTN DI UJUNG LEMAHABANG SAMPAI TAHUN 2000 Sri Hariani Sjarief
Jurnal Pengembangan Energi Nuklir Vol 3, No 2 (2001): Desember 2001
Publisher : Pusat Kajian Sistem Energi Nuklir, Badan Tenaga Nuklir Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17146/jpen.2001.3.2.2025

Abstract

ABSTRAK EVALUASI LINGKUNGAN CALON. TAPAK PLTN DI UJUNG LEMAHABANG SAMPAI TAHUN 2000. Lingkungan merupakan salah satu aspek yang periu mendapat perhatian dalam setiap rencana pembangunan di suatu lokasi. Penentuan kondisi lingkungan sebelum proyek dibangun merupakan suatu ketentuan yang periu dilaksanakan dalam rangka mengetahui dampak proyek selama operasi dan kebijakan dalam penanggulangan dampak. Pada rencana pembangunan Pusat Listrik Tenaga Nuklir, pengamatan aspek-aspek lingkungan dilakukan di sekitar lokasi tapak dalam bentuk data primer maupun sekunder di radius sampai 100 km. Pengamatan beijalan sampai tahun 1997. Dari aspek lingkungan yang diteliti ada perubahan jumlah penduduk, ekologi, kesejahteraan masyarakat sekitar yang berkaitan dengan perkembangan ekonomi penduduk daerah Ujung Lemahabang. Selama perubahan ini tidak memberikan dampak terialu besar terhadap wilayah calon tapak Ujung Lemahabang dalam radius 5 km, kemungkinan calon tapak ini masih dapat dipertahankan sebagai lokasi PLTN dalam beberapa tahun mendatang. ABSTRACT THE ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION OF THE UJUNG LEMAHABANG AS A SELECTED SITE FOR THE INDONESIAN NPP UP TO 2000. In the development planning of a certain area, one of the aspects which should be considered is the environment. Before the project construction it is necessary to define the condition of environment around the site, which is needed to identify the impact of the project to the environment and the policy that should be taken. In the planning of the Nuclear Power Plant construction, the environmental aspects have been observed around the site by collecting primary and secondary data in the radius of 100 km. The observation has been done up to the year 1997. It is observed .that there are some alterations on population development, ecology, and public welfare which are related to the economic development of the Ujung Lemahabang community. As long as the alteration does not give any harmful impact to the site around 5 km radius, it is possible to maintain Ujung Lemahabang as a candidate site for the Nuclear Power Plant Project for a few years in the future.
PENGARUH TINGGI CEROBONG TERHADAP DOSIS AWAN GAMMA DARI PELEPASAN RUTIN RADIONUKLIDA PLTN Yarianto Sugeng Budi Susilo
Jurnal Pengembangan Energi Nuklir Vol 3, No 2 (2001): Desember 2001
Publisher : Pusat Kajian Sistem Energi Nuklir, Badan Tenaga Nuklir Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17146/jpen.2001.3.2.2026

Abstract

ABSTRAK PENGARUH TINGGI CEROBONG TERHADAP DOSIS AWAN GAMMA DARI PELEPASAN RUTIN RADIONUKLIDA PLTN. Tinggi cerobong mempunyai peran penting daiam menentukan pola penyebaran radionuklida di udara pada pelepasan rutin. Optimasi tinggi cerobong suatu fasilitas nuklir dapat dilakukan dengan simulasi perhitungan dosis awan gamma dari berbagai ketinggian titik pelepasan. Data meteorologi yang digunakan sebagai masukan berupa data dari calon tapak PLTN di Ujung Lemahabang. Perhitungan dilakukan dengan menggunakan paket program komputer PC CREAM, dengan Modul PLUME. Untuk perhitungan awan gamma digunakan model yang umum dipakai, yaitu model finite cloud. Semakin tinggi titik pelepasan (tinggi cerobong) maka semakiri kecil konsentrasi radionuklida di tingkat permukaan, demikian juga tingkat dosis awan gammanya. Hasil perhitungan menunjukkan bahwa dosis awan gamma maksimum dari pelepasan radionuklida untuk PLTN tunggal PWR 900MWe untuk tinggi cerobong 20 m, 60 m dan 100 m berturut-turut adalah 2,2.10-4; 8.9.10-8 dan 5,4.10-8 mSv/tahun. Dosis ini masih jauh di bawah batas ambang, yaitu 5 mSv./tahun.   ABSTRACT INFLUENCE OF HEIGHT OF STACK TO THE GAMMA CLOUD DOSE AT NPP ROUTINE RELEASE. Height of stack will contribute to determine pattern of radionuclides dispersion in atmosphere at routine release. Optimization of high level of stack of nuclear facility can be determined by simulation of gamma cloud dose at several high level of release point. Meteorological data input are used Ujung Lemahabang site data. Calculation is performed by PC CREAM with PLUME Module. Gamma cloud calculation is used finite cloud model that is general model. The higher of release point will induce less activity as well as gamma cloud dose at near ground level. The calculation results show that maximum gamma cloud dose of radionuclides released by NPP of 900 MWe PWR type for height of stack 20, 60, and 100 meter are 2,2.10-4; 8.9.10-8 dan 5,4.10-8 mSv/year respectively. The doses are still under limited dose of 5 mSv./year.
ANALISIS PROSES DESALINASI PADA SISTEM SINGLE EFFECT EVAPORATION (SEE) Nurlaila Nurlaila
Jurnal Pengembangan Energi Nuklir Vol 3, No 2 (2001): Desember 2001
Publisher : Pusat Kajian Sistem Energi Nuklir, Badan Tenaga Nuklir Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17146/jpen.2001.3.2.2027

Abstract

ABSTRAK ANALISIS PROSES DESALINASI PADA SISTEM SINGLE EFFECT EVAPORATION (SEE). Single Effect Evaporation (SEE) adalah desain sederhana dari Multi Effect Desalination (MED) yang mempunyai fungsi dan komponen yang sama. Perbedaannya terletak pada temperatur dan tekanan serta jumlah efeknya . Pada makalah ini hanya dibahas mengenai unjuk kerja dari sistem SEE tanpa kombinasi dengan sistem pompa panas, dengan menampilkan hasil hitungan mengenai Perbandingan Unjuk Kerja (Performance Ratio, PR), Luasan Transfer Panas Spesifik (Specific Heat Transfer Area, sA), Laju Alir Pendingin Air Laut Spesifik (Specific Cooling Seawater Flow Rate, sMcw) dan Perbandingan Konversi (Conversion Ratio, CR). Perbandingan Unjuk Kerja serta perbandingan jumlah air laut dan jumlah air yang dihasilkan dari SEE (sMw) ini selanjutnya dapat digunakan sebagai parameter untuk menentukan layak atau tidaknya SEE untuk skala industri. Perhitungan yang dipakai menggunakan komputasi dengan model matematika yang dikembangkan oleh El-Desouky dan Ettouney (1999). Hasil perhitungan menunjukkan bahwa PR lebih kecil dari 1 dan membutuhkan air laut dalam jumlah yang jauh lebih besar. Disimpulkan bahwa SEE kurang layak untuk skala industri.   ABSTRACT DESALINATION PROCESS ANALYSIS ON SINGLE EFFECT EVAPORATION (SEE) SYSTEM. Single Effect Evaporation (SEE) is the simple design of Multi Effect Desalination (MED), with the same functions and components. The differences are on their temperature, pressure and the number of effects. This paper discusses the performance of SEE system without heat pump system combination. This paper describes calculation results on Performance Ratio (PR) comparation, Specific Heat Transfer Area (sA), Specific Cooling Seawater Flow Rate (sMcw) and Conversion Ratio (CR). The calculation results can be used as the parameter to determine whether SEE is feasible or not to industrial scale. The calculation for this paper uses mathematic model which is developed by El-Desouky and Ettouney (1999). The result shows that PR is lower than 1 and the system needs substantial amount of seawater. Based on the calculation results, SEE is not feasible to industrial scale.
THE GREEN HOUSE GAS ABATEMENT STUDY FOR INDONESIA Edi Sartono; Scorpio Sri Herdinie
Jurnal Pengembangan Energi Nuklir Vol 3, No 2 (2001): Desember 2001
Publisher : Pusat Kajian Sistem Energi Nuklir, Badan Tenaga Nuklir Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17146/jpen.2001.3.2.2028

Abstract

ABSTRACT The energy demand in Indonesia is projected to increase in the future. Based on the tentative results of the comprehensive assessment of different energy source for electricity, the demand will grow and reach the figure of about 8,200 Peta Joules in the year 2025. With regards to the energy supply in connection with climate change resulting from increasing Greenhouse Gases (GHG) in the atmosphere, and in line with the national energy policy which stresses on diversification, conservation, energy price and environmental awareness in energy supply development. The main objective of this study is to analyse GHG abatement by introduction various clean energy options such as renewable and nuclear energy in the Indonesian energy system by using IAEA Tool and to calculate the cost of GHG emission avoided. For the purpose of the case study, two cases were developed with some aggregations and assumptions for simplification. The first case Baseline case, which represents the current energy network (doing nothing case) and the second case defined GHG mitigation in the electric sector by replacing fossil power plants (600 MWe + 400 MWe) with various clean energy options GHG abatement technology (1000 MWe Nuclear PP). The result of the study shown that the total of CH4 reduction until the end of study period of about 1180.8 tons and 271.6 million tons for C02. The average reduction of the greenhouse gas are 4.4% per year for CH4 and 7.3% per year for C02, starting from introduction of nuclear power plant in year 2012. It is believed that, the economic competitiveness of nuclear power could significantly increase if GHG mitigation program were taken into account in the national energy planning. GHG abatement technology choice has to be made on the basis of economic aspects and its efficiency, so that the type of technology that is chosen is the most optimum as viewed from all aspects of the economy and the environment. Applying fuel diversification in the electric generation mix, nuclear and renewable energy, energy conservation as well as the demand side management can be carry out by mitigation of CH4 and C02 in the energy sector.
ONGKOS EKSTERNAL PEMBANGKITAN LISTRIK, SEBUAH PERHITUNGAN PENDEKATAN Mursid Djokolelono; Edi Sartono; Scorpio Sri Herdinie
Jurnal Pengembangan Energi Nuklir Vol 3, No 2 (2001): Desember 2001
Publisher : Pusat Kajian Sistem Energi Nuklir, Badan Tenaga Nuklir Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17146/jpen.2001.3.2.2029

Abstract

ABSTRAK ONGKOS EKSTERNAL PEMBANGKITAN LISTRIK, SEBUAH PERHITUNGAN PENDEKATAN. Hitungan ongkos pembangkitan listrik pada pembangkit fosil mencakup ongkos modal, ongkos operasi & perawatan, serta ongkos bahan bakar. Pada PLTN ongkos pembangkitan ini masih ditambah dengan ongkos pasca operasi (dekomisi). Kesadaran terhadap kesehatan masyarakat dan perlindungan lingkungan dewasa ini, telah memacu diperhitungkannya ongkos yang harus ditanggung masyarakat akibat polusi/gangguan yang mengakibatkan degradasi terhadap kesehatan, kerusakan material maupun lingkungan, yang disebut ongkos eksternal. Hitungan eksternalitas dapat dilakukan dengan berbagai metoda dan program komputasi, antara lain yang tengah dikembangkan dan diperkenalkan oleh IAEA, yaitu program B-GLAD. Metoda ini menghitung penyebaran polusi ke lingkungan pembangkit listrik, menaksir dosis yang diterima masyarakat dan lingkungan, menaksir korban dan kerusakan, serta menilainya dalam besaran moneter. Dalam makalah ini tiga kasus telah diambil untuk aplikasi dengan program ini, yaitu dengan data dari PLTN 2x900 MWe di tapak Ujung Lemah Abang dan dua PLTU-batubara 3x600 MWe di tapak Tanjung Jati, kedua tapak di pantai Semenanjung Muria. Sedang PLTU-batubara dibandingkan yang menggunakan flue gas desulphurization (FGD) dan yang tidak. Sedangkan bagi PLTN, taksiran kerugian masyarakat memasukkan pula faktor keengganan risiko dan kejadian kecelakaan. Hasil taksiran Ongkos Eksternal diperoleh adalah 0,9094 mills/KWh untuk PLTU tanpa FGD, 0,8156 mills/KWh untuk PLTU dengan FGD, serta 0,0083 mills/KWh untuk PLTN, atau besarnya dua sampai empat orde di bawah harga pembangkitan listrik masing-masing. Dibandingkan dengan hasil perhitungan untuk pembangkit di Eropa, ongkos eksternal mereka lebih kecii, tetapi dengan studi di Thailand masih tercakup dalam batas bentang besaran mereka.   ABSTRACT EXTERNAL COSTS OF ELECTRICITY GENERATION, APROXIMATE CALCULATION. Electricity generation cost of a fossil power plant includes capital cost, operation & maintenance costs and fuel cost. For a nuclear power plant the generation cost includes also a post-operation cost (decommissioning cost). The awareness of public health and environmental protection have recently urged to elaborately incorporate those costs bome by the public due to the pollution and negative effects resulting from the electricity generation, which are called external costs. Methods and computer programs of such calculation have been published and being developed, for example the one that is being developed and promoted by the IAEA, the B-Glad computation program. The method calculates dispersion of emitted pollution to public and environment, assess the doses received and damages thereafter, and then evaluate the damages in monetary quantities. This paper illustrates calculation using the B-Glad taking the input data of nuclear power plant (NPP) of 2x900 MWe at the Ujung Lemah Abang site, and two kinds of coal power plants (CPP) of 3x600 MWe at the Tanjung Jati site, both sites are located at the coast of the Muria peninsular. The CPPs with Flue Gas Desulphurization (FGD) and without FGD.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2001 2001


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 23, No 2 (2021): Desember 2021 Vol 23, No 1 (2021): Juni 2021 Vol 22, No 2 (2020): Desember 2020 Vol 22, No 1 (2020): Juni 2020 Vol 21, No 2 (2019): Desember 2019 Vol 21, No 1 (2019): Juni 2019 Vol 20, No 2 (2018): Desember 2018 Vol 20, No 1 (2018): Juni 2018 Vol 19, No 2 (2017): Desember 2017 Vol 19, No 1 (2017): Juni 2017 Vol 18, No 2 (2016): Desember 2016 Vol 18, No 1 (2016): Juni 2016 Vol 17, No 2 (2015): Desember 2015 Vol 17, No 1 (2015): Juni 2015 Vol 16, No 2 (2014): Desember 2014 Vol 16, No 1 (2014): Juni 2014 Vol 15, No 2 (2013): Desember 2013 Vol 15, No 1 (2013): Juni 2013 Vol 14, No 2 (2012): Desember 2012 Vol 14, No 1 (2012): Juni 2012 Vol 13, No 2 (2011): Desember 2011 Vol 13, No 1 (2011): Juni 2011 Vol 12, No 2 (2010): Desember 2010 Vol 12, No 1 (2010): Juni 2010 Vol 11, No 2 (2009): Desember 2009 Vol 11, No 1 (2009): Juni 2009 Vol 10, No 2 (2008): Desember 2008 Vol 10, No 1 (2008): Juni 2008 Vol 9, No 2 (2007): Desember 2007 Vol 9, No 1 (2007): Juni 2007 Vol 8, No 2 (2006): Desember 2006 Vol 8, No 1 (2006): Juni 2006 Vol 7, No 2 (2005): Desember 2005 Vol 7, No 1 (2005): Juni 2005 Vol 6, No 2 (2004): Desember 2004 Vol 6, No 1 (2004): Juni 2004 Vol 5, No 2 (2003): Desember 2003 Vol 5, No 1 (2003): Juni 2003 Vol 4, No 2 (2002): Desember 2002 Vol 4, No 1 (2002): Juni 2002 Vol 3, No 2 (2001): Desember 2001 Vol 2, No 4 (2000): Desember 2000 Vol 2, No 3 (2000): September 2000 Vol 2, No 2 (2000): Juni 2000 Vol 2, No 1 (2000): Maret 2000 Vol 1, No 4 (1999): Desember 1999 Vol 1, No 3 (1999): September 1999 Vol 1, No 1 (1999): Maret 1999 More Issue