cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Safril Yanda
Contact Email
Jlprcatalyst@gmail.com
Phone
+6282274721598
Journal Mail Official
lprcatalyst@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Imam Bonjol No. 99, Seuneubok, Johan Pahlawan, Aceh Barat-Aceh, Indonesia.
Location
Kab. aceh barat,
Aceh
INDONESIA
Journal of Law Perspectives Review
Published by Catalist Indo Publisher
ISSN : -     EISSN : 31104878     DOI : https://doi.org/10.64670/jlpr
Core Subject :
Journal of Law Perspectives Review (JLPR) is an open-access and peer-reviewed academic journal focusing on legal studies and contemporary issues in law. We publish original and up-to-date articles that address significant theoretical, doctrinal, and practical legal issues relevant to Indonesia, Southeast Asia, and the global context. JLPR explores various aspects of law from multidisciplinary and critical perspectives, emphasizing legal development, justice reform, and the role of law in societal transformation at national and international levels. Main topics include constitutional law, administrative law, criminal law, civil law, international law, environmental law, human rights law, legal theory, and legal pluralism. We welcome original research articles, case analyses, theoretical studies, and literature reviews that offer new paradigms and critical insights into the evolving nature of law and legal systems. Each submission undergoes rigorous peer review by legal scholars and practitioners to ensure high scientific quality and global relevance.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): Juli" : 5 Documents clear
Efektivitas Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 22 Tahun 2022 dalam PerlindunganHukum dan Pemenuhan Hak Awak Kapal Perikanan Migran Sabrina Sugiatna; Dede Agus; Nuryati Solapari
Journal of Law Perspectives Review Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): Juli
Publisher : Catalist Indo Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64670/jlpr.v1i1.13

Abstract

 Indonesia is a country with abundant marine resources due to the large number of islands in Indonesia,including large and small islands, with approximately 17,508 islands. The high number of islands inIndonesia makes this one of the livelihoods of the Indonesian people, especially those living on thecoastline, namely as fisheries crew members or fishermen. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness ofGovernment Regulation Number 22 of 2022 in providing legal protection and ensuring the fulfillment ofrights for migrant fisheries crew members. The research employs an empirical juridical approach, utilizingliterature review and field studies through direct interviews. The findings reveal that despite the existenceof this regulation, the implementation of legal protection for migrant fisheries crew members remainschallenging. Key issues include weak policy enforcement, limited supervision, lack of legal awarenessamong crew members, and bureaucratic obstacles that hinder access to legal assistance. Additionally,cases of exploitation and labor contract misinterpretation persist, particularly in the high-risk fisheriesindustry. The regulation establishes a clearer legal framework by defining the responsibilities ofplacement companies and the government in ensuring social protection, fair wages, work safety,insurance, and legal aid for crew members. However, gaps in enforcement necessitate collaborative effortsamong government agencies, fisheries companies, and non-governmental organizations. Strengtheningsupervision, legal enforcement, and empowering crew members through legal education and training arecrucial to improving protection. Continuous policy improvements and inter-agency coordination areexpected to enhance the effectiveness of legal protection for migrant fisheries crew members in Indonesia. 
Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Penyewa Tanah Dari Pengelola Tanah Yang Hendak Dijual Pemilik Tanah Sebelum Masa Sewa Tegar Ananta Prakarsa; Glady Arga Maroena; Tiyas Vika Widyastuti; Evy Indriasari; Nuridin
Journal of Law Perspectives Review Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): Juli
Publisher : Catalist Indo Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64670/jlpr.v1i1.14

Abstract

A lease agreement is an agreement set forth in a written agreement with the contents of the parties binding themselves to each other within a specified time and has an agreed price value that gives rise to an obligation for the tenant to pay for the goods or buildings he rents, but in practice the researcher found that there are things that harm the tenant such as by selling land without the knowledge of the party The tenant of the land certainly cannot be ignored, considering that the principle of an engagement agreement is good faith in an agreement, good faith means that one party intends not to interfere with allies or public interest The type of method used by the author is using the library research method (Library Research), which is a method used by studying literature books,  legislation, and other written materials. The results of this study show the Legal Protection of Land Tenants from Land Managers Who Want to Sell Land Owners Before the Lease Period and Land Rental Agreements from Land Managers Who Want to Be Sold by Land Owners. Based on the results of this research, it is hoped that it will be material for information and input from students, academics, and all parties in need, especially within the Faculty of Law, Pancasakti University of Tegal
Perbandingan Penagangan Hukum Anak Penggunaan Narkoba Di Indonesia Dan Malaysia Dimas Bayunegara; Alamsyah; Mario Marco
Journal of Law Perspectives Review Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): Juli
Publisher : Catalist Indo Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64670/jlpr.v1i1.15

Abstract

The increasing rate of drug abuse among children and adolescents has become a serious concern that demands urgent attention from all levels of society. The severity of this issue calls for a united effort to combat drug trafficking and promote stronger legal frameworks that address the specific needs of young drug users. In particular, law enforcement approaches toward children and adolescents involved in drug abuse should emphasize not only criminal penalties but also rehabilitation and child protection. This study aims to compare how Indonesia and Malaysia legally handle cases involving juvenile drug offenders. Employing the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method, this research analyzes various national legal documents, policies, and academic perspectives to explore the similarities and differences in both countries’ legal treatments. In Indonesia, the legal response to children involved in drug abuse is guided by a restorative justice approach, which is embedded in the Narcotics Law and the Juvenile Criminal Justice System Law. These laws focus on rehabilitation and reintegration into society, rather than solely on punitive measures. Meanwhile, Malaysia also adopts a comparable framework through several pieces of legislation, including the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952, the Child Act 2001, and the Juvenile Courts Act 1947. These laws aim to strike a balance between punishment and protection, acknowledging the unique status of children in conflict with the law. In conclusion, while both countries adopt progressive strategies to deal with juvenile drug abuse, the implementation reflects each nation’s distinct legal system and socio-cultural context.
Permohonan Pailit terhadap developer perumahan dalam Praktik Peradilan di Indonesia dan Malaysia Agung Hermansyah; Harul Surya Fernanda; Novaranty Zura Dwiputri
Journal of Law Perspectives Review Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): Juli
Publisher : Catalist Indo Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64670/jlpr.v1i1.16

Abstract

This article aims to comparatively examine the legal mechanisms for filing bankruptcy petitions against housing developers in Indonesia and Malaysia, with a particular focus on the effectiveness of consumer protection. The research is motivated by the rising number of stalled housing projects and the weakened legal position of consumers, especially in Indonesia following the issuance of Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) No. 3 of 2023, which restricts the use of bankruptcy petitions against property developers. This study employs a normative legal research method with a comparative law approach, analyzing statutory regulations, court decisions, and relevant legal literature from both countries. The findings reveal that Malaysia offers a more consumer-responsive insolvency framework through the implementation of escrow accounts, performance bonds, clear legal segmentation between individual and corporate bankruptcy, and the presence of a dedicated housing regulatory authority. In contrast, Indonesia continues to face legal uncertainty and lacks sufficient consumer protection mechanisms in bankruptcy cases involving developers. The study concludes that Indonesia’s bankruptcy law requires reform to become more adaptive and consumer-oriented. The recommendation includes strengthening bankruptcy regulations, integrating escrow account mechanisms into national law, and establishing an independent housing supervisory body to enhance developer accountability and ensure legal certainty for homebuyers.
Penyelesaian Sengketa Kesehatan Dengan Metode Non Litigasi, Mediasi, Arbitrase Dan Alternatif Lainnya Maryanto; Irwan Triadi
Journal of Law Perspectives Review Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): Juli
Publisher : Catalist Indo Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64670/jlpr.v1i1.17

Abstract

This article aims to analyze the effectiveness of non-litigation dispute resolution methods in the healthcare sector, focusing on mediation, arbitration, and other alternatives such as negotiation, conciliation, and expert determination. This study employs a qualitative approach through normative legal analysis and literature review of relevant Indonesian laws and regulations, including Law No. 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution, the Medical Practice Law, and Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2016 on Mediation Procedures. The findings indicate that non-litigation methods offer significant advantages over traditional litigation, particularly in terms of time efficiency, cost reduction, and the preservation of relationships between patients and healthcare providers. Mediation facilitates mutually beneficial agreements (win-win solutions), while arbitration provides binding decisions without lengthy court procedures. Additionally, internal complaint mechanisms and the roles of institutions such as the Indonesian Medical Disciplinary Honorary Council (MKDKI) contribute to the institutionalization of non-litigation approaches. In conclusion, non-litigation healthcare dispute resolution is a more adaptive, humane, and trust-based solution that aligns with the demands of responsive healthcare services. Enhancing legal literacy and institutional capacity in mediation practices is essential to broaden the implementation of these methods.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2025 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): April Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): Januari Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): Oktober Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): Juli