cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Teuku Rizky Noviandy
Contact Email
trizkynoviandy@gmail.com
Phone
+6282275731976
Journal Mail Official
ditorial-office@journals.grimsa.org
Editorial Address
Jalan Makam T. Nyak Arief, Krueng Barona Jaya, Aceh Besar, Indonesia
Location
Kab. aceh besar,
Aceh
INDONESIA
Genesis Law and Social Sciences
Published by PT. Graha Primera Saintifika
ISSN : -     EISSN : 31089054     DOI : https://doi.org/10.61975/glass
Core Subject :
Genesis Law and Social Sciences (GLASS) is dedicated to providing a dynamic and inclusive platform for researchers, scholars, and professionals to exchange groundbreaking ideas, theoretical advancements, and empirical research in the diverse and evolving fields of social sciences. The journal fosters interdisciplinary dialogue and critical engagement across various domains, promoting research that addresses contemporary societal challenges, policy developments, and human interactions: Law and Legal Studies, Notarial Law, Sociology and Anthropology, Political Science and Public Administration, Education and Pedagogy, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Media and Communication Studies, Criminology and Social Justice, Gender and Diversity Studies, Environmental and Social Sustainability, Interdisciplinary and Emerging Research
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 15 Documents
 1   2 
Legal Responsibility of PT Pembangunan Sabang Mandiri (Perseroda) Over the Assets and Liabilities of a Regional-Owned Enterprise Following a Change in Legal Form Putri Cahaya Alyfia; Muhammad Insa Ansari; Teuku Ahmad Yani
Genesis Law and Social Sciences Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): May 2026
Publisher : Graha Primera Saintifika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61975/glass.v2i1.119

Abstract

The transformation of a Regional Owned Enterprise (BUMD) from a Regional Company (Perusahaan Daerah) into a Regional Limited Liability Company (Perseroda) reflects the implementation of Good Corporate Governance, mandated by Article 402(2) of Law No. 23 of 2014 on Regional Government and operationalized through Sabang City Qanun No. 3 of 2020, which converted the Sabang Regional Development Company (PDPS) into PT Pembangunan Sabang Mandiri (Perseroda). This change entails the transfer of all assets and liabilities to the successor entity, yet in practice remains incomplete, raising questions of successor liability and creditor protection. This study analyses the Perseroda's legal liability for assets and liabilities arising from the transformation, the limits of such liability, and the legal protection of creditors. Using an empirical juridical method with a socio-legal approach, it draws on literature, legal documents, and interviews, analyzed qualitatively. The findings show that, under Article 7(1) and (3) of the Qanun, the transfer follows the principles of continuity of legal entity and universal succession, whereby all rights, obligations, assets, and legal relationships of the PDPS pass by operation of law to the Perseroda, which therefore bears full responsibility for them. Creditor protection remains secured, as pre-existing legal relationships are not extinguished and claims may be enforced against the successor. Empirically, however, the transfer lacks complete administrative and juridical settlement: inadequate inventory and verification, incomplete documentation, and ambiguous legal status of certain assets and obligations render both principles sub-optimally implemented, risking legal uncertainty. The study recommends comprehensive reorganization through inventory, verification, and clarification of asset status; clearer liability limits under Article 7 of the Qanun; and stronger creditor-protection mechanisms to ensure legal certainty.
Compensation Payments for Land Rights in the Construction of the Krueng Baroe Bridge in South Aceh Cut Tiya Ascasari; Ilyas Ismail; Siti Rahmah
Genesis Law and Social Sciences Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): May 2026
Publisher : Graha Primera Saintifika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61975/glass.v2i1.125

Abstract

The development of infrastructure for public interest requires land acquisition based on the principles of justice, legal certainty, and utility as stipulated in Article 2 of Law Number 2 of 2012 concerning Land Acquisition for Public Interest Development, which includes the principles of humanity, justice, utility, certainty, openness, agreement, participation, welfare, sustainability, and harmony. However, in practice, the implementation of compensation still poses problems, especially regarding the discrepancy between the compensation value and the real market conditions. This is evident in the construction of the Krueng Baro Bridge in South Aceh, where there are discrepancies in land value and public dissatisfaction with the determined value. The purpose of this research is to analyze the implementation of compensation payments for land rights in the construction of the Krueng Baroe Bridge in South Aceh. The research method used is empirical juridical with a sociological legal approach, data obtained thru interviews with the Commitment-Making Officer, the National Land Agency, the Public Appraisal Service Office, as well as the affected community, and reinforced with literature study. The research results show that formally, the implementation of compensation has followed legal procedures, but the execution has not fully reflected substantive justice, as public consultations were not conducted and non-physical losses were not accommodated in the determination of compensation value. The obstacles that arise are multidimensional, including limited land data, weak institutional integration, and low transparency. The resolution efforts that have been undertaken include deliberations and renegotiations between the implementing parties, KJPP, and the community that rejects the compensation.
Analysis of Unlawful Acts by a Land Deed Official Concerning Promised Compensation in the Granting of Land Donations Muhammad Faza Kamla Alfitra; Ria Fitri; Teuku Abdurrahman
Genesis Law and Social Sciences Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): May 2026
Publisher : Graha Primera Saintifika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61975/glass.v2i1.126

Abstract

The transfer of land rights through grants must be evidenced by a deed executed before a Land Deed Official (PPAT), who is also obliged to explain the contents and legal implications of the deed to the parties concerned. In practice, however, grants accompanied by compensation frequently give rise to legal issues, particularly where the parties do not fully understand the legal nature and consequences of the transaction. This study aims to analyze the occurrence of land grants accompanied by compensation, the legal responsibility of PPATs, and the legal consequences arising from such transactions. Employing a normative juridical method, this research utilizes statutory, case, and conceptual approaches with qualitative legal analysis. The findings indicate that the PPAT’s failure to provide adequate explanations regarding the legal consequences of the deed is associated with a shift in the parties’ understanding of the legal nature of grants and may create conditions that contribute to legal uncertainty. From a legal perspective, grants accompanied by compensation may be regarded as inconsistent with the essential characteristics of a grant and, therefore, may affect the validity of the legal act. Accordingly, PPATs should provide comprehensive legal explanations to the parties, while reciprocal legal relationships should be structured through legal instruments that correspond to their actual legal characteristics to ensure legal certainty and minimize the risk of future disputes.
Idiosyncratic Factors in Defense Policy Formulation: An Analysis of Prabowo Subianto's Role in Indonesia's Optimum Essential Force 2025 Muhammad Zhafran Abiyyu; Shabrina Khalisah Ibrahim
Genesis Law and Social Sciences Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): May 2026
Publisher : Graha Primera Saintifika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61975/glass.v2i1.127

Abstract

This study analyzes the influence of Prabowo Subianto's idiosyncratic characteristics on the formulation of Indonesia's Optimum Essential Force (OEF) 2025 defense policy. Despite growing scholarly interest in Indonesian defense modernization, existing literature predominantly emphasizes structural and institutional explanations while under examining the role of individual leadership. Drawing on Foreign Policy Analysis, this study employs Leadership Trait Analysis (LTA) based on Hermann's framework and process tracing to construct and verify causal chains between Prabowo's personal characteristics and specific OEF 2025 policy decisions. Analysis of spontaneous public statements identifies four dominant traits: high need for power, high belief in ability to control events, high self-confidence, and high ingroup bias combined with medium-high distrust of others. Process tracing demonstrates that these traits causally contributed to the centralization of acquisition decision-making, the mandatory inclusion of technology transfer clauses, the ambitious defense budget targets, and platform preferences reflecting limited power-projection ambitions. The findings indicate that the qualitative shift from the Minimum Essential Force to OEF 2025 cannot be explained by regional structural pressures alone; within this case, the idiosyncratic variable functions as a necessary component of the explanation. The study contributes the first systematic individual-level account of Indonesian defense policymaking and illustrates the analytical value of leadership variables in explaining departures from established policy trajectories.
The Risks of Unregulated Artificial Intelligence in Indonesia: Challenges and Solutions Ahmad Zharfan; Ghadamfar Muflih Idroes; Faisal A Rani
Genesis Law and Social Sciences Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): May 2026
Publisher : Graha Primera Saintifika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61975/glass.v2i1.128

Abstract

The rapid diffusion of artificial intelligence (AI) systems in Indonesia has outpaced the country's regulatory capacity. Although several statutory and subordinate instruments touch upon AI-related concerns, including Law Number 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions as most recently amended by Law Number 1 of 2024, Law Number 27 of 2022 on Personal Data Protection, Government Regulation Number 71 of 2019, the Circular Letter of the Minister of Communication and Informatics Number 9 of 2023 on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence, the Circular Letter of the Financial Services Authority Number 19/SEOJK.06/2023, and the 2020-2045 National Strategy for Artificial Intelligence, none of these instruments establishes a comprehensive legal regime for AI. Employing normative legal research combining statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, this article argues that Indonesia's prevailing reliance on subordinate regulations and ministerial circulars is constitutionally insufficient for a regulatory domain that engages fundamental rights protected by Article 28J(2) of the 1945 Constitution. Drawing comparatively upon the European Union's risk-based AI Act, Singapore's Model AI Governance Framework, and Japan's agile governance approach, the article proposes a primary statute (Undang-Undang) on AI as the constitutionally proper anchor, with subordinate Presidential and Ministerial Regulations performing operational functions. The contribution is not the now familiar claim that Indonesia needs AI regulation, but the reframing of that claim as a question of constitutional form, mapping a civil law hierarchy of instruments onto it and offering Indonesian legislators and ASEAN scholarship a worked architecture suited to a civil law jurisdiction.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 15

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2025 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): May 2026 Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): November 2025 Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): May 2025