cover
Contact Name
Deo Renaldi Saputra
Contact Email
admin@sovereignresearch.org
Phone
+6285709683865
Journal Mail Official
admin@sovereignresearch.org
Editorial Address
Jalan Gunung Talang Timur Nomor 45, RT 005, RW 002, Desa Bendan Duwur Kecamatan Gajah Mungkur
Location
Kota semarang,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Lex Recta: Journal of Law and Normative Justice
ISSN : -     EISSN : 31634559     DOI : 10.65310
Core Subject :
Lex Recta: Journal of Law and Normative Justice is a peer-reviewed academic journal dedicated to publishing high-quality scholarly works in the field of legal studies, with a primary focus on normative and doctrinal legal research. The journal provides an international platform for legal scholars, academics, practitioners, and policymakers to disseminate original research articles, conceptual analyses, statutory interpretations, and critical legal arguments addressing contemporary legal issues in both national and international contexts. Lex Recta welcomes manuscripts in areas such as legal theory, jurisprudence, constitutional law, civil law, criminal law, administrative law, human rights law, business law, Islamic law, comparative law, and legislative studies. The journal emphasizes normative analysis grounded in legal principles, statutory frameworks, judicial reasoning, and doctrinal development. All submissions undergo a rigorous double-blind peer-review process to ensure originality, analytical depth, logical consistency, and meaningful contributions to the advancement of legal scholarship. Published quarterly in March, June, September, and December, Lex Recta aims to foster critical legal discourse, strengthen doctrinal research traditions, and promote justice-oriented legal scholarship at local, national, and international levels.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 13 Documents
Analysis of the Implementation of Electronic Traffic Tickets and Their Impact on Reducing Traffic Violations and Accidents: (A Study in Serang City, Banten) Ifat Hanifah; Fadly Surya Wijaya
Lex Recta: Journal of Law and Normative Justice Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): : June: Lex Recta: Journal of Law and Normative Justice
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study examines the implementation of Electronic Traffic Law Enforcement (ETLE) and its impact on reducing traffic violations and traffic accidents in Serang City, Banten. Employing an empirical legal research design with a socio-legal approach, this research analyzes the interaction between legal norms, institutional practices, and public compliance through interviews with traffic law enforcement officers, relevant stakeholders, and road users, supported by statutory and documentary analysis. The findings indicate that ETLE strengthens traffic law enforcement by improving evidentiary certainty, institutional accountability, and administrative transparency while contributing to declining trends in traffic violations and accident impacts. However, its effectiveness remains constrained by limited public legal awareness, institutional coordination challenges, technological limitations, and persistent human behavioural factors influencing traffic violations. This study contributes theoretically by conceptualizing ETLE as a socio-legal governance mechanism rather than merely a technological enforcement tool, while providing methodological insight into evaluating digital law enforcement through integrated normative and empirical analysis.
Public Trust, Procedural Justice, and Public Compliance with the Law: A Socio-Legal Analysis of the Legitimacy of Law Enforcement Institutions in Indonesia Abdul Hafid
Lex Recta: Journal of Law and Normative Justice Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): : June: Lex Recta: Journal of Law and Normative Justice
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between procedural justice, public trust, institutional legitimacy, accountability, and legal compliance in the context of law-enforcement institutions in Indonesia. The study adopts a socio-legal approach with an explanatory quantitative design that integrates normative analysis of constitutional and statutory frameworks with empirical assessment of citizens’ perceptions of law-enforcement authority. The analysis focuses on how procedural experiences, institutional accountability, public trust, and perceptions of legitimate authority contribute to citizens’ normative acceptance and compliance with the law. Data analysis incorporates descriptive statistics, construct validity and reliability assessment, and structural equation modeling to examine direct, indirect, and mediating relationships among the relevant constructs. The analysis demonstrates that institutional legitimacy cannot be sustained through formal legal authority alone, as citizens’ acceptance is also influenced by procedural fairness, neutrality, respectful treatment, transparency, accountability, and access to effective complaint and corrective mechanisms. Judicial control over coercive measures further establishes an external safeguard against arbitrary exercises of authority and reinforces rights-based law enforcement. Public trust operates as an important link between procedural experiences and acceptance of institutional authority, while legitimacy supports compliance that extends beyond obedience motivated solely by sanctions. The study highlights the need to integrate legality, procedural justice, institutional performance, accountability, rights protection, and effective oversight to strengthen legitimate law enforcement and sustain public legal compliance.
Analysis of the Abuse of Extraordinary General Shareholders’ Meetings in the Removal of Directors (A Study of Judgment No. 2/PDT.G/2019/PN.PRN) Gusti Rahmadani
Lex Recta: Journal of Law and Normative Justice Vol. 1 No. 3 (2026): : September: Lex Recta: Journal of Law and Normative Justice
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

A limited liability company operates through corporate organs whose respective authorities are regulated by statutory provisions to ensure lawful and accountable corporate governance. The General Meeting of Shareholders (GMS) possesses authority to appoint and dismiss directors, but such authority must be exercised in accordance with mandatory procedural requirements. This study examines the legal validity of the Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders (EGMS) used to dismiss the President Director of PT Rahmah Mandiri Mulia, as considered in Paringin District Court Decision Number 2/Pdt.G/2019/PN Prn. The study aims to analyze the legal standing of the EGMS, identify the legal consequences of its invalidity, and examine whether the exercise of shareholder authority constituted an abuse of authority and violated principles of fiduciary responsibility and good corporate governance. This study employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, case, and comparative approaches, with legal materials analyzed qualitatively and descriptively. The findings demonstrate that the disputed EGMS was legally invalid because the meeting failed to satisfy essential procedural requirements concerning formal notice, quorum, voting, and the director's opportunity to present a defense. The invalid resolution also affected subsequent changes in the company's management structure and provided grounds for restoring the director's legal position. The case demonstrates that shareholder authority is not absolute and must be exercised within statutory limits, good faith, procedural fairness, and corporate accountability.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 13