cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Adam Mudinillah
Contact Email
adammudinillah@staialhikmahpariangan.ac.id
Phone
+6285379388533
Journal Mail Official
adammudinillah@staialhikmahpariangan.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jorong Kubang Kaciak Dusun Kubang Kaciak, Kelurahan Balai Tangah, Kecamatan Lintau Buo Utara, Kabupaten Tanah Datar, Provinsi Sumatera Barat, Kodepos 27293
Location
Kab. tanah datar,
Sumatera barat
INDONESIA
Rechtsnormen: Journal of Law
Published by Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi
ISSN : 29884454     EISSN : 29884462     DOI : 10.70177/rjl
Core Subject :
Rechtsnormen: Journal of Law is a leading international journal focused on the global exchange of knowledge in Law as well as advancing research and practice across law disciplines. The journal provides a forum for articles reporting on original research, systematic and scholarly reviews focused on law from around the world. Rechtsnormen: Journal of Law publishes national and international research in an attempt to present a reliable and respectable information source for the researchers. Rechtsnormen: Journal of Law has been published since 2023 and is published quarterly. However, since 2025, this journal has changed the number of publications, i.e., bi-monthly | February, April, June, August, October, and December. Articles submitted for publication are subject to a double-blind review process. This journal publishes original articles in English.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 6 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "vol. 3 no. 3 (2025)" : 6 Documents clear
Effectiveness of Implementing General Principles of Good Government (AUPB) in Public Services Endang Sutrisno; Bruna Costa; Pedro Silva
Rechtsnormen: Journal of Law Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/rjl.v3i3.2093

Abstract

Background. Public service quality is a crucial component of good governance, and the application of General Principles of Good Government (AUPB) plays a key role in ensuring effective public services. These principles, which include transparency, accountability, fairness, and efficiency, are essential for fostering trust between government institutions and citizens. However, there is a gap in understanding how effectively AUPB are implemented within public services and their impact on service delivery. Objective. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of implementing the General Principles of Good Government (AUPB) in public services. The research focuses on how these principles influence the efficiency, transparency, and quality of services provided by governmental institutions. Method. A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining qualitative interviews with public sector employees and quantitative surveys with citizens receiving public services. Data were collected from various government agencies to assess the practical application of AUPB principles and their impact on service quality. Results. The findings suggest that while AUPB are widely recognized, their implementation varies across institutions. Public services that effectively apply these principles show higher satisfaction rates among citizens, with increased accountability and transparency. Conclusion. The study concludes that implementing AUPB significantly improves the quality and transparency of public services, but challenges remain in ensuring consistent application across all governmental sectors.
Effectiveness of Pretrial in Testing the Legality of Arrest and Detention Sri Primawati Indraswari; Rachel Chan; Ava Lee
Rechtsnormen: Journal of Law Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/rjl.v3i3.2096

Abstract

Background. Pretrial procedures play a vital role in testing the legality of arrest and detention, ensuring that individuals' rights are protected against arbitrary detentions. Legal safeguards such as judicial review of arrests are essential in preventing abuses of power by law enforcement agencies. In many jurisdictions, pretrial hearings serve as a critical mechanism to determine whether there is enough evidence to justify continued detention, thus promoting the rule of law and human rights protection. Objective. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of pretrial hearings in testing the legality of arrest and detention. The research investigates how these procedures influence the protection of individual rights and the overall functioning of the justice system. Method. A qualitative research design was employed, utilizing case studies, legal analysis, and interviews with legal professionals, detainees, and human rights advocates. Data were collected from multiple jurisdictions to assess the impact of pretrial procedures on the legality of detention. Results. The findings suggest that pretrial hearings are an effective mechanism for testing the legality of arrests and detentions, but their application is inconsistent, with some jurisdictions lacking adequate legal frameworks to ensure timely and fair reviews. Conclusion. The study concludes that while pretrial hearings can significantly contribute to the protection of individual rights, improvements in procedural consistency and access to legal representation are needed to enhance their effectiveness.
Regulating Algorithmic Bias: Normative Challenges of AI Ethics in Automated Decision-Making Magnus Andersson; Maria Lindström; Johan Nilsson
Rechtsnormen: Journal of Law Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/rjl.v3i3.2214

Abstract

Background. The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into automated decision-making systems has introduced significant ethical and legal concerns, particularly regarding algorithmic bias. Purpose. These biases can perpetuate systemic discrimination, distort outcomes in critical sectors such as healthcare, finance, and criminal justice, and challenge the foundational principles of fairness and transparency. Despite widespread recognition of the issue, there remains a normative gap in regulatory responses across jurisdictions.   Method. This study aims to explore the ethical challenges of algorithmic bias and assess the adequacy of existing legal frameworks in addressing these concerns. Results. Using a normative legal research design, the study employs comparative analysis across selected regulatory regimes in the EU, US, and Asia, supported by doctrinal analysis of AI-related policies and ethical codes. Findings reveal fragmented regulatory landscapes, a lack of binding accountability mechanisms, and insufficient integration of ethical principles into enforceable legal norms. Conclusion. The study concludes that an interdisciplinary approach merging ethical theory with legal doctrine is essential to regulate algorithmic bias effectively. A normative framework grounded in transparency, accountability, and inclusivity is proposed to guide future legislation and policy development.
The Disruption of Labor Law in the Platform Economy: Towards a Normative Reconfiguration Hermanto Hermanto; Pieter Hendriks; Sophie Vermeer
Rechtsnormen: Journal of Law Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/rjl.v3i3.2216

Abstract

Background. The emergence of the platform economy characterized by gig work, algorithmic management, and digital intermediation has profoundly challenged traditional labor law frameworks. Conventional legal categories such as “employee” and “employer” often fail to capture the complexity of work relationships within platform-based environments. As a result, workers engaged in ride-sharing, food delivery, and other digital services are frequently excluded from fundamental labor protections, including minimum wage, social security, and collective bargaining rights. Purpose. This study aims to critically examine how platform-mediated work disrupts existing labor law norms and to propose a normative reconfiguration that reflects the evolving nature of work. Method. The study involved 288 university students from Chinese, Japanese, and Korean TFL settings, and the data from questionnaires were analysed using appropriate statistical methods. Results. The findings reveal widespread legal fragmentation, insufficient protection for platform workers, and a growing tension between labor flexibility and social security. Conclusion. The study concludes that a redefinition of labor status and regulatory categories is essential for restoring legal coherence and ensuring just working conditions in the platform economy. A hybrid regulatory model integrating digital rights with labor standards is proposed as a pathway forward.
Legal Pluralism in Postcolonial Nations: Reconciling Customary, Religious, and State Norms in Judicial Practices James Kirunda; Helen Nabirye; Ronald Muwanguzi
Rechtsnormen: Journal of Law Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/rjl.v3i3.2217

Abstract

Background. Postcolonial nations often grapple with the coexistence of multiple legal systems, including state law, customary norms, and religious legal traditions. This legal pluralism reflects historical layers of colonization, indigenous governance, and religious authority, yet it frequently results in normative conflicts within judicial processes. Courts are regularly confronted with cases that require navigating overlapping legal frameworks, raising questions about authority, legitimacy, and the equitable treatment of diverse legal subjects. Purpose. This study aims to critically examine how postcolonial judicial systems reconcile these competing normative orders in practice. Method. Employing a comparative socio-legal methodology, the research analyzes judicial decisions and legal frameworks from Indonesia, Nigeria, and India countries characterized by entrenched plural legal structures. Results. The findings reveal that while legal pluralism is often constitutionally acknowledged, its practical implementation is marked by selective incorporation, strategic ambiguity, and jurisdictional contestation. Courts act as sites of normative negotiation, where customary and religious laws are either validated, reinterpreted, or subordinated to state law. Conclusion. The study concludes that achieving legal coherence in postcolonial contexts requires more than doctrinal reform; it demands a rethinking of legal authority that embraces pluralism while safeguarding human rights and procedural fairness.
Digital Green Laws: The Role of Legal Norms in Advancing Climate Technology for Sustainable Development Deni Yusup Permana; Stefan Mihaila; Radu Popa
Rechtsnormen: Journal of Law Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/rjl.v3i3.2218

Abstract

Background. The intersection of environmental governance and digital innovation has introduced new opportunities for addressing climate change through technology-driven solutions. However, the role of legal norms in facilitating or hindering the development and deployment of climate technologies remains underexplored. Purpose. This study investigates how legal frameworks can effectively support digital green technologies such as AI-based environmental monitoring, blockchain for carbon tracking, and smart infrastructure for renewable energy as tools for achieving sustainable development goals.   Method. The research aims to examine the normative gaps, institutional barriers, and regulatory innovations needed to align legal systems with emerging climate technologies. Employing a normative-legal research design combined with comparative policy analysis, the study evaluates legal instruments from the European Union, Singapore, and selected developing countries. Results. The findings indicate that while some jurisdictions have begun to integrate digital green laws into their climate strategies, others lag due to regulatory fragmentation, data governance challenges, and insufficient legal innovation.   Conclusion. The study concludes that adaptive, principle-based legal frameworks are essential to accelerate climate tech deployment while ensuring transparency, equity, and sustainability. A proactive legal architecture is critical for steering climate technology toward inclusive and effective environmental governance.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 6

 1 

Filter by Year

2025 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 4 No. 4 (2026) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026) Vol. 3 No. 6 (2025) Vol. 3 No. 5 (2025) Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 2 No. 4 (2024) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 1 No. 4 (2023) Vol. 1 No. 3 (2023) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023) More Issue