cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
B. Lora Christyanti
Contact Email
jurnalham@kemenkum.go.id
Phone
+628119780028
Journal Mail Official
jurnalham@kemenkum.go.id
Editorial Address
Pusat Strategi Evaluasi dan Publikasi Kebijakan Hukum, Badan Strategi Kebijakan Hukum, Kementerian Hukum Republik Indonesia, Jl. Raya Gandul No. 4, Gandul, Kec. Cinere, Kota Depok, Jawa Barat, Indonesia - 16514
Location
Unknown,
Unknown
INDONESIA
Jurnal HAM
Published by Badan Strategi Kebijakan Hukum, Kementerian Hukum Republik Indonesia
ISSN : 16938704     EISSN : 25798553     DOI : https://doi.org/10.30641/ham
Core Subject :
Focus and Scope Given that the study of human rights involves many scientific elements that are interdisciplinary in nature, Jurnal HAM accepts submissions of scientific articles discussing human rights in Indonesia and beyond from the lens of, but not limited to, legal studies, social sciences, politics, languages, international relations to communication. The scope of human rights writing covers two aspects, namely Civil and Political Rights and Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, with the scope of study areas such as: Case studies on human rights issues; Regulation and protection of human rights; Economic, social and cultural rights; Civil and political rights; National and international human rights policies; Human rights in law enforcement; Business and human rights; Institutions and institutionalization of human rights. The study areas mentioned above are not an exhaustive list of studies on human rights. For this reason, the Jurnal HAM remains open for manuscripts with objects to be analyzed related to human rights.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 263 Documents
 23   24   25   26   27 
Pengakuan Hukum terhadap Perkosaan terhadap Laki-Laki di Indonesia: Persetujuan, Non-Diskriminasi, dan Batasan Pendekatan Hukum Netral Gender Novi Enjelina Putri
Jurnal HAM Vol 17 No 2 (2026): Edisi Agustus
Publisher : Badan Strategi Kebijakan Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/ham.2026.17.125-151

Abstract

Rape can occur to anyone, including men; therefore, legal protection is necessary to ensure equal rights for all individuals as human beings. Indonesian law previously regulated rape explicitly from a female-victim perspective, as reflected in Article 285 of the Criminal Code (KUHP), which used the phrase “a woman.” This provision fails to reflect equality and results in legal injustice for men who become victims of rape. To date, Indonesian law has largely recognized men only as perpetrators of rape, indirectly creating discriminatory elements within the criminal justice system. This study employs a socio-legal research method, using statutory and comparative legal approaches. Legal regulation of rape against men plays a crucial role in determining fair legal protection for male victims of rape. However, existing rape regulations have not yet been able to ensure the fulfillment of human rights and effective law enforcement for male victims. Therefore, inclusive legal reform is required to protect victims regardless of gender perspective, thereby opening greater opportunities for law enforcement and the realization of human rights. It is essential to reconstruct the law in a more inclusive and gender-neutral manner. Such efforts can be undertaken by refining Article 473 on rape in the new Criminal Code through comparative analysis with the United Kingdom’s Sexual Offences Act 2003. This reform also requires an expanded understanding of justice and human rights within Indonesian law, including clearer recognition of consent, coercion, and the absence of consent. The objective is to ensure that the law no longer favors gender stereotypes, but instead provides universal protection for victims, creating space for equality that acknowledges men as potential victims within the substance, structure, and legal culture of an equitable legal system
Formalisme Hakim Menguji Pengakuan Bebas Dari Paksaan: Reduksi Non-Derogable Rights pada Proses Peradilan Pasca Berlakunya KUHAP 2025 Antok Kurniyawan
Jurnal HAM Vol 17 No 2 (2026): Edisi Agustus
Publisher : Badan Strategi Kebijakan Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/ham.2026.17.153-172

Abstract

The enactment of Law Number 20 of 2025 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code (CPC) introduces a defendant's confession mechanism in court proceedings as stipulated in Article 205, that requires Judges to assess six elements before diverting the examination to a summary proceeding, including the element that the confession was not caused by pressure, coercion, or torture during the investigation and prosecution process. Textually, this provision aligns with Article 33 of Law Number 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights and Article 15 of the Convention Against Torture. However, its examination mechanism relies on court proceedings based on case files produced by the very authorities whose conduct is being scrutinized. This article aims to analyze the normative construction of such guarantees and examine the extent to which their application in district court decisions post-enactment of the new CPC reflects a substantive examination. This research employs a normative juridical method, analyzing district court decisions that apply Article 205 of the CPC available in the Supreme Court Decision Directory, utilizing a formal-substantive indicator framework developed by the author. The analysis of the six available decisions reveals that two decisions completely lack explicit consideration of the freedom-from-coercion element; three decisions merely state that all requirements are met without outlining the underlying basis (formal); one decision explicitly mentions the element but lacks supporting evidentiary descriptions (semi-formal); and not a single decision demonstrates a substantive examination. This article is expected to contribute to filling the literature gap, which has predominantly focused on the normative construction of guilty pleas without examining judicial practices, while simultaneously offering an analytical framework to monitor the implementation of similar provisions in the future.
Dilema Rempang Eco City: Reorientasi Tanggung Jawab Negara dan Korporasi Berbasis Keadilan Environmental, Social and Governance Prasetyo Adi Nugroho
Jurnal HAM Vol 17 No 2 (2026): Edisi Agustus
Publisher : Badan Strategi Kebijakan Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/ham.2026.17.173-188

Abstract

Environmental Social Governance (ESG) investments have entered a phase of rapid development globally, forcing a paradigm shift in how corporate activities affect local communities and their ecosystems. The revocation of the National Strategic Project (PSN) status of Rempang Eco City under Presidential Regulation Number 12 of 2025 has created a significant legal transition and a regulatory vacuum regarding land acquisition and resettlement responsibilities. This study aims to analyze the legal implications of the post-PSN resettlement schemes, specifically focusing on the government's "Local Transmigration" policy, and to reconstruct a human rights-based corporate-state responsibility model using the ESG framework. This study employs a doctrinal (normative) legal research method combined with a descriptive-analytical qualitative research design based on John W. Creswell’s theoretical framework, utilizing secondary legal sources and statutory synchronization. The study finds that the post-PSN transition shifts the land dispute back to a pure private law corridor, invalidating coercive state acquisition under the guise of public interest. The proposed "Local Transmigration" program contains an administrative fallacy and risks violating the ecological sovereignty of traditional fisherfolk. Under OJK Regulation Number 51/POJK.03/2017, the ESG framework serves as a binding legal bridge that forces the concession holder (PT MEG) to internalize human rights due diligence (HRDD) to secure its social license to operate. Human rights mainstreaming requires the integration of private corporate liabilities into the state's public protection framework. The Ministry of Transmigration should evaluate the local transmigration program and prioritize fair compensation and meaningful consultation under Law Number 2 of 2012.

Page 27 of 27 | Total Record : 263

 23   24   25   26   27 

Filter by Year

2010 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 17 No 2 (2026): Edisi Agustus Vol 17 No 1 (2026): Edisi April Vol 16 No 3 (2025): Edisi Desember Vol 16 No 2 (2025): Edisi Agustus Vol 16 No 1 (2025): Edisi April Vol 15 No 3 (2024): Edisi Desember Vol 15 No 2 (2024): Edisi Agustus Vol 15 No 1 (2024): Edisi April Vol 14 No 3 (2023): Edisi Desember Vol 14 No 2 (2023): Edisi Agustus Vol 14 No 1 (2023): Edisi April Vol 13 No 3 (2022): Edisi Desember Vol 13 No 2 (2022): Edisi Agustus Vol 13 No 1 (2022): Edisi April Vol 12 No 3 (2021): Edisi Desember Vol 12 No 2 (2021): Edisi Agustus Vol 12 No 1 (2021): Edisi April Vol 11 No 3 (2020): Edisi Desember Vol 11 No 2 (2020): Edisi Agustus Vol 11 No 1 (2020): Edisi April Vol 10 No 2 (2019): Edisi Desember Vol 10 No 1 (2019): Edisi Juli Vol 9 No 2 (2018): Edisi Desember Vol 9 No 1 (2018): Edisi Juli Vol 8 No 2 (2017): Edisi Desember Vol 8 No 1 (2017): Edisi Juli Vol 7 No 2 (2016): Edisi Desember Vol 7 No 1 (2016): Edisi Juli Vol 6 No 2 (2015): Edisi Desember Vol 6 No 1 (2015): Edisi Juli Vol 5 No 2 (2014): Edisi Desember Vol 5 No 1 (2014): Edisi Juli Vol 4 No 2 (2013): Edisi Desember Vol 4 No 1 (2013): Edisi Juli Vol 3 No 2 (2012): Edisi Desember Vol 3 No 1 (2012): Edisi Juli Vol 1 No 1 (2010): Edisi Perdana More Issue