Smart: Journal of Islamic Religion and Sharia Studies
Smart: Journal of Islamic Religion and Sharia Studies (SSharia) is a peer-reviewed academic publication dedicated to advancing scholarly discourse on Islamic theology, religious jurisprudence, and Sharia law within contemporary and historical contexts. Established as a forum for rigorous intellectual inquiry, the journal publishes original research articles, theoretical analyses, and critical reviews that examine Islamic religious thought, legal frameworks, and their applications in modern societies. Contributors include internationally recognized scholars, theologians, legal experts, and researchers from diverse academic disciplines who investigate topics ranging from classical Islamic jurisprudence and Quranic exegesis to contemporary issues in Islamic law, ethics, and religious practice. The journal maintains rigorous academic standards through a comprehensive peer-review process, ensuring that all published works meet the highest scholarly criteria and contribute meaningfully to the field. By fostering interdisciplinary dialogue between Islamic studies, comparative religion, law, sociology, and philosophy, the journal serves as a vital platform for understanding the complexities of Islamic religious and legal traditions while promoting evidence-based scholarship and nuanced analysis of Sharia jurisprudence. Published triannually in February, June, and October, the Journal of Islamic Religion and Sharia Studies reaches a global audience of academics, practitioners, policymakers, and students seeking authoritative insights into the theological, legal, and practical dimensions of Islamic scholarship and its relevance to contemporary international discourse.
Articles
12 Documents
Analysis of Cash Waqf from the Perspective of the Hanafi and Shafi’i Schools of Thought in Indonesia
Apipudin Apipudin;
Izla Amalia;
Muhammad Fairuzi Amin;
Yuliyah Yuliyah
Smart: Journal of Islamic Religion and Sharia Studies Vol. 1 No. 3 (2026): Smart: Journal of Islamic Religion and Sharia Studies (SSharia)
Publisher : Divisi Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Yayasan Cerdas Pedia Indonesia
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.65101/ssharia.v1i3.90
Cash waqf management in Indonesia triggers epistemological tension between the physical asset preservation dogma of Shafiite jurisprudence and the commercial custom rationalization of Hanafite scholars. This dogmatic gap produces a massive fund stagnation anomaly due to theological hesitation among managers. This normative doctrinal research dismantled this deadlock through a comparative jurisprudential and teleological approach toward classical literature alongside national waqf legislation. The analytical results prove that the Indonesian positive legal architecture essentially created a novel methodological synthesis. These regulations adopt Shafiite principal value protection while simultaneously legitimizing Hanafite productive investment schemes through financial institutions. Nevertheless, this normative hybridization proves highly vulnerable to operating suboptimally in reality without proper risk mitigation infrastructure. This synthesis firmly asserts that philanthropic legal certainty absolutely demands the institutionalization of asset guarantee insurance instruments to accelerate economic justice. This constructive idea provides a revolutionary civilizational prototype for formulating global philanthropic epistemology within the modern international economy.
Analyzing Sharia P2P Lending Administrative Fees: POJK 10/2022 and Fatwa 117/DSN-MUI/II/2018 Perspectives
Apipudin Apipudin;
Atila Ananta Putri;
Khiliza Zuratunnisa;
Akhmad Kamal Khoiro
Smart: Journal of Islamic Religion and Sharia Studies Vol. 1 No. 3 (2026): Smart: Journal of Islamic Religion and Sharia Studies (SSharia)
Publisher : Divisi Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Yayasan Cerdas Pedia Indonesia
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.65101/ssharia.v1i3.91
The transformation of digital funding ecosystems creates epistemological tension due to the absence of administrative fee caps. Positive law in POJK 10/2022 only mandates formal information transparency, clashing diametrically with Fatwa DSN-MUI 117/2018 which demands material justice. Addressing the analytical void of previous literature, this doctrinal research aimed to dissect this regulatory flaw. This qualitative study was conducted using the tahqiq al-manath method. The findings prove that procedural transparency instruments without maximum tariff parameters actually facilitate exploitative practices and fail to prevent tadlis violations, as evidenced empirically in the massive dispute case of PT Dana Syariah Indonesia. Administrative disclosure without substantive balance is a legal illusion that blatantly violates the hifzh al-mal protection principle. As a strategic implication, this study proposes an integrative governance reconstruction based on maqashid al-syari'ah. The author recommends adopting global Islamic financial civilization standards to recalibrate fee operationalization toward fair ujrah al-mitsl, preventing unjust wealth consumption.