cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Smart: Journal of Criminal Law Review and Analysis
Contact Email
scriminal2026@gmail.com
Phone
+6285117086910
Journal Mail Official
scriminal2026@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Cendana Residen blok i5, RT 4. pondok benda Pamulang Tangerang Selatan, 15416
Location
Kota tangerang selatan,
Banten
INDONESIA
Smart: Journal of Criminal Law Review and Analysis
Published by Yayasan Cerdas Pedia Indonesia
ISSN : -     EISSN : 31247830     DOI : https://doi.org/10.65101/scrim.
Core Subject :
Smart: Journal of Criminal Law Review and Analysis (SCrim) is a rigorous, peer-reviewed academic forum dedicated to the comprehensive examination of substantive and procedural criminal law, penal policy, and the broader intersections of criminal justice and contemporary society. Published triannually in February, June, and October, SCrim seeks to advance scholarly discourse by featuring high-impact doctrinal analyses, empirical studies, and critical theoretical perspectives from legal scholars, practitioners, and policymakers. Committed to fostering intellectual excellence and shaping critical legal debates, the journal serves as a premier platform for incisive critiques, comprehensive reviews of emerging statutory reforms, and the thorough evaluation of seminal jurisprudence within the dynamic field of criminal law.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 13 Documents
 1   2 
Criminal Liability of Mining Corporations for Post-Mining Environmental Damage Aji Wahyu Maarif; Hartiwiningsih; Sulistyanta
Smart: Journal of Criminal Law Review and Analysis Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): Smart: Journal of Criminal Law Review and Analysis (SCrim)
Publisher : Divisi Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Yayasan Cerdas Pedia Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65101/scrim.v1i2.57

Abstract

Mining activities frequently cause massive post-mining environmental degradation, yet criminal law enforcement remains trapped within weak administrative formalities. This research analyzes corporate criminal liability and the relevance of applying the lex specialis derogat legi generali principle between the Mineral and Coal Mining Law and the Environmental Protection and Management Law. Utilizing normative juridical methods with conceptual and statutory approaches, this study reveals that ambiguous jurisdictional boundaries are frequently exploited by corporations as an impunity shield to evade substantive environmental offenses. The findings assert that the urgency of integrating ecological investigations and applying the lex consumens derogat legi consumptae principle is necessary to supersede partial lex specialis doctrines. This legal paradigm transformation is crucial to ensure that criminal enforcement transcends mere administrative compliance, aiming to guarantee ecological justice, functional environmental restoration, and the sustainability of constitutional rights for future generations of impacted communities due to current systemic corporate crimes in Indonesia.
Enshrining Non-Solicitation and Non-Competition Doctrines within Employment Agreement Provisions Ray Immanuel Febrian
Smart: Journal of Criminal Law Review and Analysis Vol. 1 No. 3 (2026): Smart: Journal of Criminal Law Review and Analysis (SCrim)
Publisher : Divisi Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Yayasan Cerdas Pedia Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65101/scrim.v1i3.76

Abstract

The contemporary industrial relations paradigm exhibits a normative clash between corporate commercial asset protection and workers' constitutional mobility rights through post-employment restraints. This study examines the validity and legal consequences of cumulative non-solicitation and non-competition clauses within Indonesian employment contracts. Employing normative legal research utilizing statutory and conceptual approaches, this research analyzes the enforceability of contractual restrictions. The results demonstrate that imposing these restrictive clauses without geographic limitations, temporal boundaries, or mandatory financial compensation violates the objective requirement of a lawful cause under Article 1320 of the Indonesian Civil Code. Consequently, these unilateral standard clauses are entirely null and void, as they contravene public order and fundamental labor rights. In conclusion, this article proposes the urgent judicial integration of a proportionality test encompassing temporal, spatial, substantive, and financial compensation parameters for industrial relations courts to restore the legal equilibrium between absolute corporate prerogatives and workers' inalienable essential constitutional employment freedoms.
Digital Evidence Under Legal Realism: Extralegal Factors Determining The Mario Dandy Verdict Muhammad Febriansyah Wijaya; Tere Anlyra Rahma Putri; Ayu Imsri Titifiani
Smart: Journal of Criminal Law Review and Analysis Vol. 1 No. 3 (2026): Smart: Journal of Criminal Law Review and Analysis (SCrim)
Publisher : Divisi Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Yayasan Cerdas Pedia Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65101/scrim.v1i3.80

Abstract

The integration of digital evidence into criminal proceedings exposes critical normative gaps within Indonesian evidentiary laws, compelling judges to navigate procedural vacuums. Employing a sociolegal methodology with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, this study examines the Mario Dandy verdict through Legal Realism. Findings reveal that judges compensate for absent forensic guidelines by converting digital data into conventional taxonomies and delegating evidentiary authority to technocrats. Consequently, judicial conviction is profoundly determined by extralegal factors, including cognitive biases from intense sociopolitical pressure, technological illiteracy, and systemic infrastructural disparities. This epistemological vulnerability inherently threatens the equality of arms principle within modern courts. To mitigate this structural anomaly, recent formal statutory revisions remain technically insufficient. Therefore, this article proposes institutionalizing an Electronic Evidence Reliability Framework mandating algorithmic audits, hashing standards, and comprehensive judicial digital literacy. This mandatory framework is an absolute prerequisite to restore structural equilibrium between technological utility and due process of law.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 13

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2026 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 1 No. 3 (2026): Smart: Journal of Criminal Law Review and Analysis (SCrim) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): Smart: Journal of Criminal Law Review and Analysis (SCrim) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): Smart: Journal of Criminal Law Review and Analysis (SCrim)