cover
Contact Name
Rifqi Muhammad
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
jiu.fu@uinjkt.ac.id
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota tangerang selatan,
Banten
INDONESIA
ILMU USHULUDDIN
ISSN : 20878265     EISSN : 25027530     DOI : 10.15408/tjems
Core Subject : Religion, Education,
Ilmu Ushuluddin specializes in U??l al-D?n which concern to Qur’an and ?ad?th, Religious, Islamic Philosophy studies, and Islamic studies in general, and is intended to communicate original researches and current issues on the subject.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 5 Documents
Search results for , issue "Volume 1, Nomor 4, Juli 2012" : 5 Documents clear
Dikotomi Sunnī-Syī‘ī: Teologis atau ‘Asabiyyah Zainal Abidin
ILMU USHULUDDIN Volume 1, Nomor 4, Juli 2012
Publisher : Himpunan Peminat Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin (HIPIUS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (11359.961 KB) | DOI: 10.15408/ilmu-ushuluddin.v1i4.1018

Abstract

Sunnite (Sunnī) and Shi‘ite (Shī‘ī) are two Islamic schools which emerged after the death of the Prophet. Basically, the Sunnī-Shī‘ī dichotomy cannot be separated from pre-Islamic Arab history, which culturally adored tribal loyalty (asabiyya.) At the beginning of its appearance, in socio-cultural historical perspective, the dichotomy emerged because of the tribal-political interest, particularly, after the battle of Siffīn. This Sunnī-Shī‘ī dichotomy in the early days was actually the rivalry between the Umayyad clan and Banū Hashimite (Hāsyimiyya) clan, and served as the legacy of pre-Islamic Arab history. In the next period, to justify its existence, each of these groups looked for nass (Qur’ānic text) to strengthen its view. Consequently, the problem formerly served as the only tribal-political issues developed into a theological issue, and hence inherited conflict beyond the context of its period. The conflict that had become the part of long history of the two schools automatically established a certain paradigm and reason to their adherents, in which such paradigm also brought about different concept of epistemology. Therefore, it is difficult to reconcile the two schools, even though is not impossible at all to do conversely; let alone when a dialogue established to reconcile the two school employs phenomenological or brotherhood (ukhuwwa) approaches, and avoids apologetic approach.
Perdebatan dan Argumentasi Semua Agama adalah Islam Nanang Tahqiq
ILMU USHULUDDIN Volume 1, Nomor 4, Juli 2012
Publisher : Himpunan Peminat Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin (HIPIUS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (19387.267 KB) | DOI: 10.15408/ilmu-ushuluddin.v1i4.1019

Abstract

This paper will elaborate the conceptions and meanings of Islam, both etymologic-ally and terminologically as well, through historical and doctrinal-theological perspectives respectively. Even though, Islam, terminologically, denotes the Prophet’s religion and a formal system fetched and assembled by the Prophet Muhammad—as narrated by the two well-known Prophetic sayings (Hadīth)—however, according to the Qur’ān, it (islām, with small letter /i/) signifies ‘to surrender.’ Within such Qur’ānic context, the word islām is not exclusively referred to the community or for the believers of Muhammad’s sharī‘a per se. In the course of Muslim history, the word and meaning of islām are believed being an institution. Yet, to examine the Qur’ān, the article will acquire lots of the Qur’ānic verses conveying such word and meaning of true islām in the function of ‘religion of resignation.’ As such, islām is actually the religion belonging to the whole prophets and apostles who taught a total capitulation to God. Moreover, islām connotes submission of personal quality as a person to God, whatever religion and belief he embraces. However, in addition, Islam cannot remain lonesome by itself, unless is being associated with īmān (belief, faith) and ihsān (God’s omnipresent.)
Reflections on the Structural Base of the Early Islamic Thought Fachry Ali
ILMU USHULUDDIN Volume 1, Nomor 4, Juli 2012
Publisher : Himpunan Peminat Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin (HIPIUS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (10188.416 KB) | DOI: 10.15408/ilmu-ushuluddin.v1i4.1015

Abstract

Religion is not merely value-resources which influence its adherents’ ideas and attitudes, but it respectively functions as an inspiration and transformation of cultural and political values that have been inherited by subsequent generations as well. This writing scrutinizes the root of Islamic social thoughts from the classical era, when the texts of the Holy Book have become ‘public constitution,’ in which the texts have been interpreted by countless theological school of thoughts in the form of ‘reaction-action’ towards arbitrage (tahkīm) involving in between ‘Alī b. Abū Tālib and Mu‘āwiya. This ‘reaction-action’ previously dealt with an issue of whether a person is a Muslim or kāfir, and later on, rose to reach the political questions—and it unconsciously has experienced the incubation epochs of social basis of Islamic thought until recent days. The emergence of hard-liner groups like Usamah bin Ladin, who fought on behalf of Islam, can be traced in this modern period from the immeasurable theological streams residing in the past phase.
Teologi Ibn ‘Arabī Arrazy Hasyim
ILMU USHULUDDIN Volume 1, Nomor 4, Juli 2012
Publisher : Himpunan Peminat Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin (HIPIUS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (12605.804 KB) | DOI: 10.15408/ilmu-ushuluddin.v1i4.1016

Abstract

This article propounds a study on Ibn ‘Arabī through theological approach. The study will show that Ibn ‘Arabī is a follower of Sunnī theology. This hypothesis can be proved via genealogical structure towards Ibn ‘Arabī’s knowledge tradition which is complex, and by tracing his statements containing theological expressions within his works. Nonetheless, it cannot be denied that his several words very potentially invite criticism and being considered infidel. However, in principle, those critiques come from critics do not have spiritual background as owned by Ibn ‘Arabī. Or there had been another assumption, i.e. it is caused by ‘insertion’ from his intellectual rivals, as stated by Ibn ‘Arabī’s proponents. In fact, Ibn ‘Arabī himself asserts, “Who believes in hulūl, then his religion is defective.”
Hukum Alam dan Sunnatullah: Upaya Rekonstruksi Pemahaman Teologis di Indonesia Eka Putra Wirman
ILMU USHULUDDIN Volume 1, Nomor 4, Juli 2012
Publisher : Himpunan Peminat Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin (HIPIUS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (10075.935 KB) | DOI: 10.15408/ilmu-ushuluddin.v1i4.1017

Abstract

This paper will provide a comprehensive understanding of the notion sunnatullāh and natural law, both in terms of science and the Qur’ān. Then it will also see the similarities and differences between the two. In this respect, the writer questions whether the sunnatullāh mentioned in the Qur’ān is similar to what meant by the laws of nature? Are the natural and all applicable laws inherently absolute and static?, and consequently they do not change gradually, and do not allow or support the development of science? Above questions need answers from the writers of theology, especially Indonesian, to discuss theology of nature in line with the discussion of nature itself which is done by scientists. So far there are indications these two terms have different purposes and meanings. This difference in the reformulation and reconstruction ultimately requires an understanding of theology, especially about the notion of natural law and sunnatullāh which has been the understanding of elementary students of theology and author in Indonesia.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5