cover
Contact Name
Abdul Hakim Wahid
Contact Email
hakim.wahid@uinjkt.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
jurnalrefleksi@uinjkt.ac.id
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota tangerang selatan,
Banten
INDONESIA
Refleksi: Jurnal Kajian Agama dan Filsafat
ISSN : 02156253     EISSN : 27146103     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Refleksi (ISSN 0215 6253) is a journal published by the Faculty of Ushuluddin Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University, Jakarta. The Journal specializes in Qur'an and Hadith studies, Islamic Philosophy, and Religious studies, and is intended to communicate original researches and current issues on the subject. This journal welcomes contributions from scholars of related disciplines.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 5 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol 16, No 2 (2017): Refleksi" : 5 Documents clear
Tafsîr Khuluqun ‘Adzîm: A Methodological Studies Saadatul Jannah
Refleksi Vol 16, No 2 (2017): Refleksi
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (659.058 KB) | DOI: 10.15408/ref.v16i2.10194

Abstract

Since 16th century until the recent age, study commentary is increasing gradually in Indonesia. It was characterized by the spirit of produce commentaries from scholars of Indonesia (pre-modern) such as works of Abd al-Raûf al-Sinkilî (Tarjumân al-Mustafid), Syaikh Nawawî (Tafsir Maraẖ Labid) and Aẖmad Sanusî (Tafsir al-Qurân al-Karîm), and modern era explicitly Quraish Shihab (Tafsir al-Misbah) and Didin Hafidhudddin (Tafsir al-Hijri). On the other hand, Quranic exegesis is magnetizing the modern society, academia, and the government. Two things are a sign that Indonesia necessitates developing new outlooks contained in the works of interpretation, so the view of Indonesian society are to be more extensive and varied without being limited by one of his Indonesian commentators. Yunan Yusûf , one of the Indonesian Muslim philosopher, within Tafsir Khuluqun 'Adzîm endeavors coloring Indonesian elucidation by creating distinctive work that is an interpretation of the Quran from the short chapters (Madanî) to the extended chapters (Makî). This article discovers specifically the explanation of the al-Mulk to find a methodology, sources, references and pattern of his works.  This paper depicts qualitative method with the analytical comparative approach through the two references commentaries Indonesia Tafsîr al-Azhâr and al-Miṣbah. Yunan interprets the Quran critically and decisively utilizing the color philosophy. He is able to convey the message of the Qur'an by using the correlation of the Quran (munâsabah al-Qurân bi al-Qurân) either on his work title or his clarification content. This article concludes that the better sources is preferred the more authentic the exegesis is and the more dominant the type of commentaries is the more pattern work is.
Riwayat Imam Al-Shāfi’iy Dalam Pandangan Imam Al-Bukhāry Abdul Hakim Wahid
Refleksi Vol 16, No 2 (2017): Refleksi
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (540.201 KB) | DOI: 10.15408/ref.v16i2.10190

Abstract

Imam al-Bukhāri berpendapat bahwa jalur periwayatan hadis yang paling terpercaya adalah yang menggunakan jalur Malik bin Anas dari Nafi’ dari Ibn Umar, dan Imam al-Shāfi’iy adalah murid imam Malik yang paling Masyhur. Akan tetapi muncul sebuah pertanyaan mengapa al-Bukhāry tidak meriwayatkan hadis dengan jalur al-Shāfi’iy, sehingga memunculkan persangkaan bahwa ia adalah seorang yang lemah dalam periwayatan hadis, meskipun semua itu tidak menurunkan martabat al-Shafi’iy sebagai ahli ḥadīth dan tidak pula menjadikan riwayatnya dihukumi ḍā’īf di kalangan pengikut madzhabnya. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui apa penyebab imam al-Bukhāry tidak meriwayatkan ḥadīth-ḥadīth melalui jalur imam al-Shafi’iy dari Imam Malik. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian yang dilakukan, ternyata al-Bukhāry juga meriwayatkan beberapa ḥadīth yang juga diriwayatkan oleh al-Shafi’iy dengan matan dan jalur yang sama. Karena itu orang yang menganggap bahwa al-Shāfi’iy itu ḍa’īf, maka anggapan itu adalah salah besar sebagaimana jika ada yang mengatakan bahwa perawi thiqah (yang terpercaya) hanyalah mereka yang terdapat dalam kutub sittah saja.
Integrating Qur’an and Science: Epistemology of Tafsir Ilmi in Indonesia Akhmad Supriadi
Refleksi Vol 16, No 2 (2017): Refleksi
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (291.246 KB) | DOI: 10.15408/ref.v16i2.10191

Abstract

This paper describes four (4) types of epistemology on tafsir ‘ilmi (science exegesis) in Indonesia, which four experts have explained their own epistemology and its relation between Al-Qur’an and science, are Nazwar Syamsu, Achmad Baiquni, Muhammad Quraish Shihab and Agus Purwanto. These experts are selected as subject of research based on an opinion if they respectively have represent their own epistemology which differs each other. Based on the result of study and analysis, although all are working to integrate Al-Qur’an and science, these four experts have different epistemic reasoning to understand and explain a relation among Qur’anic verses on science. Nazwar Syamsu’s epistemology tends to an Islamization or Qur’anization of Qur’anic verses on science so its interpretation which is sourced from Al-Qur’an and scientific theory tends to look for Qur’anic justification through scientific theory. Type of epistemology which is initiated by Achmad Baiquni tends to dialogue between Al-Qur’an and modern scientific theory, so it will result unapologetical Islamic science but integrative-interconnective. The type of epistemology initiated by Achmad Baiquni has a similarity with Agus Purwanto’s, while Agus works to elaborate his own epistemology of Islamic science. He puts Al-Qur’an ashypothesis base, not Islamization nor Qur’anization of Qur’anic verses on science. Muhammad Quraish Shihab with his background as expert mufassir (Al-Qur’an interpreter) presents Al-Qur’an as Islamic miracle holy book through identification of modern Qur’anic verses on science. Even if on the one side it seems apologetic, but science exegesis of Quraish Shihab has different way of interpretation, he puts the scientific verses into function as medium to know God’s Greatness and take lessons from each phenomena which is relevant to modern science.
Kontekstualitas Vs Universalitas Hadis: Problem Metodologi Fariz Pari
Refleksi Vol 16, No 2 (2017): Refleksi
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (488.022 KB) | DOI: 10.15408/ref.v16i2.10192

Abstract

Perbedaan dan variasi interpretasi terhadap teks merupakan problem metodologi, khususnya tentang bagaimana memahami dan menafsirkan teks. Tulisan ini fokus pada analisis metodologi memahami-menafsirkan dalam interpretasi terhadap teks, khususnya teks hadis Nabi Muhammad saw., yang telah berumur 1400 tahun lalu dan dari geografis serta budaya yang berbeda juga.
Mengenal Tafsir Nusantara: Melacak Mata Rantai Tafsir Dari Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, Singapura Hingga Brunei Darussalam Hasani Ahmad Said
Refleksi Vol 16, No 2 (2017): Refleksi
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (449.588 KB) | DOI: 10.15408/ref.v16i2.10193

Abstract

Tafsir (exegesis) scholars traced in the Nusantara archipelago, will not be separated from the figure of ‘Abdurrauf al-Fansuri with his Tarjuman alMustafid. Through this work, tafsir had been developed through many media teaching until today. This work also allegedly gave birth to a variety of tafsir model and methodology of qur’anic interpretation in the archipelago. At least two aspects of the interpretation gives birth to the scholars transmission; and to development of the science of interpretation. Firstly, through the activities of teaching; and secondly, through writings. Through these two transmission lines the network of interpretation, until today continues to progress well.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5


Filter by Year

2017 2017


Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Refleksi Vol. 23 No. 2 (2024): Refleksi Vol 23, No 2 (2024): Refleksi Vol 23, No 1 (2024): Refleksi Vol. 23 No. 1 (2024): Refleksi Vol. 22 No. 2 (2023): Refleksi Vol 22, No 2 (2023): Refleksi Vol 22, No 1 (2023): Refleksi Vol. 22 No. 1 (2023): Refleksi Vol. 21 No. 2 (2022): Refleksi Vol 21, No 2 (2022): Refleksi Vol. 21 No. 1 (2022): Refleksi Vol 21, No 1 (2022): Refleksi Vol 7, No 2 (2005): Refleksi Vol 20, No 2 (2021): Refleksi Vol 20, No 2 (2021) Vol. 20 No. 2 (2021): Refleksi Vol 20, No 1 (2021): Refleksi Vol. 20 No. 1 (2021): Refleksi Vol 19, No 2 (2020): Refleksi Vol. 19 No. 2 (2020): Refleksi Vol. 19 No. 1 (2020): Refleksi Vol 19, No 1 (2020): Refleksi Vol 18, No 2 (2019): Refleksi Vol 18, No 1 (2019): Refleksi Vol 17, No 2 (2018): Refleksi Vol 17, No 1 (2018): Refleksi Vol 16, No 2 (2017): Refleksi Vol. 16 No. 1 (2017): Refleksi Vol 16, No 1 (2017): Refleksi Vol 15, No 2 (2016): Refleksi Vol 15, No 1 (2016): Refleksi Vol 14, No 2 (2015): Refleksi Vol 14, No 1 (2015): Refleksi Vol. 13 No. 6 (2014): Refleksi Vol 13, No 6 (2014): Refleksi Vol 13, No 5 (2013): Refleksi Vol. 13 No. 5 (2013): Refleksi Vol. 13 No. 4 (2013): Refleksi Vol 13, No 4 (2013): Refleksi Vol. 13 No. 3 (2012): Refleksi Vol 13, No 3 (2012): Refleksi Vol. 13 No. 2 (2012): Refleksi Vol 13, No 2 (2012): Refleksi Vol 13, No 1 (2011): Refleksi Vol. 13 No. 1 (2011): Refleksi Vol. 11 No. 2 (2009): Refleksi Vol 11, No 2 (2009): Refleksi Vol 11, No 1 (2009): Refleksi Vol. 11 No. 1 (2009): Refleksi Vol. 10 No. 3 (2008): Refleksi Vol 10, No 3 (2008): Refleksi Vol 10, No 2 (2008): Refleksi Vol. 10 No. 2 (2008): Refleksi Vol 10, No 1 (2008): Refleksi Vol. 10 No. 1 (2008): Refleksi Vol. 9 No. 3 (2007): Refleksi Vol 9, No 3 (2007): Refleksi Vol 9, No 2 (2007): Refleksi Vol. 9 No. 2 (2007): Refleksi Vol 9, No 1 (2007): Refleksi Vol. 9 No. 1 (2007): Refleksi Vol 8, No 3 (2006): Refleksi Vol. 8 No. 3 (2006): Refleksi Vol 8, No 2 (2006): Refleksi Vol. 8 No. 2 (2006): Refleksi Vol 8, No 1 (2006): Refleksi Vol. 8 No. 1 (2006): Refleksi Vol. 7 No. 3 (2005): Refleksi Vol 7, No 3 (2005): Refleksi Vol. 7 No. 2 (2005): Refleksi Vol. 7 No. 1 (2005): Refleksi Vol 7, No 1 (2005): Refleksi Vol 6, No 3 (2004): Refleksi Vol. 6 No. 3 (2004): Refleksi Vol 6, No 2 (2004): Refleksi Vol. 6 No. 2 (2004): Refleksi Vol. 6 No. 1 (2004): Refleksi Vol 6, No 1 (2004): Refleksi Vol 5, No 3 (2003): Refleksi Vol 5, No 1 (2003): Refleksi Vol. 5 No. 1 (2003): Refleksi Vol 4, No 3 (2002): Refleksi Vol. 4 No. 3 (2002): Refleksi Vol. 4 No. 2 (2002): Refleksi Vol 4, No 2 (2002): Refleksi Vol 4, No 1 (2002): Refleksi Vol. 4 No. 1 (2002): Refleksi Vol 3, No 3 (2001): Refleksi Vol. 3 No. 3 (2001): Refleksi Vol. 3 No. 2 (2001): Refleksi Vol 3, No 2 (2001): Refleksi Vol. 2 No. 3 (2000): Refleksi Vol 2, No 3 (2000): Refleksi Vol. 2 No. 2 (2000): Refleksi Vol 2, No 2 (2000): Refleksi Vol 2, No 1 (2000): Refleksi Vol. 2 No. 1 (2000): Refleksi Vol. 1 No. 3 (1999): Refleksi Vol 1, No 3 (1999): Refleksi Vol 1, No 2 (1999): Refleksi Vol. 1 No. 2 (1999): Refleksi Vol. 1 No. 1 (1998): Refleksi Vol 1, No 1 (1998): Refleksi More Issue