cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota surabaya,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Arete
Published by Universitas Katolik Widya Mandala Surabaya
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Education, Social,
Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences
Jurnal Ilmiah Fakutas Filsafat Universitas Katolik Widya Mandala Surabaya. Jurnal ilmiah ini diharapkan menghasilkan kontribusi yang positif dari Fakultas Filsafat bagi pemikiran-pemikiran filosofis di Indonesia yang secara jujur dan setia melihat, memahami, dan menilai realitas sosial di tanah air dengan kritis dan cerdas.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 16 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Vol 8, No 1 (2019)" : 16 Documents clear
Bonum Commune Dalam Bingkai Kebangsaan: Perjuangan Politik Petrus Canisius Edi Laksito
Arete Vol 8, No 1 (2019)
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS KATOLIK WIDYA MANDALA SURABAYA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

To speak of bonum commune from the standpoint of the tradition of the In- donesian Catholic Church, this paper does not emphasize the theories of thinkers or their leaders. The priority is precisely the “struggle practices” of the Catholics seeking “conditions of inner and outer well-being” for each individual citizen and community groups in the life of the Indonesian nation. From there it is hoped that the relevance of the idea of bonum commune can be found and its significance for living together. At the pragmatic level, the benchmarks are of course the fruits for the Indonesian people. Normatively, ideologically, the measure is its compatibility with the principles of nation and state, namely Pancasila and Bhinneka Tung- gal Ika. In order for the discussion to be on its track to understand the bonum commune according to Church doctrine, a few items of understanding from the Church's official sources were previously presented.This study was directed at the first period of the Catholic Party's journey, covering the period from its establishment until the recognition of the sovereignty of the Republic of Indonesia by the Dutch Government on December 27, 1949. The recognition it self was the final result of the Round Table Conference (Ronde Tafel Conferentie), namely a meeting between the Netherlands and Indonesia in The Hague, the Netherlands on August 23 to November 2, 1949. The two periods after that, namely the period of liberal democracy and guided democracy as well as the initial period of the New Order to fusion into the Indonesian Democratic Party, are expected to be discussed in other opportunities . Keywords: Catholic, Indonesia, Bonum Commue
Iman melawan Nalar: Perdebatan Joseph Ratzinger dengan Juergen Habermas R.B. Aditya Wahyu
Arete Vol 8, No 1 (2019)
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS KATOLIK WIDYA MANDALA SURABAYA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Populisme Agama Era Demokrasi Di Indonesia Venti Wijayanti
Arete Vol 8, No 1 (2019)
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS KATOLIK WIDYA MANDALA SURABAYA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Populism as a phenomenon is developing in countries throughout the world. The failure of democracy as a system of government is a major factor in the emergence of populism. Indonesia has only stepped on 20 years of the reign of democracy, religious populism has emerged in fertile fields. The elections of 2016 and 2019 became a phenomenon of the great success of populism in Indonesia. Religious populism can be created because there are three main constituent elements, namely: the people, the elite, the public will. Religious populism arises because ideology can give symbolic legitimacy to control public space. In the face of challenges, the social, global economy comes in the middle, religious populism provides promises of certainty and motivation. The existence of information media that positions everyone can be a source of information about lies so that social polarization appears. Religious populism responds to the political status quo and economic of democratic era in Indonesia. Keywords: Religious populism, Indonesian democracy, Symbolic legitimacy, Social polarization
Yohanes, Injil Cinta Kasih Stefanus Eka Tommy Maryono
Arete Vol 8, No 1 (2019)
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS KATOLIK WIDYA MANDALA SURABAYA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

CARU MAÑCA MEBAYANG-BAYANG GODEL BANG DI PURA DALEM KUNCI LINGKUNGAN BATUDAWA KELURAHAN TANJUNG KARANG KECAMATAN SEKARBELA KOTA MATARAM I Made Kastawa
Arete Vol 8, No 1 (2019)
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS KATOLIK WIDYA MANDALA SURABAYA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to study the upakara caru manca using red calf as bayang- bayang(ritual material) in the Dalem Kunci Batudawa Temple, Tanjung Karang Village, Sekar Bela Sub-District, Mataram City. This research was de- signed in qualitative descriptive research. The formulation of the problem of this study are:(1)    What is the form of upakara caru manca using red calf as bayang- bayang (ritual material) in Jaba Pura Dalem Kunci? (2) What is the function of upakara caru manca using red calf as bayang-bayang (ritual material) in the Jaba Pura Dalem Kunci? and (3) What is the meaning of upakara caru manca using red calf as bayang-bayang (ritual material) in Jaba Pura Dalem Kunci?The results of the study show that the shape of the upakara caru manca using red calf as bayang-bayang (ritual material) in the Jaba Pura Dalem Kunci,(a)    the shape of the symbol is the same as the upakara carumancasata, and is equipped with bones and head godel bang (red calf), (b) the process begins with plug in sanggar surya as pesaksi, mapepada, and caru worship which ends with ngelebar. The function of upakara caru manca using red calf as bayang-bayang (ritual material) on the Jaba Pura Dalem Kunci is (a) its religious function as a medium to connect itself with Ida Sang Hyang Widhi Wasa in its manifestation as Durga Mahesasura Mardini; (b) Social functions: as a medium of interaction and social communication both individually and internally in Hindu groups in Lombok. 3) The meaning of upakara caru manca using red calf as bayang-bayang (ritual material) in Jaba Pura Dalem Kunci are: (a) meaningful as an increase in religiosity (sradha and bhakti) of Hindus, and (b) Increasing social solidarity between the Mataram City Hindu. Keywords: caru mañca, shadowing, goddess bang, temple Dalem key
Sumbangan Internalisme dan Eksternalisme dalam Konsep Ketuhanan Untara Simon
Arete Vol 8, No 1 (2019)
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS KATOLIK WIDYA MANDALA SURABAYA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Internalism and externalism are closely related to the issue of knowledge justification. There are fundamental differences between the two streams in the epistemology. However, both agree that to be true, knowledge must be justified. For internalism, this justification is sufficient from within: if it is based on memory, conclusions on various opinions and sensory perceptions of the subject of the knower have rational and reasonable justifications, then the conclusion is true. While for externalism, justification must take into account the validity of the process of achieving knowledge so that the environment, history and social context associated with that knowledge must be taken into account in determining the truth of a conclusion.This paper will try to answer the following questions: Related to the internalism-externalism debate, how can theology be classified? Is it true that theology falls into the category of internalism because God, the object of knowledge in theology, is something that has never been encountered by anyone, cannot be sensed and cannot be objectified? What are the implications of this classification of theology for theology itself? How does this debate make a special contribution to theology? Key Words: Epistemology, Internalism, Externalism, Theodicy.
Apa Hubungan Pancasila Dan Kebijakan Publik? Xaverius Chandra
Arete Vol 8, No 1 (2019)
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS KATOLIK WIDYA MANDALA SURABAYA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The quote of Mohammad Hatta’s statement should have triggered Indone- sians to reÀect on whether the Indonesian state was based on Pancasila if the 1945 Constitution was used? If the implementation of the constitution is related to public policy, should public policy in Indonesia be based on Pancasila? What is the basis of the Pancasila underlying public policies in Indonesia? Is that because Pancasila is the basis of the state so that it also underlies public policy in Indone- sia? So, if Pancasila underlies public policy, what does it mean to base it here? Can Pancasila underlie public policy? These are the questions from this essay that were made for the 2018 Faculty of Philosophy Extension Course which raised the theme of general good in relation to public policy. Key Words : Pancasila, Public Policy
SUMBANGAN INTERNALISME DAN EKSTERNALISME DALAM KONSEP KETUHANAN Untara Simon
Arete Vol 8, No 1 (2019)
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS KATOLIK WIDYA MANDALA SURABAYA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Internalism and externalism are closely related to the issue of knowledge justification. There are fundamental differences between the two streams in the epistemology. However, both agree that to be true, knowledge must be justified. For internalism, this justification is sufficient from within: if it is based on memory, conclusions on various opinions and sensory perceptions of the subject of the knower have rational and reasonable justifications, then the conclusion is true. While for externalism, justification must take into account the validity of the process of achieving knowledge so that the environment, history and social context associated with that knowledge must be taken into account in determining the truth of a conclusion.This paper will try to answer the following questions: Related to the internalism-externalism debate, how can theology be classified? Is it true that theology falls into the category of internalism because God, the object of knowledge in theology, is something that has never been encountered by anyone, cannot be sensed and cannot be objectified? What are the implications of this classification of theology for theology itself? How does this debate make a special contribution to theology? Key Words: Epistemology, Internalism, Externalism, Theodicy.
APA HUBUNGAN PANCASILA DAN KEBIJAKAN PUBLIK? Xaverius Chandra
Arete Vol 8, No 1 (2019)
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS KATOLIK WIDYA MANDALA SURABAYA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The quote of Mohammad Hatta's statment should have triggered Indonesians to reflect on whether the Indonesian state was based on Pancasila if the 1945 Constitution was used? If the implementation of the constitution is related to public policy, should public policy in Indonesia be based on Pancasila? What is the basis of the Pancasila underlying public policies in Indonesia? Is that because Pancasila is the basis of the state so that it also underlies public policy in Indonesia? So, if Pancasila underlies public policy, what does it mean to base it here? Can Pancasila undrlie public policy? These are the questions from this essay.Key words: Pancasila, Pbulic Policy
SUMBANGAN INTERNALISME DAN EKSTERNALISME DALAM KONSEP KETUHANAN Untara Simon
Arete Vol 8, No 1 (2019)
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS KATOLIK WIDYA MANDALA SURABAYA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33508/arete.v8i1.4286

Abstract

AbstractInternalism and externalism are closely related to the issue of knowledge justification. There are fundamental differences between the two streams in the epistemology. However, both agree that to be true, knowledge must be justified. For internalism, this justification is sufficient from within: if it is based on memory, conclusions on various opinions and sensory perceptions of the subject of the knower have rational and reasonable justifications, then the conclusion is true. While for externalism, justification must take into account the validity of the process of achieving knowledge so that the environment, history and social context associated with that knowledge must be taken into account in determining the truth of a conclusion.This paper will try to answer the following questions: Related to the internalism-externalism debate, how can theology be classified? Is it true that theology falls into the category of internalism because God, the object of knowledge in theology, is something that has never been encountered by anyone, cannot be sensed and cannot be objectified? What are the implications of this classification of theology for theology itself? How does this debate make a special contribution to theology? Key Words: Epistemology, Internalism, Externalism, Theodicy. AbstrakInternalisme dan eksternalisme terkait erat dengan persoalan justifikasi pengetahuan. Tedapat perbedaan mendasar atas kedua aliran dalam epistemology tersebut. Meskipun demikian, keduanya sepakat bahwa untuk menjadi benar, suatu pengetahuan harus dijustifikasi. Bagi internalisme, justifikasi ini cukup dari dalam diri saja: bila berdasarkan pada ingatan, kesimpulan atas berbagai pendapat dan pencerapan inderawi subjek penahu memiliki justifikasi rasional dan masuk akal, berarti kesimpulan itu benar. Sementara bagi eksternalisme, justifikasi harus memperhitungkan sahihnya proses pencapaian pengetahuan sehingga, lingkungan, sejarah dan konteks sosial yang terkait dengan pengetahuan tersebut harus diperhitungkan dalam menentukan kebenaran suatu kesimpulan.Tulisan ini akan mencoba menjawab beberapa pertanyaan berikut: Terkait dengan perdebatan internalisme-eksternalisme, bagaimana teologi mau diklasifikasikan? Benarkah teologi masuk dalam kategori internalisme karena Tuhan, objek pengetahuan dalam teologi itu adalah sesuatu yang tidak pernah ditemui oleh siapapun, tidak bisa diindera dan tidak bisa diobjekkan? Apa implikasi penggolongan teologi ini bagi teologi itu sendiri? Bagaimana perdebatan ini memberi sumbangan khusus bagi teologi? Kata Kunci: Epistemologi, Internalisme, Eksternalisme, Teodicy

Page 1 of 2 | Total Record : 16

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2019 2022


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 12, No 1 (2023) Vol 8, No 2 (2019) Vol 8, No 1 (2019) Vol 9, No 1 (2020) Vol 7, No 1 (2018) Vol 6, No 1 (2017) Vol 2, No 2 (2013) Vol 2, No 1 (2013) Vol 1, No 2 (2012) Vol 1, No 1 (2012)