cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Api Adyantari
Contact Email
kinerja.journal@uajy.ac.id
Phone
+6281358444050
Journal Mail Official
kinerja.journal@uajy.ac.id
Editorial Address
PPBE 1st Floor, Faculty of Business and Economics, Campus III Bonaventura Building, Babarsari Street No. 43, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, Postal Code 55281
Location
Kota yogyakarta,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Kinerja
Published by Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta
ISSN : 08536627     EISSN : 25491709     DOI : https://doi.org/10.24002/kinerja.v28i1.8338
Core Subject : Economy,
Economics, Econometrics & Finance
KINERJA (ISSN Online: 2549-1709; ISSN Printed: 0853-6627) is an international journal published twice a year in March and September, hosted and managed by the Faculty of Business and Economics, Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta. It was first published in June 1996. KINERJA provides a forum for lecturers, academicians, researchers, practitioners, and students to deliver and share knowledge in the form of empirical and theoretical research articles and case studies. KINERJA journal invites professionals in the world of education, research, and entrepreneurship to disseminate ideas, concepts, new theories, or science development in the fields of Business, Management, Economics, Accounting, Finance, Tourism Management, Entrepreneurship, or the JEL coverage field through this scientific journal. KINERJA Journal accredited Rank 3 from RISTEKDIKTI, Decree Number 36/E/KPT/2019 valid from Volume 23 No. 2 (2019) to Volume 28 No. 1 (2024).
Arjuna Subject : Bisnis, Menejemen, dan Akutansi (semua kategori) - Bisnis, Menejemen, dan Akutansi (Lain-Lain)
Articles 8 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 8 No. 1 (2004): Kinerja" : 8 Documents clear
KEBANGKRUTAN VERSUS RESTRUKTURISASI: EVALUASI DAN PREDIKSI KELANGSUNGAN HIDUP PERUSAHAAN PASCA KRISIS KEUANGAN 1997 Hermeindito Kaaro
KINERJA Vol. 8 No. 1 (2004): Kinerja
Publisher : Faculty of Business and Economics Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/kinerja.v8i1.805

Abstract

The purposes of this study are to evaluate the persistence in healthy firms during financial crisis periods, to predict healthy firms based on some relevant variables, and to evaluate the effectiveness of the change of company strategic attributes to cope with the financial distress, and to avoid firms bankruptcy in the future. This study provides a methodology that useful to evaluate and predict firm performance. This study uses statistical and qualitative approaches in order to get comprehensive conclusion whether non-healthy firms can increase their performance or not.Twelve selected variables are employed to predict the healthy firms from one through four periods (from 1994 through 1999) before the events (from 1998 through 2000). Seven strategic attributes are identified during the crisis periods to evaluate the change of firm performance. Four major research findings can be summarized as follows. First, there is persistence in the firm performance. The non-healthy firms underperform healthy firms and they also persistently have the worst performance in one and two next years. Second, two business risk proxies, sales stability and standard deviation of return on investment, are consistently significant in predictingthe healthy firms. The effect of investment opportunity, leverage (financial risk), and liquidity in predicting the healthy firms is relatively moderate from one through four years before the event years. While other variables including dividend policy, earning stability, and assets structure are less consistent to predict the healthy firms due to the bias of multicolinearity effects. This study also finds that using univariate t-test, most variables of the two sub-samples (healthy versus nonhealthy firms) are significantly different for all periods, except 1994. Third, the results of predictionmodels are robust. The models provide highly accurate results in matching the classifications of actual observations and the prediction results, range from 86,8% through 100%. Fourth, four strategic attributes, the change of director boards, the composition change of capital ownerships, strategic alliances, and acquisitions, are effective to increase the firm performance. However, surprise that debt restructuring is less powerful to cope with the firm financial distress during three year periods of analysis.Keywords: healthy firm, debt restructuring, corporate strategy, business and financial risks
MORNING LOSSES AND AFTERNOON PRICE VOLATILITY: EVIDENCE OF JAKARTA STOCK EXCHANGE Y. Sukmawati Sukamulja
KINERJA Vol. 8 No. 1 (2004): Kinerja
Publisher : Faculty of Business and Economics Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/kinerja.v8i1.806

Abstract

Menggunakan data intraday, penelitian ini menemukan bukti adanya perilaku bias padaharga di Bursa Efek Jakarta. Investor yang mengalami kerugian pada pagi hari lebih beranimenerima risiko pada siang hari. Investor yang mengalami kerugian di pagi hari bersedia membeli pada harga lebih tinggi daripada investor yang memperoleh keuntungan di pagi hari. Kebalikannya, investor yang tidak suka menerima risiko sepanjang hari akan mengambil posisi sebaliknya, yaitu hanya mau menerima lebih sedikit risiko jika investor telah menerima keuntungan sebelumnya. Penemuan ini membuktikan adanya pengaruh psikologi investor dalam hubungannya dengan keuntungan, kerugian, dan risiko.Kata kunci: keuangan perilaku, keuntungan pagi hari, kerugian pagi hari, penentuan risiko
PENENTUAN NILAI TUKAR: PENGUJIAN PURCHASING POWER PARITY DI INDONESIA Sri Yani Kusumastuti
KINERJA Vol. 8 No. 1 (2004): Kinerja
Publisher : Faculty of Business and Economics Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/kinerja.v8i1.807

Abstract

This paper provides a test of purchasing power parity (PPP) as an explanation for longtermforeign exchange rate movement. We impose symmetry and proportionality restrictions ofPPP to data drawn from the period 1969.1 through 2001.4. The tests are also run for sub-periods. Symmetry and proportionality restrictions find little support for the unit root tests though the Johansen test suggests that foreign exchange rate and inflation rate are linked in a long run sense. Error correction models are then estimated on the basis of the assumption that the United States inflation rate is exogenous. The error correction models result also rejects the PPP.Keywords: purchasing power parity, exchage rate
SURVEI KINERJA KONEKSI INTERNET DAN KEMAMPUAN INVESTASI WARNET DI YOGYAKARTA P. Didit Krisnadewara
KINERJA Vol. 8 No. 1 (2004): Kinerja
Publisher : Faculty of Business and Economics Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/kinerja.v8i1.808

Abstract

This research tries to measure internet-services rental connection performance and the owner’s investment capacity in Yogyakarta. By conducting a field survey, the data obtained then is descriptively analyzed. The analysis shows that internet-services rental industry in Yogyakarta can be classified as small-scale internet services industry with only 1 to 20 unit of personal computers. In addition, the kind of connection used is the wireless 2.4 G.Hz. (54.29%) with a connection speed of 64 k.b.p.s. (51.43%). Most of the owner (45.05%) of the internet-services rentals are willing to increase their investment to upgrade the connection performance up to 10 millon rupiahs.Keywords: connection performance, investment capacity, internet, internet-services rental
PERANAN CORPORATE STRATEGY DALAM KESUKSESAN-KEGAGALAN MERGER & AKUISISI: SUATU TELAAH LITERATUR Andreas Lako
KINERJA Vol. 8 No. 1 (2004): Kinerja
Publisher : Faculty of Business and Economics Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/kinerja.v8i1.809

Abstract

Most empirical studies and literature reviews documented that the final results of the wave of mergers and acquisitions in the United States, Canada, and European countries during the decade of 1980s, 1990s and 2000s were always dissatisfactory. In fact, the extent of the failure is higher than the success.However, a comprehensive investigation on the factors motivating the rise of mergers and acquisitions and the causes for success and failure is still rare. This paper reviews the contribution of corporate strategy in success and failure of mergers and acquisitions during three decades. Specifically, this paper reviews literatures with respect to the motives of corporate mergers and acquisitions actions and the trigger factors of their failures. The result of the literature review shows that corporate strategy has a significant contribution to the extent of the success and failure of corporate mergers and acquisitions. The review finds that trigger factors of mergers and acquisitions failure are the ambiguous communications and cross-cultural gaps, inappropriate and insufficient integration and transformation of new corporate culture, incompatible leadership style accustomed with a new corporate climate, inappropriate corporate planning and internal consolidation, inappropriate anatomy of organizational internal factors, and erroneousness in choosing the partners and the timing of mergers and acquisitions. To ensure the successful and sustainability of corporatemergers and acquisitions, therefore, top management and task force of mergers and acquisitions need to accurately consider those internal and external organization factors.Keywords: merger and acquisition, corporate strategy, cross-cultural, financing and operatingsinergy, stockholder wealth.
MANAJEMEN KARIR: PERMASALAHAN MOBILITAS DAN PENGEMBANGAN KARIR INDIVIDU DALAM ORGANISASI Theresia Diah Widiastuti
KINERJA Vol. 8 No. 1 (2004): Kinerja
Publisher : Faculty of Business and Economics Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/kinerja.v8i1.810

Abstract

This paper explores in depth some problems and issues related to individual careermobility at workplace and the role of organization in employee career development activities at work place. The exploration will be developed further by making advanced analysis on career management, especially the importance of career planning and development and also some obstacles for career mobility seen from an individual and organizational perspective. This paper also identifies some factors that facilitate individual career mobility process and a number of career development intervention activities in an organization.Keywords: career mobility, career management, career development intervention
DOES ENVIRONMENTAL HOSTILITY MODERATE TECHNOLOGY PERFORMANCE RELATIONSHIP ? Lena Ellitan
KINERJA Vol. 8 No. 1 (2004): Kinerja
Publisher : Faculty of Business and Economics Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/kinerja.v8i1.811

Abstract

Telah lama disepakati bahwa teknologi membantu perusahaan untuk meningkatkan kinerja, untuk memperoleh keunggulan kompetitif, dan menciptakan hambatan dalam persaingan. Adopsi teknologi dan kekuatan-kekuatan teknologi secara langsung terkait dengan pendorong persaingan seperti kecepatan proses, tingkat cacat produk, ketepatan penghantaran dan produktivitas. Beberapa studi sebelumnya menunjukkan bahwa tingkat kompetisi dalam persaingan bisnis memoderasi hubungan teknologi-kinerja. Studi ini memfokuskan pada peran environmental hostility terhadap hubungan teknologi-kinerja. Data dikumpulkan melalui survey surat yang ditujukan kepada pimpinan perusahaan mamufaktur di Indonesia. Studi ini menemukan bahwa teknologi lunak dan teknologi keras berpengaruh positif terhadap seluruh indikator kinerja. Environmental hostility memoderasi hubungan teknologi keras dengan semua indikator kinerja kecuali pertumbuhan kinerja manufaktur. Selanjutnya studi ini juga menemukan bahwa environmental hostility memoderasi hubungan teknologi lunak dengan kinerja finansial, pertumbuhan kinerja manufaktur, dan kinerja keseluruhan.Kata Kunci: lingkungan, hostility, teknologi, kinerja
Resensi Buku: Creativity: 76 Cara instant meningkatkan Kreativitas anda C Jarot Priyogutomo
KINERJA Vol. 8 No. 1 (2004): Kinerja
Publisher : Faculty of Business and Economics Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/kinerja.v8i1.812

Abstract

Penulis : Brian Clegg dan Paul BirchPenerbit : Penerbit ErlanggaCetakan : Cetakan 1, 2001Tebal : 192 halaman

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 8

 1 

Filter by Year

2004 2004


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 29 No. 2 (2025): KINERJA Vol. 29 No. 1 (2025): KINERJA Vol. 28 No. 2 (2024): KINERJA Vol. 28 No. 1 (2024): KINERJA Vol. 27 No. 2 (2023): KINERJA Vol. 27 No. 1 (2023): KINERJA Vol. 26 No. 2 (2022): KINERJA Vol. 26 No. 1 (2022): KINERJA Vol. 25 No. 2 (2021): KINERJA Vol 25, No 2 (2021): KINERJA Vol 25, No 1 (2021): KINERJA Vol. 25 No. 1 (2021): KINERJA Vol 24, No 2 (2020): KINERJA Vol. 24 No. 2 (2020): KINERJA Vol. 24 No. 1 (2020): KINERJA Vol 24, No 1 (2020): KINERJA Vol 23, No 2 (2019): KINERJA Vol. 23 No. 2 (2019): KINERJA Vol 23, No 1 (2019): KINERJA Vol. 23 No. 1 (2019): KINERJA Vol. 22 No. 2 (2018): KINERJA Vol 22, No 2 (2018): KINERJA Vol 22, No 1 (2018): KINERJA Vol. 22 No. 1 (2018): KINERJA Vol. 21 No. 2 (2017): KINERJA Vol 21, No 2 (2017): KINERJA Vol 21, No 1 (2017): KINERJA Vol. 21 No. 1 (2017): KINERJA Vol 20, No 2 (2016): Kinerja Vol. 20 No. 2 (2016): Kinerja Vol 20, No 1 (2016): Kinerja Vol. 20 No. 1 (2016): Kinerja Vol. 19 No. 2 (2015): Kinerja Vol 19, No 2 (2015): Kinerja Vol. 19 No. 1 (2015): Kinerja Vol 19, No 1 (2015): Kinerja Vol. 18 No. 2 (2014): Kinerja Vol 18, No 2 (2014): Kinerja Vol. 18 No. 1 (2014): Kinerja Vol 18, No 1 (2014): Kinerja Vol 17, No 2 (2013): Kinerja Jurnal Bisnis dan Ekonomi Vol 17, No 2 (2013): Kinerja Vol. 17 No. 2 (2013): Kinerja Vol. 17 No. 1 (2013): Kinerja Vol 17, No 1 (2013): Kinerja Jurnal Bisnis dan Ekonomi Vol 17, No 1 (2013): Kinerja Vol. 16 No. 2 (2012): Kinerja Vol 16, No 2 (2012): Kinerja Jurnal Bisnis dan Ekonomi Vol 16, No 2 (2012): Kinerja Vol 14, No 2 (2010): Kinerja Vol. 14 No. 2 (2010): Kinerja Vol. 13 No. 2 (2009): Kinerja Vol 13, No 2 (2009): Kinerja Vol 12, No 1 (2008): Kinerja Vol. 12 No. 1 (2008): Kinerja Vol. 11 No. 1 (2007): Kinerja Vol 11, No 1 (2007): Kinerja Vol. 10 No. 2 (2006): Kinerja Vol 10, No 2 (2006): Kinerja Vol 10, No 1 (2006): Kinerja Vol. 10 No. 1 (2006): Kinerja Vol 9, No 2 (2005): Kinerja Vol. 9 No. 2 (2005): Kinerja Vol. 9 No. 1 (2005): Kinerja Vol 9, No 1 (2005): Kinerja Vol. 8 No. 2 (2004): Kinerja Vol 8, No 2 (2004): Kinerja Vol 8, No 1 (2004): Kinerja Vol. 8 No. 1 (2004): Kinerja Vol. 7 No. 2 (2003): Kinerja Vol 7, No 2 (2003): Kinerja Vol 7, No 1 (2003): Kinerja Vol. 7 No. 1 (2003): Kinerja More Issue