Articles
45 Documents
Search results for
, issue
"Vol 1 No 1 (2019)"
:
45 Documents
clear
<![CDATA[ADVOKASI GREENPEACE DALAM MENDESAK PENGHENTIAN PENGGUNAAN BATU BARA SEBAGAI SUMBER ENERGI PEMBANGKIT LISTRIK DI INDONESIA ]]>
<![CDATA[Wulandari, Ni Komang Triani]]>;
<![CDATA[Priadarsini, Ni Wayan Rainy]]>;
<![CDATA[Parameswari, A.A.Ayu Intan]]>
<![CDATA[ DIKSHI (DISKUSI ILMIAH KOMUNITAS HUBUNGAN INTERNASIONAL) Vol 1 No 1 (2019) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Program Studi Hubungan Internasional FISIP Universitas Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (208.306 KB)
<![CDATA[ABSTRACTGreenpeace as an international non-governmental organization committed to the environmental protection. This study aims Greenpeace’s advocacy in urging Indonesian Government to stop using coal as an energy source for electricity generation in Indonesia, in the periods of 2015 - 2017. This research used descriptive qualitative research methods by using the concept of NGOs and strategy and tactic of NGOs. Both of those concepts were able to explain the activity of Greenpeace as a advocacy NGOs in addressing environmental damage due to Indonesian Government policy. This study found that the advocacy of Greenpeace success in influencing the society of danger of coal in Indonesia. Keyword:NGOs, Greenpeace Advocacy, Coal, Indonesia]]>
<![CDATA[Upaya Indonesia dalam Mengurangi Terjadinya Pelanggaran Perbatasan Maritim yang Dilakukan oleh Tiongkok di Perairan Kepulauan Natuna Tahun 2016-2017 ]]>
<![CDATA[Rahyuda Redi, A. A. Ngurah Made]]>;
<![CDATA[Fasisaka, Idin]]>;
<![CDATA[Parameswari, A.A. Ayu Intan]]>
<![CDATA[ DIKSHI (DISKUSI ILMIAH KOMUNITAS HUBUNGAN INTERNASIONAL) Vol 1 No 1 (2019) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Program Studi Hubungan Internasional FISIP Universitas Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (173.947 KB)
<![CDATA[ABSTRACT This research aims to describe the efforts of the Indonesian government under the leadership of Joko Widodo in reducing maritime boundary violation carried out by China in the Natuna Islands in 2016 until 2017. China claims the waters of Natuna Islands as part of its “nine-dash line”which encompasses the majority of the South China Sea, while Indonesia claims the same waters as its territory based on international law. The policies of the previous Indonesian government were inconsistent in defending state’s claims, but Joko Widodo’s governance applied more assertive policies in facing the Chinese by strengthening defense and economy in affected region and actively collaborates with other nations to bolster its position. Using the conceptual framework of coercive diplomacy and balancing behavior, this research concludes that Joko Widodo’s government applied both concept in it’s effort to reducethe violations carried out by China in the Natuna Islands. Keywords: Indonesia, Natuna Islands, coercive diplomacy, balancing]]>
<![CDATA[KEBIJAKAN DEPORTASI ISRAEL TERHADAP PENDATANG ILEGAL BERKEBANGSAAN AFRIKA ]]>
<![CDATA[Geraldio B, Rhafa Jireh]]>;
<![CDATA[Darmiasih, D. A. Wiwik]]>;
<![CDATA[Suwecawangsa, Putu Adi Putra]]>
<![CDATA[ DIKSHI (DISKUSI ILMIAH KOMUNITAS HUBUNGAN INTERNASIONAL) Vol 1 No 1 (2019) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Program Studi Hubungan Internasional FISIP Universitas Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (175.575 KB)
<![CDATA[ABSTRACT The issue of refugees is an issue that continues to grow and has significant impact on a country. A state has the ability to deport refugees in their country. Israel has decided to deport African refugees who are predominantly Eritrean and Sudanese. The Deportation policy of Israel was carried out after the number of refugees from Africa in the country continued to grow. Israel sees African refugees coming illegally to their country. The Refugees who came also received negative responses due to the impact they caused inside Israel. This research analyzes the reasons of Israel’s deportation policy towards African refugees. The data is collected from various network sites, scientific research, journals, news, and articles related to this research. The concept uses is National Security and Securitization. This research focuses on Israel’s decision to create a deportation policy to secure its national security from African refugees residing in its country. Keywords: Israel’s deportation policy, African refugees, Security]]>
<![CDATA[Kebijakan Pembangunan Border Barrier di Wilayah Perbatasan oleh Hungaria sebagai Upaya Mengatasi Krisis Imigran ]]>
<![CDATA[Mechiho, Samuel]]>;
<![CDATA[Dharmiasih, D.A. Wiwik]]>;
<![CDATA[Widya Nugraha, A.A. Bagus Surya]]>
<![CDATA[ DIKSHI (DISKUSI ILMIAH KOMUNITAS HUBUNGAN INTERNASIONAL) Vol 1 No 1 (2019) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Program Studi Hubungan Internasional FISIP Universitas Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (192.142 KB)
<![CDATA[ABSTRACT This research aims to describe what is the reason for Hungary has built a border barrier in the border region using descriptive qualitative methods. Hungary, which is a member state of the European Union, facing a contemporary security threat, which is the flow of immigrants. To cope with this issues, Hungary issued a physical development policy in the form of a border barrier. Although it did not get funding from the European Union in the process of building the border barrier, Hungary continued to carry out the construction process.Therefore, researchers use the framework of immigrant as a contemporary security threat and border barrier as a foreign policy to answer what is the reason for the construction of the border fences in the border region. Keywords: Hungary, Contemporary Security Threat, Foreign Policy, Immigrant, Border Barrier]]>
<![CDATA[Proses Penyelesaian Sengketa Delimitasi Maritim di Laut Barents Antara Rusia dan Norwegia ]]>
<![CDATA[Wismiati, Fiesta Ayu]]>;
<![CDATA[Kumala Dewi, Putu Ratih]]>;
<![CDATA[Widya Nugraha, A.A Bagus Surya]]>
<![CDATA[ DIKSHI (DISKUSI ILMIAH KOMUNITAS HUBUNGAN INTERNASIONAL) Vol 1 No 1 (2019) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Program Studi Hubungan Internasional FISIP Universitas Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (157.389 KB)
<![CDATA[ABSTRACT The writing of this thesis aims to describe the problem between two countries namely Norway and Russia regarding maritime delimitation conflicts that occur in the Barents sea. The background of this essay writing arises because of the potential contained in the Barents sea, which triggers the existence of different struggles and claims for the region. In addition, the natural wealth contained in the Barents sea is one of the most important places in the world. Natural resources in the region create profits to improve the economy for Russia and Norway, of course. With the conflict between Russia and Norway hampering economic activities to be carried out in the region. The two countries adhere to different principles to the delineation of maritime boundaries which make the journey to resolve this conflict last long. However, the conflict that lasted for 40 years was finally resolved by the two countries through the negotiation process. The following negotiation process will be explained in this paper. Keyword :UNCLOS, Bilateral Agreement Process, Negotiation as a Peaceful Settlement Disputes]]>
<![CDATA[FAKTOR – FAKTOR PENDORONG DALAM PENYELESAIAN DELIMITASI ZEE ANTARA INDONESIA DAN FILIPINA ]]>
<![CDATA[Aryastuti Dewi, Ni Made Yuni]]>;
<![CDATA[Kumala Dewi, Putu Ratih]]>;
<![CDATA[Kawitri Resen, Putu Titah]]>
<![CDATA[ DIKSHI (DISKUSI ILMIAH KOMUNITAS HUBUNGAN INTERNASIONAL) Vol 1 No 1 (2019) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Program Studi Hubungan Internasional FISIP Universitas Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (149.17 KB)
<![CDATA[ABSTRACT Delimitation problem between Indonesia and Philippines lasted for 20 years. The location of Indonesia boundaries ‘Miangas Island’ which is closer to the Philippines, becomes one of the key issues. This study will describe the factors that play a role in case resolution of ZEE delimitation between Indonesia and the Philippines. A country will strive to keep its outermost point. The debate over Indonesia's outer perimeter is seen from UNCLOS or Treaty of Paris 1898. However later in 2011 the Philippines agreed on UNCLOS understanding, and accepted Miangas Island as Indonesia's outermost point. This study was made for a change of attitude in the issue of ZEE delimitation settlement caused by several factors in it. This research will be descriptive qualitative research method and using the concept of determinant on foreign policy. Keywords : Miangas Island, Delimitation ZEE , Indonesia, Philippines.]]>
<![CDATA[KEPENTINGAN AUSTRALIA DALAM MEMBERLAKUKAN LARANGAN IMPOR BAGI PRODUK APEL SELANDIA BARU ]]>
<![CDATA[Prayanti, Ida Ayu Adi]]>;
<![CDATA[Sushanti, Sukma]]>;
<![CDATA[Widya Nugraha, A. A. Bagus Surya]]>
<![CDATA[ DIKSHI (DISKUSI ILMIAH KOMUNITAS HUBUNGAN INTERNASIONAL) Vol 1 No 1 (2019) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Program Studi Hubungan Internasional FISIP Universitas Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (158.417 KB)
<![CDATA[ABSTRACT This research aims to describe Australia's national interest in enforcement of import ban of New Zealand apple products. This was triggered by the spread of fire blight pests in Auckland, New Zealand in 1919. The negotiation process between the Australian Government and New Zealand was carried out from 1986 to 2008. The Australian Government imposed the import ban based on the Australian Quarantine Policies 1908 specifically referring to scientific research reports in Final Import Risk Analysis. This research used qualitative descriptive method. Data were collected from various resources including library sources, news and reports. Data were analyzed with the concept of National Interest and Protectionism in International Trade. This research shows a ban on imports of New Zealand apple products is to establish economic interest, especially in an effort to protect the domestic market. Keywords: Australia, Quarantine Policies, Protectionism in International Trade, National Interest]]>
<![CDATA[KEPENTINGAN PERTAHANAN KOREA SELATAN MELALUI JOINT TEAM KOREA DALAM WINTER OLYMPIC 2018 ]]>
<![CDATA[Lokanata Putra S, A.A. Gede Oka]]>;
<![CDATA[Sushanti, Sukma]]>;
<![CDATA[Kumala Dewi, Putu Ratih]]>
<![CDATA[ DIKSHI (DISKUSI ILMIAH KOMUNITAS HUBUNGAN INTERNASIONAL) Vol 1 No 1 (2019) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Program Studi Hubungan Internasional FISIP Universitas Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (168.337 KB)
<![CDATA[ABSTRACT This research describes the national interests that South Korea attempts to achieve in the form of security through the 2018 Winter Olympic Games as a tool to establish diplomatic relations with North Korea. Security issues on the Korean Peninsula are caused by provocative actions carried out by North Korea by carrying out a series of tests and development of nuclear weapons which are troubling not only South Korea but also the international community. For this reason, South Korea, through President Moon Jae-In, seeks to establish diplomatic relations with North Korea through the 2018 Winter Olympic Games to pursue security on the Korean Peninsula by initiating cooperation, dialogues and meetings in order to realize peace and prosperity on the Korean Peninsula. To make this effort a success, South Korea is supported and assisted by the United States as an alliance in dealing with North Korea's nuclear issue and the international community. Keywords:South Korea, North Korea, Nuclear, Winter Olympic, Defense]]>
<![CDATA[Alasan Amerika Serikat Menyalurkan Kontribusi Dana Multilateral Untuk Sudan Selatan Melalui WFP (World Food Programme) Tahun 2014-2017 ]]>
<![CDATA[Pavilia, Novellita]]>;
<![CDATA[Priadarsini, Ni Wayan Rainy]]>;
<![CDATA[Kumala Dewi, Putu Ratih]]>
<![CDATA[ DIKSHI (DISKUSI ILMIAH KOMUNITAS HUBUNGAN INTERNASIONAL) Vol 1 No 1 (2019) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Program Studi Hubungan Internasional FISIP Universitas Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (184.33 KB)
<![CDATA[ABSTRACT Foreign aid is one example of an issue that often appears in a study of International Relations. Countries like the United States often use foreign aid to respond some issues like conflict which is happening in South Sudan.The United States has supported those country since the beginning of its independence and when the civil war struck again in mid-December 2013, those country committed to continue its support through the provision of foreign aid. On one side, congress then questioned about the circumstances of South Sudan whose has not shown any progress yet. Some member of congress has suggested that the United States should prioritize the humanitarian aid to helping South Sudan society, one of the example is could be through the international institutions such as WFP. This study aims to see the reason of United States channels its multilateral funding contribution for South Sudan through WFP (World Food Programme). Keywords: State, United States, World Food Programme (WFP), Foreign Aid, South Sudan, Civil War, Multilateral Contribution]]>
<![CDATA[KEPENTINGAN TIONGKOK DALAM MENGEMBANGKAN PARIWISATA TIBET MELALUI TIBET TOURISM MASTER PLAN 2005 – 2014 ]]>
<![CDATA[Wardana, Jolyn Andrea]]>;
<![CDATA[Priadarsiny, Ni Wayan Rainy]]>;
<![CDATA[Kawitri Resen, Putu Titah]]>
<![CDATA[ DIKSHI (DISKUSI ILMIAH KOMUNITAS HUBUNGAN INTERNASIONAL) Vol 1 No 1 (2019) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Program Studi Hubungan Internasional FISIP Universitas Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (228.304 KB)
<![CDATA[ABSTRACT This research aimed to find out China's interests behind the Tibet Tourism Master Plan policy. Data was obtained through library methods such as books, scientific journals, e-books, official state documents, and related websites. Afterwards the collected data is described with descriptive qualitative method, which means the answer to research questions is explained in form of words rather than numeric. Research analysis used the concept of internal colonialism and national interests. The concept of internal colonialism helped explain the process of changing the Tibetan region into a Chinese colony and the concept of national interest analyzed China's interests behind the policy of the Tibet Tourism Master Plan. Both of these concepts have a correlation, China conditions Tibet as a colony because there are several interests that need to be achieved. The result obtained was that there are economic and hegemony interests that China wants to achieve in developing tourism in Tibet. Keywords: Chinese Occupation, Tibet Tourism Master Plan, Internal Colonialism, National Interest]]>
