cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota surakarta,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Jurnal S2 Pendidikan Matematika
Published by Universitas Sebelas Maret
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Education,
Education Mathematics
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 10 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue " Vol 4, No 10 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika" : 10 Documents clear
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION (TAI)DAN STUDENT TEAM ACHIEVEMENT DIVISION (STAD) PADA MATERI LOGARITMADITINJAU DARIMOTIVASI BELAJAR SISWA KELAS X SMA NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN PURWOREJO TAHUN PELAJARAN 2011/ 2012 Darmono, Prasetiyo Budi; Riyadi, Riyadi; Budiyono, Budiyono
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 10 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (258.496 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of the learning models on achievement viewed from learning motivation (LM) of the students. The learning models compared were TAI, STAD and direct instruction (DI). The type of the research was quasi-experimental research with 3x3 factorial design. The population of this research was the students in grade X senior high school in Purworejo on academic year of 2011/2012. The size of the sample was 294 students, which was taken by using stratified cluster random sampling technique. The instruments used for data collection were achievement test and motivation questionnaire. The hypothesis test used unbalanced two ways analysis of variance. The results of the research were as follows. (1) STAD and TAI had the same achievement. STAD gave better achievement than DI. TAI and DI had the same achievment(2) The students with high and medium LM had same achievement. The students with high LM had better achievement than the students with low LM. The students with medium and low LM had same achievement (3) In STAD, The students with high and medium LM had same achievement. The students with high LM had better achievement than the students with low LM. The students with medium and low LM had same achievement. In TAI, The students with high and medium LM had same achievement. The students with high LM had better achievement than the students with low LM. The students with medium and low LM had same achievement In DI, The students with high and medium LM had same achievement. The students with high LM had better achievement than the students with low LM. The students with medium and low LM had same achievement. (4) At the students with high LM, STAD and TAI had the same achievement. STAD gave better achievement than DI. TAI and DI had the same achievment. At the students with medium LM, STAD and TAI had the same achievement. STAD gave better achievement than DI. TAI and DI had the same achievment The students with low LM, STAD and TAI had the same achievement. STAD gave better achievement than DI. TAI and DI had the same achievmentKey words: Teams Assisted Individualization, Student Team Achievement Division, Direct Instruction, Learning Motivation , Achievement.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE JIGSAW DAN TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZED (TAI) PADA MATERI SISTEM PERSAMAAN LINEAR DUA VARIABEL (SPLDV) DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT (AQ) SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN KARANGANYAR Pambudi, Pangesti Arum; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 10 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (267.587 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of this research was to determine the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from students’ AQ. The learning models compared were Jigsaw cooperative learning, TAI cooperative learning, and direct learning. The type of this research was quasi-experimental research. Population was all of state Junior High School students in Karanganyar Regency on academic year 2015/2016. Samples for group experiment 1 (Jigsaw cooperative learning model) were 98 students, group experiment 2 (TAI cooperative learning model) were 99 students, and control class (direct learning model) were 98 students. The data were collected using documentary method, AQ questionnaire, and mathematics learning achievement test. Data analysis technique used two-ways analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The conclusion of this research as follows: (1) The Jigsaw cooperative learning model makes better mathematics learning achievement than TAI cooperative learning model and direct learning model, while TAI cooperative learning model makes better mathematics learning achievement than direct learning, (2) Climber students get better mathematics learning achievement than students Camper students and Quitter students, while Camper students get better mathematics learning achievement than Quitter students, (3) for every learning model, Climber students get better mathematics learning achievement than Camper students and Quitter students, while Camper students get better mathematics learning achievement than Quitter students, (4) for every categories, Jigsaw cooperative learning model makes better mathematics learning achievement than TAI cooperative learning model and direct learning model, while TAI cooperative learning model makes better mathematics learning achievement than direct learning model.Key words : Jigsaw, Team Assisted Individualized, Adversity Quotient
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF PEER TUTORING DAN TGT DENGAN TEKNIK TALKING CHIPS TERHADAP PRESTASI DAN MINAT BELAJAR MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR Susanti, Sarah Wahyu; Budiyono, Budiyono; Slamet, Isnandar
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 10 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (300.166 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of this research was to determine the effect of learning models toward the learning achievement in Mathematics and the learning interest viewed from the learning styles. The learning models compared were Cooperative Learning Model of Peer Tutoring and Teams Gamest Tournament with the talking Chips Technique. This research used the quasi experimental research method. Its population was all of the students in Grade XI of Senior High Schools of Surabaya City. The samples consisted of 223 students, and they were divided into two groups. First group consisted of 112 students who are for experimental class 1, and the other consiststed of 111 who are for experimental class 2. The instruments used were test of achievement in Mathematics learning, questionaire of learning interst and learning styles. The data was analyzed using multivariate analysis of variance. The results of the research show that: (1) the students exposed to the TGT-TC have a better learning achievement than peer tutoring; (2) the students exposed to peer tutoring have a better learning interest than TGT-TC; (3) the kinesthetic style have learning achievement as well as the auditory style, and the kinesthetic and auditory style have a better learning achievement than the visual style; (4) the kinesthetic style have learning interst as well as the visual style, and the kinesthetic and visual style have a better learning interest than  the auditorial style; (5) in each learning model, either in the cooperative learning model of the peer tutoring or in TGT-TC, the students with kinesthetic style have learning achievement as well as those with auditory style, and the students with kinesthetic and auditory style have a better learning achievement than those with visual style; (6) in each learning model, either in peer tutoring or TGT-TC, the students with kinesthetic style have learning interest as well as those with visual style, and the students with kinesthetic and visual style have a better learning interst than those with auditory style; (7) in each type of learning styles, either the kinesthetic, auditory, and visual, the students have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than peer tutoring; and (8) in each type of learning styles, either the kinesthetic, auditory, and visual, the students exposed to peer tutoring have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than TGT-TC.Key words: Peer Tutoring, TGT, Talking Chips, learning styles, learning achievement, and learning interst. 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PBL, MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TGT, DAN STAD DITINJAU DARI TINGKAT AKTIVITAS METAKOGNISI Wahartojo, Sri; Budiyono, Budiyono; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 10 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (251.923 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to know the effect of the learning models on the learning achievement in mathematics viewed from the students category of metacognition activity. The learning models compared were PBL learning model, the cooperative learning model of TGT, and STAD. The type of research was a quasi-experimental research with a 3x3 factorial design. The population of the study was all first grade students of Vocational High Schools in Surakarta in academic year 2015/2016 by using Curriculum 2013. Instruments used for data collection techniques were mathematics achievement test and questionnaire from metacognition activity. The data analysis technique used was the two-way ANOVA with unequal cell. Based on the hypothesis test, it was concluded that: 1) The mathematics learning achievement of TGT was better than PBL, the mathematics learning achievement of STAD was better than PBL. The mathematics learning achievement of TGT was equal STAD. 2) The mathematics learning achievement of the students with middle category in metacognition activity was better than the students with low category in metacognition activity. The mathematics learning achievement of the students with low category in metacognition activity was equal with the students who had high category in metacognition activity. The mathematics learning achievement of the students with middle category in metacognition activity was equal with the students who had high category in metacognition activity. 3) On all learning models, PBL learning model, TGT learning model, and STAD learning model, the mathematics learning achievement of the students with middle category in metacognition activity was better than students with low category, but the students with low category was equal with high category students then, middle category students was equal with high category students. 4) On all categories, the students with low, middle, and high category in metacognition activity who were treated by PBL, TGT, and STAD learning models, TGT was better than PBL, then, STAD was better than PBL, in addition TGT was equal with STAD.Key words: Achievement in Learning Mathematics, Metacognition Activity, PBL, STAD, TGT Learning Model.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION (TAI) DAN THINK TALK WRITE (TTW) PADA MATERI FUNGSI DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN BOYOLALI TAHUN PELAJARAN 2015/2016 Ulfa, Nur Fitriyana; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Sujadi, Imam
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 10 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (311.156 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to know the effect of the learning models on the learning achievement in mathematics viewed from the students adversity quotient. The learning models compared were the cooperative learning of TAI, TTW, and direct learning model. The type of research was a quasi-experimental research with a 3x3 factorial design. The study population was all grade eighth students of Junior High Schools in Boyolali Regency in the academic year of 2015/2016. Instruments used for data collection were mathematics achievement test and adversity quotient questionnaire. The data analysis technique used was the two-way ANAVA with unbalanced cell. Based on the hypothesis test, it was concluded as follows. 1) The mathematics learning achievement of TAI was better than TTW and direct learning model, the mathematics learning achievement of TTW was better than direct learning model. 2) The mathematics learning achievement of students with climbers category was better than students with campers and quitters category; the mathematics learning achievement of students with campers category was better than students with quitters category. 3) Students with climbers category who were treated by TAI, TTW, and direct learning models had same mathematics learning achievement; the mathematics achievement of students with campers category who were treated by TAI was same of TTW and was better than direct learning model, students who were treated by TTW was better than direct learning model; students with quitters category who were treated by TAI had better mathematics learning achievement than students with TTW and direct learning model, students with TTW was same students with direct learning model. 4) In TAI, the mathematics learning achievement of students with climbers category was better than students with campers and quitters category, students with campers category was same students with quitters category; in TTW, the mathematics learning achievement of students with climbers category was same students with campers category and was better than students with quitters category, students with campers category was better than students with quitters category; in direct learning model, the mathematics learning achievement of students with climbers category was better than students with campers and quitters category, students with campers category was same students with quitters category.Key words: TAI, TTW, Direct Learning Model, Adversity Quotient, Mathematics Learning Achievement
PENGEMBANGAN BAHAN AJAR DENGAN EDMODO UNTUK MENINGKATKAN LEVEL BERPIKIR PROBABILISTIK SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI 12 SURAKARTA Kurniasih, Rini; Sujadi, Imam; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 10 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (300.168 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The purposes of this study were: 1) to determine the process and to get the development of learning materials in accordance with Edmodo, 2) to decide whether the level of students probabilistic thinking that use learning materials with Edmodo better than the level of probabilistic thinking that use the existing learning materials or not.This study is a research and development (R&D). This study is divided into three stages namely the preliminary stage, the development stage and the testing stage or experimentation. Preliminary stage includes research and information collecting. The development stage includes planning and develop preliminary form product, preliminary field testing and main product revision, main field testing and operational product revision, operational filed testing and final product revision. The testing stage includes the qualitative analysis and quantitative analysis with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test . Data analysis that used is descriptive analysis and the quality of learning materials based on the criteria of validity, practicality and effectiveness of learning materials. Determination of the final product is done by focus group discussion (FGD) between researchers and teachers or practitioners. Based on the study results obtained the following conclusions : 1) the preliminary stage is concluded learners at the level of the subjective and transitional; the development stage is conclude the obtained validity with an average of 3.57 of a media expert, 3.67 of subject matter experts; the practicality has exceeded the criteria above 75 % and the effectiveness gained an average response learners receive is 93.25 %; and from the result of FGD concluded that learning materials can be used in the process of learning in the curriculum 2013 and can be disseminated, 2) learning that use Edmodo learning materials is more effectively to improve the level of probabilistic thinking learners than the learning that use the existing learning materials.Key words: learning material, Edmodo, level, probabilistic thinking
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAMS GAMES TOURNAMENT (TGT) DAN TWO STAY TWO STRAY (TSTS) PADA MATERI SISTEM PERSAMAAN LINEAR DUA VARIABEL DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA KELAS VIII SMP SE-KABUPATEN REMBANG TAHUN PELAJARAN 2015/2016 Proborini, Ellen; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 10 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (258.602 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of the learning model on learning achievement viewed from students’ learning style. The learning models compared were TGT, TSTS and direct learning. The population of this research was the students in grade VIII of state junior high schools in Rembang year 2015/2016. The hypothesis test used unbalanced two way analysis of variance. The results of the research were as follow. 1) TGT and TSTS learning model gave equal students achievement, the students achievement that given TGT was better than direct learning, and the students achievement that given TSTS was better than direct learning. 2) The auditory students achievement was better than visual, but the auditory and kinesthetic have equal students achievement, and visual and kinesthetic have equal students achievement, 3) In TGT, auditory and kinesthetic have equal students achievement, auditory and visual have equal students achievement, and kinesthetic students achievement was better than visual. In TSTS, the auditory and visual have equal students achievement, auditory and kinesthetic have equal students achievement, and visual students achievement was better than kinesthetic. In direct learning, the auditory and visual have equal students achievement, the auditory and kinesthetic have equal students achievement, and kinesthetic and visual have equal students achievement, 4) In auditory, TGT and TSTS learning model gave equal students achievement, wether TSTS and direct learning gave equal students achievement, and TGT and direct learning gave equal students achievement. In visual, students achievement that given TSTS was better than TGT, wether TGT and direct learning gave equal students achievement, and TSTS was better than direct learning. In kinesthetic, students achievement that given TGT was better than TSTS, wether direct learning and TGT gave equal students achievement, and direct learning and TSTS gave equal students achievement.Key words: TGT, TSTS, Direct Learning, Learning Style.
EKSPERIMENTASI PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN MEDIA KOMPUTER TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI KREATIVITAS BELAJAR SISWA Juniarto, Suci; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 10 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (330.813 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The purpose of this research was to determine the effect model of learning and creativity of students learning the mathematics achievement. The research was quasi experimental. The population of this research was all students of grade VIII SMP/ MTs Muhammadiyah of the District Surakarta, academic year 2011/2012. Instruments used to collect data were mathematics achievement instrument test and questionnaires creativity students toward mathematics instrument. Data analysis technique used hypothesis test with two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells resume test of double comparisons. From the results of the analysis, can be concluded that: 1) the learning achievement in mathematics of the students who were learning mathematics with cooperative learning model NHT computer-assisted media were better than the with cooperative NHT and conventional, however the students who were learning mathematics with cooperative learning model NHT were better than the with conventional, 2) the learning achievement in mathematics of the students with the high learning creativity were better than the ones with the medium and low, however the students with the medium learning creativity were better  than the ones with the low, 3) in the cooperative learning model NHT computer-assisted media, the learning achievement in mathematics of the students with ones who have the high learning creativity were better than the students with the low learning creativity, students with the high learning creativity were as good as the ones who have medium learning creativity, and students with the medium learning creativity were as good as the ones who have low learning creativity as well. In the cooperative learning model NHT and conventional, the students with the high, medium, and low learning creativity had the same achievement in learning mathematics, 4) in the students with the high learning creativity, the learning achievement of the students who were learning mathematics with ones who have cooperative learning model NHT computer-assisted media were better than the students were learning mathematics with cooperative NHT, the students who were learning mathematics with cooperative NHT had the same achievement in learning mathematics with conventional, and the students who were learning mathematics with cooperative learning model NHT computer-assisted media had the same achievement in learning mathematics with cooperative NHT. The students with the medium and low learning creativity had the same achievement in learning mathematics among the ones who were given the cooperative learning model NHT computer-assisted media, NHT, and conventional on solid geometry.Key words: Numbered Heads Together (NHT), Computer media, Conventional Learning Model, Learning Creativity, Achievement Learning Mathematics.
ANALISIS KESALAHAN SISWA DALAM PEMECAHAN MASALAH BERDASARKAN PENDAPAT JOHN W. SANTROCK PADA POKOK BAHASAN BANGUN RUANG SISI LENGKUNG DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR DAN GAYA BERPIKIR SISWA Rosyida, Entyka Mayhasti; Riyadi, Riyadi; Mardiyana, Mardiyana
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 10 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (198.688 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: This research aimed to find out the errors and causes of students’ with learning and thinking styles in non-polyhedra geometry. The subject of research was 30 students in SMP Negeri 1 Plantungan, in the school year of 2012/2013. The selection of research subjects is based on the problems arising from students in mathematical problem solving, especially in non-polyhedra geometry. Data triangulation used in this research was method triangulation. Before questionnaire was distributed, the author had conducted observation. After in non-polyhedra geometry was taught, diagnostic test item were administered and the result with most errors were selected as the research subject. The result of research are Auditory-Sequential students includes determining a formula error, errors of count, and the error determining unit. The causes were the students don’t understanding the concept of matter; Auditory-Random students errors included that of not writing all the elements on the part and the error of count. The causes were the students less creativity in choosing the measure of problem solving; Visual-Sequential students involved errors set the formula, an error entering element values into the formula, and errors of calculating. The causes were students not understanding concept of matter; Visual-Random student errors included that of determining the formula, converting volume unit, and of drawing a conclusion from the result of calculation. The causes were students paying attention imprecisely to answer and question; Kinesthetic-Sequential students involved errors set the formula, an error including the value element into formula, calculating error, and the error determining unit. The causes were students not forgetting the formula of objects, working in the problem imprecisely, and working the problem in hurry; Kinesthetic-Random students involved errors identifying any elements known from the picture, set the formula errors, errors of counting, and error of determining unit. The causes were that the students identified picture imprecisely.Key words: error analysis, problem solving, learning style, thinking style.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER (NHT) DAN THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) PADA MATERI OPERASI BENTUK ALJABAR DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN EMOSIONALKELAS VII SMP NEGERI SE-KAB LOMBOK UTARA TAHUN AJARAN 2015/2016 Hasanah, A.K Uswatun; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Riyadi, Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 10 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (344.581 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The objectives of this research were to investigate: (1) which learning model of the NHT, TPS, and direct learning models (2) which emotional intelligence of the low, moderate, and high emotional intelligences results in a better learning (3) in each learning model, which emotional intelligence of the low, moderate, and high emotional intelligences results in a better learning (4) in each emotional intelligence, which learning model  of the NHT, TPS, and direct learning models results in a better learning achievement. This research used the quasi experimental research method with the factorial design of 33. Its population was all of the students in Grade VII of State Junior Secondary Schools of North Lombok Regency in Academic Year 2015/2016. The samples of research were determined by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique. They consisted of 309 students, namely: 103 in Experimental Class 1; 102 students in Experimental Class 2; and 104 in Control Class. The data of research were collected through questionnaire of emotional intelligence and test of learning achievement. The technique of analyzing the data use two-ways ANOVA with unbalanced cells. The results of research are as follows: 1) The NHT learning model results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics than the TPS and the direct learning model. 2) The learning achievement in Mathematics of the students with the high emotional intelligence is better than that of the students with the moderate emotional intelligence. 3) In the NHT learning model, the students with the high emotional intelligence have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with the moderate and low emotional intelligences, and the students with the moderate emotional intelligence have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with the low emotional intelligence. 4) In the high emotional intelligence, the NHT learning model results in the same learning achievement in Mathematics as the TPS learning model.Key words: Numbered Heads Together, Think Pair Share, Direct Learning, and Emotional Intelligence.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 10

 1 

Filter by Year

2016 2016


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 4, No 10 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 9 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 8 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 7 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 6 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 3 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 2 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 1 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 10 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 9 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 8 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 7 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 6 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 5 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 2 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 1 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 9 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 7 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 6 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 5 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 4 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 3 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 2 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 1 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 7 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 6 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 5 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 4 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 3 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 1 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika More Issue