cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota tangerang selatan,
Banten
INDONESIA
'ADALAH
Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
ADALAH is “one of the ten most influential law journals in the world, based on research influence and impact factors,” in the Journal Citation Reports. ADALAH also publishes student-written work.Adalah publishes pieces on recent developments in law and reviews of new books in the field. Past student work has been awarded the International Law Students Association’s Francis Deak Prize for the top student-written article published in a student-edited international law journal.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 498 Documents
 46   47   48   49   50 
Blockchain dan Cryptocurrency: Tantangan Regulasi dan Kepastian Hukum dalam Arsitektur Keuangan Digital Indonesia Gilang Rizki Aji Putra; Sri Ajeng Murni Cahyani Putri
BULETIN ADALAH Vol. 9 No. 7 (2025)
Publisher : UIN Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/adalah.v9i7.51878

Abstract

Blockchain and cryptocurrency have disrupted global financial systems through decentralized and transparent transactions. In Indonesia, however, these technologies face regulatory challenges rooted in conventional legal frameworks. This article analyzes Indonesia’s regulatory landscape on blockchain and cryptocurrency, identifies key issues, and proposes reform directions. Using normative legal research with statutory and comparative approaches, the study finds three main problems: unclear dual legal status of cryptocurrency as commodity and financial asset, weak mechanisms for seizure and enforcement of digital assets, and tension between regulation and the borderless nature of blockchain. Despite reforms under the P2SK Law and OJK supervision, significant legal gaps remain. The article concludes that comprehensive digital asset legislation is urgently needed. Keywords: Blockchain, Cryptocurrency, Legal Certainty, Digital Assets, Regulation.
Kedudukan Bukti Digital dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia: Rekonsepsi Pengaturan dan Penguatan Chain of Custody di Era Cyber-Enabled Crime Gilang Rizki Aji Putra
BULETIN ADALAH Vol. 8 No. 7 (2024)
Publisher : UIN Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/adalah.v8i7.51879

Abstract

Digital transformation has reshaped criminal activity and positioned electronic evidence as a central element in criminal investigations. This article analyzes the juridical status of digital evidence within Indonesia’s criminal justice system, focusing on its legal basis, evidentiary value, and challenges related to authentication and the preservation of chain of custody. Using normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, the study finds that the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (ITE Law) has expanded the closed system of evidentiary instruments under the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) by formally recognizing electronic information and documents as admissible evidence. Nevertheless, significant issues remain, including unclear substantive requirements for admissibility, the absence of comprehensive chain of custody standards, and disparities in law enforcement capacity. Court decisions demonstrate that evidentiary strength often depends on proving integrity and authenticity rather than clear normative standards. The article concludes that procedural reform, standardized digital forensic protocols, and institutional capacity building are essential. Keywords: Digital Evidence, Chain of Custody, Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), Electronic Information and Transactions Law (ITE Law), Digital Forensics.
Peran Forensik Digital dalam Mengungkap Kejahatan Siber: Tantangan Prosedural dan Kebutuhan Standardisasi di Indonesia Gilang Rizki Aji Putra
BULETIN ADALAH Vol. 8 No. 7 (2024)
Publisher : UIN Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/adalah.v8i7.51880

Abstract

Digital forensics is a multidisciplinary field that integrates information technology and forensic science to identify, secure, extract, and analyze digital evidence for judicial proceedings. This article examines the vital role of digital forensics in uncovering cybercrime in Indonesia, analyzing its legal foundations and identifying procedural and institutional challenges affecting its effectiveness. Using normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and case study approaches, the study finds that digital forensics serves as a crucial mechanism for transforming volatile digital traces into admissible evidence that satisfies chain of custody requirements. The Electronic Information and Transactions Law (ITE Law) and relevant Supreme Court jurisprudence provide a legal basis for the acceptance of digital evidence. However, implementation faces significant obstacles, including fragmented procedural standards, limited expert personnel, regional disparities in laboratory infrastructure, and the absence of uniform national guidelines. The article concludes that strengthening standardization, certification, and institutional capacity is essential. Keywords: Digital Forensics, Cybercrime, Chain of Custody, Electronic Information and Transactions Law (ITE Law), Digital Evidence.
Tantangan Aparat Penegak Hukum dalam Menangani Cybercrime di Indonesia: Kesenjangan Kapasitas, Regulasi, dan Kerjasama Lintas Batas Gilang Rizki Aji Putra
BULETIN ADALAH Vol. 8 No. 7 (2024)
Publisher : UIN Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/adalah.v8i7.51881

Abstract

Cybercrime has evolved into a sophisticated, transnational, and rapidly mutating form of criminality driven by technological advancement. Law enforcement agencies, as the frontline actors in combating these offenses, face complex multidimensional challenges. This article aims to comprehensively identify and analyze the challenges encountered by Indonesian law enforcement authorities—particularly the Police, the Prosecutor’s Office, and related institutions—in addressing cybercrime. Employing a normative-sociological legal research method with statutory, conceptual, and case study approaches, the study reveals three principal clusters of challenges: (1) technical and human resource capacity gaps that lag behind technological developments; (2) procedural regulatory frameworks that remain insufficiently adaptive to modern cyber investigations; and (3) jurisdictional barriers and limited international cooperation in pursuing transnational offenders. Analysis of major cases, including ransomware attacks, cross-border online fraud syndicates, and dark web investigations, demonstrates persistent institutional constraints. The article concludes that comprehensive institutional reform, technological investment, and enhanced international collaboration are imperative. Keywords: Law Enforcement Agencies, Cybercrime, Technical Capacity, Jurisdiction, International
Kerja Sama Internasional dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan Siber: Urgensi Ratifikasi Konvensi Budapest dan Pembentukan Rezim Kolaboratif bagi Indonesia Gilang Rizki Aji Putra
BULETIN ADALAH Vol. 8 No. 7 (2024)
Publisher : UIN Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/adalah.v8i7.51882

Abstract

Cybercrime transcends territorial boundaries, constituting a transnational threat that demands coordinated international responses. This article analyzes the framework of international cooperation in combating cybercrime, evaluates Indonesia’s position within the global architecture, and formulates strategic measures to strengthen its engagement. Using normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, the study finds that the Budapest Convention on Cybercrime (2001) remains the most comprehensive multilateral instrument, providing a foundation for harmonizing substantive and procedural law as well as enabling rapid cooperation mechanisms. As Indonesia currently holds observer status, structural limitations persist, including delays in Mutual Legal Assistance (MLA) processes and lack of direct access to the 24/7 point-of-contact network. Analysis of cross-border cyber incidents affecting Indonesia demonstrates that without seamless cooperation, enforcement efforts frequently stall at issues of attribution and jurisdiction. The article concludes that accession to the Budapest Convention, coupled with domestic legal harmonization and proactive cyber diplomacy, is essential. Keywords: Transnational Cybercrime, Budapest Convention, Mutual Legal Assistance, International Cooperation, Jurisdiction.
Tanggung Jawab Hukum Platform Media Sosial terhadap Konten Pengguna di Indonesia: Potret Conditional Safe Harbor, Sistem SAMAN, dan Tarikan Menuju Akuntabilitas Proaktif Gilang Rizki Aji Putra
BULETIN ADALAH Vol. 8 No. 7 (2024)
Publisher : UIN Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/adalah.v8i7.51883

Abstract

Social media platforms have evolved from mere communication channels into digital public spheres mediating information, opinion, and expression for billions of users. The presence of illegal content—such as hate speech, pornography, disinformation, and incitement to violence—raises a fundamental question: to what extent are platforms legally responsible for user-generated content? This article analyzes Indonesia’s legal framework on platform liability, examining the intermediary liability regime, its evolution from safe harbor to conditional liability, and the implementation of the Content Moderation Compliance System (SAMAN). Using normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, the study finds that Indonesia adopts a conditional liability model requiring platforms to remove illegal content within specified deadlines upon notification, subject to administrative fines. However, regulatory fragmentation and limited due process safeguards undermine legal certainty. Comparative analysis indicates the need for stronger transparency standards and independent oversight mechanisms. Keywords: Intermediary Liability, Social Media Platforms, SAMAN, Electronic Information and Transactions Law (ITE Law), Conditional Safe Harbor, Content Moderation.
Implementasi Konsep Single Bar Dalam Organisasi Advokat Di Indonesia: Perspektif Ikatan Advokat Indonesia (IKADIN) Herman Sitompul; Fitriyanti Fitriyanti
BULETIN ADALAH Vol. 10 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : UIN Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/adalah.v10i3.52095

Abstract

Advocate organizations play a significant role in improving professional quality, enforcing codes of ethics, and conducting supervision and development of advocates. Within the framework of the legal profession, the single bar concept represents an organizational model that centralizes the authority to regulate and manage the advocate profession under a single professional body. This concept is legally grounded in Law Number 18 of 2003 concerning Advocates, which served as the basis for the establishment of the Indonesian Advocates Association (PERADI) by the Indonesian Advocates Association (IKADIN) together with seven other advocate organizations as the sole advocate organization in Indonesia. However, institutional developments following the issuance of Supreme Court Decree Number 073/KMA/HK.01/IX/2015 have led to the emergence of various advocate organizations performing professional functions, thereby generating debates regarding the existence and implementation of the single bar system in Indonesia. This article aims to analyze the single bar concept within Indonesia's advocate organizational framework from the perspective of IKADIN and to examine the challenges faced in maintaining PERADI's position as the sole advocate organization. The study finds that the single bar concept continues to possess a strong juridical foundation under the Advocate Law; however, its implementation faces significant challenges arising from regulatory developments, judicial decisions, and the evolving dynamics of advocate organizations in Indonesia. Keywords: Single Bar, Advocate Organization, PERADI, IKADIN, Advocate Profession.
The Effectiveness of Village Heads as Mediators in Land Dispute Resolution: An Empirical Juridical Study in Pasilian Village, Tangerang Regency Abdulatip Abdulatip; Muh Nasir; Rasman Habeahan
BULETIN ADALAH Vol. 10 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : UIN Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/adalah.v10i2.52106

Abstract

Land disputes remain a persistent challenge in rural Indonesia, often threatening social cohesion and local development. While formal litigation offers a legally binding resolution, its cost, complexity, and length frequently deter village communities. Consequently, alternative dispute resolution through mediation has emerged as a preferred mechanism, with the Village Head functioning as a key mediator due to his or her formal authority and social legitimacy. This study examines the implementation and effectiveness of the Village Head's mediating role in land disputes in Pasilian Village, Kronjo District, Tangerang Regency. Employing a socio-legal or empirical-normative research methodology, the study combines analysis of statutory regulations with empirical data obtained through in-depth interviews, direct observation, and documentary analysis. The findings reveal that the Village Head performs multiple functions: as a facilitator of dialogue, a neutral intermediary, and a guardian of local wisdom. However, the effectiveness of this role is constrained by several factors, including limited legal knowledge regarding agrarian law and mediation techniques, the absence of standardised procedural guidelines, weak administrative documentation of land rights, and the potential for bias arising from kinship ties or local political interests. Furthermore, mediation outcomes lack formal executorial force, undermining legal certainty. The study concludes that while the Village Head's mediation offers significant advantages in terms of speed, cost, and social harmony, its sustainability requires institutional reinforcement through capacity-building programmes, clearer regulatory frameworks, and enhanced coordination with land agencies. Recommendations include the development of standard operating procedures for village-level mediation, systematic training for Village Heads in agrarian law and conflict resolution, and improved land administration systems to prevent future disputes. Keywords: Village Head; mediation; land dispute; socio-legal study; alternative dispute resolution

Page 50 of 50 | Total Record : 498

 46   47   48   49   50 

Filter by Year

2017 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 10 No. 3 (2026) Vol. 10 No. 2 (2026) Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026) Vol. 9 No. 7 (2025) Vol 9, No 6 (2025) Vol. 9 No. 6 (2025) Vol. 9 No. 5 (2025) Vol. 9 No. 4 (2025) Vol. 9 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 8 No. 7 (2024) Vol 8, No 6 (2024) Vol. 8 No. 6 (2024) Vol. 8 No. 5 (2024) Vol 8, No 5 (2024) Vol 8, No 4 (2024) Vol. 8 No. 4 (2024) Vol. 8 No. 3 (2024) Vol 8, No 3 (2024) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024) Vol 8, No 1 (2024) Vol. 7 No. 7 (2023): Kejahatan Siber (Cybercrime) dan Tantangan Penegakan Hukum di Era Digital Vol. 7 No. 6 (2023) Vol 7, No 6 (2023) Vol. 7 No. 5 (2023) Vol 7, No 5 (2023) Vol. 7 No. 4 (2023) Vol 7, No 4 (2023) Vol. 7 No. 3 (2023) Vol 7, No 3 (2023) Vol 7, No 2 (2023) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2023) Vol 7, No 1 (2023) Vol. 6 No. 7 (2022): Perlindungan Data Pribadi dan Hak Privasi di Era Digital Vol 6, No 6 (2022) Vol 6, No 5 (2022) Vol 6, No 4 (2022) Vol 6, No 3 (2022) Vol 6, No 2 (2022) Vol 6, No 1 (2022) Vol. 5 No. 7 (2021): Beyond UU ITE: Arah Baru Hukum Siber di Era Teknologi Disruptif Vol. 5 No. 6 (2021) Vol 5, No 6 (2021) Vol 5, No 5 (2021) Vol. 5 No. 5 (2021) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2021) Vol 5, No 4 (2021) Vol 5, No 3 (2021) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2021) Vol 5, No 2 (2021) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2021) Vol 5, No 1 (2021) Vol 4, No 1 (2020): Coronavirus Covid-19 Vol 4, No 1 (2020): Spesial Issue Covid-19 Vol. 4 No. 6 (2020): Hukum Siber dan Transformasi Digital Vol 4, No 4 (2020): Keadilan Masyarakat Vol 4, No 3 (2020): Keadilan Hukum & Pemerintahan Vol 4, No 2 (2020): Keadilan Sosial & Politik Vol. 3 No. 6 (2019): Philosophy of State Vol 3, No 6 (2019): Philosophy of State Vol. 3 No. 5 (2019): Budaya Hukum Masyarakat Rusia Vol 3, No 5 (2019): Budaya Hukum Masyarakat Rusia Vol 3, No 4 (2019): Keadilan Sosial & Politik Vol. 3 No. 4 (2019): Keadilan Sosial & Politik Vol. 3 No. 3 (2019): Keadilan Budaya & Masyarakat Vol 3, No 3 (2019): Keadilan Budaya & Masyarakat Vol 3, No 2 (2019): Keadilan Negara & Konstitusi Vol. 3 No. 2 (2019): Keadilan Negara & Konstitusi Vol. 3 No. 1 (2019): Keadilan Hukum & Pemerintahan Vol 3, No 1 (2019): Keadilan Hukum & Pemerintahan Vol 2, No 11 (2018) Vol 2, No 10 (2018) Vol 2, No 9 (2018) Vol 2, No 8 (2018) Vol 2, No 7 (2018) Vol 2, No 6 (2018) Vol 2, No 5 (2018) Vol 2, No 4 (2018) Vol 2, No 3 (2018) Vol 2, No 2 (2018) Vol 2, No 1 (2018) Vol 1, No 12 (2017) Vol 1, No 11 (2017) Vol 1, No 10 (2017) Vol 1, No 9 (2017) Vol 1, No 8 (2017) Vol 1, No 7 (2017) Vol 1, No 6 (2017) Vol 1, No 5 (2017) Vol 1, No 4 (2017) Vol 1, No 3 (2017) Vol 1, No 2 (2017) Vol 1, No 1 (2017) More Issue