Articles
129 Documents
Search results for
, issue
"Vol 4, No 1 (2015)"
:
129 Documents
clear
<![CDATA[PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP TENAGA KERJA KONTRAK DI KOTA SAMARINDA ]]>
<![CDATA[Abraham Abraham]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Law ( Jurnal Ilmu Hukum ) Vol 4, No 1 (2015) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Samarinda ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[AbstractSometimes the presence of the union or unions at the company did not have the strength. The position of workers or contract workers is even more difficult, because the protection of the law for workers or contract workers is still weak.Population growth is higher and less balanced distribution of the population, a factor that greatly affects on employment issues in the homeland of Indonesia. In the literature of existing labor law, labor relations history in Indonesia begins with a very bleak future that slavery in which the oppression and inhuman treatment committed by parties capable of socio-economic as well as the rulers at that time.The contract workers can demand higher wages on employers as a result of the prices of basic necessities rise caused by rising fuel prices and employers reject wage hike demands of workers for reasons not yet expired letters of intent. The new labor agreement will expire in 2014.]]>
<![CDATA[TANGGUNG JAWAB YURIDIS DAN PERMASALAHANNYA TERHADAP BARANG JAMINAN GADAI DI PT PEGADAIAN CABANG AIR PUTIH KOTA SAMARINDA ]]>
<![CDATA[Mika, Silwanus]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Law ( Jurnal Ilmu Hukum ) Vol 4, No 1 (2015) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Samarinda ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[ABSTRACTPawnship office is Body of Effort Publik Ownerworkships which is its nucleus core in service area channeling of credit to society assist government in improving prosperity of societybespecially fot middle economic faction downwords.Mortage is matter of important between pawnship office with society in worse of the happening of agreement of both parties by that of sociey need right and obligations of pawnship office and also society which with mortage which in pawn.Giving knownledge to society how to finish the problem of related to mortage as according to existing order so that do not is wrong of thigh between society with PT Pegadaian offiice.Can give knowledge and knowledge good to society and also for the interested parties with mortage so that can become benefit as all.Its keyword : Knowledge about Law Mortage Pwan]]>
<![CDATA[KEABSAHAN STANDART KONTRAK YANG DIBUAT TERLEBIH DAHULU FORMATNYA DI TINJAU MENURUT PASAL 1320 KUH PERDATA JO PASAL 1338 KUH PERDATA ]]>
<![CDATA[HENRY HIDAYAT AZZHAR]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Law ( Jurnal Ilmu Hukum ) Vol 4, No 1 (2015) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Samarinda ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (96.768 KB)
<![CDATA[ABSTRACTRegarding the validity of standard agreements that in this case the agreement between Perusda taps with the fact that the customer is considered to contain weakness especially if connected or in terms of Article 1320 Article 1338 BW BW Jo. Said to contain a weakness because the agreement contained no standard agreement (consensus) in the broad sense of the two sides, but only one-sided. While the applicant in giving the deal is only fictitious. Thus the standard agreement not only contains a weakness, but also deviated from the principles contained in Article 1320 BW 1338 BW Jo chapter. So it can be said of the legality standard agreement when viewed from Article 1320 Article 1338 BW BW Jo formally it can be said that the agreement is not valid standards. But this case we are faced with the problems that inevitably recognize the existence of a standard agreement as a means to meet the many needs of the community in supporting the survival, growth becomes vital as a means of fulfilling the primary requirement.Attachment problems of the parties to the standard agreement of the parties is able to foretell anything, as long as it is not contrary to law and morality, and what was agreed legally binding like a law. In relation to the standard agreements held by Perusda taps and customers or consumers, as long as it is agreed upon standard agreement and there is no injured party then the agreement is considered valid as stated in article 1338 paragraph (1) BW. Moreover, the standard agreement which became the object of the agreement is a vital means (water consumed) which is a primary need that is impossible to ignore by all humans in his life. This should be acknowledged its existence.]]>
<![CDATA[PENERAPAN PASAL 374 KUHP JO PASAL 64 AYAT (1) KUHP DAN LAMANYA HUKUMAN YANG DIJATUHKAN TERHADAP SUBYEK HUKUM PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PENGGELAPAN DI PERUSAHAAN ]]>
<![CDATA[Agus Setiawan]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Law ( Jurnal Ilmu Hukum ) Vol 4, No 1 (2015) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Samarinda ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[ABSTRAKPenerapan pasal 374 KUHP jo pasal 64 ayat (1) KUHP oleh Majelis Hakim dalam perkara pidana No. 15/Pid.B/1999/PN.Smda sudah tepat, akan tetapi mengenai lamanya hukuman yang dijatuhkan oleh Majelis Hakim terlepas dari hal-hal yang memberatkan dan meringankan hukuman yang dijatuhkan terhadap pelaku perbuatan pidana penggelapan barang milik perusahaan yang dilakukan secara berturut – turut. Sehubungan dengan perkara pidana tersebut yang terdakwa dijatuhi hukuman selama 5 (lima) bulan, penulis berpendapat hukuman tersebut sangat ringan. Sehubungan dengan permasalahan klasifikasi perbuatan pidana penggelapan sebagaimana diatur dan diancam pasal 374 KUHP jo pasal 64 ayat (1) KUHP adalah merupakan perbuatan pidana penggelapan dengan pemberatan. Adapun akibat hukumnya terhadap pelaku perbuatan pidana penggelapan dengan pemberatan sebagaimana diatur dalam pasal 374 KUHP adalah pidana penjara selama – lamanya 5 (lima) tahun. Sedangkan dalam putusan perkara pidana No. 15/Pid.B/1999/PN.Smda sebagaimana telah diuraikan di atas, terhadap pelaku perbuatan pidana penggelapan barang milik perusahaan yang dilakukan secara berturut – turut termasuk dalam klasifikasi perbuatan pidana dengan pemberatan dengan pidana penjara selama 5 (lima) bulan. Oleh karena perbuatan tersebut termasuk dalam klasifikasi perbuatan pidana penggelapan dengan pemberatan, seharusnya perbuatan tersebut diputus dengan hukuman yang cukup berat.]]>
<![CDATA[PENERAPAN SISTEM PERHITUNGAN PAJAK YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH DIRI SENDIRI DALAM PELAKSANAAN PPH PASAL 21 UU NO.17 TAHUN 2000 DI KUTAI TIMUR ]]>
<![CDATA[Sandrianus Sandrianus]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Law ( Jurnal Ilmu Hukum ) Vol 4, No 1 (2015) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Samarinda ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (68.096 KB)
<![CDATA[ABSTRAK Penerapan self assesment dalam pelaksanaan pembayaran pajak penghasilan pasal 21 tidak sepenuhnya berlaku karena wajib pajak tidak menghitung sendiri. Self assesment masih berlaku dalam hal pihak ketiga sebagai pemotong mengisi SPT dan melaporkan serta menghitung sendiri besarnya pajak yang terutang dari wajib pajak yang dipotong pajaknya. Self assesment dapat juga diterapkan langsung kepada wajib pajak dalam hal wajib pajak menerima atau memperoleh penghasilan lebih dari satu sumber.Keuntungan Sistem Self Assesment untuk fiskus, memudahkan fiskus dalam pelaksanaan pembayaran pajak, mengamankan pajak oleh pihak ketiga sebagai pemotong dan menyederhanakan proses pembayaran pajak. Keuntungan utuk pihak ketiga, dapat membantu pemerintah dalam pengumpulan dana untuk keperluan pembangunan. Sedangkan bagi wajib pajak merupakan suatu keringanan beban pekerjaan karena dalam hal ini wajib pajak hanya tinggal menerima penghasilan yang bersih dari pihak pemberi kerja.Kerugian self assesment untuk fiskus apabila pihak pemotong tidak melaporkan SPT fiskus mengetahui. Untuk pihak ketiga merupakan tambahan pekerjaan karena harus menghitung besarnya pajak yang terutang, membayar serta melaporkan pajak dari wajib pajak. Sedangkan bagi waajib pajak dalam hal ini tidak dapat menghindari kewajibannya untuk tidak membayar pajak.]]>
<![CDATA[RUNTUHNYA JEMBATAN KUTAI KARTANEGARA DI TINJAU DARI ASPEK HUKUM PIDANA ]]>
<![CDATA[Juma Raya]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Law ( Jurnal Ilmu Hukum ) Vol 4, No 1 (2015) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Samarinda ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[ABSTRACTDiscussion of this issue is an interest of the author because of these events appeared several speculations about the case of the collapse of the bridge Kutai, the author would like to delve further into the elements of negligence and intentional done by workers and those responsible in the process of care and maintenance so that it can be seen how the chronology of these events in detail, therefore the authors raised the title of the collapse of the bridge in Kutai as Review Of Criminal Legal Aspects. The method of this thesis include the type of research that the method of juridical empirical, perimer and secondary data sources, research sites in the District Court Tenggarong Kutai regency, data collection techniques such as literature studies and studies in the field that includes observation, interviews, and documentation.The purpose of this study was to find out who is responsible and reviewing the consideration of judges in a verdict for the defendant cases Kutai bridge collapse and increase scientific treasures for the entire academic community of the University of August 17, 1945 samarinda.The results showed that one of the people responsible for the bridge collapse incident aquatic mammal is MUHAMMAD SYAHRIAR Fakhrurrozi, ST bin NOOR HADI, as Project Manager Kutai Bridge Maintenance Activities In 2011, consideration sentencing judge is to consider the second charge of Public Prosecutions is to commit criminal and punishable as provided in Article 360 paragraph (2) of the Criminal Code Jo. Article 55 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code to-1,whose elements are as follows:a.Whoever elementb. Element for mistakesc. Elements lead others injuredd. Elements do, who told to do or participating in the act. The author hopes of events bridge collapse incident aquatic mammal is the Government and the company that holds a tender for more mature planning to the implementation of bridge maintenance in these events, in order to avoid further accidents resulting in loss of life of others.]]>
<![CDATA[KENDALA YANG DIHADAPI DALAM PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP PELANGGARAN LALU LINTAS OLEH KENDARAAN BERMOTOR DI KOTA BARONG TONGKOK KUTAI BARAT ]]>
<![CDATA[Sopian Sinan]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Law ( Jurnal Ilmu Hukum ) Vol 4, No 1 (2015) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Samarinda ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[ABSTRAKDi kota Barong Tongkok dalam penegakan hukum terhadap pelanggaran lalu lintas oleh kendaraan bermotor dilakukan dengan dua cara yaitu tindakan Non Yustisi dan Yustisi. Tindakan Non Yustisi adalah suatu tindakan yang berupa peringatan secara tertulis terhadap si pelanggar tetapi si pelanggar tetap dikenakan sanksi berupa retribusi terhadap apa yang dilanggar dan uang tersebut merupakan salah satu Pendapatan Asli Daerah. Sedangkan tindakan Yustisi merupakan tindakan yang dikenakan kepada si pelanggar melalui membuat berita acara serta dilimpahkan ke pengadilan untuk diproses dan dijatuhkan sanksi dan uang tersebut akan masuk ke Negara. Dalam penegakan hukum terhadap pelanggaran lalu lintas oleh kendaraan bermotor di Barong Tongkok terdapat beberapa kendala-kendala atau faktor-faktor yang menghambat yaitu : Di Propinsi Kalimantan Timur Berdasarkan wawancara dengan pihak Polda ( Kasubdit Bin Gakkum), kendala-kendala atau faktor yang menghambat adalah : Masyarakat yang tidak sadar akan pelanggaran hukum yang dilakukannya,masyarakat tidak faham akan hukum; Aparat hukum tidak tahu akan tugasnya artinya aparat Kepolisian adalah : pelayan masyarakat bukan sebagai penguasa; Sarana dan prasarana ada yang rusak dan hilang; Sanksi yang diterapkan terlalu ringan; Masyarakat yang kurang sadar akan hukum; Sarana dan prasarana masih kurang]]>
<![CDATA[TINJAUAN YURIDIS PELAKSANAAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 22 TAHUN 2001 TENTANG MINYAK DAN GAS BUMI DI KOTA SAMARINDA (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 588/Pid.B/2014/PN SMR) ]]>
<![CDATA[Priastama Adiyoga]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Law ( Jurnal Ilmu Hukum ) Vol 4, No 1 (2015) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Samarinda ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[ABSTRACT This thesis aims to determine the extent to which the execution of criminal sanctions against misuse of the transport and / or commercial subsidized oil fuel and to determine the legal considerations of the judge in the case ruled on 588 / Pid.B / 2014 / PN SMR.This research was conducted in the District Court of Samarinda to do an interview to the parties of the agency is directly related to the issues to be discussed. The author also collecting data related to the object of study and a study of literature by way of examining the books, literature and legislation relating to the issues discussed in this thesis. The findings obtained from this study is the application of criminal law by the judge in a criminal case 588 / Pid.B / 2014 / PN SMR.Based on the results of the study, the authors considered was the fulfillment of the elements of a criminal offense under article 5 of Law 22 of 2001 on Oil and Gas. In this ruling the judge impose a criminal sanction against the defendant "Ilham Bin Muslims" form of imprisonment for six (6) months and a fine of Rp.3.000.000,00 (three million rupiah). This thesis aims to be useful as a source of public knowledge in understanding the definition of the crime of abuse of Subsidized Fuel haulage and know the elements of the offense in issue.The author expects completion of this thesis can be a useful contribution to society and appealed to the law enforcement agencies that the perpetrators of such offenses can be subject to strict sanctions according to the Law in force referred to in Article 55 of Law No. 22 of 2001 so as to minimize the occurrence of this criminal act. Keywords: subsidized fuel, Abuse, Event Transportation and Distribution of fuel. ]]>
<![CDATA[PELAKSANAAN PEMBERIAN PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP ANAK SEBAGAI KORBAN TRAFICKING DI PENGADILAN NEGERI SAMARINDA ]]>
<![CDATA[Sandor Pardomuan Sinurat]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Law ( Jurnal Ilmu Hukum ) Vol 4, No 1 (2015) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Samarinda ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[ABSTRAK Hubungan antara rekonstruksi dengan TKP adalah untuk membenarkan keterangan tersangka yang dibuat oleh penyidik dalam rangka kegiatan penyidikan tindak pidana untuk disesuaikan dengan keadaan di TKP sebenarnya. Pada prakteknya, rekonstruksi tidak dilakukan di TKP yang sebenarnya. Hal ini semata-mata dilakukan untuk keamanan tersangka sendiri agar terhindar dari amukan masyarakat. Disamping untuk itu, juga untuk menekan seminim mungkin biaya rekonstruksi apalagi jika TKP dimana rekonstruksi itu akan diadakan berada di luar kota. Tetapi apabila TKP tidak berada di luar kota, pelaksanaan rekonstruksi tetap dilakukan di TKP yang sebenarnya.Apabila TKP-nya belum diketahui dengan pasti maka usaha-usaha yang dilakukan adalah : Melakukan tindakan dengan cara pengusutan yang merupakan tehnik dari penyidikan agar perkara pidana itu terungkap, dimana dengan tehnik penyidikan ini akan diperoleh jawaban atas pertanyaan-pertanyaan dalam bidang pengusutan perkara pidana; Melakukan kegiatan interogasi terhadap pelapor kejadian dan meminta keterangan dari saksi penderita, saksi ahli dan saksi-saksi yang mengetahui pertama kali perkara pidana ini. Meskipun terjadi perbedaan wilayah antara tempat kejadian perkara dengan wilayah tempat diketemukannya korban atau hasil kejahatan tidaklah menghalangi pihak kepolisian untuk mengungkap perkara pidana tersebut, karena walaupun terjadi perbedaan wilayah pihak kepolisian masih tetap bisa saling bekerjasama antara satu dengan yang lainnya.]]>
<![CDATA[UPAYA DALAM PENERAPAN KLAUSULA EKSONERASI DALAM PERJANJIAN JUAL BELI BARANG AGAR SEIMBANG ]]>
<![CDATA[Yasinta Karmelia U.lulu]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Law ( Jurnal Ilmu Hukum ) Vol 4, No 1 (2015) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Samarinda ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[ABSTRACTThe clause eksoneri In business practice in Indonesia often found an agreement made with the provisions of the Code beyond the Civil Code that the provisions as sayarat called Clause Eksoneri or clause penyampingan this often creates problems because it is very detrimental to the buyer on the intent of the clause umumnya.Adapun eksoneri or penyampingan this clause is to limit the liability of either party, usually the seller, in this case the seller of electronic goods. With clause eksoneri he limit his responsibility and imposes a duty on the buyer or by the words generally stronger party imposes a duty on the weaker side. The Steps - Steps to be taken in order to clause seimbang.Apabila Eksoneri be considered, then the clause in the agreement eksoneri sometimes too one-sided, to the detriment of the other party. To overcome this particular measures should be taken in order to avoid overly burdensome aklibat weak. Steps - steps are as follows: Subject to the provisions of Law - laws that are governing the rights and obligations based on good faith; Writing eksoneri clause (clause penyampingan) was made in a clear and easy to read, by every person who wants an agreement by the parties; Eksoneri clause (clause penyampingan) may not be the basic condition (Condition); eksoneri clause (clause penyampingan) load to bear joint liability arising as a result of the agreement, for example, if there is damage to the purchased goods, then the seller to bear the cost.]]>
