cover
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kab. gowa,
Sulawesi selatan
INDONESIA
AL-Fikr
ISSN : 14112140     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Humanities, Art,
Jurnal Al-Fikr diterbitkan oleh Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Filsafat UIN Alauddin Makassar. Al-Fikr diterbitkan pertama kali bulan juni 1996 dengan nama jurnal al Fikr : World Journal for Islamic Studies kemudian berubah pada tahun 2002 dengan nama al-Fikr : Jurnal Pendidikan Islam. Al-Fikr adalah jurnal terakreditasi nasional melalui Surat Keputusan Direktorat Pendidikan Tinggi Kemendiknas RI. Nomor 51/DIKTI/Kep/2010 tanggal 5 Juli 2010
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 2 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol 28 No 01 (2026): Februari" : 2 Documents clear
Telaah Historisitas dan Penulisan Hadis Pada Masa Kenabian Tasmin Tangngareng; Asmita; Rayyn, I Gusti Bagus Agung Perdana
Jurnal Ushuluddin: Media Dialog Pemikiran Islam Vol 28 No 01 (2026): Februari
Publisher : Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Filsafat Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/jumdpi.v28i01.58018

Abstract

This article discusses the historicity and writing of hadith during the prophetic period. In this article, several important points will form the core of the discussion, namely the historicity of hadith during the prophetic period and the writing of hadith during the same period. It is therefore necessary to explain these matters to avoid confusion and misunderstanding regarding the historicity of hadith and the writing of hadith during the prophetic period. The study of this issue was conducted by conducting a literature review with a historical approach to the historical development of hadith studies. The conclusion is that during the time of the Prophet, known as 'Ashr al-Wahy wa al-Takwin, traditions were transmitted to the Companions through oral transmission, practice, and direct consent. In Arabian society where there was little tradition of writing, memorisation became the main means of transmission. The Prophet conveyed them in a contextual manner, both in public assemblies and in private. Although the writing of traditions was banned to preserve the purity of the Qur'an, some companions recorded them with the Prophet's permission. This prohibition was preventive in nature and was later replaced by the permission to write when the people were able to distinguish between the Qur'an and the hadith. The difference in the Prophet's attitude towards writing shows his caution in maintaining the authenticity of revelation. Thus, although not yet formally documented, hadith during the time of the Prophet was taught systematically and methodically
Menimbang Kaidah Syādz dalam Kritik Hadis: Kerangka Konseptual dan Aplikasinya pada Sanad serta Matan: Kerangka Konseptual dan Aplikasinya Pada Sanad Serta Matan Munadi, Radhie
Jurnal Ushuluddin: Media Dialog Pemikiran Islam Vol 28 No 01 (2026): Februari
Publisher : Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Filsafat Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/jumdpi.v28i01.65756

Abstract

In general, this study examines the shādhdh principle in ḥadīth criticism, emphasizing that assessing the validity of a report cannot rely solely on an isnād that appears sound, but must also involve detecting irregularities revealed through comparison across transmission routes (mu‘āraḍah/muqāranah) in both isnād and matn. The methodology employs an analytical–conceptual, library-based approach, tracing primary literature to map definitions, the foundations of application, and the distinctions of shādhdh in isnād and matn within the classical tradition of ḥadīth criticism and its relevance to contemporary discourse. The findings show: (1) shādhdh is understood as a narration transmitted by a trustworthy (thiqah) narrator that contradicts a stronger narration; (2) there are differences in formulation among al-Shāfiʿī, al-Ḥākim, and al-Khalīlī, yet scholars tend to privilege al-Shāfiʿī’s definition; and (3) identifying shādhdh in the isnād is carried out by compiling all chains, evaluating the reliability of narrators, and then determining maḥfūẓ versus shādhdh/marjūḥ, whereas shādhdh in the matn is established through muqāranah and by testing forms of “irregularity” such as maqlūb, mudraj, ziyādah, muḍṭarib, muṣaḥḥaf, and muḥarraf. The implications underscore the importance of comparative work across transmission lines to prevent the acceptance of reports that are “formally sound yet deviant,” while providing a methodological basis for more measured and responsible matn criticism in contemporary ḥadīth studies.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 2