cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business
Published by Universitas Gadjah Mada
ISSN : 14111128     EISSN : 23387238     DOI : -
Core Subject : Economy,
Economics, Econometrics & Finance
Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business (GamaIJB) is a peer-reviewed journal published three times a year (January-April, May-August, and September-December) by Master of Management Program, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Gadjah Mada. GamaIJB is intended to be the journal for publishing articles reporting the results of research on business, especially in the context of emerging economies. The GamaIJB invites manuscripts in the various topics include, but not limited to, functional areas of management, accounting, international business, entrepreneurship, business economics, risk management, knowledge management, information systems, ethics, and sustainability.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 22, No 2 (2020): May-August" : 5 Documents clear
Investigation of the Stochastic Choice under Risk using Experimental Data Yudistira Permana; Giovanni van Empel; Rimawan Pradiptyo
Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business Vol 22, No 2 (2020): May-August
Publisher : Master in Management, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/gamaijb.34446

Abstract

This paper extends the analysis of the data from the experiment undertaken by Pradiptyo et al. (2015), to help explain the subjects’ behaviour when making decisions under risk. This study specifically investigates the relative empirical performance of the two general models of the stochastic choice: the random utility model (RUM) and the random preference model (RPM) where this paper specifies these models using two preference functionals, expected utility (EU) and rank-dependent expected utility (RDEU). The parameters are estimated in each model using a maximum likelihood technique and run a horse-race using the goodness-of-fit between the models. The results show that the RUM better explains the subjects’ behaviour in the experiment. Additionally, the RDEU fits better than the EU for modelling the stochastic choice. 
Assessing the Imagination Scale’s Nomological Validity: Effect of Hedonic versus Utilitarian Product Types and Abstract versus Concrete Advertising Execution Ike Janita Dewi; Swee Hoon Ang
Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business Vol 22, No 2 (2020): May-August
Publisher : Master in Management, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/gamaijb.51111

Abstract

This research builds on a study of advertisement-evoked imagination scale developed by Dewi and Ang (2015). The imagination scale contains four types of imagination, that is, benefit-anticipatory imagination, emotional-bonding imagina­tion, symbolic imagination, and mind-wandering imagination.In this paper, the pro­po­sed constructs of the imagination types are related to other relevant constructs exis­ting in marketing literature.The purpose of this research is twofold. First, it establishes the nomological validity of the imagination measures by placing it in the context of hedonic-utilitarian concepts proposed by Holbrook and Hirschman (1983). Second, the research empirically studies the effect of situational factor, that is concrete versus abstract advertisement execution, on imagination elicitation. The study is an experiment which employs mixed factor design involving eight sub-groups of participants. Results of the research demons­trate the nomological validity of the imagination scale where the four types of imagination were elicited in response to hedonic/utilitarian product depicted in the ad and situational factors (that is, abstract versus concrete ads).
Validation of A Measuring Scale of The Factors for The Employability of Millennials María Teresa De la Garza Carranza; Jorge Armando López Lemus; Eugenio Guzmán Soria; Quetzalli Atlatenco Ibara
Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business Vol 22, No 2 (2020): May-August
Publisher : Master in Management, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/gamaijb.51212

Abstract

Today the retention millennial workers is a challenge for organizations. The purpose of this paper is to propose ideas to the decision makers, to lessen the high rate of personnel turnover in all kinds of industries in many countries. This research validates an instrument thatevaluates the employability factors of millennials in Mexico, according to their own expectations. We based our study on the previous literature about the millennial generation in many countries. To validate the questionnaire, a sampling of 781 workers from the states of Querétaro and Guanajuato in México was conducted. The method used to achieve the objective was through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. The confirmatory factor analysis was conducted using structural equation modeling, and tested two different methods: first order and second order models. With the three methods, exploratory, first order and second order factor analyses, similar results were obtained. In the analysis of the statistical techniques, two latent variables associated with the expectations of this generational group were generated. The factors found are “personal satisfaction with the organization” and “satisfaction with the organization’s social commitment.” These two factors are supported by the literature of other researchers. It is suggested that this questionnaire be validated in other countries but also in other regions of Mexico, using different productive sectors, thereby obtaining a broader perspective that will allow us to understand not only what millennials want from their work, but to what extent they want it
On the Nexus Between CSR Practices, ESG Performance, and Asymmetric information Berto Usman; Oscar Tiago Fontes Bernardes; Paulus Sulluk Kananlua
Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business Vol 22, No 2 (2020): May-August
Publisher : Master in Management, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/gamaijb.54053

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to test the relationship of CSR practice­–asymmetry information and ESG performance–asymmetry information. We conjecture that there might be a particular role where the disclosure of non-financial information is deemed useful in truncating the level of asymmetry information. Using the data from two different countries, Indonesia (Asia) and Portugal (Europe), we extracted 37 companies with time period of observation ranges from 2012 to 2016. To manifest the empirical test, we use CSR report (CSR_Rep), CSR committee (CSR_com), CSR assurance (CSR_ass) and GRI adoption as the proxies of CSR practice, while the proxies of ESG performance are represented by Environmental (ENVscr), Social (SOCscr), and Governance (GOVscr) pillar scores as obtained from Thomson Reuters ASSET4 database. Bid-ask spread is used as the surrogate indicator of asymmetry information. The empirical test reveals that only variable GRI and SOCscr show negative and significant association with bid-ask spread. Whilst, the remaining variables of CSR practice (CSR_rep, CSR_com, CSR_ass), and ESG performance (ENVscr and GOVscr) are negatively associated with asymmetry information (Spread) but statistically insignificant. Our results suggest that CSR practice and ESG performance are weakly associated with asymmetry information, in which most of CSR practices and ESG performance need a time lag to allow them to be value relevant information in mitigating the level of asymmetry information.
The Influence of CEOs’ Hubris on Firms’ Performance in Indonesia: The Moderating Effects of CEOs’ Power and Board Vigilance Noni Ayu Rizka; T. Hani Handoko
Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business Vol 22, No 2 (2020): May-August
Publisher : Master in Management, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/gamaijb.55239

Abstract

Past studies on CEO hubris has found that board vigilance is effective in managing the negative outcome of hubris. Some studies found CEO non-duality and independent director representation are effective in decreasing the damage of hubris. However, these studies have only explored the causal relationship of hubris and firm performance in the one-tier corporate governance setting. This study analyzed the influence of CEO hubris on firm performance in Indonesia by taking into account the CEO-board power dynamics. Indonesia adopts the two-tier corporate system where the board is divided into the board of directors and commissioners. Through 99 public listed companies, this study found that hubris in Indonesian CEOs contributes well to firm performance. Moreover, a bigger commissioner board is effective in strengthening the positive influence of hubris on firm performance in Indonesia. Furthermore, this study hints that two-tier corporate governance is more efficient in controlling hubris than the one-tier system.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2020 2020


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 27, No 3 (2025): September-December Vol 27, No 2 (2025): May-August Vol 27, No 1 (2025): January - April Vol 26, No 3 (2024): September-Desember Vol 26, No 2 (2024): May-August Vol 26, No 1 (2024): January - April Vol 25, No 3 (2023): September-December Vol 25, No 2 (2023): May-August Vol 25, No 1 (2023): January-April Vol 24, No 3 (2022): September-December 2022 Vol 24, No 2 (2022): May - August 2022 Vol 24, No 1 (2022): January-April Vol 23, No 3 (2021): September-December Vol 23, No 2 (2021): May-August Vol 23, No 1 (2021): January-April Vol 22, No 3 (2020): September-December Vol 22, No 2 (2020): May-August Vol 22, No 1 (2020): January-April Vol 21, No 3 (2019): September-December Vol 21, No 2 (2019): May-August Vol 21, No 1 (2019): January-April Vol 20, No 3 (2018): September-December Vol 20, No 2 (2018): May-August Vol 20, No 1 (2018): January-April Vol 19, No 3 (2017): September-December Vol 19, No 2 (2017): May-August Vol 19, No 1 (2017): January- April Vol 18, No 3 (2016): September-December Vol 18, No 2 (2016): May-August Vol 18, No 1 (2016): January-April Vol 17, No 3 (2015): September-December Vol 17, No 3 (2015): September-December Vol 17, No 2 (2015): May-August Vol 17, No 1 (2015): January-April Vol 17, No 1 (2015): January-April Vol 16, No 3 (2014): September-December Vol 16, No 3 (2014): September-December Vol 16, No 2 (2014): May-August Vol 16, No 2 (2014): May-August Vol 16, No 1 (2014): January-April Vol 16, No 1 (2014): January-April Vol 15, No 3 (2013): September - December Vol 15, No 3 (2013): September - December Vol 15, No 2 (2013): May-August Vol 15, No 2 (2013): May-August Vol 15, No 1 (2013): January - April Vol 15, No 1 (2013): January - April Vol 14, No 3 (2012): September-December Vol 14, No 3 (2012): September-December Vol 14, No 2 (2012): May - August Vol 14, No 2 (2012): May - August Vol 14, No 1 (2012): January - April Vol 14, No 1 (2012): January - April Vol 13, No 3 (2011): September-December Vol 13, No 3 (2011): September-December Vol 13, No 2 (2011): May-August Vol 13, No 2 (2011): May-August Vol 13, No 1 (2011): January-April Vol 13, No 1 (2011): January-April Vol 12, No 3 (2010): September - December Vol 12, No 3 (2010): September - December Vol 12, No 2 (2010): May - August Vol 12, No 2 (2010): May - August Vol 12, No 1 (2010): January - April Vol 12, No 1 (2010): January - April Vol 11, No 3 (2009): September - December Vol 11, No 3 (2009): September - December Vol 11, No 2 (2009): May - August Vol 11, No 2 (2009): May - August Vol 11, No 1 (2009): January - April Vol 11, No 1 (2009): January - April Vol 10, No 3 (2008): September - December Vol 10, No 3 (2008): September - December Vol 10, No 2 (2008): May - August Vol 10, No 2 (2008): May - August Vol 10, No 1 (2008): January - April Vol 10, No 1 (2008): January - April Vol 9, No 3 (2007): September - December Vol 9, No 3 (2007): September - December Vol 9, No 2 (2007): May - August Vol 9, No 2 (2007): May - August Vol 9, No 1 (2007): January - April Vol 9, No 1 (2007): January - April Vol 8, No 3 (2006): September-December Vol 8, No 3 (2006): September-December Vol 8, No 2 (2006): May - August Vol 8, No 2 (2006): May - August Vol 8, No 1 (2006): January-April Vol 8, No 1 (2006): January-April Vol 7, No 3 (2005): September-December Vol 7, No 3 (2005): September-December Vol 7, No 2 (2005): May-August Vol 7, No 2 (2005): May-August Vol 7, No 1 (2005): January-April Vol 7, No 1 (2005): January-April Vol 6, No 3 (2004): September-December Vol 6, No 3 (2004): September-December Vol 6, No 2 (2004): May-August Vol 6, No 2 (2004): May-August Vol 6, No 1 (2004): January-April Vol 6, No 1 (2004): January-April Vol 5, No 3 (2003): September-December Vol 5, No 3 (2003): September-December Vol 5, No 2 (2003): May-August Vol 5, No 2 (2003): May-August Vol 5, No 1 (2003): January-April Vol 5, No 1 (2003): January-April Vol 4, No 3 (2002): September-December Vol 4, No 3 (2002): September-December Vol 4, No 2 (2002): May-August Vol 4, No 2 (2002): May-August Vol 4, No 1 (2002): January-April Vol 1, No 2 (1999): September More Issue