cover
Contact Name
Edy Kurnianto
Contact Email
kurniantoedy17@gmail.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
jppt.fpundip@gmail.com
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota semarang,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Journal of the Indonesian Tropical Animal Agriculture
Published by Universitas Diponegoro
ISSN : 20878273     EISSN : 24606278     DOI : -
Journal of the Indonesian Tropical Animal Agriculture (JITAA) is a double blind peer-reviewed publication devoted to disseminate all information contributing to the understanding and development of animal agriculture in the tropics by publication of original research papers
Articles 12 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol 44, No 3 (2019): September" : 12 Documents clear
Hydrolyzation of duck meat protein using Bacillus cereus TD5B protease, pepsin, trypsin and their potency as an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor Winarti, A.; Rahmawati, F.; Fitriyanto, N. A.; Jamhari, J.; Erwanto, Y.
Journal of the Indonesian Tropical Animal Agriculture Vol 44, No 3 (2019): September
Publisher : Diponegoro University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jitaa.44.3.266-276

Abstract

This study was aimed to explore their potency of protein-bioactive of native ducks-meat after enzymatic hydrolysis by Bacillus-cereus TD5B-protease, Pepsin, and Trypsin as an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor. The samples: ducks-meats from 10 months age of male Mojosari and Magelang-Duck. The experiments: individually hydrolysis of meat-protein using protease-enzyme (0.1 % w/w) from Bacillus-cereus TD5B, Pepsin, or Trypsin. The observed parameters: protein concentration, protein molecular weight, ACE-inhibitor activity, and IC-value (IC50). Data of protein concentration were statistically analyzed using T-Test, while data of SDS-PAGE and ACE-inhibiting activity were analyzed descriptively. The results showed that soluble protein concentration increased due to the hydrolysis process, from 0.826±0.108 mg/mL to 1.050±0.197 mg/mL (Microbial-protease), 2.122±0.141 mg/mL (pepsin), 1.641±0.071 mg/mL (trypsin) for Mojosari-duck and 0.642±0.038 mg/mL to 1.171±0.534 mg/mL(Microbial-protease), 2.100±0.376 mg/mL(pepsin), 1.725±0.092 mg/mL(trypsin) for Magelang-duck. The SDS-PAGE pattern showed that there was a decrease of molecular weight of duck-meats due to the hydrolysis process, from the range of 196.53-43.88 kDa to the range of 71.35-10.12 kDa. Duck-meat protein hydrolysate had ACE-inhibiting activity 71.7%(Mojosari-Microbial-Protease) IC50 54μg/mL, 57%(Mojosari-Pepsin) IC50 151μg/mL, 75.8%(Mojosari-Trypsin) IC50 51μg/mL and 52.8%(Magelang-Microbial-Protease) IC50 83μg/mL, 78,5%(Magelang-Pepsin) IC50 85μg/mL, 83.9%(Magelang-Trypsin) IC50 22μg/mL. In conclusion, hydrolysate of Magelang duck-meat used Trypsin had better potency as an ACE-inhibitor. 
Analysis in making decision of farmer to select bull frozen semen in Indonesia Agustine, R.; Bintara, S.; Andarwati, S.; Muzayyanah, M. A. U.; Widi, T. S. M.; Putra, A. R. S.
Journal of the Indonesian Tropical Animal Agriculture Vol 44, No 3 (2019): September
Publisher : Diponegoro University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jitaa.44.3.323-332

Abstract

The research objectives was to analyze the farmer’s decision in selecting breed of bull frozen semen for Artificial Insemination (AI) and determine the factors influencing the decision. There were five bull frozen semen options which simulated in this research, such as Simmental, Limousine, Ongole Grade (Peranakan Ongole / PO), Brahman, and other option. ”Other” option was used if the farmer did not recognize what breed of frozen semen was inseminated to their cow. Farmers must choose only one option of bull frozen semen that suitable for their cow. This study was conducted by collecting data using questionaire from 400 beef cattle’s farmers in Central Java Province and Yogyakarta Province. Respondents were selected by multistage random sampling technique. Descriptive statistical analysis and multinomial logistic regression analysis was used in this study The results revealed that 42% of farmers were more interested in inseminating their cows with bull semen from Simmental, and 30.75% of farmers were more interested in Limousin. Other variables such as family member, AI’s cost, land ownership, cow breed which lastly being inseminated, geographical factor, and farmer’s knowledge about the inseminatorswere variables that determine farmer’s decision process.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 12


Filter by Year

2019 2019


Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 50, No 4 (2025): December Vol 50, No 3 (2025): September Vol 50, No 2 (2025): June Vol 50, No 1 (2025): March Vol 49, No 4 (2024): December Vol 49, No 3 (2024): September Vol 49, No 2 (2024): June Vol 49, No 1 (2024): March Vol 48, No 4 (2023): December Vol 48, No 3 (2023): September Vol 48, No 2 (2023): June Vol 48, No 1 (2023): March Vol 47, No 4 (2022): December Vol 47, No 3 (2022): September Vol 47, No 2 (2022): June Vol 47, No 1 (2022): March Vol 46, No 4 (2021): December Vol 46, No 3 (2021): September Vol 46, No 2 (2021): June Vol 46, No 1 (2021): March Vol 45, No 4 (2020): December Vol 45, No 3 (2020): September Vol 45, No 2 (2020): June Vol 45, No 1 (2020): March Vol 44, No 4 (2019): December Vol 44, No 3 (2019): September Vol 44, No 2 (2019): June Vol 44, No 1 (2019): March Vol 43, No 4 (2018): December Vol 43, No 3 (2018): September Vol 43, No 2 (2018): June Vol 43, No 1 (2018): March Vol 42, No 4 (2017): December Vol 42, No 3 (2017): September Vol 42, No 2 (2017): June Vol 42, No 1 (2017): March Vol 41, No 4 (2016): December Vol 41, No 3 (2016): September Vol 41, No 2 (2016): June Vol 41, No 1 (2016): March Vol 40, No 4 (2015): December Vol 40, No 3 (2015): September Vol 40, No 2 (2015): June Vol 40, No 1 (2015): March Vol 39, No 4 (2014): December Vol 39, No 3 (2014): September Vol 39, No 2 (2014) Vol 39, No 1 (2014): (March) Vol 38, No 4 (2013): (December) Vol 38, No 3 (2013): (September) Vol 38, No 2 (2013): (June) Vol 38, No 1 (2013): (March) Vol 37, No 4 (2012): (December) Vol 37, No 3 (2012): (September) Vol 37, No 2 (2012): (June) Vol 37, No 1 (2012): (March) Vol 36, No 4 (2011): (December) Vol 36, No 3 (2011): (September) Vol 36, No 2 (2011): (June) Vol 36, No 1 (2011): (March) Vol 35, No 4 (2010): (December) Vol 35, No 3 (2010): (September) Vol 35, No 2 (2010): (June) Vol 35, No 1 (2010): (March) Vol 34, No 4 (2009): (December) Vol 34, No 3 (2009): (September) More Issue