cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Fahrus Zaman Fadhly
Contact Email
fahruszf@gmail.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
englishreviewjournal@gmail.com
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kab. kuningan,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
English Review: Journal of English Education
Published by Universitas Kuningan
ISSN : 23017554     EISSN : 25413643     DOI : -
Core Subject : Humanities, Education, Art,
Arts Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media
ENGLISH REVIEW: Journal of English Education (ISSN print 2301-7554) is a peer-reviewed journal published in Indonesia by the Department of English Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, the University of Kuningan (PBI FKIP UNIKU) in collaboration with the Association of Indonesian Scholars of English Education (AISEE). This journal is published twice a year: June and December. The scopes of the journal include, but not limited to, the following topic areas: the classroom action research, applied linguistics, linguistics, pragmatics, critical discourse analysis, and literature.The journal is published in both printed and online versions.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 15 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Vol 6, No 1 (2017)" : 15 Documents clear
GRICE’S MAXIMS IN HUMOUR: THE CASE OF “HOME WITH KIDS” Zhao Xue; Kuang Ching Hei
English Review: Journal of English Education Vol 6, No 1 (2017)
Publisher : University of Kuningan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25134/erjee.v6i1.770

Abstract

Sitcoms provide entertainment, one of which is through humour. Using Grice’s (1975) non-observance of Cooperative Principles – flouting, violating, infringing, opting out, and suspending as framework for analysis, this study aims to investigate whether the non-observance of Grice’s (1975) maxims can contribute to the humorous effects seen in the Chinese sitcom “Home with Kids (Season 4)”. Specifically, this study aims to detect which of the maxims play an important role in creating humour. Data were compiled from 96 episodes of the show. A comparison of the non-observance was made before findings were qualitatively presented. The findings revealed that flouting and violating were used most frequently to create humour. The outcome of this study will have beneficial effects for L2 learners of Mandarin by enabling them to comprehend Chinese humour. The implications derived from this study suggest that humour may be created differently due to cultural differences.  Keywords: Chinese sitcoms, humour, flouting, violation, non-observance, maxims
TEACHING WRITING USING THINK-PAIR-SHARE VIEWED FROM STUDENTS’ LEVEL OF RISK-TAKING Ningtyas Orilina Argawati; Lilis Suryani
English Review: Journal of English Education Vol 6, No 1 (2017)
Publisher : University of Kuningan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25134/erjee.v6i1.776

Abstract

Writing is considered as the most difficult skill to master compared with the other skills because it involves many language elements such as content, organization, vocabulary, grammar and mechanics. The research examines the effect of two independent variables (Think-Pair-Share and Direct instruction method) on dependent variable (Writing Descriptive skill). The samples were class A1 2016 as the experimental class and A3 2016 as the control class. Each class consisted of 32 students. The instruments used covered the risk-taking’s questionnaire and writing test. Before applying the questionnaire of risk-taking, it was tried out to class A2 2016 to find out the validity and the reliability of the instrument. Meanwhile, before conducting the writing test, it needs to test the readability of the writing instruction. The treatment was conducted in eight meetings, and the 9th meeting was allocated for the post-test. The data were then analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey test. From the analysis, it reveals that: (1) Think-Pair-Share is significantly different from direct instruction method to teach writing; (2) the students with high level of risk-taking have better writing than those with low level of risk-taking; and (3) there is an interaction between teaching methods and the students’ level of risk-taking. Even though Think-Pair-Share is effective to teach writing, teachers must consider about the students’ condition, in this case their level of risk-taking.Keywords: Think-Pair-Share, Direct instruction method, Writing descriptive text, Risk-Taking
DEVELOPING ESL/EFL LEARNERS’ PUBLIC SPEAKING SKILLS THROUGH PECHA KUCHA PRESENTATIONS Romualdo A. Mabuan
English Review: Journal of English Education Vol 6, No 1 (2017)
Publisher : University of Kuningan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25134/erjee.v6i1.765

Abstract

In the 21st century workplace, there has been an increasing demand for graduates to possess communicative competence particularly in speaking. Anchored on the 21st Century Learning Framework (Partnership for 21st Century Skills or P21, 2006) and the TPACK Framework (Koehler Mishra, 2009), this study reports findings on the pedagogical viability of utilizing Pecha Kucha 20x20 Presentations in developing students’ competence and confidence while presenting in the language classroom. Research participants include 43 English as Second Language (ESL) learners taking Speech Communication classes in a private university in Manila, the Philippines during the second semester of the academic year 2016-2017. Research data from students’ reflections, interviews, survey, and focus group discussion (FGD) suggest that despite some format and technological limitations, delivering Pecha Kucha presentations may help students develop their English speaking and oral presentation skills, build their confidence in speaking before an audience, and practice their English macro skills such as listening and reading. In the light of these findings, pedagogical implications are provided for ESL (English as a second language) and EFL (English as a foreign language) teachers, communication educators, and researchers.Keywords: Teaching speaking, Pecha Kucha Presentations, ESL public speaking, TPACK
SCIENTIFIC APPROACH OF 2013 CURRICULUM: TEACHERS’ IMPLEMENTATION IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING Sri Ratnaningsih
English Review: Journal of English Education Vol 6, No 1 (2017)
Publisher : University of Kuningan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25134/erjee.v6i1.792

Abstract

The research is aimed at investigating the teachers’ implementation of scientific approach in English Language Teaching in one state junior high school in Bandung Regency. In addition, this research discusses the conformation of the Scientific Approach implementation and the lesson plans based on the 2013 curriculum. This research employs a case study qualitative research design. The data were obtained from classroom observation and teachers’ lesson plan analysis and interview. The findings showed that the teachers implemented the scientific stages in English Language Teaching. They conducted observing, questioning, experimenting, associating and communicating in the sequence activities. Besides, the teachers can demonstrate the student-centered learning strengthened by collaborative, cooperative, active and meaningful learning. However, concerning the conformation of the implementation with lesson plans, based on the indicators, learning objectives, learning materials, learning media, scientific stages and Scientific Approach model (discovery learning, inquiry leaning, problem based learning and project based learning), the teachers still have to underline and mention the Scientific Approach model and state learning objectives. Furthermore, the other components have been presented well in both teaching and lesson plans.Keywords: English language teaching, lesson plan, scientific approach, teaching practice, the 2013 curriculum
ENGLISH TEACHERS’ PROBLEMS IN APPLYING THE 2013 CURRICULUM Yulia Nur Ekawati
English Review: Journal of English Education Vol 6, No 1 (2017)
Publisher : University of Kuningan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25134/erjee.v6i1.769

Abstract

The 2013 curriculum is regarded as the current issue for teachers and students. This curriculum is based on the competencies concerning on implementing four aspects of spiritual, attitude, knowledge and skills in order to achieve students’ character building. This study, moreover, investigates the teachers’ problems in applying the 2013 curriculum at vocational high school in Tegal. Four English teachers are observed and interviewed to obtain data. The data is analyzed referring to four points; a) preparing lesson plan, b) applying the steps of teaching learning activities, c) preparing media, and d) making evaluation. The result shows that; a) three teachers do not prepare lesson plan before their teaching learning process, b) for all teachers, they understand the principles of scientific approach and the basic concept of 2013 curriculum (i.e. inquiry-based learning, project-based learning, discovery-learning, problem-based learning and task-based learning) but they do not apply it in their teaching, c) one teacher prepares the teaching media but the others do not prepare it, and d) all teachers get difficulties in assessing students’ attitude (behaviour).Keywords: English teachers’ problem, the 2013 curriculum

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 15

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2017 2017


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 13 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 13 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 12 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 12 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 12 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 11 No. 3 (2023) Vol. 11 No. 2 (2023) Vol 11 No 2 (2023) Vol. 11 No. 1 (2023) Vol 11 No 1 (2023) Vol 10, No 3 (2022) Vol. 10 No. 3 (2022) Vol 10 No 2 (2022) Vol 10 No 1 (2021) Vol 9 No 2 (2021) Vol 9 No 1 (2020) Vol. 9 No. 1 (2020) Vol 8, No 2 (2020) Vol 8 No 2 (2020) Vol 8 No 1 (2019) Vol 8, No 1 (2019) Vol 7 No 2 (2019) Vol 7, No 1 (2018) Vol 7 No 1 (2018) Vol 7, No 1 (2018) Vol 6, No 2 (2018) Vol 6, No 2 (2018) Vol 6, No 1 (2017) Vol 6, No 1 (2017) Vol 5, No 2 (2017) Vol 5, No 2 (2017) Vol 5, No 1 (2016) Vol 4, No 2 (2016) Vol 4, No 1 (2015) Vol 3, No 2 (2015) Vol 3, No 1 (2014) Vol 2, No 2 (2014) Vol 2, No 1 (2013) Vol 1, No 2 (2013) Vol 1, No 1 (2012) More Issue