cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Dr.-Ing. Prihadi Nugroho
Contact Email
Dr.-Ing. Prihadi Nugroho
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
laredem.ijpd@gmail.com
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota semarang,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
The Indonesian Journal of Planning and Development
Published by Universitas Diponegoro
ISSN : 20879733     EISSN : 2442983X     DOI : -
Core Subject : Science, Social,
Earth & Planetary Sciences Environmental Science Social Sciences
The Indonesian Journal of Planning and Development (P-ISSN: 2087-9733 and E-ISSN: 2442-983X) is a journal devoted to the study of urban and regional planning and development issues in Indonesia and the other countries. IJPD publishes empirical and theoretical research in order to advance and disseminate knowledge emerged from Indonesian or foreign experiences to an international forum. IJPD emphasizes sustainability issues on economic, social, environmental and institutional dimensions concerning regional and urban development in Indonesia and the other countries. The Indonesian Journal of Planning and Development published two times per year in February and October
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 8, No 2 (2023): October 2023" : 5 Documents clear
The Role of Rural Production Systems in the Transformation of Rural Areas in Kediri Regency Kusumastuti, Gustia
The Indonesian Journal of Planning and Development Vol 8, No 2 (2023): October 2023
Publisher : Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/ijpd.8.2.%p

Abstract

Rural transformation involves comprehensive changes at the community level, including shifts from agriculture to non-agricultural sectors, infrastructure development, and socio-cultural changes toward urbanization. The organization of rural production is both a key driver and a reflection of this transformation. Kediri Regency in East Java is experiencing rural transformation, with 29 villages reclassified as urban between 2000 and 2010. While a shift to non-agricultural sectors is evident, the agricultural sector in some areas remains strong and competitive. This study analyzes rural production systems within the context of rural transformation in Kediri Regency. The analysis focuses on three villages with varying proximity to Kediri City (primary city) and Pare (secondary city), using a quantitative method and descriptive statistical analysis. Results show that rural production systems contribute significantly to sustaining agriculture during transformation. Notable progress is seen in physical assets, natural resources, and social capital—such as the use of modern tools, crop diversification, and stronger social networks. Local production systems are advancing through innovations and improved operational structures, though collective farming remains dominant. Productivity, income, and marketing opportunities have improved, along with signs of emerging production chains and better access to central markets. Villages closer to urban centers show faster adaptation due to spatial advantages and stronger assets. This study recommends that rural production systems be included in rural development planning to enhance agricultural innovation, expand partnerships, and strengthen social and economic networks in response to rural transformation.
The Impact of Rural Transformation to Regional Welfare in Kediri Regency East Java Sigalingging, Christina
The Indonesian Journal of Planning and Development Vol 8, No 2 (2023): October 2023
Publisher : Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/ijpd.8.2.%p

Abstract

Significant regional development can lead to changes in the characteristics of an area due to rural transformation processes. These transformations are often marked by a shift in economic activity from the agricultural sector to non-agricultural sectors, infrastructure development, and changes in social and cultural characteristics from rural to more urban-like features. Differences in subjective well-being among communities may arise as a result of rural transformation, and these differences are also influenced by a region's proximity to primary and secondary cities. This study focuses on Kediri Regency, which has experienced rural transformation in 29 villages over the past ten years. The aim of this research is to analyze the relationship between components of subjective well-being and rural transformation in Kediri Regency. The analysis uses quantitative methods, including descriptive statistical analysis and the Structural Equation Model (SEM). The SEM results indicate that the two main components of subjective well-being are strongly linked to the rural transformation observed in the three villages studied. The findings show that rural transformation has had varying effects on the subjective well-being of residents in these villages. Furthermore, the study reveals that a village’s proximity to urban areas does not necessarily correlate with higher levels of satisfaction or perceived improvement due to rural development. The study also offers several planning recommendations, emphasizing the importance of development strategies that prioritize the actual needs of local communities. Such approaches aim to promote equitable life satisfaction and happiness across rural populations.
The Changing Face of Rural Kediri: A Study on Rural Transformation Processes Sandy, Dixzi Anindita
The Indonesian Journal of Planning and Development Vol 8, No 2 (2023): October 2023
Publisher : Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/ijpd.8.2.%p

Abstract

Urbanization, along with the flow of various elements, has triggered changes in the economic, social, and spatial structures of many regions, driving processes of rural transformation. This transformation presents challenges for both rural and urban development due to its broad impact on physical, socio-economic, and cultural aspects. Kediri Regency, located on Java Island, has experienced such changes, with 29 villages reclassified as urban between 2000 and 2010, based on BPS Regulation No. 37 of 2010—indicating a clear sign of rural transformation. This study aims to assess the degree of rural transformation in Kediri Regency by analyzing physical, economic, and socio-demographic aspects. The research uses spatial and socio-economic data from 2013 and 2023, analyzed through descriptive quantitative methods, GIS, and a weighted scoring analysis. Findings show that all three studied villages—Bringin, Gempolan, and Petok—have undergone varying levels of transformation. Bringin displays the most significant economic and socio-demographic transformation, driven by growth in non-agricultural employment, household income, and access to education and health services. Gempolan ranks highest in overall transformation due to industrial growth, land-use changes, and expanded infrastructure and services. In contrast, Petok shows minimal transformation, particularly in economic and physical aspects, with stagnant development indicators. Overall, rural transformation is most advanced in Bringin, likely due to its proximity to Pare, a secondary city, which stimulates rural change through increased urban economic interaction.
Examining Rural Transformation in Gisting, Tanggamus Regency, Lampung Province Al Murthado, Muhammad Dzaky
The Indonesian Journal of Planning and Development Vol 8, No 2 (2023): October 2023
Publisher : Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/ijpd.8.2.%p

Abstract

Rural transformation is often triggered by urbanization, marked by changes in economic structure, land use, and population dynamics. This transformation can lead to both development opportunities and challenges, including agricultural decline, land-use conflicts, and environmental degradation. This study examines rural transformation in Gisting Subdistrict, Tanggamus Regency, Lampung Province, which has experienced a shift from a predominantly agricultural area to a more urbanized setting. Between 2000 and 2010, five villages in Gisting changed status from rural to urban, as classified by BPS (2010). The research aims to measure the degree of rural transformation and identify the key internal and external factors influencing the process. Using a quantitative approach, the degree of transformation is assessed through indicators of population, land use, and industry. Regression analysis is used to determine the most influential factors. Internal factors include economic, social, and resource variables, while external factors are based on the transformation levels of nearby subdistricts. Data sources include household surveys and secondary data from BPS and various government agencies. The findings indicate that Gisting experienced a high degree of rural transformation in 2010, 2015, and 2020. The most influential internal factors were per capita GRDP and water availability. Externally, the transformation processes in Kota Agung and Talang Padang significantly impacted Gisting. These results offer insights for formulating sustainable rural development strategies in the region.
The Role of Non-Agricultural Rural Activities in the Transformation of Rural Areas in Kediri Regency Husna, Isnaini Nur
The Indonesian Journal of Planning and Development Vol 8, No 2 (2023): October 2023
Publisher : Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/ijpd.8.2.%p

Abstract

Rural-to-urban transformation is marked by increasing population movement and a shift from agricultural to non-agricultural sectors. This transformation reflects the impact of urbanization on rural areas, resulting in economic diversification and job pluralism. Non-agricultural rural activities provide alternative income sources, especially for households with limited or no agricultural land, contributing to labor absorption, economic growth, and poverty reduction. Kediri Regency in East Java exemplifies this phenomenon, with 29 villages reclassified as urban according to the Central Bureau of Statistics Regulation No. 37 of 2010. This study aims to analyze non-agricultural rural activities in the context of rural transformation in Kediri Regency. It examines external and internal driving factors as well as the outcomes of such activities. A quantitative approach was used, including descriptive statistical analysis and Geographic Information Systems (GIS). A scoring method identified the most influential drivers and outcomes. The study used multistage sampling—area and snowball techniques—focusing on non-agricultural households in three villages: Bringin, Gempolan, and Petok, each with varying proximity to primary and secondary cities. Findings show that proximity to urban centers is the main external driver in Bringin, while physical capital dominates in Gempolan and Petok. Internally, innovation drives non-agricultural activities in Bringin and Petok, whereas access to credit is more influential in Gempolan. Income improvement is the most reported outcome across all villages. The research concludes with policy recommendations to support rural development programs aligned with the most significant influencing factors, fostering diversification and sustainable rural transformation.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2023 2023


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 10, No 2 (2025): October 2025 Vol 10, No 1 (2025): February 2025 Vol 9, No 2 (2024): October 2024 Vol 9, No 1 (2024): February 2024 Vol 8, No 2 (2023): October 2023 Vol 8, No 1 (2023): February 2023 Vol 7, No 2 (2022): October 2022 Vol 7, No 1 (2022): February 2022 Vol 6, No 2 (2021): October 2021 (Article in Progress) Vol 6, No 2 (2021): October 2021 Vol 6, No 1 (2021): February 2021 Vol 5, No 2 (2020): October 2020 Vol 5, No 1 (2020): February 2020 Vol 4, No 2 (2019): October 2019 Vol 4, No 1 (2019): February 2019 Vol 3, No 2 (2018): October 2018 Vol 3, No 1 (2018): February 2018 Vol 2, No 2 (2017): October 2017 Vol 2, No 1 (2017): February 2017 Vol 1, No 1 (2014) Vol 1, No 1 (2014) More Issue