cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
lawreviewuph@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Lippo Karawaci, Tangerang - 15811
Location
Kota tangerang,
Banten
INDONESIA
LAW REVIEW
Published by Universitas Pelita Harapan
ISSN : 14122561     EISSN : 26211939     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Law Review is published by the Faculty of Law of Universitas Pelita Harapan and serves as a venue for scientific information in the field of law resulting from scientific research or research-based scientific law writing. Law Review was established in July 2001 and is published triannually in July, November, and March. Law Review provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The aim of this journal is to provide a venue for academicians, researchers, and practitioners for publishing original research articles or review articles. The scope of the articles published in this journal deals with a broad range of topics, including Business Law, Antitrust and Competition Law, Intellectual Property Rights Law, Criminal Law, International Law, Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, Agrarian Law, Medical Law, Adat Law, and Environmental Law.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 6 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Volume XXI, No. 3 - March 2022" : 6 Documents clear
PEMBAHARUAN HUKUM TERHADAP KEBIJAKAN PENGELOLAAN LEMBAGA PEMASYARAKATAN [Law Restoration and Policy Management of Correctional Institutions] Agus Budianto; Afdhal Mahatta Piliang
Law Review Volume XXI, No. 3 - March 2022
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pelita Harapan | Lippo Village, Tangerang 15811 - Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lr.v0i3.4773

Abstract

Lembaga Pemasyarakatan (Lapas) are places to carry out guidance for inmates who have obtained permanent legal force to receive guidance. The presence of this institution is due to the fact that the inmates cannot be separated from their essence, namely humans who have to work to fulfill their daily needs. However, there are many incidents that indicate deficiencies in the management of prisons so far. In this case, the effort that must be made is to improve and strengthen the role and function of the Correctional System in Indonesia. The purpose of this paper is to look for management policy problems, both in terms of the existence of institutions, organizations and implementing management for reform of prison management. The writing of this article is designed using a mix method in the form of quantitative to support qualitative research with a case study approach. However, the type of research is prioritized in the form of qualitative, namely testing legal norms qualitatively. The National Penitentiary Agency as an independent institution to independently manage the implementation of the correctional system is an alternative idea for renewal and improvement.Bahasa Indonesia Abstrak: Lembaga Pemasyarakatan (Lapas) adalah tempat untuk melaksanakan pembinaan terhadap warga binaan yang telah memperoleh kekuatan hukum tetap untuk mendapatkan pembinaan. Hadirnya lembaga ini disebabkan warga binaan juga tidak dapat lepas dari hakikatnya yaitu manusia yang harus bekerja untuk memenuhi kebutuhan kehidupannya. Namun demikian, banyak sekali kejadian yang mengindikasi kekurangan dalam pengelolaan Lapas selama ini. Dalam hal ini, upaya yang harus dilakukan adalah meningkatkan dan menguatkan peran dan fungsi Sistem Pemasyarakatan di Indonesia seperti pemberian sarana fasilitas yang memadai. Tujuan dari penulisan ini adalah mencari permasalahan kebijakan pengelolaan, baik dari sisi keberadaan kelembagaan, organisasi dan menejemen pelaksana untuk pembaharuan pengelolaan Lapas. Penulisan artikel ini didesain secara mix method berupa kuantitatif untuk mendukung penelitian kualitatif dengan pendekatan studi kasus. Namun demikian, jenis penelitian diutamakan berupa kualitatif, yaitu menguji norma hukum secara kualitatif. Badan Pemasyarakatan Nasional sebagai lembaga yang mandiri dan independen untuk melakukan pengelolaan dalam penyelenggaraan sistem pemasyarakatan menjadi ide alternatif untuk pembaharuan dan perbaikan.
ARTI PENTING COMMON HERITAGE OF MANKIND DALAM REZIM PENGATURAN AREA DAN PERKEMBANGANNYA [The Importance of the Common Heritage of Mankind Principle in the Regulation of the Area Regime and Its Development] Agustina Merdekawati; Marsudi Triatmodjo; Irkham Afnan Trisandi Hasibuan; Vivin Purnamawati; Nahda Anisa Rahma
Law Review Volume XXI, No. 3 - March 2022
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pelita Harapan | Lippo Village, Tangerang 15811 - Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lr.v0i3.4198

Abstract

UNCLOS 1982 adopted the Common Heritage of Mankind (CHM) principle for the newly established Area regime. The Area regime governs the utilization of the minerals in the deep seabed and ocean floor and the subsoil thereof beyond the limits of national jurisdiction. The CHM principle requires the utilization of the Area to be carried out for the benefit of all mankind. There is no universally agreed-upon definition and scope of the CHM principle, even within the law of the sea sector. The utilization activities in the Area will soon expand to the use of genetic resources, which poses the question on whether the CHM principle should also apply. This research attempted to find the core philosophy of the CHM principle, independent from the UNCLOS 1982 provisions, to better understand its scope and meaning, and how it may impact our understanding of the Area regime. This study is normative legal research and utilized secondary data. The study concluded that the CHM principle has its roots from the res communis, adopted in response to the inability of the latter to ensure fair access to natural resources. The principle has its own independent character outside of UNCLOS 1982 and may be applied to govern the utilization of genetic resources outside states’ jurisdiction under a dedicated international legal instrument. Bahasa Indonesia Abstrak: Kehadiran UNCLOS 1982 membawa pembaharuan dalam hukum laut internasional dengan mengadopsi prinsip Common Heritage of Mankind (CHM) dalam rezim pengaturan baru untuk Area. Rezim pengaturan Area berlaku terhadap pemanfaatan sumber daya mineral pada dasar laut dan lapisan tanah di bawahnya yang berada di luar batas-batas wilayah yurisdiksi negara. Prinsip CHM mengatur bahwa aktivitas pemanfaatan harus membawa kemanfaatan bagi seluruh umat manusia. Masih terdapat perbedaan pendapat mengenai definsi dan lingkup prinsip CHM bahkan dalam konteks hukum laut. Perkembangan pemanfaatan Area mencakup sumber daya genetik menimbulkan pertanyaan mengenai sejauh mana sumber daya dapat disebut suatu CHM. Penelitian ini mengkaji filosofi dari prinsip CHM di luar konteks UNCLOS 1982 untuk memperdalam pemahaman atas prinsip tersebut dan dampaknya terhadap pemahaman pengaturan Area. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif, dengan menggunakan data sekunder. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa prinsip CHM berakar dari konsep res communis yang didorong oleh keinginan untuk menciptakan keadilan akses terhadap sumber daya alam. Sebagai konsep yang independen dari UNCLOS 1982, prinsip CHM dapat diterapkan terhadap sumber daya genetik di luar yurisdiksi negara di bawah instrumen hukum internasional tersendiri.
STUDI PERBANDINGAN IMPLEMENTASI PERLINDUNGAN HAK ATAS PENDIDIKAN BAGI PEREMPUAN DI INDONESIA DAN TURKI [A Comparison Study of the Implementation of Women’s Right to Education between Indonesia and Turkey] Andi Hugeng; Anna Erliyana
Law Review Volume XXI, No. 3 - March 2022
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pelita Harapan | Lippo Village, Tangerang 15811 - Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lr.v0i3.4651

Abstract

The 2018 International Student Assessment data puts Indonesia at 72nd and Turkey at 40th in the world, but that’s not all, the Times Higher Education World University Rankings Research puts 49 universities in Turkey on the list of the best university in the world, while Indonesia has left behind with only 9 campuses. In 2020, the literacy rate in Indonesia is 98.28% while Turkey is at 99.07%. However, how exactly is the fulfillment of the right to education for women in both countries? This article aims to explore the education system, budget allocation and education delivery based on the principle of equality. The results of the study show that although the law has guaranteed equal access to education, there is still discrimination in access to education for women in Indonesia, especially for coastal women and pregnant women. This study uses a qualitative method with a deductive approach, while the benefits of this article are to provide an overview of the education system and the fulfillment of education rights for women in both countries that can be used as lessons to build a better education system based on the principle of equality.Bahasa Indonesia Abstrak: Data Internasional Student Assessment tahun 2018 menempatkan Indonesia di peringkat 72 dan Turki di peringkat 40 dunia, tak hanya itu, Penelitian Times Higher Education World University Rankings menempatkan 49 Universitas di Turki masuk dalam daftar kampus terbaik didunia, sedangkan Indonesia jauh tertinggal dengan hanya 9 kampus. Tahun 2020, angka melek huruf di Indonesia adalah 98,28% sedangkan Turki berada di angka 99,07%. Namun, bagaimana sebenarnya pemenuhan hak atas pendidikan bagi perempuan dikedua negara? Artikel ini hendak mengupas sistem pendidikan, alokasi anggaran dan penyelenggaran pendidikan yang berdasarkan pada prinsip kesetaraan. Hasil penelitian menunjukan meskipun Undang-undang sudah menjamin kesetaraan akses atas pendidikan namun masih terdapat diskriminasi akses pendidikan bagi perempuan di Indonesia, khususnya bagi perempuan pesisir dan perempuan hamil. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode Kualitatif dengan pendekatan deduktif, adapun manfaat artikel ini untuk memberikan gambaran sistem pendidikan dan pemenuhan hak pendidikan bagi perempuan di kedua negara yang dapat dijadikan pelajaran untuk membangun sistem pendidikan yang lebih baik berlandaskan pada prinsip kesetaraan.
FENOMENA MARAKNYA PEER TO PEER LENDING DI MASA PANDEMI COVID-19: MITIGASI RISIKO HUKUM BAGI PEMINJAM [The Phenomenon of Peer-to-Peer Lending During the Covid-19 Pandemic: Mitigation of Legal Risks for Borrowers] Jerry Shalmont; Dora Dominica
Law Review Volume XXI, No. 3 - March 2022
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pelita Harapan | Lippo Village, Tangerang 15811 - Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lr.v0i3.4806

Abstract

The use of Peer to Peer Lending (P2P Lending) has been increasing rapidly since the Covid-19 pandemic in Indonesia, online loan has become a financing option for individuals and business entities. However, the facts showed that some P2P Lending providers operate without proper licenses from the Financial Services Authority (OJK), resulting in huge disadvantages for the borrowers as a result of illegal P2P Lending. This paper will analyze the legal aspects of P2P Lending in terms of risks, from its legality to supervision, and the role of associations in building a sustainable fintech ecosystem. Legal risks should be differentiated from investment risks in which from the user side, especially the borrowers, it is important to act proactively to check whether P2P Lending providers are legal and registered with OJK for risk management. This paper uses normative research by referring to some P2P Lending prevailing laws and regulations in Indonesia as well as factual facts. There are two types of approaches used, namely the statute and conceptual approach, to obtain the desired research results.Bahasa Indonesia Abstrak: Penggunaan Peer to Peer Lending (P2P Lending) sangat berkembang pesat sejak pandemi Covid-19 di Indonesia, pinjaman online menjadi salah satu opsi pembiayaan baik bagi individu sampai dengan badan usaha. Akan tetapi, fakta menunjukan bahwa cukup banyak penyelenggara P2P Lending yang beroperasi namun tidak memiliki izin resmi dari Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK), yang pada akhirnya mengakibatkan banyak pengguna yang merasa dirugikan akibat P2P Lending ilegal. Tulisan ini akan menganalisis aspek hukum dari P2P Lending dari segi risiko, legalitas sampai dengan pengawasan, serta peranan asosiasi dalam membangun ekosistem fintech yang berkelanjutan. Risiko hukum harus dibedakan dari risiko investasi dari sisi pengguna terutama peminjam, sangatlah penting untuk berperan proaktif mencari tahu penyelenggara P2P Lending legal dan terdaftar di OJK dalam rangka manajemen risiko. Jurnal ini menggunakan penelitian normatif dengan mengacu pada ketentuan hukum dan peraturan P2P Lending yang berlaku di Indonesia. Ada dua jenis pendekatan yang digunakan yaitu pendekatan undang-undang dan konseptual, guna mendapatkan hasil penelitian yang diinginkan.
KEKUATAN HUKUM SURAT PERNYATAAN PENGUASAAN FISIK SEBAGAI ALAS HAK PENGURUSAN HAK ATAS TANAH [Legal Enforcement of A Statement Letter of Land Utilization as the Legal Basis to Obtain Land Rights] Gunanegara Gunanegara
Law Review Volume XXI, No. 3 - March 2022
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pelita Harapan | Lippo Village, Tangerang 15811 - Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lr.v0i3.4864

Abstract

A person or legal-person who utilises state land or customary land needs a title to be able to apply for land rights. The form and type of the title used is only accepted if it is in accordance with the regulation of UUPA juncto PP No. 24 of 1997. That norm regulated basis of land rights has changed after enactment of PP No. 18 on the year 2021. Whoever utilise of the land as be a title to apply for land rights could be proofed by a statement letter. How a legal force of statement letter to apply for land rights in land law as a legal issue of this research. Aim of the research is juridical-analysis concerning statement letter as proof of land utilisation for land rights basis. The research was conducted using normative juridical research methods, and the conclusion that the statement letter regulated by PP No. 18 of 2021 actually has a little bit of legal force, because it has a unilateral ownership claim and it is unauthentic letter.Bahasa Indonesia Abstrak: Orang yang menguasai tanah negara atau tanah adat memerlukan alas hak untuk dapat mengajukan permohonan hak atas tanah. Bentuk dan jenis alas hak yang digunakan hanya diakui jika sesuai dengan yang diatur UUPA juncto PP No. 24 Tahun 1997. Ketentuan baru soal alas hak berubah bersamaan dengan diundangkannya PP No. 18 Tahun 2021. Disebutkan bahwa penguasaan fisik atas tanah adalah alas hak untuk permohonan hak yang dibuktikan dengan surat pernyataan penguasaan fisik (SPPF). Bagaimana kekuatan hukum SPPF sebagai alas hak untuk permohonan hak ditinjau dari hukum pertanahan menjadi masalah hukum di penelitian ini. Tujuan peneltian untuk menganalisis SPPF sebagai alas hak permohonan hak atas tanah. Penelitian dilakukan dengan menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif, dan kesimpulannya bahwa SPPF yang diatur PP No. 18 Tahun 2021 sejatinya mempunyai kekuatan hukum pembuktian yang tidak kuat, karena bermaterikan pengakuan sepihak dan berkualifikasi di bawah tangan.
KEWENANGAN PEMERINTAH DAERAH DALAM PENGELOLAAN KEHUTANAN PASCA UNDANG-UNDANG CIPTA KERJA [The Authority of Local Governments in the Context of Forestry Management after the Law on Job Creation] Hario Danang Pambudhi; Muhammad Arief Virgy
Law Review Volume XXI, No. 3 - March 2022
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pelita Harapan | Lippo Village, Tangerang 15811 - Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lr.v0i3.4885

Abstract

The Indonesian government initiated a law called Job Creation which aims to facilitate the flow of licensing bureaucracy to increase investment in Indonesia. However, there are problems that have come to the attention of the author regarding the regulation of forestry matters in this regulation, namely the centralization of authority to issue permits in the central government, the role of local governments in the formation and assessment of environmental impact analysis (AMDAL) and Environmental Management Efforts-Environmental Monitoring Efforts (UKL-UPL), and regarding the features of the National Strategic Project (PSN). These problems are the main discussion of the authors in this study. By using normative juridical research through a statutory approach as well as descriptive analytical concepts, the authors conclude that forestry regulations in these laws tend to restore the dignity of centralization of authority in the context of forest management authority, particularly with regard to forest use. This is not in line with the constitutional design regulated in the constitution regarding the division of authority for forest use between the central and regional governments which must be carried out based on the spirit of autonomy as wide as possible in a fair and harmonious manner.Bahasa Indonesia Abstrak: Pemerintah Indonesia menginisiasi sebuah Undang-Undang dengan nama Cipta Kerja yang bertujuan untuk mempermudah alur birokrasi perizinan untuk meningkatkan investasi di Indonesia. Namun, terdapat permasalahan yang menjadi perhatian penulis terkait pengaturan soal kehutanan dalam regulasi ini, yaitu pemusatan kewenangan pemberian izin di pemerintah pusat, peran pemerintah daerah dalam pembentukan dan penilaian analisis mengenai dampak lingkungan (AMDAL) dan Upaya Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup-Upaya Pemantauan Lingkungan Hidup (UKL-UPL), dan perihal keistimewaan Proyek Strategis Nasional (PSN). Permasalahan tersebut menjadi bahasan utama penulis pada penelitian ini. Dengan menggunakan penelitian yuridis normatif melalui pendekatan perundang-undangan serta konsep yang bersifat deskriptif analitis, penulis berkesimpulan bahwa pengaturan kehutanan dalam undang-undang tersebut cenderung mengembalikan marwah sentralisasi kewenangan dalam konteks kewenangan pengelolaan hutan, khususnya berkaitan dengan pemanfaatan hutan. Hal ini tidak selaras dengan desain konstitusional yang diatur dalam konstitusi mengenai pembagian kewenangan pemanfaatan hutan antara pemerintah pusat dan daerah yang harus diselenggarakan berdasarkan semangat otonomi seluas-luasnya yang adil dan selaras.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 6

 1 

Filter by Year

2022 2022


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Volume 25 Issue 1 (March 2025) Volume 24 Issue 2 (November 2024) Volume 24 Issue 1 (March 2024) Volume 23 Issue 2 (November 2023) Volume 23 No. 2 (November 2023) Volume XXII, No. 3 - March 2023 Volume XXIII, No. 1 - July 2023 Volume XXI, No. 3 - March 2022 Volume XXII, No. 2 - November 2022 Volume XXII, No. 1 - July 2022 Volume XX, No. 3 - March 2021 Volume XXI, No. 2 - November 2021 Volume XXI, No. 1 - July 2021 Volume XIX, No. 3 - March 2020 Volume XX, No. 2 - November 2020 Volume XX, No. 1 - July 2020 Volume XVIII, No. 3 - March 2019 Volume XIX, No. 2 - November 2019 Volume XIX, No. 1 - July 2019 Volume XVII, No. 3 - March 2018 Volume XVIII, No. 2 - November 2018 Volume XVIII, No. 1 - July 2018 Vol 11, No 2 (2011) Vol 11, No 1 (2011) Vol 6, No 2 (2006) Vol 6, No 1 (2006) Vol 5, No 3 (2006) Vol 5, No 2 (2005) Vol 5, No 1 (2005) Vol 4, No 3 (2005) Vol 4, No 2 (2004) Vol 4, No 1 (2004) Vol 3, No 3 (2004) Vol 2, No 3 (2003) Vol 2, No 2 (2002) Vol 2, No 1 (2002) Vol 1, No 3 (2002) Vol 1, No 2 (2001) Vol 1, No 1 (2001) More Issue