Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
7.493
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA LAW REFORM LAW REVIEW Jurisprudentie Jurnal Konstitusi Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia Jurnal Justisia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Perundang-undangan dan Pranata Sosial Administrative Law & Governance Journal Unes Law Review Journal of Humanities and Social Studies JISIP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan Jurnal Yudisial Pagaruyuang Law Journal Dialogia Iuridica PALAR (Pakuan Law review) Selisik : Jurnal Hukum dan Bisnis JUSTISI Santhet: (Jurnal Sejarah, Pendidikan Dan Humaniora) Transparansi Hukum ADIL : Jurnal Hukum Journal of Law and Policy Transformation Jurnal Darma Agung Al-Manhaj: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Jurnal Syntax Transformation Majalah Hukum Nasional Journal of Judicial Review Indonesian Journal of International Law Constitutionale Jurnal Konstitusi The International Journal of Politics and Sociology Research Jurnal Hukum Sehasen Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) Indonesia Law Review (ILREV) Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia
Anna Erliyana
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia
Religion Arts Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 62 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 62 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4   5 
Keputusan Administrasi Negara (Beschikking) Erliyana, Anna
LAW REVIEW Vol 4, No 3 (2005)
Publisher : Pelita Harapan University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Adiministrative decision made by government, legally called administrative Decree  (Ketetapan Aministrasi), is a decision issued by the authority in order to give legal basis  for all administrative actions of public agencies. Not only that, such Decree is also the  rules of procedure or code of conduct upon which every state of government agencies  conduct their interrelation and cooperation. The competence vested within its organs  agencies, which in turn also serves as the source of law for those agencies to operate. A  Decree issued by an Agency not given the legal authority is considered invalid that is,  null and void.
Upaya Administratif Erliyana, Anna
LAW REVIEW Vol 5, No 3 (2006)
Publisher : Pelita Harapan University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Upaya Administratif diperlukan untuk memelihara keseimbangan antara kepentingan individu dan kepentingan umum menuju huhungan yang rukun  antara rakyat dan pemerintah. Perdamaian melalui musyawarah merupakan aspek penting untuk mencapai keputusan yang dapat diterima oleh para pihak. Oleh karena itu badan yang menyelesaikannya hams bersikap objektif dalam memberikan pertimbangan hukum dan pertimbangan kemanfaatan.
Peraturan Presiden No.36 Tahun 2005 dan Berbagai Permasalahannya Erliyana, Anna
LAW REVIEW Vol 5, No 1 (2005)
Publisher : Pelita Harapan University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Presidential Regulation Number 36 of the year 2005 on Land Availability for Public Usage contains several weakness, such as not taking into considerations what soever that making available of land for public interest must be acquired in fairly manner and, on the first instance, through direct consent by the owner or holder of the ownership right; not mentioning the Law No. 32/2004 on Local Government; Government Regulation No. 40/1996 on The Right of Land of Business, Construction and Private Usage Purposes; Government Regulation No. 24/1997 on Land Registration and Government in the Autonomous Territory; he substantial meaning of public interest has been downsized into, and limited to, the interest of majority of the society, whereas the scope of the projects has been extended; provisions on human rights matter shall be regulated in different laws inform of parliamentary acts.
Asas Larangan Melampui Wewenang Pada Penerbitan Keputusan Presiden Republik Indonesia Tahun 1987-1998 Erliyana, Anna
LAW REVIEW Vol 4, No 2 (2004)
Publisher : Pelita Harapan University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The policy making power held by President is difficult to control in practice. Discretionary administrative power is apparently a permanent feature of modern governments, including purportedly democratic ones. But many worrie whether the broad discretionary power that resides in Presidents hand will be used arbitrarily. This research tries to find out how broad Presidents discretionary power is already used through the decree of President. Are there of power in President s discretionary power? How to determine which decree of Presidents is abuse of power is the goal of this research.
HAMBATAN EKSEKUSI PUTUSAN PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN PENETAPAN CALON ANGGOTA DPD Mustikaningsih, Rahmah Mutiara; Erliyana, Anna
JUSTISI Vol 7, No 1 (2021): Januari 2021
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33506/js.v7i1.1199

Abstract

Pejabat tata usaha negara memiiki kewajiban utntuk melakukan eksekusi putusan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara (PTUN) yang sudah berkekekuatan hukum tetap, salah satunya putusan PTUN mengenai sengketa proses pemilu. Namun, fakta yang terjadi dilapangan putusan PTUN tidak selalu dapat dieksekusi dengan baik walaupun sudah terdapat mekanisme upaya paksa eksekusi dan sanksi jika tidak melakukannya. Berbagai faktor dapat mengambat eksekusi putusan PTUN, salah satunya diakibatkan putusan itu sendiri yang tidak dapat diekskusi karena bersinggungan dengan putusan lembaga peradilan lainnya. Kondisi ini membuat ketidakpastian hukum, baik bagi pejabat tata usaha yang wajib melakukan eksekusi serta bagi penggugat yang memiliki hak untuk dipenuhi dengan dieksekusinya putusan PTUN. Pada studi kasus Putusan  Nomor 242/G/SPPU/2018/PTUN.JKT, Komisi Pemilihan Umum (KPU) selaku pejabat tata usaha terkait tidak dapat melaksanakan putusan PTUN tersebut demi mematuhi Putusan MK yang secara final dan sejajar dengan undang-undang telah memberikan landasan hukum bagi KPU dalam melakukan tindakan penyelenggaraan pemilu untuk menetapkan daftar calon tetap anggota DPD 2019. Metode pendekatan masalah yang digunakan dalam metode penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif yang berbasis pada studi kepustakaan, dengan analisa berbagai sumber dan bahan hukum terkait eksekusi putusan peradilan tata usaha negara. State administrative officials have obligation to carry out the execution of State Administrative Court (PTUN) decision that already have permanent legal force, one of which is the PTUN decision regarding the election process dispute. However, in facts, the PTUN decision is not always executed properly even though there is already a mechanism to forced execution and sanctions whether not doing so. Various factors can hamper the execution of PTUN decision, one of which as result of the decision itself cannot be executed since it collides with the decisions of other judicial institutions. This condition creates legal uncertainty, both for administrative officials who are obliged to carry out executions and for plaintiffs who have the right to be fulfilled by the execution of the PTUN decision. In the case study of Decision Number 242 / G / SPPU / 2018 / PTUN.JKT, the General Election Commission (KPU) as the related administrative officer could not carry out the PTUN decision in order to comply with the Constitutional Court Decision which is final and parallel to the law that has provided reasons law for the KPU in carrying out election administration actions to determine the final list of candidates for DPD members 2019. The problem approach method used in this research method is normative legal research based on literature study, with analysis of various sources and legal materials related to the execution of state administrative judicial decisions.
Penegakan Rasa Aman Melalui Intervensi Kemanusiaan Erliyana, Anna
Indonesian Journal of International Law
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (2591.586 KB)

Abstract

When a state has no longer guaranteed the implementation of personal rights, social contract automatically will decease. The decease of social contract will cause the failing of state sovereignty. In this case, state is no longer has philosophic fundamental as supporting state. As a consequence of a state cannot protect its citizens’ rights, the enforcement of state sovereignty merely can be done through external hand; this is the part when the role humanity begins to play. Humanity intervention will automatically stop when the norm and humanity law are enforced in the state and social contract are reconstructed.
Menimbang Model Pengujian Keputusan Pejabat Publik oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia (Studi Perbandingan Indonesia dan Korea Selatan) Yunita Nurwulantari; Anna Erliyana
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 18, No 1 (2021)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (454.615 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1818

Abstract

Testing public officials decision in Indonesia, which has been the authority of the State Administrative Court (PTUN) should be done through a constitutional complaint mechanism, written under the authority of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia (MKRI). This is due to all public officials have the potential to perform acts that violate or harm the constitutional rights of citizens as guaranteed in the 1945 Constitution (UUD 1945). This additional authority to examine and decide cases of constitutional complaints should be possible in the framework of carrying out the functions of the Constitutional Court as the guardian of the constitution as implemented in countries that apply the principle of constitutional supremacy, one of which is as applied in the Constitutional Court of The South Korea. Even though South Korea has an administrative court which also has the authority to examine the decision of public officials, South Korea still open space for its citizens to file constitutional complaint in Constitutional Court of South Korea when there is a public official decision that harm and violating the constitutional rights of the citizens that have been guaranteed in constitution. Thus, when all legal remedy for violations of constitutional rights as a result of the issuance of public official decision has been exhausted, but violations still occur, then this constitutional complaint mechanism into the need to provides maximum protection and respect the constitutional rights of citizens. Therefore, the additional authority to examine and decide constitutional complaint can not be separated from the authority of the Constitutional Court.
PERAN KLHK DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA LINGKUNGAN HIDUP DILUAR PENGADILAN Andie Hevriansyah; Anna Erliyana; Audrey G Tangkudung
Jurnal ADIL Vol 12, No 1 (2021): Juli 2021
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian Universitas YARSI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33476/ajl.v12i1.1922

Abstract

Artikel ini membahas permasalahan mengenai peran Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan (KLHK) dalam upaya menyelesaikan sengketa di luar pengadilan yang terjadi pada  lingkungan  hidup,  dan  penyelesaian  kesepakatan  ganti  kerugian  sebagai  akibat pencemaran.  metode  penelitian  menggunakan  analisis  yuridis  normatif,  artikel  ini menyimpulkan  peran  KLHK  yang  bertindak  sebagai  fasilitator  dan  mediator,  juga sebagai  pihak  yang  mewakili  negara  saat  terjadi  kerusakan  lingkungan  yang mengakibatkan  kerugian  negara.  Menteri  KLHK  juga  berperan  sebagai  verifikator. Lahirnya kesepakatan para pihak yang bersengketa dengan pilihan penyelesaian sengketa di  luar  pengadilan,  melalui  beberapa  tahapan,  diawali  dari  pengaduan,  atau  berasal  dari hasil  pengawasan,  selanjutnya  data  tersebut  di  telaah,  dari  hasil  telaah  tersebut  bila terdapat  indikasi  pencemaran  dan/atau  kerusakan  lingkungan  hidup,  maka  dilanjutkan dengan  memverifikasi  dan  klarifikasi  hasil  verifikasi,  bila  hasil  verifikasi  tersebut ditemukan  indikasi  kerugian  dilakukan  perhitungan  kerugian  negara  lingkungan  hidup. Suatu  kesepakatan  ganti  kerugian  akibat  dari  pencemaran  lahir  dari  perbuatan  melawan hukum  (PMH)  merupakan  titik  awal  dari  lahirnya  ganti  kerugian  dan  selanjutnya  PMH berkembang  menjadi  pertanggungjawaban  mutlak  (strict  liability),  pada  persengketaan lingkungan, Rejim  pengelolaan lingkungan  pada  UU  No.32  tahun  2009  tentang  UPPLH telah menganut asas strict liability, karena itu, tersangka pencemar tidak perlu dibuktikan kesalahannya,  cukup  dengan  adanya  suatu  potensi  yang  terjadi,  maka  dapat  melahirkan suatu gugatan.
Keputusan Elektronis Pada Layanan Perizinan Pendirian Perguruan Tinggi Swasta (Studi Kasus Putusan PTUN Nomor 521/K/TUN/2018) Siti Labiba Fathin; Anna Erliyana
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 10 No 4 (2021)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2021.v10.i04.p10

Abstract

This study was conducted with a normative research that provides answers to two issues in this research, first, electronic decree regulation in the government administration law and omnibus law; second, analyzing the decisions of judges from the first level verdict to cassation verdict, related to electronic decree on licensing services for the establishment of private higher education at the Directorate General of Higher Education, Research, and Technology. Regarding the first issue, an answer was found that Electronic Decree are regulated in UUAP, especially Article 38 in conjunction with the Omnibus Law, where Electronic Decree have the same legal force or are not different from written decree. However, there is a change in the Omnibus Law regarding this electronic decree, namely the change occurs in the deletion of paragraphs 5 and 6 of Article 38, so that electronic decree no longer have to be made in writing, and there is an electronic system that is centralized in the central government. Regarding the second issue, the TUN verdict Number 53/B/2018/ PT.TUN.JKT, could not be implemented by the Kemenristekdikti because the judex facti of the Judges in the decision was wrong, and besides there was an ultra petita in the decree, so the Kemenristekdikti putted on appeal to the Supreme Court for the verdict of TUN Number 53/B/2018/PT.TUN.JKT. the Supreme Court granted the appeal and canceled the verdict of TUN Number 53/B/2018/PT.TUN.JKT Kajian ini dilakukan dengan penelitian normatif yang memberikan jawaban dua permasalahan dalam penelitian ini, pertama, pengaturan keputusan elektronis di undang-undang administrasi pemerintahan dan omnibus law; kedua, menganalisa putusan majelis hakim dari putusan tingkat pertama sampai dengan tingkat kasasi terkait keputusan elektronis pada layanan perizinan pendirian perguruan tinggi swasta di Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi, Riset, dan Teknologi. Terkait permasalahan pertama, ditemukan jawaban bahwa Keputusan Elektronis diatur di UUAP khususnya Pasal 38 juncto Omnibus Law, dimana Keputusan Elektronis mempunyai kekuatan hukum yang sama atau tidak berbeda dengan Keputusan tertulis. Namun, terdapat perubahan pengaturan dalam Omnibus Law mengenai keputusan elektronis ini, yaitu perubahan terjadi pada penghapusan ayat 5 dan ayat 6 dari Pasal 38, sehingga Keputusan elektronis, tidak lagi harus dibuat Keputusan tertulis, dan adanya sistem elektronis yang terpusat di pemerintah pusat. Terkait permasalahan kedua, putusan TUN Nomor 53/B/2018/ PT.TUN.JKT, namun putusan tersebut tidak dapat dilaksanakan oleh pihak Kemenristekdikti karena judex facti Majelis Hakim pada putusan tersebut telah keliru, dan adanya ultra petita dalam putusan tersebut, sehingga pihak Kemenristekdikti mengajukan permohonan kasasi ke Mahkamah Agung untuk putusan TUN Nomor 53/B/2018/ PT.TUN.JKT. Majelis Hakim Agung mengabulkan permohonan kasasi tersebut serta membatalkan putusan TUN Nomor 53/B/2018/PT.TUN.JKT.
KAJIAN GOOD GOVERNANCE SINGAPURA DAN INDONESIA: STUDI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI [Singapore and Indonesia's Good Governance Review: An Anticorruption Study] Andreas Sulardi; Anna Erliyana
Law Review Volume XXI, No. 2 - November 2021
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pelita Harapan | Lippo Village, Tangerang 15811 - Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lr.v0i2.3950

Abstract

Eradication of Corruption in Indonesia in 2015-2019 in a row did not experience significant progress. In contrast to Indonesia, in 2019 Singapore actually occupied the number two position for the Asia Pacific region and number one in the ASEAN region in eradicating corruption. How to compare the eradication of corruption in the two countries? This article will explore the eradication of corruption in Singapore and Indonesia with a Good Governance approach and analysis of data reading from the two countries’ corruption eradication institutions. The results show that there are three key pillars in eradicating corruption in Singapore which consist of political will, independence, and effectiveness of corruption eradication institutions, and the application of good administrative services. The results of the next study explained that the eradication of corruption in the 2015-2019 period in Indonesia was deemed not optimal due to three things: political patronym and the power of investors that hindered the eradication of corruption, the ineffectiveness of taking action against the KPK, and the vision of Jokowi’s leadership that was too focused on the development and economic growth but did not pay attention to it. bureaucratic reform agenda. The benefits of this paper are primarily intended to assist Indonesia in optimizing the eradication of corruption by learning from Singapore. It is hoped that good and corruption-free governance can be implemented in Indonesia.Bahasa Indonesia Abstrak: Pemberantasan Korupsi di Indonesia pada 2015-2019 secara berturut-turut tidak mengalami kemajuan yang berarti. Berbeda dengan Indonesia, pada 2019 Singapura justru menduduki posisi nomor dua untuk wilayah Asia Pasifik dan nomor satu di wilayah ASEAN dalam pemberantasan korupsi. Bagaimana membandingkan pemberantasan korupsi pada kedua negara tersebut? Artikel ini hendak mengupas pemberantasan korupsi Singapura dan Indonesia dengan pendekatan Good Governance dan analisa pembacaan data dari kedua lembaga pemberantasan korupsi negara tersebut. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat tiga pilar kunci dalam pemberantasan korupsi di Singapura yang terdiri dari political will, independesi dan efektivitas lembaga pemberantasan korupsi, dan penerapan pelayanan administrasi yang baik. Hasil penelitian berikutnya memaparkan bahwa pemberantasan korupsi pada kurun 2015-2019 di Indonesia dirasa tidak optimal karena tiga hal: patronisme politik dan kuasa pemodal yang menghambat pemberantasan korupsi, ketidakefektifan penindakan KPK, dan visi kepemimpinan Jokowi yang terlalu fokus pada pembangunan dan pertumbuhan ekonomi namun kurang memperhatikan agenda pembaharuan birokrasi. Manfaat penulisan ini terutama ditujukan untuk membantu Indonesia dalam optimalisasi pemberantasan korupsi dengan belajar dari Singapura. Harapannya kepemerintahan yang baik dan bebas korupsi dapat terselenggara di Indonesia.
Co-Authors Afif Juniar Ahmad Haidar Muiny Andi Hugeng Andie Hevriansyah Andie Hevriansyah Andreas Sulardi Arief Rahman Ruslan Atmaja, A.P. Edi Audrey G Tangkudung Audrey Tangkudung Barokah, Muhamad Raziv Clarissa, Gavinela Dewi, Lia Riesta Dzikry Gaosul Ashfiya Edmon Makarim Elfrieda Anggi Basamarito Erma Yustiyah Fahmi Ramadhan Firdaus Happy Hayati Helmi Happy Hayati Helmi Indah Mutiara Sari Indra Wahyu Bintoro Khalid Dahlan Khaliza Fauzi, Maghfira Nur Lidya Rahmawati Luh Rina Apriani Marvin, Renius Albert Moch Chafid Moch Chafid Muhammad Ali Hasan Muhammad Alifian Geraldi Fauzi Muhammad Brillyan Alvayedo Mustikaningsih, Rahmah Mutiara Nico Handoko Utama Nisrina, Virihana Widad Paramita Ersan Paulus Rudy Calvin Sinaga Puteri Anggun Amirillis Putri Aprilia Anggraini Putri Wanda Nisyah Bela Rahmah Mutiara Mustikaningsih Reydonaldo Thomas Sidabutar Samuel Ivander Aritonang Saragih, Yessi Nadia Giatma Setyawan, Yhannu Siagian, Lowrenszya Siti Labiba Fathin Siti Rahmaniah Jamaluddin Sjarif, Fitriani Ahlan Suha Qoriroh Sukma, Ahmad Novindri Aji Sukri, Indah Fitriani Syafri Hariansah Syafrijal Latief Wahyu Ardiansyah wili utama, Alif Winanta, Rendro Prastyan Yunita Nurwulantari