cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Galih Puji Mulyono, S.H., M.H.
Contact Email
Galihpujimulyono@unmer.ac.id
Phone
+6285646664788
Journal Mail Official
jurnalcakrawalahukum@unmer.ac.id
Editorial Address
Faculty of Law Building, Terusan Dieng Street 62-64, Malang City, East Java, Indonesia, 65146
Location
Kota malang,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum
Published by Universitas Merdeka Malang
ISSN : 23564962     EISSN : 25986538     DOI : https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
The Journal of Cakrawala Hukum, is a scientific periodical of the Faculty of Law, University of Merdeka Malang, which includes a variety of research in the field of law, or the analysis of actual case studies, or ideas related to the actual law. A Scientific periodical is intended as a means of scientific communication and a means of fostering, developing and strengthening knowledge in the field of law. Academics, legal practitioners, or anyone interested in the field of law may submit his papers to the editor with the guidelines in writing. Coverage includes, but is not limited to Employment and industrial law, Corporate governance and social responsibility, Intellectual property, Corporate law and finance, Insolvency, Commercial law and consumer protection, Environmental law, Taxation, Competition law, and Regulatory theory. Researchers in all law fields are encouraged to contribute articles based on recent research. Published 3 times a year in April, August and December.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 4 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 9, No 2 (2018): Desember 2018" : 4 Documents clear
Implikasi Yuridis Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 13 Tahun 2016 dalam Putusan Hakim Haniah, Haniah
Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum Vol 9, No 2 (2018): Desember 2018
Publisher : University of Merdeka Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26905/idjch.v9i2.2731

Abstract

Criminal liability with corporation subject hasn’t regulated in Criminal Code and Criminal Code Procedures in Indonesia, but the law outside Criminal Code Procedures has already admitted that corporation is a law subject. The Supreme Court Law Number 13 in 2016 about Procedures for the Submission of Handling Case of a Criminal Act by Corporate became the new rule as the reference for criminal code procedures as corporate law subject because there was no law rule about how to make an indictment, a prosecution letter, and others in this Supreme Court Law. With this Supreme Court Law, it is expected that the law enforcement can ensnare more corporations who do criminal acts. In this study, the writer is will discuss how the criminal liability of corporation works before and after the Supreme Court Law Number 13 in 2016 about Procedures for the Submission of Handling Case of a Criminal Act by Corporate in three verdicts. This study will reveal whether Supreme Court Law Number 13 in 2016 about Procedures for the Submission of Handling Case of a Criminal Act by Corporate can be a good and correct guidance of how law runs in criminal code with a law corporation as the subject.DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v9i2.2731
Penerapan Diversi Terhadap Anak Pelaku Penyalahguna Narkotika Indrawati indrawati; Byrna Mirasari
Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum Vol 9, No 2 (2018): Desember 2018
Publisher : University of Merdeka Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26905/idjch.v9i2.2764

Abstract

This study examines the free application to the perpetrators of narcotics violations applied in the Banjarbaru District Court in accordance with various regulations relating to children’s rights such as Law No. 4 of 1949 concerning Child Welfare, Law No. 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights, Law No. 35 of 2014 concerning Child Protection and Law No. 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Justice System, including diversification requirements where the threat of punishment is less than 7 years and the perpetrator is not recidivism. Because that is true and true what hasbeen done by the facilitator of transfer / child judge in case Number 4 / Pid.Sus-Anak / 2016 / PN.BJB because it is in accordance with the rules relating to the transfer of those who transact with the law. Factors that hinder the adoption of a diversion attempt on children who abuse drugs in the Banjarbaru District Court are: Understanding of law enforcement officers involved in the Diversion process is still lacking. i.e. parties involved in the transfer process, such as Community / Bapas Supervisors including legal counsel / legal counsel who are interns, including juvenile judges, should be more familiar with the contents of Perma No. 4 of 2014 concerning the Guidelines for the Implementation of Diversification in the Child Criminal Justice System and the Role of Parents in the Transfer process are still less active due to a lack of understanding of the process.How to cite item: indrawati, I., Mirasari, B. (2018). Penerapan Diversi Terhadap Anak Pelaku Penyalahguna Narkotika. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 9(2), 177-185. doi:https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v9i2.2764 
Urgensi Pengaturan Tentang Peralihan Hak Atas Merek Sebagai Objek Jaminan Fidusia Amrulla, Mohammad Fahrial
Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum Vol 9, No 2 (2018): Desember 2018
Publisher : University of Merdeka Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26905/idjch.v9i2.2767

Abstract

His study aims to find out that these researchers are meant to address the importance of the transfer of rights to a trademark that is used as a fiduciary jinminary object. So it can be seen that the importance of the arrangement of the transfer of rights to the trademark as the object of fiduciary collateral can provide legal certainty for the creditor and debtor as well as to know what legal factors causing the transfer of the trademark can not be applied if the trademark becomes the object of fiduciary collateral. type of normative research. From the research that has been done obtained the result that substantially Law no. 42 of 1999 on Fiduciary Guaranty and Law No.20 of 2016 on Trademarks and Geographical Indications have not been able to provide clarity in interpreting Article 1 number (1) of Law no. 42 of 1999 on Fiduciary Collateral, as well as Article 41 of Law No.20 of 2016 on Trademarks and Geographical Indications, and Section 499 of the Civil Code.How to cite item: Amrulla, M. (2018). Urgensi Pengaturan Tentang Peralihan Hak Atas Merek Sebagai Objek Jaminan Fidusia. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 9(2), 135-141. doi:https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v9i2.2767
Perlindungan Hukum Data Pribadi Bagi Pelanggan Jasa Telekomunikasi Terkait Kewajiban Registrasi Kartu SIM Mega Sonia Putri
Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum Vol 9, No 2 (2018): Desember 2018
Publisher : University of Merdeka Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26905/idjch.v9i2.2772

Abstract

The government requires SIM card owners to register by submitting a Population Registration Number (NIK) and Family Card Number (KK) starting 31 October 2017 to 28 February 2018. This registration must be done for owners of new SIM Cards and old SIM Cards. For new SIM card owners who do not register, they cannot use the SIM card without activating with registration, while sanctions for old users will gradually get service blocking. The application of SIM Card registration is in accordance with the Regulation of the Minister of Communication and Information No. 14 of 2017 Amendment to the Regulation of the Minister of Communication and Information No. 12 of 2016. Until the enactment of this policy, the Government does not yet have a law that specifically protects personal data that has been submitted by the public and clear rules related to data management. The research results to date there is no protection of the personal data of the population in the SIM Card registration program because the regulations are still not comprehensive and are spread in several laws and regulations.How to cite item: Putri, M. (2018). Perlindungan Hukum Data Pribadi Bagi Pelanggan Jasa Telekomunikasi Terkait Kewajiban Registrasi Kartu SIM. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 9(2), 195-203. doi:https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v9i2.2772 

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 4

 1 

Filter by Year

2018 2018


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 14, No 2 (2023): August 2023 Vol 14, No 1 (2023): April 2023 Vol 13, No 3 (2022): December 2022 Vol 13, No 2 (2022): August 2022 Vol 13, No 1 (2022): April 2022 Vol 12, No 3 (2021): December 2021 Vol 12, No 3 (2021): Desember 2021 Vol 12, No 2 (2021): Agustus 2021 Vol 12, No 2 (2021): August 2021 Vol 12, No 1 (2021): April 2021 Vol 11, No 3 (2020): December 2020 Vol 11, No 3 (2020): Desember 2020 Vol 11, No 2 (2020): August 2020 Vol 11, No 2 (2020): Agustus 2020 Vol 11, No 1 (2020): April 2020 Vol 10, No 2 (2019): Desember 2019 Vol 10, No 2 (2019): December 2019 Vol 10, No 1 (2019): Juni 2019 Vol 10, No 1 (2019): June 2019 Vol 9, No 2 (2018): December 2018 Vol 9, No 2 (2018): Desember 2018 Vol 9, No 1 (2018): Juni 2018 Vol 9, No 1 (2018): June 2018 Vol 8, No 2 (2017): December 2017 Vol 8, No 2 (2017): Desember 2017 Vol 8, No 2 (2017): Desember 2017 Vol 8, No 1 (2017): Juni 2017 Vol 8, No 1 (2017): June 2017 Vol 6, No 1 (2015): June 2015 Vol 5, No 2 (2014): December 2014 Vol 7, No 2 (2016): Desember 2016 Vol 7, No 2 (2016): December 2016 Vol 7, No 1 (2016): June 2016 Vol 7, No 1 (2016): Juni 2016 Vol 6, No 2 (2015): December 2015 Vol 19, No 1 (2014): June 2014 Vol 5, No 2 (2014): Desember 2014 Vol 18, No 2 (2013): Desember 2013 Vol 18, No 2 (2013): December 2013 More Issue