cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik
Published by Universitas Gadjah Mada
ISSN : 14104946     EISSN : 25027883     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik (JSP) is an open access, and peer-reviewed journal. Our main goal is to disseminate current and original articles from researchers and practitioners on various contemporary social and political issues: gender politics and identity, digital society and disruption, civil society movement, community welfare, social development, citizenship and public management, public policy innovation, international politics & security, media, information & literacy, politics, governance & democracy, radicalism and terrorism. JSP is published three times a year.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 6 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 24, No 3 (2021): March" : 6 Documents clear
Gender-Equality Concerns and Political Attitudes toward Women in the 2019 Legislative Election: Evidence from Pelalawan Andhik Beni Saputra; Azhari Setiawan; Citra Puspita Febriani
Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Vol 24, No 3 (2021): March
Publisher : Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jsp.53324

Abstract

The presence of women in Indonesian politics remains underrepresented whereas cultural and societal aspects pose critical influence in determining voter behavior toward female candidates. The aim of this article is to examine voter behavior regarding female candidates and the probability for them to be elected as members of parliament. We apply quantitative method by developing three models representing three combinations of predictor variables, (i) socio-demography, (ii) gender- equality concern, and (iii) political attitude towards female candidates as determinants towards female candidate electability. The study took place in Pelalawan Regency in Riau Province, by analyzing 400 respondents with equal numbers of men and women from various socio-economic backgrounds through clustered random sampling method. We tested these hypotheses and our three models by utilizing logistic regression analysis. The result shows that political attitude toward female candidates (Model 3) are the strongest coefficient and most significant determinant for female candidate electability. The study also revealed that female candidate’s electability in Pelalawan Regency is lower than male candidate’s electability among male respondents. On the other hand, female candidate’s electability is higher than male candidate’s electability among female respondents. Moreover, we also found that education determines female candidate’s electability where the more educated an individual is, the more he/she tends to vote for female candidates.
Ideological Cleavage under Open-list Proportional Representation: Parties’ Position toward the 2019 Indonesian Presidential Threshold Ridho Al-Hamdi
Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Vol 24, No 3 (2021): March
Publisher : Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jsp.53514

Abstract

This article examines the ideological position of Indonesia’s political parties in addressing the 2019 presidential threshold under the open-list proportional representation system. The article aims to determine the political cleavage among Indonesian political parties, whether classified into the ideological spectrum or the organisational degree. From a methodological standpoint, it is qualitative research by employing in-depth interviews and online news collection as a data gathering technique. The study’s finding depicts that the ideological cleavage is no longer relevant under the open-list proportional representation system because political parties eventually have pragmatical orientations rather than ideological onsiderations. It can be proven that the position of nationalist secular parties is not merely in the approval side but also in the denial and dilemma sides. Likewise, the position of nationalist Islamist parties can be found on two sides: denial and dilemma. This finding verifies that Indonesia’s ideological contestation is waning and inactive when political parties cope with power issues. On the contrary, the ideology is revived when it deals with religious and tribal affairs.
Gender Discourses in Positioning Indonesian Female Migrant Workers Wening Udasmoro; Setiadi Setiadi
Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Vol 24, No 3 (2021): March
Publisher : Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jsp.54034

Abstract

Indonesian female migrant workers are a group that has over time experienced physical, psychological, and verbal violence in their jobs in foreign countries. The story presented of the struggles of this subordinated group of women remains one-sided and incomplete. The untold part of the story are the experiences they have encountered domestically from within their own country, Indonesia. This article argues that the subordinated position of Indonesian female migrant workers is initially created and strongly reinforced through the discrimination they face within specific social settings in the Indonesian context. One such social setting is at Indonesian international airports. Indonesian international airports are where the female migrant workers are positioned as “others”; rules put in place and their enforcement by airport officials and other passengers show the exclusion of female migrant workers from Indonesian society. Such positioning is an act of discrimination, exploitation, and exercise of power. This study examines what discourses are used in positioning these Indonesian female migrant workers in Soekarno Hatta International Airport, Jakarta. The authors argue, using research data and gender theories, that the positioning of Indonesian female migrant workers is a discursive act. It is committed by various individuals, particularly those (in the power system) that have the position of “we” and “us”, to preserve the social classes, which have become normalized throughout Indonesian history. The research found that the discrimination against female migrant workers is strongly connected to their social class. Although they have financial capital, their position is considered lower than other people in the airport, which creates multiple forms of discrimination, from material to symbolic discrimination and stereotypes.
Health Citizenship and Healthcare Access in Indonesia, 1945-2020 Arief Priyo Nugroho; Sri Handayani; Diyan Ermawan Effendi
Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Vol 24, No 3 (2021): March
Publisher : Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jsp.54618

Abstract

Health citizenship is understood over how the government provides access to healthcare. This paper aims to describe the development of health citizenship from the post-colonial until the democratization era in Indonesia by analyzing health accessibility. The social-history approach was applied to analyze contemporary study in Indonesian healthcare access from 1945 to 2020. This article analyses the dynamic over political regime changes context and its approach to deal with health accessibility based on acceptability, availability, and affordability issues. This study found that each political regime provides a different social-political context in prioritizing and administrating the accessibility of healthcare. Besides each regime appears issues of accessibility, all of which provoke inequity in healthcare. This paper argues that health citizenship development in Indonesia shows the underlying cause of inequity. Consequently, the minimal presence of public participation raises inequity. Inequity leads to healthcare access that provides pointless improvement. Narratives in health citizenship fulfillment call for public participation space in administering access to healthcare.
Political Polarization and Selective Exposure of Social Media Users in Indonesia Denny Januar Ali; Eriyanto Eriyanto
Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Vol 24, No 3 (2021): March
Publisher : Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jsp.58199

Abstract

This study is intended to answer the question of how political polarization is related to social media users’ posts about Covid-19. The researchers chose health cases related to Covid-19 instead of political issues (e.g. elections) to prove that this political polarization has spread to many areas. The research also wants to see the relationship between this political polarization and selective exposure. Theories applied in this study are polarization, filter bubble, and selective exposure. The study applied two methods: social media network analysis and content analysis. The network analysis included 82,156 posts, while the content analysis was carried out on 4,050 social media accounts. The research outcome proves the occurrence of political polarization. Social media users were divided into two major groups, namely pro-Jokowi and anti-Jokowi. Each group interacted with fellow users who had the same political choices and shared the same message content. Users with certain political choices tend to receive the same information as their political choices, and ignore information from other political parties. Another interesting finding from this study is how this polarization was sharpened by the use of hashtags. Each party (supporters and oppositions of Jokowi) uses hashtags to create solidarity and mobilization from each supporter. Research also proves the validity of the selective exposure and filter bubble hypothesis in the Indonesian context.
Quasi-Alliance at Play: The Curious Case of South Korea’s Aborted Withdrawal from GSOMIA in 2019 Resi Qurrata Aini; Yandry Kurniawan
Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Vol 24, No 3 (2021): March
Publisher : Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jsp.59148

Abstract

This study aims to explain why countries maintain security cooperation with a partner even though they are in the middle of severe tensions. This is experienced by the Republic of Korea (ROK), which preferred to maintain its security cooperation with Japan under the General Security of Military Information Agreement (GSOMIA). This research utilizes the concept of abandonment fears to explain South Korea's behavior in reversing its self-declared withdrawal from GSOMIA in 2019. By conducting a deductive-qualitative research approach, this research shows that South Korea was in a position of abandonment fears—fears of being ignored by Japan—magnified by the uncertainty of US commitment. For now, South Korea considers Japan as the most likely partner choice in the region. Thus, Seoul decided to maintain the partnership with Japan within the GSOMIA framework and compromise its grievances with the latter.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 6

 1 

Filter by Year

2021 2021


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 29, No 2 (2025): November Vol 29, No 1 (2025): July Vol 28, No 3 (2025): March Vol 28, No 2 (2024): November Vol 28, No 1 (2024): July Vol 27, No 3 (2024): March Vol 27, No 2 (2023): November Vol 27, No 1 (2023): July Vol 26, No 3 (2023): March Vol 26, No 2 (2022): November Vol 26, No 1 (2022): July Vol 25, No 3 (2022): March Vol 25, No 2 (2021): November Vol 25, No 1 (2021): July Vol 24, No 3 (2021): March Vol 24, No 2 (2020): November Vol 24, No 1 (2020): July Vol 23, No 3 (2020): March Vol 23, No 2 (2019): November Vol 23, No 1 (2019): July Vol 22, No 3 (2019): March Vol 22, No 2 (2018): November Vol 22, No 1 (2018): July Vol 21, No 3 (2018): March Vol 21, No 2 (2017): November Vol 21, No 1 (2017): July Vol 20, No 3 (2017): March Vol 20, No 2 (2016): November Vol 20, No 1 (2016): Juli Vol 19, No 3 (2016): Maret Vol 19, No 2 (2015): NOVEMBER Vol 19, No 1 (2015): JULI Vol 18, No 3 (2015): Maret Vol 18, No 2 (2014): November Vol 18, No 1 (2014): Juli Vol 17, No 3 (2014): Maret Vol 17, No 2 (2013): NOVEMBER (Korporasi dan Tanggung Jawab Sosial) Vol 17, No 1 (2013): JULI (Menimbang Birokrasi, Partai, dan Politik di Indonesia) Vol 16, No 3 (2013): MARET (Gerakan Sosial (Baru) Pasca “Orde Baru”) Vol 16, No 2 (2012): NOVEMBER (Mengelola Perbatasan Negara) Vol 16, No 1 (2012): JULI (Politik Pengelolaan Lingkungan dan Sumber Daya Alam) Vol 15, No 3 (2012): MARET (Dinamika Politik Desentralisasi) Vol 15, No 2 (2011): NOVEMBER (Dilema Tata Kelola Pemerintahan) Vol 15, No 1 (2011): JULI (Kebijakan Sosial di Aras Lokal) Vol 14, No 3 (2011): MARET (Membingkai Peran Politik Media) Vol 14, No 2 (2010): NOVEMBER (Membedah Radikalisme di Indonesia) Vol 14, No 1 (2010): JULI (Multikulturalisme dan Pergulatan Identitas) Vol 13, No 3 (2010): MARET (Dinamika Penyelenggaraan Kesejahteraan Sosial) Vol 13, No 2 (2009): NOVEMBER (Demokrasi dan Transformasi Institusi Tradisional) Vol 13, No 1 (2009): JULI (Konflik dan Perdamaian) Vol 12, No 3 (2009): MARET (Parpol dan Pemilu) Vol 12, No 2 (2008): NOVEMBER (Media dan Demokrasi) Vol 12, No 1 (2008): JULI (Gerakan Sosial) Vol 11, No 3 (2008): MARET (Komunikasi Bencana) Vol 11, No 2 (2007): NOVEMBER (Dinamika Politik Lingkungan) Vol 11, No 1 (2007): JULI (Demokrasi Mencari Bentuk) Vol 10, No 3 (2007): MARET (Kebijakan Sosial Politik) Vol 10, No 2 (2006): NOVEMBER (Respon terhadap Tantangan Internasional) Vol 10, No 1 (2006): JULI (Pemberdayaan Masyarakat) Vol 9, No 3 (2006): MARET (Tarik Menarik Kepentingan dalam Media Masa) Vol 9, No 2 (2005): NOVEMBER (Potret Ilmu-ilmu Sosial) Vol 9, No 1 (2005): JULI (Demokrasi: Problema dan Manfaatnya) Vol 8, No 3 (2005): MARET (Democratic Governance) Vol 8, No 2 (2004): NOVEMBER (Tinjauan Kritis Globalisasi) Vol 8, No 1 (2004): JULI (Representasi dan Keberpihakan dalam Media) Vol 7, No 3 (2004): MARET (Peran dan Konstruksi Sosial tentang Perempuan) Vol 7, No 2 (2003): NOVEMBER (Globalisasi dan Kemiskinan) Vol 7, No 1 (2003): JULI (Neolibralisme: Refleksi Kritis) Vol 6, No 3 (2003): MARET (Dinamika Negara dan Masyarakat Sipil) Vol 6, No 2 (2002): NOVEMBER (Perkembangan dan Potret Ilmu Sosial) Vol 6, No 1 (2002): JULI (Kebijakan Publik: Perspektif Alternatif) Vol 5, No 3 (2002): MARET (Kebijakan dan Manajemen Publik) Vol 5, No 2 (2001): NOVEMBER (Otonomi Lokal dan Keindonesiaan) Vol 5, No 1 (2001): JULI (Khasanah Gerakan Sosial) Vol 4, No 3 (2001): MARET (Refleksi Nasionalisme Indonesia) Vol 4, No 2 (2000): NOVEMBER (Menggugat Kajian Media dan Kebebasan Pers) Vol 4, No 1 (2000): JULI (Reformasi Kelembagaan Politik) Vol 3, No 3 (2000): MARET (Kekerasan, Keberdayaan, dan Demokrasi) Vol 3, No 2 (1999): NOVEMBER Vol 3, No 1 (1999): JULI Vol 2, No 3 (1999): MARET Vol 2, No 2 (1998): NOVEMBER Vol 2, No 1 (1998): JULI Vol 1, No 3 (1998): MARET Vol 1, No 2 (1997): NOVEMBER Vol 1, No 1 (1997): JULI More Issue