Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.288
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Journal of Islamic World and Politics Andalas Journal of International Studies Sospol : Jurnal Sosial Politik PERSPEKTIF Jurnal Diplomasi Pertahanan Jurnal Politica Dinamika Masalah Politik Dalam Negeri dan Hubungan Internasional Jurnal Komunikasi Indonesia Masyarakat: Jurnal Sosiologi The Indonesian Journal of Computer Science
Kurniawan, Yandry
Departemen Ilmu Hubungan Internasional, Universitas Indonesia
Religion Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 12 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Peran Kepemimpinan Indonesia dalam Pengelolaan Sengketa Laut Cina Selatan Haffsari, Peggy Puspa; Kurniawan, Yandry
Sospol : Jurnal Sosial Politik Vol 4, No 1 (2018): Januari-Juni
Publisher : Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (373.259 KB) | DOI: 10.22219/sospol.v4i1.5327

Abstract

AbstrakPenelitian ini akan membahas peran kepemimpinan Indonesia dalam upaya pengelolaan sengketa Laut Cina Selatan (LCS). Tujuan penelitian ini adalah memahami peran negara dalam kawasan dan pengaruhnya pada dinamika keamanan di tingkat regional secara komprehensif. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian kualitatif dengan model deduktif. Kerangka analisis menggunakan konsep kepemimpinan dalam pendekatan kekuatan regional dan kerangka keamanan (Regional Powers and Security Freamwork-RPSF). Terdapat lima komponen yang menjelaskan perilaku pemimpin regional antara lain keterlibatan dalam proses inisiasi (prosess-initiation), keterlibatan dalam pembingkaian isu (issue framing), pertimbangan kepentingan (interest consideration), membangun institusi (institutional development) dan penyebaran kekuatan (deployment of power). Hasil penelitian secara umum mendapatkan bahwa peran Indonesia dalam upaya pengelolaan sengketa LCS cukup aktif namun berdampak terbatas. Peran Indonesia dikatakan aktif terlihat dari telah banyak kerja sama dan diplomasi yang dilakukan Indonesia selama dua puluh enam tahun. Peran Indonesia berdampak terbatas karena ditemukan kendala pada tiap praktek peran kepemimpinan Indonesia dalam mendorong dan mendukung terciptanya solusi internal penyelesaian sengketa LCS dari pihak-pihak yang bersengketa.Kata Kunci:  Kawasan, Keamanan, LCS, Peran, Sengketa AbstractThis research discusses the role of Indonesian leadership in the effort of managing the South China Sea (LCS) disputes. The purpose of this study is to understand the role of the state in the region and its influence on the dynamics of regional security. This study is a qualitative reseacrh with the deductive model. the analytical framework uses the concept of leadership in regional and security approaches (Regional Powers and Security Framework-RPSF). There are five components that explain the role of initiation, initiation proceedings, discussions in framing issues, considerations of interests, institutional development, and power dissemination.  This research finds out that Indonesian role in LCS dispute is quite active but limited impact. The active role of the Indonesian leadership wants to create and maintain an environment that is fulfilled the absence of open conflict in the LCS. The role of Indonesia has limited impact because it finds obstacles in every practice of Indonesia's leadership role in encouraging and supporting the creation of internal dispute solution of LCS from the parties.Key words: Dispute, Regional, Role, Security, South China Sea
Mispersepsi Dalam Sengketa Laut Tiongkok Selatan dan Peluang Diplomasi Pertahanan Indonesia Swastanto, Yoedhi; Pedrason, Rodon; Kurniawan, Yandry; Arif, Muhammad
Jurnal Diplomasi Pertahanan Vol 3, No 3 (2017): Jurnal Prodi Diplomasi Pertahanan
Publisher : Universitas Perrtahanan Indonesia (UNHAN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstrak--Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memahami persepsi dan mispersepsi antarnegara pengaku kedaulatan di Laut Tiongkok Selatan, serta melihat peluang diplomasi pertahanan Indonesia. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif, penelitian ini memiliki dua bagian analisis utama. Bagian pertama berisikan analisis mengenai persepsi dan mispersepsi negara-negara yang memiliki klaim kedaulatan di wilayah maritime yang berpotensi bereskalasi menjadi konflik kekerasan. Untuk bagian pertama ini peneliti akan menggunakan pendekatan persepsi dan mispersepsi dalam politik internasional. Bagian kedua berisikan analisis mengenai peluang diplomasi pertahanan Indonesia untuk meredam mispersepsi antarnegara dan meningkatkan sikap saling percaya untuk mencegah eskalasi konflik di wilayah maritim ini. Untuk bagian kedua ini peneliti akan menggunakan pendekatan diplomasi pertahanan. Secara akademik dan empirik, Penelitian            ini akan berkontribusi  memberikan  alternative pemahaman dan masukan kebijakan terkait sengketa di Laut Tiongkok Selatan melalui analisis yang memiliki sandaran teoritik yang jelas (theory-informed analysis).Kata Kunci: Laut Tiongkok Selatan, persepsi, mispersepsi, diplomasi pertahanan Abstract--This study aims to understand the perception and misperception of the claimant states in the South China Sea disputes and examine the opportunities for Indonesia's defense diplomacy. Using qualitative method, this study proceeds with two main parts. The first part analyzes the prospect of conflict escalation caused by the perception and misperception among the claimant states in the South China Sea disputes. The authors employ perception and misperception approach in International Relations in the analysis. The second part of the study examines the opportunities for Indonesia's defense diplomacy in reducing the misperception, mitigating the confict escalation as well as increasing mutual trust and confidence among the conflicting parties. In this second part, the authors make use of "defense diplomacy" as the conceptual tool. This study is academically and empirically significant as it contributes by giving alternative understanding on the South China Sea disputes as well as research-based and theory-informed policy recommendation.Keywords: South China Sea, perception and misperception, defense diplomacy
Quasi-Alliance at Play: The Curious Case of South Korea’s Aborted Withdrawal from GSOMIA in 2019 Resi Qurrata Aini; Yandry Kurniawan
Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Vol 24, No 3 (2021): March
Publisher : Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jsp.59148

Abstract

This study aims to explain why countries maintain security cooperation with a partner even though they are in the middle of severe tensions. This is experienced by the Republic of Korea (ROK), which preferred to maintain its security cooperation with Japan under the General Security of Military Information Agreement (GSOMIA). This research utilizes the concept of abandonment fears to explain South Korea's behavior in reversing its self-declared withdrawal from GSOMIA in 2019. By conducting a deductive-qualitative research approach, this research shows that South Korea was in a position of abandonment fears—fears of being ignored by Japan—magnified by the uncertainty of US commitment. For now, South Korea considers Japan as the most likely partner choice in the region. Thus, Seoul decided to maintain the partnership with Japan within the GSOMIA framework and compromise its grievances with the latter.
One Belt One Road (Obor): Agenda Keamanan Liberal Tiongkok? Yandry Kurniawan
Jurnal Politica Vol 7, No 2 (2016): Jurnal Politica
Publisher : Sekretariat Jenderal DPR RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22212/jp.v7i2.1135

Abstract

Diplomasi Maritim dalam Keberhasilan Patroli Terkoordinasi Indonesia-Malaysia-Singapura Di Selat Malaka Lintang Suproboningrum; Yandry Kurniawan
Jurnal Politica Vol 8, No 2 (2017): Jurnal Politica
Publisher : Sekretariat Jenderal DPR RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22212/jp.v8i2.1141

Abstract

Gus Dur and the Deliverance of Meutya Hafid and Budiyanto in 2005: the Role of Legitimacy Issues in Negotiating with Armed Group Husni Mubarok; Yandry Kurniawan
Journal of Islamic World and Politics Vol 6, No 1 (2022): June
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (362.95 KB) | DOI: 10.18196/jiwp.v6i1.12787

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the role of an individual actor in hostage negotiation using legitimacy issues and a deductive-qualitative research approach. These research methods are closely related to the interpretation of quality or narrative, which cannot be described with numbers or values. A deductive approach was taken to conclude the research data that the authors found through the data findings. In this case, a negotiator (mediator) for releasing a hostage is a communicator, and a capable communicator will send the message effectively and efficiently. A negotiator is also an analyst who must read the hostage situation and conditions, especially knowing the characteristics of the hostage-takers. Specifically, legitimacy is one of the factors that a hostage release negotiator must own. Communication skills can support this factor. To achieve this, a negotiator ultimately should have the skills of interpersonal communication and intercultural communication. Gus Dur’s legitimacy factor played an essential role in the diplomacy and negotiation process, especially in this hostage case. Therefore, this study explores why an individual actor successfully overcame this hostage crisis. The role of the former Indonesian President, K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid (Gus Dur), as a concrete example of the success of an individual actor in hostage negotiation, was determined by his legitimacy.
Difusi Norma Kerja Sama Keamanan ASEAN Melawan Perdagangan Manusia Rahmadanu Pradityo; Mabda Haerunnisa Fajrilla Sidiq; Yandry Kurniawan
Andalas Journal of International Studies (AJIS) Vol 10, No 2 (2021): Andalas Journal of International Studies, Vol 10 No 2 November 2021
Publisher : Department of International Relations, Universitas Andalas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/ajis.10.2.151-170.2021

Abstract

The United Nations (UN) ratified the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (UNCTOC) in 2000 as the norm for international security cooperation in addressing transnational crimes that threaten the global security. Transnational crimes include human trafficking that involves a wide range of criminal organizations and networks. Therefore, ASEAN also refers to UNCTOC and the Trafficking in Person (TIP) Protocol in overcoming transnational crimes, especially the fight against human trafficking. This paper proposes questions ASEAN's attitude to not adopt all UNCTOC norms and Trafficking in Person Protocol in the ASEAN Convention on Trafficking in Person, Especially Women and Children (ACTIP). This paper uses qualitative research methods and norm diffusion theory as the analytical framework. This study found that ASEAN did not fully adopt external norms because there were parts that were not in accordance with ASEAN's internal norms, so that ASEAN made adjustments between external norms and ASEAN internal norms in the formation of ACTIP which referred to ASEAN's cognitive priors, so that ACTIP became the security cooperation norms with human rights element.
The Challenges of UN Peacekeeping Mission in Finding a Solution to Rebel Groups in the East of the Democratic Republic of Congo [Tantangan Misi Penjaga Perdamaian PBB dalam Menemukan Solusi Terhadap Kelompok Pemberontak di Timur Republik Demokratik Kongo] Landry Ingabire; Yandry Kurniawan
Jurnal Politica Vol 13, No 1 (2022): Jurnal Politica Mei 2022
Publisher : Sekretariat Jenderal DPR RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22212/jp.v13i1.2921

Abstract

The Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) is a country with the longest rebel conflict of the 21st century. This article analyzes the causes of the UN’s difficulties in finding a solution to the crisis of rebel groups which threaten security in the DRC, particularly in its eastern part. Most of the existing work on the subject under study state that the failure of peacekeeping missions in the DRC are due to various factors such as mandate, strength, complexity of violence, etc. However, existing studies have not analyzed the work of MONUSCO as a regime and why this regime is not effective. In approaching the theory of the international regime, this article uses the internal and external factors of the regime to analyze the causes of this ineffective peacekeeping mission in the DRC. Research applies qualitative research methods with data from primary and secondary data obtained from official MONUSCO documents, books, journals, and online news. This article shows that the rebel crisis in the DRC is due to various internal problems and that the MONUSCO principles and rules are ineffective in eradicating the rebel groups which cause insecurity hence deterring peace in the DRC.AbstrakRepublik Demokratik Kongo (DRC) adalah negara dengan konflik pemberontakan terpanjang pada abad ke-21. Artikel ini menganalisis penyebab kesulitan PBB dalam mencari solusi atas krisis kelompok pemberontak yang mengancam keamanan di DRC, khususnya yang terjadi di wilayah bagian timurnya. Sebagian besar tulisan yang sudah ada mengenai subjek yang diteliti menyatakan bahwa kegagalan misi penjaga perdamaian di DRC disebabkan oleh berbagai faktor seperti mandat, kekuatan, kompleksitas kekerasan, dll. Namun, penelitian terdahulu belum pernah menganalisis MONUSCO sebagai rezim dan mengapa rezim ini tidak efektif. Dengan pendekatan teori rezim internasional, artikel ini menggunakan faktor internal dan eksternal rezim untuk menganalisis penyebab tidak efektifnya misi pemeliharaan perdamaian di DRC. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif dengan data primer dan data sekunder yang diperoleh dari dokumen resmi MONUSCO, buku, jurnal, dan berita online. Artikel ini menunjukkan bahwa krisis pemberontak di DRC disebabkan oleh berbagai masalah internal dan bahwa prinsip dan aturan MONUSCO tidak efektif dalam memberantas kelompok pemberontak yang menyebabkan ketidakamanan sehingga menghalangi perdamaian di DRC.
Donald Trump’s Securitizing Speech Acts and theUnited States Maximum-Pressure Strategy towardsNorth Korea in 2017 Rubini, Nida; Kurniawan, Yandry
Jurnal Komunikasi Indonesia Vol. 10, No. 2
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Intersubjective process of international communication may shape security issue which requires extraordinary policy. This article aimed to analyze how speech acts of a country leader securitize an issue and result in an extraordinary or distinct foreign policy. Donald Trump, the 45th President of the United States of America, demonstrated his blunt talkativeness through social media and formal speech acts, including on the North Korean nuclear issue during his presidency term. Despite of the regular focus placement of North Korea’s nuclear in the United States’ foreign policy since the 1990s, Trump leaves the issue during his campaign. Nevertheless, in 2017, the first year of his term, he shifted to expressing his enmity in line with the enactment of the maximum pressure strategy, which was the heaviest sanctions ever enacted on North Korea. This study applied the securitization theory by analyzing three assumptions that support Trump’s political communication style: the centrality of the audience, co-dependency of agency and context, and dispositive and structuring forces of practices. Using the qualitative-deductive method, this article found that Trump’s speech acts in 2017 securitized the North Korean nuclear threat as an unprecedented threat requiring an extraordinary policy of maximum pressure strategy. Proses intersubyektif dari komunikasi politik di level internasional dapat membentuk suatu isu keamanan yang membutuhkan suatu kebijakan khusus. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk melakukan analisis bagaimana–tindak tutur (speech act) pemimpin suatu negara dalam melakukan sekuritisasi terhadap isu tertentu untuk menetapkan kebijakan luar negeri yang berada di luar kelaziman. Donald Trump, Presiden Amerika Serikat ke-45, seringkali melakukan komunikasi internasional secara blak-blakan melalui media sosial maupun pernyataan formal, termasuk mengenai isu nuklir Korea Utara. Meskipun isu nuklir Korea Utara sudah menjadi salah satu fokus kebijakan luar negeri Amerika Serikat sejak 1990-an, Trump tidak menjadikan isu ini sebagai salah satu fokus selama kampanyenya. Meskipun demikian, setelah menjabat pada tahun 2017, ia mulai menunjukkan permusuhan dengan Korea Utara melalui pemberlakuan strategi maximum pressure, yang merupakan sanksi terberat yang pernah diberlakukan kepada Korea Utara. Studi ini menggunakan teori sekuritisasi dengan menganalisis tiga asumsi yang mendukung tindak tutur Trump: sentralitas audiens, saling-ketergantungan antara agen dan konteks, serta dispositif dan kekuatan struktur praktik. Dengan menggunakan metode kualitatif-deduktif, studi ini menemukan bahwa tindak tutur Trump pada tahun 2017 berhasil mengangkat ancaman nuklir Korea Utara ke level yang belum pernah terjadi sebelumnya dan membutuhkan kebijakan baru di luar kelaziman selama ini, yaitu strategi maximum pressure.
Ontological Security, Identity, and Movement of the People: Barack Obama’s Syrian Refugee Policy Chairunnisa, Farina; Kurniawan, Yandry
Masyarakat: Jurnal Sosiologi Vol. 24, No. 1
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This article examines the United States’ decision to admit 10,000 Syrian refugees in the fiscal year of 2016 amidst potential national security concerns brought by the incoming refugees. In past studies, United States’ policies of refugee admission mainly focused on the security and political interests, while this particular admission decision reflected a different interest consideration, namely the ideational aspect of the United States as a nation of immigrants. Through discourse analysis on the speeches and remarks made by government actors of the United States, this research offers an alternative perspective on understanding how the United States came to a decision that may not reflect traditional security interests, but reflects its ontological security needs or its security of being. Using the framework of analysis offered by Brent J. Steele, this research finds that the United States’ awareness of its capabilities, along with past memory as a nation of immigrants and urgings from fellow international actors, affects the United States in reaching the decision to admit Syrian refugees.
Co-Authors Arifandy, Mohamad Chairunnisa, Farina Farina Chairunnisa Husni Mubarok Kurnianingsih, Alfi Landry Ingabire Lintang Suproboningrum Mabda Haerunnisa Fajrilla Sidiq Muhammad Arif Pedrason, Rodon Peggy Puspa Haffsari Putri, Erika Husna Nabila Rahmadanu Pradityo Resi Qurrata Aini Rubini, Nida Septiasari, Rycka Swastanto, Yoedhi