cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Ari Purwadi
Contact Email
aripurwadi.fhuwks@gmail.com
Phone
+6281938020282
Journal Mail Official
perspektif_hukum@yahoo.com
Editorial Address
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya Dukuh Kupang XXV/54, Surabaya, 60225
Location
Kota surabaya,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Perspektif : Kajian Masalah Hukum dan Pembangunan
Published by Universitas Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya
ISSN : 14103648     EISSN : 24067385     DOI : https://doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v28i2
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
PERSPEKTIF is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes scientific articles in the field of law. The published articles are the results of original scientific research and review of legal interactions. PERSPEKTIF is published by the Institute for Research and Community Services (LPPM) of University of Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya. PERSPEKTIF accepts any manuscripts or articles in the field of law or legal studies from both national and international academicians and researchers. The articles published in PERSPEKTIF is published three times a year (in January, May, and September). Submitted article should follow the writing guidelines.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 7 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 25, No 2 (2020): Edisi Mei" : 7 Documents clear
KARAKTERISTIK PERSETUJUAN DEWAN KOMISARIS TERHADAP KEWENANGAN DIREKSI MENJAMINKAN ASET PERUSAHAAN Ryamirzad Ryamirzad; Galang Fauzan Prawinda
Perspektif Vol 25, No 2 (2020): Edisi Mei
Publisher : Institute for Research and Community Services (LPPM) of Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30742/perspektif.v25i2.765

Abstract

Menjaminkan aset perusahaan adalah kewenangan direksi, namun kewenangan tersebut memiliki karakteristik tersendiri di dalam anggaran dasar sebuah perusahaan. Notaris yang memiliki kewenangan membuat akta jaminan tentunya akan menerapkan prinsip kehati-hatian dalam membuat produk hukumnya. Salah satu prinsip kehati-hatian yang digunakan oleh Notaris sebelum membuat akta jaminan bagi perusahaan ialah meminta bukti persetujuan dewan komisaris dalam wujud akta autentik walaupun sebenarnya bentuk persetujuan tersebut dapat dibuat dalam bentuk persetujuan di bawah tangan. Mengingat aset perusahaan memiliki peran yang penting bagi suatu perusahaan, tentunya akan ada batasan-batasan tersendiri yang wajib diatur oleh seorang komisaris manakala seorang direksi akan menjaminkan aset suatu perusahaan. Batasan-batasan tersebut adalah batasan nilai aset yang tentunya adalah aset-aset perusahaan yang bernilai tinggi. Tentunya bentuk persetujuannya dibuat dengan memperhatikan aturan yang berlaku agar memberikan kepastian dan perlindungan hukum. Oleh karenanya dalam penelitian ini akan dicari karakteristik bentuk persetujuan komisaris kepada direksi ketika menjaminkan aset perusahaan sebagai rumusan permasalahannya. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian normatif. Hasil yang didapatkan dari penelitian ini adalah bentuk persetujuan komisaris kepada direksi dengan akta otentik akan lebih dapat memberikan keamanan dalam kegiatan berbisnis.Guaranteeing company assets is the authority of the board of directors, but this authority has its own characteristics in the articles of association of a company. Notaries who have the authority to make guarantee deeds will certainly apply the principle of prudence in making their legal products. One of the precautionary principles used by a notary before making a deed of guarantee for a company is to ask for proof of approval from the board of commissioners in the form of an authentic deed even though in fact the form of agreement can be made in the form of an underhand agreement. Given that a company has an important role for a company, of course there will be its own limitations that must be regulated by a commissioner when a director will pledge the assets of a company. These limits are limits on the value of assets which of course are high value company assets. Of course, the form of approval is made by taking into account the applicable rules in order to provide legal certainty and protection. Therefore, this research will look for the characteristics of the form of approval from the commissioners to the directors when pledging the company’s assets as a formulation of the problem. This research is a normative research. The results obtained from this study are the form of commissioner approval to directors with an authentic deed will provide more security in doing business.
PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM CRIMINAL ACTION IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF A CHILD-FRIENDLY-CITY Septiana Prameswari
Perspektif Vol 25, No 2 (2020): Edisi Mei
Publisher : Institute for Research and Community Services (LPPM) of Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30742/perspektif.v25i2.764

Abstract

Since Indonesia ratified the Convention on the Rights of the Child in the form of the Child Protection Act, the government has now started to pay attention to child issues. Children are in a period of growth, development, and achievement, in which children very easily absorb everything that happens to them, whether good or bad. Sadly, recently, many children have experienced criminal acts that have caused injuries to the children, not only physical injuries but also psychological/mental injuries. The problem of child protection is not only referring to children who are victims of criminal acts that receive legal protection, but also children of witnesses and children of criminal offenders who have the same legal protection needs. Various Problems of violence against children that occur and even polemics in households that consider violence against children is a natural way of educating children has become piecework for the government to protect children from other violent crimes. Currently, the government is trying to build a suitable city structure for children to live in. The regional government’s role, all law enforces, and the community is to manifest legal protection for children in a Child-Friendly-City structure.
UTILIZATION OF DEBT COLLECTOR SERVICES IN DEBT SECURED WITH FIDUSIA IN PANDEMIC PERIOD AFTER THE VERDICT OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT NO. 18/PUU-XVII/2019 Fani Martiawan Kumara Putra
Perspektif Vol 25, No 2 (2020): Edisi Mei
Publisher : Institute for Research and Community Services (LPPM) of Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30742/perspektif.v25i2.760

Abstract

Fiduciary guarantee institutions are guarantee institutions that are in great demand in Indonesia, in fact it is very possible that Fiduciary is currently the most widely used guarantee institution besides three other security institutions in Indonesia, namely Gadai, Hipotek and Hak Tanggungan. Determination when the default debtor, has its own rules, can not be interpreted arbitrarily, then in a pandemic like this, determining the default debtor certainly also needs to consider the economic conditions of many parties that decline, then it means, whether the use of debt collectors is still a matter that is worthy of attention to these two aspects. This is a normative legal research. The result of this research is that the Constitutional Court’s ruling drew many interpretations, one form of which was that the Fiduciary guarantee was no longer familiar with parate executies, and sales were underhanded, but had to go through the court. Even though the decree also emphasized default. This decision must be interpreted in full, not only related not to execute it, but also to understand about the default. Thus, will be clear what the purpose of the ruling of the constitutional court. This will also be useful for law enforcement on the civil debt relationship during this pandemic. Leasing as an institution that provides credit to the public, still requires classification rules for customers who can apply for credit. So that cases of customers who are negligent in debt payments and have problems with debt collectors do not occur.
TINJAUAN NORMA HUKUM JUSTICE COLLABORATOR DAN WHISTLEBLOWER PADA TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI Esti Kanti Pertiwi; Noor Rahmad
Perspektif Vol 25, No 2 (2020): Edisi Mei
Publisher : Institute for Research and Community Services (LPPM) of Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30742/perspektif.v25i2.768

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui formulasi norma hukum pada justice collaborator dan whistleblower dalam tindak pidana korupsi dan pelaksanaannya. Hukum pidana memberikan peluang bagi pelaku tindak pidana agar menjadi justice collaborator dan mau bekerja sama dengan penegak hukum, dimana bentuk apresiasinya adalah mereka bisa dipertimbangkan untuk diberikan perlindungan dan keringanan hukuman. Istilah justice collaborator sering disalahartikan dengan whistleblower. Norma tentang whistleblower dan justice collaborator sudah diatur dalam peraturan bersama, SEMA dan UU No. 31 Tahun 2014, pada pelaksanaannya masih ada kelemahan-kelemahan yang disebabkan berbeda-beda penafsiran dari peraturan yang ada oleh penegak hukum. Penelitian ini menggunakan penleitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan undang-undang. Hasil penelitian ini mengungkapkan bahwa peraturan yang ada masih memiliki kelemahan dalam mengatur justice collaborator dan whistleblower. Justice collaborator dan whistleblower berperan penting dalam memberikan informasi untuk mengungkap suatu tindak pidana korupsi. Peran penting dari justice collaborator dan whistleblower menimbulkan ancaman, sehingga perlu diberikan perlindungan dari penegak hukum dan diberikan penghargaan, seperti pengurangan hukuman bagi justice collaborator.The study aims to determine the formulation of legal norms on justice collaborator and whistleblower in corruption and their implementation. ]Criminal law provides an opportunity for criminal offenders to become justice collaborators and want to cooperate with law enforcement, where the form of appreciation is that they can be considered for protection and relief from punishment. The term justice collaborator is often confused with whistleblowers. the norms regarding whistleblowers and justice collaborators are already regulated in a joint regulation, SEMA and Law No. 31/2014, in its implementation there are still weaknesses caused by different interpretations of existing regulations by law enforcement. This research uses normative legal research with a statute approach.. The results of this study reveal that the existing regulations still have weaknesses in regulating justice collaborators and whistleblowers. Justice collaborator and whistleblower play an important role in providing information to uncover a corruption. the important role of justice collaborator and whistleblower creates threats, so it needs to be given protection from law enforcers and given respect, such as reducing penalties for justice collaborators.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI KONSUMEN KLINIK KECANTIKAN ATAS PENGGUNAAN KOSMETIK RACIKAN DOKTER Difa Wardatul Izza; Salma Zavira
Perspektif Vol 25, No 2 (2020): Edisi Mei
Publisher : Institute for Research and Community Services (LPPM) of Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30742/perspektif.v25i2.778

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui mengenai peraturan meracik kosmetik dalam hukum Indonesia. Hal ini berkaitan dengan penggunaan kosmetik yang sudah menjadi bagian dan tidak dapat dipisahkan dari kehidupan manusia. Kosmetik digunakan sebagai produk perawatan untuk menjaga kesehatan dan mempercantik diri, perkembangan kosmetik pun terbilang sangat cepat. Hal ini terbukti dengan munculnya berbagai macam jenis kosmetik, mulai dari kosmetik tradisional yang menggunakan bahan alami hingga kosmetik modern yang dibuat dengan teknologi canggih masa kini. Dengan pilihan yang beragam tersebut, membuat konsumen kosmetik lebih memilih produk kosmetik yang diracik oleh dokter pada klinik kecantikan dengan dasar rasa nyaman dan aman dalam penggunaannya. Namun dalam perkembangannya, kewenangan seorang dokter dipertanyakan dalam meracik kosmetik. Apabila kosmetik racikan dokter tersebut menimbulkan kerugian bagi konsumen, hal apa yang dapat dilakukan oleh konsumen. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian Normatif. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah bahwa dokter tidak memiliki kewenangan untuk meracik kosmetik. Proses peracikan kosmetik hanya boleh dilakukan oleh tenaga kefarmasian yang terdiri dari Apoteker dan Tenaga Teknis Kefarmasian. Sehingga apabila konsumen merasa dirugikan, dapat mengajukan gugatan dengan dalil perbuatan melawan hukum, yang berdasar pada Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen.This study aims to determine the regulations for formulating cosmetics in Indonesian law. This is related to the use of cosmetics which have become a part and cannot be separated from human life. Cosmetics are used as care products to maintain health and beautify themselves, the development of cosmetics is also very fast. This is evidenced by the emergence of various types of cosmetics, ranging from traditional cosmetics that use natural ingredients to modern cosmetics made with today’s sophisticated technology. With a variety of options, making cosmetic consumers prefer cosmetic products are formulated by doctors at a beauty clinic on the basis of convenience and security. However, in its development, the authority of a doctor has been questioned in preparing cosmetics. If the doctor’s formulations of cosmetics causes harm to consumers, what can consumers do to defend their rights. This is a Normative research. The result of this study is that doctors do not have the authority to formulate cosmetics. The process of formulating cosmetics can only be carried out by a pharmaceutical staff consisting of a pharmacist and pharmaceutical technical personnel. So that if consumers feel aggrieved, they can file a lawsuit on the basis of an illegal act, which is based on the Consumer Protection Law.
MENYOAL URGENSI DAN PROSEDUR PEMBENTUKAN REVISI UNDANG-UNDANG KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI Madaskolay Viktoris Dahoklory; Muh Isra Bil Ali
Perspektif Vol 25, No 2 (2020): Edisi Mei
Publisher : Institute for Research and Community Services (LPPM) of Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30742/perspektif.v25i2.766

Abstract

Revisi Undang-Undang Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi yang selanjutnya disingkat revisi UU KPK yang menjadi usul inisiatif DPR, menimbulkan pro kontra di tengah masyarakat, sebab sebagain besar masyarakat menganggap undang-undang KPK saat ini tidak perlu direvisi, ada pula yang mengatakan bahwa proses pembentukan revisi undang-undang KPK ini tidak ditempuh melalui prosedur dan tahapan-tahapan sebagaimana telah diatur dalam undang-undang. Penelitian ini akan membahas permasalahan mengenai urgensi dilakukannya revisi undang-undang KPK, dan prosedur pembentukan UU yang baik dan benar, serta penerapannya dalam pembentukan revisi undang-undang KPK. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan perundang-undangan dalam menganalisis permasalahan yang menjadi fokus penelitian. Hasil Penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa urgensi dilakukannya revisi UU KPK adalah karena UU No. 30 Tahun 2002 sudah tidak sesuai dengan perkembangan zaman dinamika hukum serta sistem ketatanegaraan Republik Indonesia, dan Proses revisi UU KPK ternyata tidak melalui prosedur-prosedur sebagaimana telah diatur dalam “Undang-Undang No. 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan” sehingga mengakibatkan kecacatan dari segi prosedur pembentukan peraturan perundang-undangan yang baik dan benar.Revision of the Corruption Eradication Commission Law, hereinafter abbreviated as revision of the KPK Law which became a proposal of the DPR’s initiative, raises pros and cons in the community, because most of the community considers the old KPK law does not need to be revised, there are also those who say that the process of forming the revision of the law This KPK law was not pursued through procedures and stages as regulated in the Act. This research will discuss issues regarding the urgency of revising the KPK law, and the procedure for establishing a good and correct law, and its application in forming the revision of the KPK law. The method used in this study is a normative juridical method by using legislation in analyzing the problems that are the focus of research. The results of the study concluded that the urgency of the KPK Law revision was due to Law No. 30 of 2002, is not in accordance with the development of the era of legal dynamics and the constitutional system of the Republic of Indonesia, and the revision process of the KPK Law apparently did not go through the procedures as regulated in “Law No. 12 of 2011 concerning Formation of Laws and Regulations” resulting in disability in terms of procedures for the formation of legislation that is good and right.
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN HUKUM PEJABAT PEMBUAT KOMITMEN (PPK) DALAM PENGADAAN BARANG/JASA PEMERINTAH Naony Fenti Istiqlallia; Raissa Ardelia; Pramudya Ramadhanti
Perspektif Vol 25, No 2 (2020): Edisi Mei
Publisher : Institute for Research and Community Services (LPPM) of Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30742/perspektif.v25i2.722

Abstract

Ketidakjelasan hukum Pejabat Pembuat Komitmen (PPK) terkait pertanggungjawaban hukum atas penyimpangan dalam pengadaan barang/jasa pemerintah, yang menimbulkan ketidakadilan hukum berdasarkan Peraturan Pemerintah tentang Pengadaan Barang/Jasa, terlihat bahwa dalam proses pengadaan barang/jasa, tidak hanya melibatkan PPK saja namun juga ada pihak lain yang berperan dalam pengadaan barang/jasa yang saling berkaitan yaitu PA dan KPA. Jurnal ini akan membahas mengenai kedudukan KPA dalam kontrak pengadaan barang/jasa; tanggung jawab pribadi PPK; batas tanggung jawab PPK. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian normatif. Hasil dari penelitian ini kedudukan PPK dalam kontrak pengadaan barang/jasa pemerintah dimulai dari menetapkan rancangan kontrak, mengendalikan Kontrak dan penyelesaian Kontrak. Sehingga PPK turut bertanggungjawab terhadap tuntutan jika terjadi kesalahan. Tanggung jawab pribadi PPK dalam pengadaan barang/jasa pemerintah adalah tanggung jawab pribadi yang timbul atas tindakan maladministrasi PPK dalam penggunaan wewenang sebagai pejabat pelaksana dan tindakan maladministrasi tersebut melahirkan tanggung jawab pidana. Sedangkan tanggung jawab jabatan PPK dalam pengadaan barang/jasa pemerintah adalah tanggung jawab keabsahan (legalitas) penggunaan wewenang dalam pengadaan oleh PPK yang bertumpu pada wewenang, prosedur dan substansi, dan melahirkan tanggung gugat pemerintah/negara.Legal ambiguity of Commitment Making Officials (PPK) related to legal responsibility for irregularities in the procurement of government goods/services, which causes legal injustice based on Government Regulations on the Procurement of Goods/Services, it is seen that in the process of procuring goods/services, it does not only involve PPK but also exists other parties that play a role in the procurement of goods/services that are interrelated, namely PA and KPA. This journal will discuss the position of KPA in the goods/services procurement contract; PPK personal responsibility; KDP’s limit of responsibility. This research is a normative study. The results of this research are the position of PPK in government procurement contracts of goods/services starting from determining the contract design, controlling the contract and contract completion. So that the PPK is also responsible for the charges if something goes wrong. PPK’s personal responsibility in the procurement of government goods/services is personal responsibility that arises from the PPK’s maladministration in the use of authority as an executing officer and the maladministration act creates criminal responsibility. Meanwhile, the responsibility of the PPK position in the procurement of government goods/services is the responsibility of legality (legality) of the use of authority in procurement by PPK which rests on the authority, procedure and substance, and creates accountability for the government/state.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 7

 1 

Filter by Year

2020 2020


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 29 No. 2 (2024): Edisi Mei Vol. 29 No. 1 (2024): Edisi Januari Vol. 28 No. 3 (2023): Edisi September Vol. 28 No. 2 (2023): Edisi Mei Vol. 28 No. 1 (2023): Edisi Januari Vol. 27 No. 3 (2022): Edisi September Vol 27, No 2 (2022): Edisi Mei Vol. 27 No. 2 (2022): Edisi Mei Vol. 27 No. 1 (2022): Edisi Januari Vol 27, No 1 (2022): Edisi Januari Vol 26, No 3 (2021): Edisi September Vol. 26 No. 3 (2021): Edisi September Vol 26, No 2 (2021): Edisi Mei Vol 26, No 1 (2021): Edisi Januari Vol 25, No 3 (2020): Edisi September Vol 25, No 2 (2020): Edisi Mei Vol 25, No 1 (2020): Edisi Januari Vol. 24 No. 3 (2019): Edisi September Vol 24, No 3 (2019): Edisi September Vol 24, No 2 (2019): Edisi Mei Vol. 24 No. 2 (2019): Edisi Mei Vol 24, No 1 (2019): Edisi Januari Vol. 24 No. 1 (2019): Edisi Januari Vol 23, No 3 (2018): Edisi September Vol 23, No 2 (2018): Edisi Mei Vol 23, No 1 (2018): Edisi Januari Vol. 22 No. 3 (2017): Edisi September Vol 22, No 3 (2017): Edisi September Vol 22, No 2 (2017): Edisi Mei Vol 22, No 1 (2017): Edisi Januari Vol 21, No 3 (2016): Edisi September Vol 21, No 2 (2016): Edisi Mei Vol 21, No 1 (2016): Edisi Januari Vol 20, No 3 (2015): Edisi September Vol 20, No 2 (2015): Edisi Mei Vol. 20 No. 2 (2015): Edisi Mei Vol 20, No 1 (2015): Edisi Januari Vol. 20 No. 1 (2015): Edisi Januari Vol. 19 No. 3 (2014): Edisi September Vol 19, No 3 (2014): Edisi September Vol. 19 No. 2 (2014): Edisi Mei Vol 19, No 2 (2014): Edisi Mei Vol 19, No 1 (2014): Edisi Januari Vol. 18 No. 3 (2013): Edisi September Vol 18, No 3 (2013): Edisi September Vol 18, No 2 (2013): Edisi Mei Vol. 18 No. 2 (2013): Edisi Mei Vol 18, No 1 (2013): Edisi Januari Vol. 18 No. 1 (2013): Edisi Januari Vol. 17 No. 3 (2012): Edisi September Vol 17, No 3 (2012): Edisi September Vol 17, No 2 (2012): Edisi Mei Vol. 17 No. 2 (2012): Edisi Mei Vol 17, No 1 (2012): Edisi Januari Vol. 17 No. 1 (2012): Edisi Januari Vol. 16 No. 4 (2011): Edisi September Vol 16, No 4 (2011): Edisi September Vol. 16 No. 3 (2011): Edisi Mei Vol 16, No 3 (2011): Edisi Mei Vol. 16 No. 2 (2011): Edisi April Vol 16, No 2 (2011): Edisi April Vol 16, No 1 (2011): Edisi Januari Vol. 16 No. 1 (2011): Edisi Januari Vol 15, No 4 (2010): Edisi Oktober Vol. 15 No. 4 (2010): Edisi Oktober Vol. 15 No. 3 (2010): Edisi Juli Vol 15, No 3 (2010): Edisi Juli Vol 15, No 2 (2010): Edisi April Vol. 15 No. 2 (2010): Edisi April Vol 15, No 1 (2010): Edisi Januari Vol. 15 No. 1 (2010): Edisi Januari Vol 12, No 3 (2007): Edisi September Vol 12, No 2 (2007): Edisi Mei Vol 12, No 1 (2007): Edisi Januari Vol 11, No 4 (2006): Edisi Oktober Vol 11, No 3 (2006): Edisi Juli Vol 11, No 2 (2006): Edisi April Vol 11, No 1 (2006): Edisi Januari Vol 10, No 4 (2005): Edisi Oktober Vol 10, No 3 (2005): Edisi Juli Vol 10, No 2 (2005): Edisi April Vol 10, No 1 (2005): Edisi Januari Vol 9, No 4 (2004): Edisi Oktober Vol 9, No 3 (2004): Edisi Juli Vol 9, No 2 (2004): Edisi April Vol 9, No 1 (2004): Edisi Januari Vol 8, No 4 (2003): Edisi Oktober Vol 8, No 3 (2003): Edisi Juli Vol 8, No 2 (2003): Edisi April Vol 7, No 4 (2002): Edisi Oktober Vol 7, No 3 (2002): Edisi Juli Vol 7, No 2 (2002): Edisi April Vol 7, No 1 (2002): Edisi Januari Vol 6, No 4 (2001): Edisi Oktober Vol 6, No 3 (2001): Edisi Juli Vol 6, No 2 (2001): Edisi April Vol 6, No 1 (2001): Edisi Januari Vol 5, No 3 (2000): Edisi Juli Vol 5, No 2 (2000): Edisi April Vol 5, No 1 (2000): Edisi Januari Vol 4, No 3 (1999): Edisi Juli Vol 4, No 1 (1999): Edisi Januari Vol 3, No 4 (1998): Edisi Oktober Vol 3, No 3 (1998): Edisi Juli Vol 3, No 2 (1998): Edisi April Vol 3, No 1 (1998): Edisi Januari Vol 2, No 3 (1997): Edisi Oktober Vol 2, No 2 (1997): Edisi Juli Vol. 2 No. 1 (1997): Edisi April Vol 2, No 1 (1997): Edisi April Vol 1, No 2 (1996): Edisi Desember More Issue