cover
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota adm. jakarta selatan,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
TREUBIA
ISSN : 00826340     EISSN : 2337876X     DOI : -
Core Subject : Education,
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 10 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol 40 (2013): Vol. 40, December 2013" : 10 Documents clear
EXTENT OF USE OF THE NOVEL FABACEOUS HOST CENTROSEMA MOLLE BY HENOSEPILACHNA VIGINTIOCTOPUNCTATA (COLEOPTERA: COCCINELLIDAE) IN NUSA TENGGARA, INDONESIA Fujiyama, Naoyuki; Ueno, Hideki; Kahono, Sih; Hartini, Sri; Matsubayashi, Kei W.; Kikuta, Shogo; Katakura, Haruo
TREUBIA Vol 40 (2013): Vol. 40, December 2013
Publisher : Research Center for Biology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (2033.478 KB) | DOI: 10.14203/treubia.v40i0.185

Abstract

The herbivorous ladybird beetle Henosepilachna vigintioctopunctata depends primarily on solanaceous plants. The utilisation of a novel fabaceous host, centro (Centrosema molle), by this beetle has been reported from several regions in Southeastern Asia, but details of the distribution and feeding habits of H. vigintioctopunctata populations on centro are largely unknown. Our study aimed to gather basic information on the utilisation of centro by H. vigintioctopunctata in the Nusa Tenggara region of southeastern Indonesia. Field surveys indicated that H. vigintioctopunctata did not yet utilize centro in the wild in this region. However, in feeding-choice experiments in the laboratory, all beetle populations tested from this region had some potential to utilize centro, i.e., showed some feeding acceptance of this plant. Based on these results, we discuss the current status of the Nusa Tenggara H. vigintioctopunctata populations in using centro as a host.
POTENTIAL ABILITY OF THE SOLANUM-FEEDING LADYBIRD BEETLE HENOSEPILACHNA DIFFINIS (COLEOPTERA; COCCINELLIDAE) TO USE THE INTRODUCED FABACEOUS PLANT CENTROSEMA MOLLE Kikuta, Shogo; Fujiyama, Naoyuki; Kahono, Sih; Kobayashi, Norio; Hartini, Sri; Katakura, Haruo
TREUBIA Vol 40 (2013): Vol. 40, December 2013
Publisher : Research Center for Biology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1783.521 KB) | DOI: 10.14203/treubia.v40i0.187

Abstract

Host specificity has been a major factor in generating the tremendous diversity of phytophagous arthropods. Studies of adaptation to introduced or invasive plant species provide an opportunity to investigate incipient evolutionary changes in host specificity. We investigated the cryptic ability of the Asian tropical herbivorous ladybird beetle Henosepilachna diffinis to feed on the fabaceous weed "centro", Centrosema molle, which was introduced to Southeast Asia about 200 years ago. In laboratory choice tests using this plant and the normal host plant, Solanum torvum, adults preferred S. torvum to centro, but over half the beetles tested ate leaves of both plants. Furthermore, most first-instar larvae accepted centro during a rearing experiment, and a few of them grew to the third-instar stage, though none reached the final (fourth) instar. Henosepilachna diffinis likely acquired this incomplete acceptability of centro without any direct host-grazer interaction with centro, probably before this weed was introduced to Southeast Asia. Our results further suggest that another Henosepilachna species, H. vigintioctopunctata, might similarly have already acquired an incomplete ability to use centro when this beetle encountered it for the first time, and this triggered a subsequent host-range expansion from solanaceous plants to include centro in various parts of Southeast Asia.
MACROCHELID MITES FROM A NEST OF HONEY BEE APIS DORSATA DORSATA AT BOGOR BOTANICAL GARDEN, WEST JAVA, INDONESIA Hartini, Sri; Kahono, Sih; Takaku, Gen
TREUBIA Vol 40 (2013): Vol. 40, December 2013
Publisher : Research Center for Biology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1877.935 KB) | DOI: 10.14203/treubia.v40i0.188

Abstract

Thirteen species of macrochelid mites belonging to the genera Holostaspella, Macrocheles, Neopodocinum and Glyptholaspis were collected from a nest of honey bee Apis dorsata dorsata at Bogor Botanical Garden, Bogor, West Java, Indonesia. Of these, one species was described as new to science, two species were recorded from Indonesia for the first time, and all species were recorded from nest of Apis dorsata dorsata for the first time. Macrocheles nidus sp. nov. is similar to some species of scutatus subgroup, but it is discernible from the latter by the pilosity of dorsal setae.
REVIEW OF THE MORPHOLOGY OF TRIMERESURUS BROGERSMAI (SERPENTES: CIPERIDAE), A RARE PIVIPER OF SIMEULUE AND THE MENTAWAI ISLANDS, INDONESIA Harvey, Michael B.; Sidik, Irvan
TREUBIA Vol 40 (2013): Vol. 40, December 2013
Publisher : Research Center for Biology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14203/treubia.v40i0.179

Abstract

Trimeresurus brongersmai is a rare pitviper from Simeulue and the Mentawai Islands. We comment on the morphology and examine new specimens from Siberut Island. The four new specimens differ morphologically from the eight specimens known previously. A distinctive banding pattern on the distal tail characterises T. brongersmai and the related species T. puniceus. Juveniles lack the distinctive projecting supraoculars of adult T. brongersmai and these scales apparently develop during ontogeny. We propose the new term “rostronasal” for a large scale positioned between the rostral and nasal on each side of the snout in this species. In addition, we discuss several features of this species that were not mentioned in earlier accounts.
Micro-spatial and seasonal distributions of two sympatric host races of the phytophagous ladybird beetle Henosepilachna diekei (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) and their host plants in West Java, Indonesia Matsubayashi, Kei W.; Kahono, Sih; Hartini, Sri; Katakura, Haruo
TREUBIA Vol 40 (2013): Vol. 40, December 2013
Publisher : Research Center for Biology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14203/treubia.v40i0.181

Abstract

Divergent adaptation to different host plants may promote reproductive isolation between hostspecific populations in phytophagous insects, since strict preferences for different host plants act as an isolating barrier between populations on the different hosts. Moreover, a high dependence on the host plants may cause additional reproductive barriers, e.g., differences in micro-spatial distribution and phenology between host-specific populations when the host plants differ in these characters. However, few studies have specifically addressed these two types of host-plant-induced isolating barriers. Here we compared the microspatialdistribution and seasonal fluctuation of two host races of the  phytophagous ladybird beetle Henosepilachna diekei (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae: Epilachnine) in Bogor, West Java, one depending onMikania micrantha (Asteraceae) and the other on Leucas lavandulifolia (Lamiaceae). In the field, M. micrantha was far more abundant and common than L. lavandulifolia throughout the year. M. micrantha wasfound in relatively moist habitats with moderate sunlight, while L. lavandulifolia was found in dry, sunny, open habitats. Consequently, the beetles depending on M. micrantha were more common and abundant than those depending on L. lavandulifolia. Although the two host races could encounter one another where the two host plants occurred in close proximity, they infrequently did so because of strict host fidelity coupledwith differences in the abundance and habitat of the two host plants. On the other hand, we detected no evidence of host-related seasonal isolation between the two host races.Key words: host race, host shift, micro-spatial distribution, phenology, seasonal fluctuation
EXTENT OF USE OF THE NOVEL FABACEOUS HOST CENTROSEMA MOLLE BY HENOSEPILACHNA VIGINTIOCTOPUNCTATA (COLEOPTERA: COCCINELLIDAE) IN NUSA TENGGARA, INDONESIA Naoyuki Fujiyama; Hideki Ueno; Sih Kahono; Sri Hartini; Kei W. Matsubayashi; Shogo Kikuta; Haruo Katakura
TREUBIA Vol 40 (2013): Vol. 40, December 2013
Publisher : Research Center for Biology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14203/treubia.v40i0.185

Abstract

The herbivorous ladybird beetle Henosepilachna vigintioctopunctata depends primarily on solanaceous plants. The utilisation of a novel fabaceous host, centro (Centrosema molle), by this beetle has been reported from several regions in Southeastern Asia, but details of the distribution and feeding habits of H. vigintioctopunctata populations on centro are largely unknown. Our study aimed to gather basic information on the utilisation of centro by H. vigintioctopunctata in the Nusa Tenggara region of southeastern Indonesia. Field surveys indicated that H. vigintioctopunctata did not yet utilize centro in the wild in this region. However, in feeding-choice experiments in the laboratory, all beetle populations tested from this region had some potential to utilize centro, i.e., showed some feeding acceptance of this plant. Based on these results, we discuss the current status of the Nusa Tenggara H. vigintioctopunctata populations in using centro as a host.
POTENTIAL ABILITY OF THE SOLANUM-FEEDING LADYBIRD BEETLE HENOSEPILACHNA DIFFINIS (COLEOPTERA; COCCINELLIDAE) TO USE THE INTRODUCED FABACEOUS PLANT CENTROSEMA MOLLE Shogo Kikuta; Naoyuki Fujiyama; Sih Kahono; Norio Kobayashi; Sri Hartini; Haruo Katakura
TREUBIA Vol 40 (2013): Vol. 40, December 2013
Publisher : Research Center for Biology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14203/treubia.v40i0.187

Abstract

Host specificity has been a major factor in generating the tremendous diversity of phytophagous arthropods. Studies of adaptation to introduced or invasive plant species provide an opportunity to investigate incipient evolutionary changes in host specificity. We investigated the cryptic ability of the Asian tropical herbivorous ladybird beetle Henosepilachna diffinis to feed on the fabaceous weed "centro", Centrosema molle, which was introduced to Southeast Asia about 200 years ago. In laboratory choice tests using this plant and the normal host plant, Solanum torvum, adults preferred S. torvum to centro, but over half the beetles tested ate leaves of both plants. Furthermore, most first-instar larvae accepted centro during a rearing experiment, and a few of them grew to the third-instar stage, though none reached the final (fourth) instar. Henosepilachna diffinis likely acquired this incomplete acceptability of centro without any direct host-grazer interaction with centro, probably before this weed was introduced to Southeast Asia. Our results further suggest that another Henosepilachna species, H. vigintioctopunctata, might similarly have already acquired an incomplete ability to use centro when this beetle encountered it for the first time, and this triggered a subsequent host-range expansion from solanaceous plants to include centro in various parts of Southeast Asia.
MACROCHELID MITES FROM A NEST OF HONEY BEE APIS DORSATA DORSATA AT BOGOR BOTANICAL GARDEN, WEST JAVA, INDONESIA Sri Hartini; Sih Kahono; Gen Takaku
TREUBIA Vol 40 (2013): Vol. 40, December 2013
Publisher : Research Center for Biology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14203/treubia.v40i0.188

Abstract

Thirteen species of macrochelid mites belonging to the genera Holostaspella, Macrocheles, Neopodocinum and Glyptholaspis were collected from a nest of honey bee Apis dorsata dorsata at Bogor Botanical Garden, Bogor, West Java, Indonesia. Of these, one species was described as new to science, two species were recorded from Indonesia for the first time, and all species were recorded from nest of Apis dorsata dorsata for the first time. Macrocheles nidus sp. nov. is similar to some species of scutatus subgroup, but it is discernible from the latter by the pilosity of dorsal setae.
REVIEW OF THE MORPHOLOGY OF TRIMERESURUS BROGERSMAI (SERPENTES: CIPERIDAE), A RARE PIVIPER OF SIMEULUE AND THE MENTAWAI ISLANDS, INDONESIA Michael B. Harvey; Irvan Sidik
TREUBIA Vol 40 (2013): Vol. 40, December 2013
Publisher : Research Center for Biology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14203/treubia.v40i0.179

Abstract

Trimeresurus brongersmai is a rare pitviper from Simeulue and the Mentawai Islands. We comment on the morphology and examine new specimens from Siberut Island. The four new specimens differ morphologically from the eight specimens known previously. A distinctive banding pattern on the distal tail characterises T. brongersmai and the related species T. puniceus. Juveniles lack the distinctive projecting supraoculars of adult T. brongersmai and these scales apparently develop during ontogeny. We propose the new term “rostronasal” for a large scale positioned between the rostral and nasal on each side of the snout in this species. In addition, we discuss several features of this species that were not mentioned in earlier accounts.
Micro-spatial and seasonal distributions of two sympatric host races of the phytophagous ladybird beetle Henosepilachna diekei (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) and their host plants in West Java, Indonesia Kei W. Matsubayashi; Sih Kahono; Sri Hartini; Haruo Katakura
TREUBIA Vol 40 (2013): Vol. 40, December 2013
Publisher : Research Center for Biology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14203/treubia.v40i0.181

Abstract

Divergent adaptation to different host plants may promote reproductive isolation between hostspecific populations in phytophagous insects, since strict preferences for different host plants act as an isolating barrier between populations on the different hosts. Moreover, a high dependence on the host plants may cause additional reproductive barriers, e.g., differences in micro-spatial distribution and phenology between host-specific populations when the host plants differ in these characters. However, few studies have specifically addressed these two types of host-plant-induced isolating barriers. Here we compared the microspatialdistribution and seasonal fluctuation of two host races of the  phytophagous ladybird beetle Henosepilachna diekei (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae: Epilachnine) in Bogor, West Java, one depending onMikania micrantha (Asteraceae) and the other on Leucas lavandulifolia (Lamiaceae). In the field, M. micrantha was far more abundant and common than L. lavandulifolia throughout the year. M. micrantha wasfound in relatively moist habitats with moderate sunlight, while L. lavandulifolia was found in dry, sunny, open habitats. Consequently, the beetles depending on M. micrantha were more common and abundant than those depending on L. lavandulifolia. Although the two host races could encounter one another where the two host plants occurred in close proximity, they infrequently did so because of strict host fidelity coupledwith differences in the abundance and habitat of the two host plants. On the other hand, we detected no evidence of host-related seasonal isolation between the two host races.Key words: host race, host shift, micro-spatial distribution, phenology, seasonal fluctuation

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 10


Filter by Year

2013 2013


Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 51, No 2 (2024) Vol 51, No 1 (2024) Vol 50, No 2 (2023) Vol 50, No 1 (2023) Vol 49, No 2 (2022) Vol 49, No 1 (2022) Vol 48, No 2 (2021) Vol 48, No 1 (2021) Vol 47, No 2 (2020): Vol. 47, No. 2, December 2020 Vol 47, No 1 (2020): Vol. 47, No. 1, June 2020 Vol 46 (2019): Vol. 46, December 2019 Vol 45 (2018): Vol. 45, December 2018 Vol 45 (2018): Vol. 45, December 2018 Vol 44 (2017): Vol. 44, December 2017 Vol 44 (2017): Vol. 44, December 2017 Vol 43 (2016): Vol. 43, December 2016 Vol 43 (2016): Vol. 43, December 2016 Vol 42 (2015): Vol. 42, December 2015 Vol 42 (2015): Vol. 42, December 2015 Vol 41 (2014): Vol. 41, December 2014 Vol 41 (2014): Vol. 41, December 2014 Vol 40 (2013): Vol. 40, December 2013 Vol 40 (2013): Vol. 40, December 2013 Vol 39 (2012): Vol. 39, December 2012 Vol 39 (2012): Vol. 39, December 2012 Vol 38 (2011): Vol. 38, December 2011 Vol 38 (2011): Vol. 38, December 2011 Vol 37 (2010): Vol. 37, December 2010 Vol 37 (2010): Vol. 37, December 2010 Vol 36 (2008): Vol. 36, December 2008 Vol 36 (2008): Vol. 36, December 2008 Vol 35 (2007): Vol. 35, December 2007 Vol 35 (2007): Vol. 35, December 2007 Vol 34 (2006): Vol. 34, December 2006 Vol 34 (2006): Vol. 34, December 2006 Vol 33, No 2 (2004): Vol. 33 No. 2, December 2004 Vol 33, No 2 (2004): Vol. 33 No. 2, December 2004 Vol 33, No 1 (2003): Vol. 33 No. 1, December 2003 Vol 33, No 1 (2003): Vol. 33 No. 1, December 2003 Vol 32, No 1 (2002): Vol. 32 No. 1, August 2002 Vol 32, No 1 (2002): Vol. 32 No. 1, August 2002 Vol 31, No 3 (2000): Vol. 31 No. 3 (Supplement), December 2000 Vol 31, No 3 (2000): Vol. 31 No. 3 (Supplement), December 2000 Vol 31, No 3 (1999): Vol. 31 No. 3, December 1999 Vol 31, No 3 (1999): Vol. 31 No. 3, December 1999 Vol 31, No 2 (1997): Vol. 31 No. 2, December 1997 Vol 31, No 2 (1997): Vol. 31 No. 2, December 1997 Vol 31, No 1 (1994): Vol. 31 No. 1, Januari 1994 Vol 31, No 1 (1994): Vol. 31 No. 1, Januari 1994 Vol 30, No 3 (1992): Vol. 30 No. 3, January 1992 Vol 30, No 3 (1992): Vol. 30 No. 3, January 1992 Vol 30, No 2 (1991): Vol. 30 No. 2, January 1991 Vol 30, No 2 (1991): Vol. 30 No. 2, January 1991 Vol 30, No 1 (1989): Vol. 30 No. 1, January 1989 Vol 30, No 1 (1989): Vol. 30 No. 1, January 1989 Vol 29, No 4 (1988): Vol. 29 No. 4, 1988 Vol 29, No 4 (1988): Vol. 29 No. 4, 1988 Vol 29, No 3 (1986): Vol. 29 No. 3, 1986 Vol 29, No 3 (1986): Vol. 29 No. 3, 1986 Vol 29, No 2 (1984): Vol. 29 No. 2, 1984 Vol 29, No 2 (1984): Vol. 29 No. 2, 1984 Vol 29, No 1 (1983): Vol. 29 No. 1, 1983 Vol 29, No 1 (1983): Vol. 29 No. 1, 1983 Vol 27, No 4 (1970): Vol. 27 No. 4, November 1970 Vol 27, No 4 (1970): Vol. 27 No. 4, November 1970 Vol 27, No 2-3 (1968): Vol. 27 No. 2-3, October 1968 Vol 27, No 2-3 (1968): Vol. 27 No. 2-3, October 1968 Vol 27, No 1 (1966): Vol. 27 No. 1, August 1966 Vol 27, No 1 (1966): Vol. 27 No. 1, August 1966 Vol 26, No 4 (1965): Vol. 26 No. 4, 1965 Vol 26, No 4 (1965): Vol. 26 No. 4, 1965 Vol 26, No 3 (1964): Vol. 26 No. 3, 1964 Vol 26, No 3 (1964): Vol. 26 No. 3, 1964 Vol 26, No 2 (1963): Vol. 26 No. 2, 1963 Vol 26, No 2 (1963): Vol. 26 No. 2, 1963 Vol 26, No 1 (1962): Vol. 26 No. 1, 1962 Vol 26, No 1 (1962): Vol. 26 No. 1, 1962 Vol 25, No 3 (1961): Vol. 25 No. 3, 1961 Vol 25, No 3 (1961): Vol. 25 No. 3, 1961 Vol 25, No 2 (1960): Vol. 25 No. 2, 1960 Vol 25, No 2 (1960): Vol. 25 No. 2, 1960 Vol 25, No 1 (1959): Vol. 25 No. 1, 1959 Vol 25, No 1 (1959): Vol. 25 No. 1, 1959 Vol 24, No 2 (1958): Vol. 24 No. 2, 1958 Vol 24, No 2 (1958): Vol. 24 No. 2, 1958 Vol 24, No 1 (1957): Vol. 24 No. 1, 1957 Vol 24, No 1 (1957): Vol. 24 No. 1, 1957 Vol 23, No 2 (1956): Vol. 23 No. 2, 1956 Vol 23, No 2 (1956): Vol. 23 No. 2, 1956 Vol 23, No 1 (1955): Vol. 23 No. 1, 1955 Vol 23, No 1 (1955): Vol. 23 No. 1, 1955 Vol 22, No 3 (1954): Vol. 22 No. 3, 1954 Vol 22, No 3 (1954): Vol. 22 No. 3, 1954 Vol 22 (1954): Vol. 22, 1954 Vol 22 (1954): Vol. 22, 1954 Vol 22, No 2 (1953): Vol. 22 No. 2, 1953 Vol 22, No 2 (1953): Vol. 22 No. 2, 1953 Vol 22, No 1 (1953): Vol. 22 No. 1, July 1953 Vol 22, No 1 (1953): Vol. 22 No. 1, July 1953 Vol 21, No 3 (1953): Vol. 21 No. 3, 1953 Vol 21, No 3 (1953): Vol. 21 No. 3, 1953 Vol 21, No 2 (1952): Vol. 21 No. 2, 1952 Vol 21, No 2 (1952): Vol. 21 No. 2, 1952 Vol 21, No 1 (1951): Vol. 21 No. 1, 1951 Vol 21, No 1 (1951): Vol. 21 No. 1, 1951 Vol 20, No 3 (1950): Vol. 20 No. 3, 1950 Vol 20, No 3 (1950): Vol. 20 No. 3, 1950 Vol 20, No 2 (1949): Vol. 20 No. 2, 1949 Vol 20, No 2 (1949): Vol. 20 No. 2, 1949 Vol 20, No 1 (1949): Vol. 20 No. 1, 1949 Vol 20, No 1 (1949): Vol. 20 No. 1, 1949 Vol 18, No 3 (1941): Vol. 18 No. 3, 1941 Vol 18, No 3 (1941): Vol. 18 No. 3, 1941 Vol 18, No 2 (1941): Vol. 18 No. 2, 1941 Vol 18, No 2 (1941): Vol. 18 No. 2, 1941 Vol 18, No 1 (1941): Vol. 18 No. 1, 1941 Vol 18, No 1 (1941): Vol. 18 No. 1, 1941 Vol 17, No 5 (1940): Vol. 17 No. 5, 1940 Vol 17, No 5 (1940): Vol. 17 No. 5, 1940 Vol 17, No 4 (1940): Vol. 17 No. 4, 1940 Vol 17, No 4 (1940): Vol. 17 No. 4, 1940 Vol 17, No 3 (1939): Vol. 17 No. 3, 1939 Vol 17, No 3 (1939): Vol. 17 No. 3, 1939 Vol 17, No 2 (1939): Vol. 17 No. 2, 1939 Vol 17, No 2 (1939): Vol. 17 No. 2, 1939 Vol 17, No 1 (1939): Vol. 17 No. 1, 1939 Vol 17, No 1 (1939): Vol. 17 No. 1, 1939 Vol 16 (1938): Vol. 16, 4 November 1938 Vol 16 (1938): Vol. 16, 4 November 1938 Vol 16, No 4 (1937): Vol. 16 No. 4, 1937-1938 Vol 16, No 4 (1937): Vol. 16 No. 4, 1937-1938 Vol 16, No 3 (1937): Vol. 16 No. 3, 1937-1938 Vol 16, No 3 (1937): Vol. 16 No. 3, 1937-1938 Vol 16, No 2 (1937): Vol. 16 No. 2, 1937-1938 Vol 16, No 2 (1937): Vol. 16 No. 2, 1937-1938 Vol 16, No 1 (1937): Vol. 16 No. 1, 1937-1938 Vol 16, No 1 (1937): Vol. 16 No. 1, 1937-1938 Vol 15, No 4 (1935): Vol. 15 No. 4, 1935-1936 Vol 15, No 4 (1935): Vol. 15 No. 4, 1935-1936 Vol 15, No 3 (1935): Vol. 15 No. 3, 1935-1936 Vol 15, No 3 (1935): Vol. 15 No. 3, 1935-1936 Vol 15, No 2 (1935): Vol. 15 No. 2, 1935-1936 Vol 15, No 2 (1935): Vol. 15 No. 2, 1935-1936 Vol 15, No 1 (1935): Vol. 15 No. 1, 1935-1936 Vol 15, No 1 (1935): Vol. 15 No. 1, 1935-1936 Vol 14, No 4 (1932): Vol. 14 No. 4, 1932-1934 Vol 14, No 4 (1932): Vol. 14 No. 4, 1932-1934 Vol 14, No 3 (1932): Vol. 14 No. 3, 1932-1934 Vol 14, No 3 (1932): Vol. 14 No. 3, 1932-1934 Vol 14, No 2 (1932): Vol. 14 No. 2, 1932-1934 Vol 14, No 2 (1932): Vol. 14 No. 2, 1932-1934 Vol 14, No 1 (1932): Vol. 14 No. 1, 1932-1934 Vol 14, No 1 (1932): Vol. 14 No. 1, 1932-1934 Vol 13, No 3-4 (1931): Vol. 13 No. 3-4, 1931 Vol 13, No 3-4 (1931): Vol. 13 No. 3-4, 1931 Vol 13, No 2 (1931): Vol. 13 No. 2, 1931 Vol 13, No 2 (1931): Vol. 13 No. 2, 1931 Vol 13, No 1 (1931): Vol. 13 No. 1, 1931 Vol 13, No 1 (1931): Vol. 13 No. 1, 1931 Vol 12, No 3-4 (1930): Vol. 12 No. 3-4, 1930 Vol 12, No 3-4 (1930): Vol. 12 No. 3-4, 1930 Vol 12, No 2 (1930): Vol. 12 No. 2, 1930 Vol 12, No 2 (1930): Vol. 12 No. 2, 1930 Vol 12, No 1 (1930): Vol. 12 No. 1, 1930 Vol 12, No 1 (1930): Vol. 12 No. 1, 1930 Vol 11, No 3 (1929): Vol. 11 No. 3, 1929-1930 Vol 11, No 3 (1929): Vol. 11 No. 3, 1929-1930 Vol 11, No 2 (1929): Vol. 11 No. 2, 1929-1930 Vol 11, No 2 (1929): Vol. 11 No. 2, 1929-1930 Vol 11, No 1 (1929): Vol. 11 No. 1, 1929-1930 Vol 11, No 1 (1929): Vol. 11 No. 1, 1929-1930 Vol 10, No 2-3 (1928): Vol. 10 No. 2-3, 1928-1929 Vol 10, No 2-3 (1928): Vol. 10 No. 2-3, 1928-1929 Vol 10, No 4 (1928): Vol. 10 No. 4, 1928-1929 Vol 10, No 4 (1928): Vol. 10 No. 4, 1928-1929 Vol 10, No 1 (1928): Vol. 10 No. 1, 1928-1929 Vol 10, No 1 (1928): Vol. 10 No. 1, 1928-1929 Vol 9, No 1-3 (1927): Vol. 9 Livr. 1-3, 1927 Vol 9, No 1-3 (1927): Vol. 9 Livr. 1-3, 1927 Vol 9, No 4 (1927): Vol. 9 Livr. 4, 1927 Vol 9, No 4 (1927): Vol. 9 Livr. 4, 1927 Vol 8, No 3-4 (1926): Vol. 8 No.3-4, 1926 Vol 8, No 3-4 (1926): Vol. 8 No.3-4, 1926 Vol 8, No 1-2 (1926): Vol. 8 No. 1-2, 1926 Vol 8, No 1-2 (1926): Vol. 8 No. 1-2, 1926 Vol 6 (1926): Vol. 6, (Supplement), 1926 Vol 6 (1926): Vol. 6, (Supplement), 1926 Vol 7, No 4 (1925): Vol. 7 No. 4, 1925-1929 Vol 7, No 4 (1925): Vol. 7 No. 4, 1925-1929 Vol 7, No 3 (1925): Vol. 7 No. 3, 1925-1929 Vol 7, No 3 (1925): Vol. 7 No. 3, 1925-1929 Vol 7, No 2 (1925): Vol. 7 No. 2, 1925-1929 Vol 7, No 2 (1925): Vol. 7 No. 2, 1925-1929 Vol 7, No 1 (1925): Vol. 7 No. 1, 1925-1929 Vol 7, No 1 (1925): Vol. 7 No. 1, 1925-1929 Vol 5, No 1-3 (1924): Vol.5 No. 1-3, 1924 Vol 5, No 1-3 (1924): Vol.5 No. 1-3, 1924 Vol 5, No 4 (1924): Vol.5 No. 4, 1924 Vol 5, No 4 (1924): Vol.5 No. 4, 1924 Vol 5 (1924): Vol. 5, (Supplement), 1924 Vol 5 (1924): Vol. 5, (Supplement), 1924 Vol 4 (1923): Vol. 4, 1923 Vol 4 (1923): Vol. 4, 1923 Vol 3 (1923): Vol. 3, 1923 Vol 3 (1923): Vol. 3, 1923 Vol 2, No 2-4 (1921): Vol. 2 No. 2-4, 1921-1922 Vol 2, No 2-4 (1921): Vol. 2 No. 2-4, 1921-1922 Vol 2, No 1 (1921): Vol. 2 No. 1, 1921 Vol 2, No 1 (1921): Vol. 2 No. 1, 1921 More Issue