Dzulfikri
University of Bakhtalruda

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Paylater Mindset: The Shift in Gen Z's Thinking Towards Debt from a Sharia Perspective Rizaldy Alpiansyah; Isrun Abdurahman; Irfan Alkhotiri; Miftah Wangsadanureja; Dzulfikri
Dirham : Journal of Islamic Economics Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): Dirham : Journal of Islamic Economics
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Minhajul Haq

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66891/3a26sp98

Abstract

Digital disruption in the modern economic landscape has given birth to financial technology (fintech) instruments that radically change the consumption patterns and financial governance of society globally and nationally. One of the most dominating innovations that has sparked sharp discourse is the Buy Now, Pay Later (BNPL) service, more popularly known as paylater. Generation Z (Gen Z) and Millennials are recorded as the largest demographic of users in this service ecosystem, where the total outstanding paylater debt in Indonesia reached an aggregate figure of Rp29.59 trillion in April 2025, with a Non-Performing Loan (NPL) ratio that continues to creep up. This scientific report presents a comprehensive, in-depth, and nuanced analysis of the fundamental shift in Generation Z's mindset towards the concept of debt due to paylater penetration, evaluated strictly through the lens of Islamic economics, Fiqh Muamalah, and Maqashid Sharia. Through a synthesis of empirical data from the Financial Services Authority (OJK), behavioral economics literature, and fatwas from the National Sharia Board of the Indonesian Ulema Council (DSN-MUI), this research identifies an acute sociological shift: debt, which in Islamic tradition is inherently viewed as an emergency instrument based on mutual assistance (tabarru'), is now commodified into a lifestyle based on instant gratification and a "self-reward" culture that reduces the psychological friction of shopping (pain of paying). Furthermore, the analysis in this report outlines contemporary Fiqh Muamalah resolutions regarding the schemes of Istijrar, Murabahah, Wakalah bil Ujrah, Qardh, and Kafalah to strictly differentiate between conventional paylater and sharia paylater facilities. Within the framework of Maqashid Sharia, the normalization of consumptive debt among Gen Z is proven to be diametrically opposed to the principle of Hifz al-Mal (protection of wealth), triggering systemic threats in the form of israf (extravagance) and tabzir (extreme wastefulness). In conclusion, the report asserts that without structured, massive, and digitally integrated Islamic financial literacy interventions, the ease of access to instant credit can transform from a tool of financial inclusion into a trap of long-term financial fragility that undermines the economic resilience of future generations.
DECONSTRUCTING THE HISTORICAL NARRATIVE: A CRITICAL REVIEW OF THE ABSENCE OF A CONSTRUCTIVE ROLE OF THE SHIA FACTION IN THE PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE OF ISLAMIC CIVILIZATION Rizaldy Alpiansyah; Isrun Abdurahman; Irfan Alkhotiri; Miftah Wangsadanureja; Dzulfikri
Mutamayyiz: Journal of Islamic Studies Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): Mutamayyiz: Journal of Islamic Studies
Publisher : STAI Minhajul Haq

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66891/rdjanp91

Abstract

The discourse on the history of Islamic civilization is often dominated by narratives that romanticize inter-group harmony without giving adequate attention to a critical analysis of the disintegrative factions within it. This scientific article aims to examine, dissect, and deconstruct the claims regarding the Shia faction's contributions to achieving the glory of Islam. This study investigates the historical role, contemporary sociopolitical reality, and future projections of the Shia faction using a comparative-analytical (muqāran) historical approach based on orthodox classical literature and modern political studies. The results conclusively show that the absence of a positive Shia role is not an a priori assumption, but a well-documented historical fact. In the past, the existence of Shia political entities such as the Fatimid (Ubaydid) Dynasty in Egypt and the Safavid Dynasty in Persia consistently acted as subversive forces that destroyed the cohesion of the Ummah, hindered the expansion of Islam into Europe by allying with Christian empires, and facilitated the collapse of the Abbasid Caliphate in Baghdad in 1258 AD. At present, the theological anomalies inherent in Shia dogma—such as the exclusive Imamate cult, the doctrine of infallibility, and the rejection of the legitimacy of the early generations of the Prophet's Companions—have triggered severe creedal clashes. The transformation of this ideology into a political movement post-1979 Iranian Revolution has proven to spawn sectarian proxy wars that destroy the infrastructure of civilization in the Middle East and threaten social harmony in regions like Indonesia. Projecting into the future, this research concludes that the historical shackles and sectarian sentiments institutionalized in Shia theology will always be a stumbling block to the reconciliation of the Ummah. As long as the epistemology of hatred towards mainstream history is maintained, the Shia faction will remain an inhibiting variable that distances the Ummah from the ideals of unity and the revival of global Islamic civilization.