Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pendas : Jurnah Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar
Kusuma Ningrat, Hadi
Unknown Affiliation
Other

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
MODEL DISKUSI EVALUATIF DALAM KEPEMIMPINAN KEPALA SEKOLAH PERSPEKTIF MANAJEMEN PENDIDIKAN ISLAM Alvin Saputra, M. Ony; Winengan; Kusuma Ningrat, Hadi
Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar Vol. 11 No. 02 (2026): Volume 11 Nomor 02, Juni 2026 Published
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar FKIP Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/jp.v11i02.53054

Abstract

This study examines principal leadership through evaluative discussions from an Islamic educational management perspective. Principals, as leaders of Islamic educational institutions, play a strategic role in determining the direction, quality, and organizational culture of schools/madrasas. Evaluative discussions, as instruments of deliberation (shura), are deliberative mechanisms rooted in Islamic tradition and have proven effective in improving the quality of leadership policies. By integrating Islamic leadership values such as shiddiq, amanah, tabligh, and fathanah with a participatory evaluation approach, this paper demonstrates that evaluative discussions are not merely technical-managerial tools, but rather shura practices that strengthen the legitimacy and accountability of principal leadership. Using theoretical frameworks from Muhaimin (2009), Ahmad Tafsir (2012), Wahab and Umiarso (2011), and Fischer's (2003) deliberative evaluation approach, this study presents relevant evaluative discussion models, the challenges of their implementation in madrasas and Islamic schools, and strategies for strengthening deliberation-based leadership capacity. The main findings confirm that effective principals are leaders who are able to foster a culture of open discussion, accept criticism graciously, and use evaluation results as a basis for continuous policy improvement.
Co-Authors Alvin Saputra, M. Ony Winengan