Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Southeast Asian Journal of Victimology Justicia Religia
Yogie Fahrisal
Universitas Al-Khairiyah
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Hak dan Kewajiban Suami–Istri dalam Fikih Klasik dan Kontemporer Sugiri; Dayan Fithoroini; Yogie Fahrisal
Justicia Religia Vol 3 No 2 (2025): Justicia Religia: Jurnal Hukum Islam
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Al-Khairiyah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.3898/jure.v3i2.578

Abstract

This study examines the formulation and evolution of spousal rights and obligations in classical and contemporary Islamic jurisprudence through a library research approach. Classical texts such as al-Majmu‘, al-Mughni, and Bidayat al-Mujtahid outline a normative structure of marital relations based on reciprocal duties, with economic maintenance (nafkah), mahr, and protection identified as primary obligations of the husband, while domestic management and obedience within lawful limits are traditionally assigned to the wife. Contemporary scholarship, however, demonstrates increasing reinterpretations driven by socioeconomic change, gender dynamics, and legal developments in Muslim-majority contexts, including Indonesia. Modern studies emphasize the necessity of contextualizing classical provisions to ensure alignment with maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah, particularly the principles of justice, dignity, and harm prevention (dar’ al-mafasid). The findings highlight that harmonizing classical jurisprudence with contemporary legal frameworks such as statutory reform and judicial practice offers a pathway toward a more equitable and responsive model of marital rights and responsibilities.
Pembatasan Penerapan Restorative Justice dalam Perkara Kekerasan Seksual pada Tahap Penyelidikan dan Penyidikan dari Perspektif Viktimologi (Kajian Berdasarkan KUHAP Baru dan UU TPKS) Yogie Fahrisal; Benny Irawan; Muttaqin Muttaqin
Southeast Asian Journal of Victimology Vol 4, No 1 (2026): Published 06-06-2026
Publisher : Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51825/sajv.v4i1.40752

Abstract

This study analyzes the limitation of Restorative justice in sexual violence cases at the preliminary investigation and criminal investigation stages from a victimology perspective based on the new Criminal Procedure Code and the TPKS Law. The issue is important because the new Criminal Procedure Code provides space for Restorative justice, while sexual violence cases have a special character related to trauma, power relations, social pressure, and the risk of revictimization. This study uses normative legal methods with analytical-prescriptive properties through statutory, conceptual, victimological, and secondary-document-based case approaches. The results show that Restorative justice in sexual violence cases cannot be used as a mechanism to stop cases against adult perpetrators. Article 23 of the TPKS Law and Article 82 letter d of the new Criminal Procedure Code restrict the settlement of sexual violence cases outside the judicial process. The revocation of the victim's report also does not automatically remove the adequacy of evidence, because investigators remain obliged to assess the victim's voluntariness and trace other relevant evidence. This research confirms that the police have a responsibility to prevent the abuse of Restorative justice through victim-oriented examinations, risk assessments, mentoring, identity protection, and cross-agency coordination. Thus, Restorative justice in sexual violence cases must be placed as a victim-recovery paradigm, not as a shortcut to stop the case.
Co-Authors Benny Irawan Dayan Fithoroini Muttaqin Muttaqin Sugiri