Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of International Relations Diponegoro
Satwika Paramasatya
Departemen Hubungan Internasional, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Diponegoro

Published : 9 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 9 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Serangan Drone dalam Aksi Counter Terrorism terhadap Hubungan Amerika Serikat dan Pakistan pada Masa Pemerintahan Presiden Barack Obama Jessica Tiolina; Satwika Paramasatya
Journal of International Relations Diponegoro Volume 4, Nomor 4, Tahun 2018
Publisher : International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jirud.v4i4.22008

Abstract

The United States and Pakistan have decided to establish a counter terrorism cooperation since the 9/11 incident. This cooperation was initiated by President George Bush as an effort to fight the terrorists. The United States uses drone attacks in counter terrorism operations because they considered drone as a very effective weapon to reduce the number of victims in an arm conflict. The counter terrorism operations was implemented again during the administration of President Barack Obama. Since elected as president, President Barack Obama increased the number of drone attacks in counter terrorism with a targeted killing strategy. The cooperation which initially went well then experienced high tensions due to drone attacks that killed thousands of people in Pakistan. Drone attacks really affected the relations between the United States and Pakistan during the President Barack Obama’s administration. The result of this research indicated that drone attacks affected the relations between the two countries, the tensions between the United States and Pakistan were generated by the high number of drone attacks.
Isu Kejahatan Perang dalam Penyelesaian Konflik Azerbaijan-Armenia Memperebutkan Nagorno-Karabakh Herlan Febriani; Tri Cahyo Utomo; Satwika Paramasatya
Journal of International Relations Diponegoro Volume 4, Nomor 1, Tahun 2018
Publisher : International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jirud.v1i1.19129

Abstract

The conflict between Azerbaijan and Armenia over Nagorno-Karabakh began with territorial disputes. Nagorno-Karabakh has de facto recognition as Azerbaijan territory, but 95% of its population is Armenian. The relations between both countries continued to tense after a ceasefire in 1994. War crimes issue also affected these two states conflict resolution. This research discusses conflict resolution efforts by Azerbaijan and Armenia and the effect of war crimes issue on their conflict resolution efforts from 2006 to 2015 with the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) as mediator. This research is carried out by using descriptive-explanative and qualitative method. This study incorporates the framework of Galtung’s triangle conflict theory and conflict resolution concepts to observe the effect of war crimes issue in conflict resolution between Azerbaijan and Armenia. This study found that the war crimes issue which affected the conflict resolution created the unconducive situation for negotiation. Therefore, it is necessary for those parties to build trust and to reaffirm the importance of international law and international humanitarian law enforcement, also putting conscience as the embodiment of a civilized society.
Pengaruh eDiplomacy dalam Normalisasi Hubungan Diplomatik Amerika Serikat - Kuba pada Masa Pemerintahan Barack Obama Tirsa Kristiani Br Ginting; Satwika Paramasatya
Journal of International Relations Diponegoro Volume 5, Nomor 3, Tahun 2019
Publisher : International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jirud.v5i3.24128

Abstract

The phenomenon of the use of modern technology such as internet, website, and social media network sites such as Facebook and Twitter bring forth a concept of Digital Diplomacy or eDiplomacy. Under the leadership of Barack Obama, United States, the country with the largest technological growth be a pioneer to implement eDiplomacy in leveraging U.S. foreign policy. Obama aligned with the mission to create a transparent government, so State Department of United States initiates the eDiplomacy implementation of 21st Century statecraft agenda. The United States eDiplomacy program was used to actualize one of Obama's campaign promises, that is the normalization of diplomatic relations with Cuba. History records that these two countries have been in dispute for almost the past 54 years. This research aims to explain how eDiplomacy is used as an instrument for normalizing diplomatic relations between the United States and Cuba using the public diplomacy concept by analyzing the various uses of media platforms and its implications. This research used qualitative research method with process-tracing data analysis method. This research concludes that eDiplomacy is one of the determinants factors in normalizing diplomatic relations between the United States and Cuba
Kepatuhan Jepang dan Tiongkok terhadap Rezim Internasional Mengenai Penanganan Kejahatan Korupsi dan Pencucian Uang Sebagai Sarana Peningkatan Kekuatan Ekonomi Negara Ribka Indriani Purba; Satwika Paramasatya
Journal of International Relations Diponegoro Volume 5, Nomor 3, Tahun 2019
Publisher : International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jirud.v5i3.24137

Abstract

It is almost undeniable that the existence of interests has basically become the basis of every states in taking policies both domestically and abroad, including Japan and China. In the contemporary era, the scope of state power is no longer limited to the issue of security and defense (military) but also its economic strength. The increasing of  economic power now  has included in the top of the country's interests. In an effort to increase the economic strength of state, Japan and China realize it by overcoming their domestic problems which potentially obstruct the economic growth as well as damage the country's economic stability. The problem in question is the crime of corruption and money laundering and categorized as complex crimes. It takes the role of other actors besides the state who are believed that it is able to help accelerate the handling of these crimes, in this context is the role of the international regime. This argument at the same time also become the main reason of why Japan China comply to the international regime towards corruption and money laundering handling. This research aims to explain that Japan and China comply to the regime is caused by the national interest that the two countries want to achieve, in this case is the interest of increasing the economic strength of Japan and China.
Analisis Motif dan Kepentingan Amerika Serikat dalam Penanganan dan Pencegahan Kejahatan Trafficking in Persons (TIP) di Indonesia Maulana Muhammad Ilyas; Hermini Susiatiningsih; Satwika Paramasatya
Journal of International Relations Diponegoro Volume 4, Nomor 1, Tahun 2018
Publisher : International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jirud.v1i1.19152

Abstract

Trafficking in Persons (TIP) is a form of modern-day slavery which seizes the human rights and freedom of its victims. The alarming situation of this transnational crime development has led the world leaders to realize the necessity of a jointly agreed international instrument to prosecute and prevent this notorious crime. Then, the Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children UNTOC was established in 2000. In 2001, the United States emerged as an advocate of Palermo Protocol towards entire countries in the world. The U.S. has promoted compliance to the TIP Protocol through an annual TIP report, followed by unilaterally exercised rewards and punishments. The U.S. always reiterates that her active role in the global TIP prosecution and prevention is intended to uphold human rights and freedom values. Nonetheless, the U.S. sincerity has been questioned by some parties, criticized for its self-interest and political tendency. This thesis will reveal the motive/reason behind the U.S. active role in Indonesia’s TIP prevention, prosecution, dan protection through application of rational theory of International Relations. This thesis applies qualitative research method to gain perceptivity of reason, opinion, and motive underlying actor’s behavior. The conclusion of this thesis is that the U.S. takes active role in Indonesia’s TIP prevention, prosecution, and protection to gain her self-interest in maintaining safe migration. Her motive is to contain terrorism Indonesia.
Isu Document Fraud dalam Fenomena Pencari Suaka: Studi Kasus Imigran Indonesia di Amerika Serikat Christian Silitonga; Hermini Susiatiningsih; Satwika Paramasatya
Journal of International Relations Diponegoro Volume 4, Nomor 2, Tahun 2018
Publisher : International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jirud.v4i2.20382

Abstract

The flows of Indonesian immigrants in United States experienced significant growth,especially in the 1980s until the beginning of the 21st century. Starting from the 2000sthere was a growing trend among Indonesian immigrants to obtain United Statespermanent resident status through seeking asylum. This study will explain the crime in theform of document fraud committed by Indonesian immigrants in the United States in orderof obtaining asylum. This study uses the transnational crime theory to explain analyze theeffort of Indonesian immigrants who uses document fraud during process of gettingasylum as a form of transnational crime. The data collected in this study varied rangingfrom primary sources which obtained through interviews, and from secondary sourceswhich obtained from literature reviews, official government documents, and media inwhich were then analyzed through content analysis. The results of this study indicate thatmajority of Indonesian immigrants who seek asylum from the United States uses documentfraud during the process of applying the status.
Memori dan Trauma dalam Hubungan Internasional: Pengaruh Isu “Comfort Women” terhadap Kerjasama Keamanan Jepang dan Korea Selatan Fiandara Dwi Adityani; Hermini Susiatiningsih; Satwika Paramasatya
Journal of International Relations Diponegoro Volume 4, Nomor 1, Tahun 2018
Publisher : International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jirud.v1i1.19038

Abstract

Japan and South Korea have a complicated relations ever since Japan’s occupation in Korean Peninsula in 1910. During Japan’s occupation, Japanese military abducted thousands of Korean women to work in a military brothel and serve as a sex slaves for Japanese forces, or known as “comfort women”. Trauma left by Japanese colonial rule created mutual animosities which hamper bilateral relations between both countries. In 2012, South Korea back off from the first military cooperation pact with Japan, due to overflow public resentment in South Korea toward Japan. The objective of this research is to understand how “comfort women” issue impacted bilateral security cooperation between Japan and South Korea. This research used qualitative methods alongside with the concept of memory, war, and world politics to explain how memory and trauma shape South Korean’s perception toward Japan, as well as the concept of Public Opinion, Domestic Structure, and Foreign Policy in Liberal Democracies to explain the impact of public opinion toward South Korea’s foreign policy. The result of this research indicated that history of “comfort women” created collective memory in South Korea, which hampers its bilateral security cooperation with Japan. The bilateral security cooperation between Japan and South Korea established only after two nations reach consensus in “comfort women” issue.
Analisis Sekuritisasi Uni Eropa terhadap Citizenship by Investment Program Kharisma Fatiratri Budi Sutrisno; Satwika Paramasatya
Journal of International Relations Diponegoro Volume 5, Nomor 3, Tahun 2019
Publisher : International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jirud.v5i3.24162

Abstract

Many countries in the world run Citizenship by Investment Programs (CIP) including European Union member countries, namely Bulgaria, Cyprus and Malta. CIP can open opportunities for financial crimes such as money laundering, corruption and tax fraud. In the European Union itself this raises more problems when the rules relating to granting citizenship in the European Union stating that every citizen of an EU member state is an EU citizen. Therefore, the European Union carries out a securitization policy towards CIP. This study aims to explain the securitization process that has been carried out through the concept of securitization from Copenhagen School and Amitav Acharya's modified model framework which consists of six elements namely issue area, securitizing actors, security concept, process, outcome and conditions affecting securitization. The result showed that the European Union's securitization process on the issue of Citizenship by Investment Program had run quite well but there were obstacles. These obstacles are the prerogative of the state in granting and losing citizenship also the existence of desecuritization actors
4. Analisis Komparasi Pemberian Bantuan Amerika Serikat dalam Mengatasi Konflik Mali dan Sudan Selatan 2013-2015 Maudy Miya Andiny; Tri Cahyo Utomo; Satwika Paramasatya
Journal of International Relations Diponegoro Volume 3, Nomor 2, Tahun 2017
Publisher : International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jirud.v3i2.16610

Abstract

Political and economic instability in Africa have caused more than 53 countries encounter conflict, including Mali and South Sudan. These ethnic conflicts have been observed from three parameters; political stability and the absence of violence, conflict barometer, and internal displaced person. To understand why these countries were decent to be putted in juxtaposition, this paper also explained about the geographical situation and its natural resources. On the other hand, to help resolve the ongoing conflicts, the United States of America becomes one of top aid donors in both countries respectively. However, the official aid provided by the USA has a significant difference amount of numbers. Hence, the conundrum of USA aid allocation was analyzed through neo-realism perspective on giving aid, geopolitics, and US Foreign Policy. These theoretical frameworks were pointed out the importance of international structure. Results indicated that the different amount of aid allocation was caused by the strategic interest in South Sudan. In conclusion, USA did not have interest neither in economic, political stability and democracy. USA was concerned about securing its strategic security in South Sudan from China’s geopolitics at recent time.
Co-Authors Christian Silitonga Fiandara Dwi Adityani Herlan Febriani Hermini Susiatiningsih Jessica Tiolina Kharisma Fatiratri Budi Sutrisno Maudy Miya Andiny Maulana Muhammad Ilyas Ribka Indriani Purba Tirsa Kristiani Br Ginting Tri Cahyo Utomo Tri Cahyo Utomo