Ika Riswanti Putranti
Departemen Hubungan Internasional, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik,Universitas Diponegoro

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

6. Analisis Implementasi Cyber Security di Uni Eropa: Studi Kasus Carbon Credits Hacking dalam European Union Emission Trading Scheme (EU ETS) Tahun 2010-2013 Naila Sukma Aisya; Ika Riswanti Putranti; Fendy Eko Wahyudi
Journal of International Relations Diponegoro Volume 3, Nomor 2, Tahun 2017
Publisher : International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jirud.v3i2.16612

Abstract

Since the last two decades in the 20th century, the European Union (EU) has presented itself as a leader in climate change issues. The leadership manifested in the formation of the European Union Emission Trading Scheme (EU ETS) as an effort to fulfill the commitments of the Kyoto Protocol to reduce emissions in the region. But the existence of the EU ETS has been challenged by the emergence of carbon credits hacking case in some national registration systems in the EU ETS. This study discusses the implementation of cyber security in the European Union which has not been able to prevent the occurrence of carbon credits hacking in 2010-2013. This study uses the collective identity and role identity concepts of constructivism. Collective identity explains the implementation of cyber security in the EU, while the role identity explains the effect of EU leadership on the issue of climate change. The results show that the collective identity of cyber security in the European Union has a systemic and strategic issue namely the lack of homogeneity of the implementation of the policies and the lack of perception of the cyber-attacks as a common threat. The EU itself tends to focus on achieving the emissions reduction commitments through the market mechanism in the EU ETS.
Peran Rezim Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) dalam Mempengaruhi Kepatuhan Negara Anggota Terhadap Rezim Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (HAKI) Internasional (Studi Kasus : Software Piracy di Vietnam Tahun 2007-2010) Adinda Gusty Rachmah; Ika Riswanti Putranti
Journal of International Relations Diponegoro Volume 4, Nomor 4, Tahun 2018
Publisher : International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jirud.v4i4.22047

Abstract

Intellectual Property Right is a sensitive issue for developing country such as Vietnam. Accession to the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) at 2008 and approval TRIPS Agreement makes Vietnam engaged in a system to guarantee the protection of intellectual property rights. TPP is a free trade agreement that is projected to be a 'comprehensive and high standard free trade agreement' in the trans pacific region which aims to liberalize trade in almost all sectors of goods and services. This research aim to obtain an overview and analysis of the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) and its relation to the crime of intellectual property rights, explaining the implementation of TPP in Vietnam in overcoming intellectual property rights. International Cooperation theory and International Regime theory are used to explain the fact and phenomenon and also as base in building the arguments to answer research questions. Built arguments are sourced from conference proceedings, report, protocols, conventions and other literature sources which are processed in qualitative way based on the theories which resulted an explanative argument as a research answer. The result of this study is Vietnam has joined the TPP but in its implementation of intellectual property rights were far from compliance with the TRIPS Agreement. Vietnam has not been able to comply with the commitments of this agreement because it could not provide sufficient protection and strict law enforcement towards the infringements.
11. Kebijakan Indonesia Belum Meratifikasi Statuta Roma 1998 Wakhid Aprizal Maruf; Ika Riswanti Putranti; Mohamad Rosyidin
Journal of International Relations Diponegoro Volume 3, Nomor 2, Tahun 2017
Publisher : International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jirud.v3i2.16681

Abstract

Post WW-II world eyewitnessed one of the darkest age of humanity. Numerous bloodbaths of innocents occurred as forms of tyranny legitimation. Cambodia, Rwanda, and Yugoslavia were three of the abundant infamous degradations of humanity at the 2nd semester of the 20th century. However, under the universal spirit of humanity, international society reacted actively against those inhumane actions ergo UN formed ad hoc tribunal such as ICTY or ICTR. Yet those ad hoc tribunal were considered ineffective ergo the escalation of permanent court demands. This resulted in the birth of Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. Rome Statute was positively acclaimed by international society and currently had been ratified by 124 countries. Still, Indonesia were not among them. This thesis would examine Indonesia’s policy of Rome Statute. Through constructivist perspective, this thesis would unfold norms disparities between international norms of Rome Statute and domestic norms of Indonesia. The perception of norms disparity would lead Indonesia to create a congruence of its norms ergo the policy to not ratify Rome Statute yet. To put the finger on the answer, this thesis would also encompass institutional dynamics of ICC and Indonesia’s commitment on Rome Statute, both explicit and implied commitments, started from Megawati’s, SBY’s, to Jokowi’s rule. As the result, it would be concluded whether there is norms disparity as the factor behind Indonesia’s policy to not ratify Rome Statute.
8. Inefektivitas Peran ASEAN Capital Market Forum terhadap Pembangunan Sistem Keamanan Pasar dalam Persiapan Integrasi Pasar Modal ASEAN Alifah Nurul Izzati; Tri Cahyo Utomo; Ika Riswanti Putranti
Journal of International Relations Diponegoro Volume 3, Nomor 2, Tahun 2017
Publisher : International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jirud.v3i2.16614

Abstract

The process to build integrated ASEAN capital market finds many obstacles because of the different national interest among its member countries. ASEAN Capital Market Forum (ACMF) as the forum that specifically created to handle this integration can not even have effective role to urges this ASEAN integrated capital market. This research conducted to examine the cause of this obstructed process that aimed to build the member state’s welfare, academically managed to explain this problem from International Relation’s spectacles. Referring to liberal intergovernmentalism by Andrew Moravcsik, this obstacles may happen because of coutry as main actor on international relations that rationally acts, tend to choose the most beneficial option that can maximize the gain of their interest. Because of this research uses qualitative data from literature review and interview, so this research can be qualified as qualitative research. The result of this research is that the difference of national interest based on economic disparities strongly occur, where high and upper middle income countries will support this initiative but in the other hand the low and lower middle income countries still prefer FDI which is more productive.
1. Diplomasi Indonesia dalam Pembebasan Sandera di Luar Negeri Studi Kasus: Diplomasi Total dalam Pembebasan WNI Sandera Abu Sayyaf pada Maret-April 2016 Annis Istikharoh; Ika Riswanti Putranti; Shary Charlotte Pattipeilohy
Journal of International Relations Diponegoro Volume 3, Nomor 3, Tahun 2017
Publisher : International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jirud.v3i3.16756

Abstract

This research aims to explain the reasons behind Indonesia’s total diplomacy strategy to release hostages under Abu Sayyaf Group. The Abu Sayyaf Group kidnapped 14 Indonesian ship crews on March and April 2016, while was passing through the Sulu Sea. Qualitative research with the explanative method is used to explain the correlation between variables. This research uses Interdependence Liberalism as analytical tool, which states that transnational actor is more significant than military force. The result indicates that there are four underlying reasons on why Indonesian Government employs total diplomacy to release the hostages from Abu Sayyaf Group. First, Indonesia was a dialogue partner for MNLF and Philippine Government in the case of the peace agreement; Second, there is trade cooperation between South Philippine and Indonesia; Third, Indonesia has global network; and fourth, soft power is being chosen / prioritized to protect the hostages.