Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of International Relations Diponegoro
Satwika Paramasatya
Program Studi Ilmu Hubungan Internasional, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Diponegoro

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
13. KEBIJAKAN KEAMANAN JEPANG TERHADAP PROLIFERASI NUKLIR KOREA UTARA PASCA KELUARNYA KOREA UTARA DARI REZIM NON-PROLIFERASI NUKLIR (PERIODE 2003-211) Renni Novia Saputri Gumay; Tri Cahyo Utomo; Satwika Paramasatya
Journal of International Relations Diponegoro Volume 2, Nomor 2, Tahun 2016
Publisher : International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jirud.v2i2.11139

Abstract

North Korea’s nuclear proliferation has implicated threat toward Japan’s security directly,proven by illicit networks existence that support the nuclear proliferation program withinthe jurisdiction of Japan and indirectly, the capability of North Korea’s nuclear power to atany time could threaten the safety of Japanese citizens and Japanese territory. Threatescalation due to the North Korea’s nuclear proliferation is North Korea dared to conduct anuclear test in 2006 and 2009 after declaring withdrawal from regime of the Treaty on theNon-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT). This nuclear issue has become internationalconcern, especially Japan. This research has purpose to analyze Japan’s security policybased on Japan’s identity as “pacifist country” and “non-nuclear country”. The frameworkused in this research is the concept of norms and identity of the constructivist theory. Thetype of this research is explanatory, using qualitative data analysis techniques fromliteratures review. The result of this research is given explanation about Japan’s securitypolicies which are normalization talk, international cooperation through ProliferationSecurity Initiative and Six Party Talk, and enhance its role as “stabilizer” in Asia region ininternational non-proliferation effort through Proliferation Security Initiative MaritimeInterdiction Exercise and Asia Senior-Level Talks on Non-Proliferation.
KEBIJAKAN KOREA SELATAN DALAM POLUSI UDARA LINTAS BATAS TIONGKOK Jhanna Baitiez Rezqi; Reni Windiani; Satwika Paramasatya
Journal of International Relations Diponegoro Volume 2, Nomor 1, Tahun 2016
Publisher : International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jirud.v2i1.10384

Abstract

China has been trying to enhance their industry production in pursuit ofeconomic growth to overcome poverty in the region.In other hand, theindustrial growth have a negative impact on the environment, causing severeair pollution. Air pollution did not only hurt China but spread to SouthKorea’s region, which is causing problem to South Korea. This study aims tofind why South Korea did not protest related to China’s Transboundary AirPollution. The study uses qualitative research method with analythicdescriptive research type. The study results are.The Cooperation betweenChina and South Korea to reduce transboundary air pollution, both bilateraland multilateral are the Korea-China Environmental Cooperation Agreementdan the Korea-China Environmental Industry Investment Forum, TripartiteEnvironment Ministers Meeting (TEMM), Northeast Asian SubregionalProgram for Environmental Cooperation (NEASPEC), the Acid Depositionand Monitoring Network in East Asia (EANET) sand Long-rangeTransboundary Air Pollution in Northeast Asia (LTP), Northwest PacificAction Plan (NOWPAP), Northeast Asian Conference on EnvironmentalCooperation (NEAC) and Environment Congress for Asia and thePacific(ECO ASIA). Beside it,the main factor which is led South Korea didnot protest to China’s transboudary air pollution is economy factor.
IMPLEMENTASI KERJASAMA INDONESIA DENGAN AS DALAM PENANGANAN AKSI TERORISME DI INDONESIA Cesarani Rilistya; Hermini Susitianingsih; Satwika Paramasatya
Journal of International Relations Diponegoro Volume 2, Nomor 1, Tahun 2016
Publisher : International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jirud.v2i1.10385

Abstract

In 2002, Indonesia was shocked by bomb explosion in Bali which causedmore than 200 casualties. Indonesian Government started to be aware withthe lethal danger of terrorism, establishing Government Regulations in Lieuof Law No. 1 Year 2002 on Combating Criminal Acts of Terrorism(Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2002tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Terorisme) and establishing Counter-Terrorism Coordinating Desk (DKPT) which is now BNPT (Badan NasionalPemberantasan Terorisme). The Bali Bombing case also received the UnitedStates’s attention and so they offered Indonesia cooperation in combatingterrorism. The cooperation between Indonesia and the United States isactualized with the implementation of counter terrorism. This research willexplain the process of the implementation of Indonesia-United Statescooperation on counter terrorism in Indonesia. On the process of thecooperation, there are supporting and inhibiting factors that affect theconsummation of Indonesia-United States cooperation on counter terrorism.This research uses qualitative method with explanative analysis. The researchshows that the cooperation between Indonesia-United States helps Indonesiapreventing terrorism acts. The prevention form on terrorism mostly done bythe Special Detachment 88 (Densus 88), which successfully combat theterrorists and raid the terrorists’s quarters. The reliable investigation andraid skills came from United States' training provided by the FBI to the bestIndonesian police forces.
PERAN ASEAN SENIOR OFFICIALS ON DRUG MATTERS (ASOD) DALAM MENANGGULANGI PERDAGANGAN OPIUM 2006-2013 Zefanya Yolanda Siegers; Tri Cahyo Utomo; Satwika Paramasatya
Journal of International Relations Diponegoro Volume 2, Nomor 1, Tahun 2016
Publisher : International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jirud.v2i1.10381

Abstract

The Golden Triangle is a border area of three Southeast Asia countries; i.eLaos, Myanmar, and Thailand. The Golden Triangle is the largest opiumproducer in the region. It causes Southeast Asia become vulnerable of drugstrafficking. Southeast Asian countries are aware of the danger of drugstrafficking, which later brought out the issue to ASEAN. In dealing with thisproblem, ASEAN established ASEAN Senior Official on Drugs Matters (ASOD),a special committee board in drugs trafficking. This research aimed todescribe ASOD roles in coping drugs trafficking in Golden Triangle from 2006to 2013. This research employed neoliberal institutionalist theory emphasizingon the concept of cooperation among states. The method is qualitative usingdescriptive analysis through library research. The results of this researchindicate that ASOD playes role as a facilitator of interstate cooperation interms of drugs trafficking among ASEAN members. This role is compatiblewith the basic assumption of neoliberal institutionalist theory arguing thatinstitution can bridge the gap between states preferences on particular issues.Yet, this research found that the role of ASOD in combating drugs trafficking isnot succeed due to its interent lack of legitimacy to make legal bindingdecisions.
11. PERANAN LAOS, MYANMAR, DAN THAILAND DALAM MENANGANI PENYALAHGUNAAN PRODUKSI DAN PERDAGANGAN OPIUM DI KAWASAN SEGITIGA EMAS Candra Yanuarizki; Tri Cahyo Utomo; Satwika Paramasatya
Journal of International Relations Diponegoro Volume 2, Nomor 2, Tahun 2016
Publisher : International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jirud.v2i2.11137

Abstract

Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) has a role to address drug trafficking inits area, thus formed a special agency to deal with this problem through a forum namedASEAN Senior Official on Drugs Matters (ASOD). ASOD, in cooperation with China,India, Laos, Myanmar, and Thailand announced Declaration of Chiang Rai, which focuseson opium production and trafficking in the Golden Triangle area. The declaration itselfreflects a common interest to control drug trafficking between Laos, Myanmar, andThailand. Based on this common interest, this research is developed to know theimplementation of Chiang Rai Declaration as a form their cooperation. Using liberalinstitutional theory, this research finds that cooperation between Laos, Myanmar, andThailand based on Declaration of Chiang Rai is implemented to address trafficking.Declaration Chiang Rai programs make Laos, Myanmar, and Thailand can collaborate toaddress opium trafficking more seriously. This research also finds that this cooperation isbased on the fact that those three countries have the same purpose, that is to maintain thestability in South East Asia.
Co-Authors Candra Yanuarizki Cesarani Rilistya Hermini Susitianingsih Jhanna Baitiez Rezqi Reni Windiani Renni Novia Saputri Gumay Tri Cahyo Utomo Zefanya Yolanda Siegers